Indiana state budget deal: Cigarette taxes go up, public health funding goes down
Show Caption
Indiana lawmakers and Gov. Mike Braun have reached a deal on the two-year state budget that's slimmer than what they began with ― but boosted by a $2 increase in the cigarette tax.
Legislative leaders had to go back to the drawing board last week after the latest revenue forecast showed a $2 billion drop in expected revenue over the course of the upcoming biennium. This new version cuts public health funding by more than half, dips a bit more into reserves, and adds new revenue from the tobacco taxes, which amount to about $800 million over the biennium.
They presented the outlines of the deal in a press briefing the afternoon of April 23, but the actual budget has not yet been posted. Lawmakers will likely vote on the final budget the evening of April 24.
"We used to think that when you were relatively flush with cash, that's a challenging budget to craft, and maybe harder than when you're short with cash. I'm not sure that I feel that anymore," Senate Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, said. "Trying to come up with a way to fund the budget with a $2 billion shortfall in the official forecast is, frankly, one of the more challenging things I think we've ever done."
The massive difference in the April forecast compared to December stems from a number of federal policy actions, from tariffs impacting trade and the stock market to deep federal spending cuts. It also partly reflects a return to normal revenues following a period of exceedingly high revenues during the COVID-19 pandemic era.
New revenue in the budget
Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka, said the final budget increases the cigarette tax by $2 a pack, which would take the tax from $1 to $3 a pack. He said the tax on other tobacco products will also increase "by the same percentage," which would be a tripling.
The roughly $400 million per year that this will raise will go entirely to the Medicaid budget, he said.
This is something that advocacy groups and the Indiana Chamber, specifically, have advocated for a long time as a way to raise revenue while discouraging people from tobacco use. The House has pitched it in the budget a few times, but the idea has usually died in the Senate. Democrats, too, have suggested it.
"Along with revenue comes a really pretty good public policy that was going to help persuade people to either not start smoking or stop smoking at the same time," Bray acknowledged. "So I think everybody expects that number will decrease over time. But that's a good thing, because we think it means we have fewer smokers."
What is getting cut
Without seeing the specifics of the bill or its fiscal analysis yet, here are some cuts leaders described:
Funding for county public health departments, which focus on preventative health care and education, will be funded at $40 million a year, down from $100 million a year.
The House wanted to expand the school voucher program to be universal in this budget, and the Senate didn't. They will both get their wish: Universal vouchers will kick in during the second year only.
Higher education funding will get slashed an additional 5%, as will the repair and rehabilitation budget, which pays for capital projects.
They "did away with some of those" commissions who haven't met in a while and had "big cash balances." They didn't specify which ones.
The new deal also dips into reserves more. While the Senate and the House budgets proposed leaving roughly 12-13% of the budget in reserves, this one will leave "a little north of 10%," Bray said. That could equate to a difference of about half a billion dollars, depending on the exact percentages.
The decision to cut public health spending while at the same time expanding voucher options for the richest families is one of the largest disappointments for Democrats, Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis, said.
"Is that making Indiana healthy again? I think it's making us extremely vulnerable," he said.
Bray said that close to half of the money counties got in 2024 went unspent, so he thinks some counties are still trying to roll out their programs.
"While that's a cut I'm sure they'll be disappointed in, they're also continuing to try to build this up," he said. "We want to continue to try to invest in that."
Overall, the state budget will grow 0.8% in 2026 and another 0.1% in 2027. By comparison, local governments are projected to have 1.6% increases in the first year and 5.1% in the second year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is under water on some of his top issues — including immigration, poll shows
President Donald Trump is under water on some of his most favorable issues — immigration and the economy — according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. The poll shows Trump's approval rating at 38 percent among registered voters, a three point drop from April. He's also losing support on subjects that were crucial to his November victory. On immigration — an issue that the president hammered on the campaign trail — Trump's approval rating dropped five points from April, to 43 percent. His already low approval rating on the economy did not budge, remaining at 40 percent. The results show a majority of voters, 54 percent, disapprove of Trump's handling of the issue. The poll surveyed 1,265 self-identified registered voters from June 5-9, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percent. The results come as Trump's approval has been steadily picking up since it dropped significantly in April, according to RealClearPolitics' polling average. The negative polling did not stop at the president himself. A majority of the voters polled also had objections to his premier piece of legislation, the 'big, beautiful bill' making its way through Congress. Fifty-three percent of the voters polled did not support the legislation. Divided among party lines, 67 percent of Republicans supported, while 89 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of independents opposed it. On Medicaid funding, an issue that has become Democratic messaging priority, 47 percent of those surveyed thought funding should increase, while 40 percent think it should stay about the same, and just 10 percent think federal funding should decrease. The bill as passed by the House is estimated to end Medicaid coverage for millions of people. Quinnipiac also asked voters what they think of billionaire Elon Musk, and his approval rating is crashing among Republicans following his very public breakup with Trump. Among Republicans, 62 percent had a favorable view of Musk, a 16 point drop from April. But while Trump's approval languishes, it's not clear Democrats will be able to take advantage of it. A vast majority of voters — 70 percent — disapprove of the way Democrats in Congress are doing their jobs, while 20 percent approved. That's 12 points lower than how voters viewed Republicans in the survey.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' could wreck Utah's groundbreaking AI laws
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget package could derail the state's groundbreaking artificial intelligence laws unless it is changed. The 1,000-page bill that passed the House last month includes a 10-year prohibition on AI regulations. An updated Senate version removed the all-out ban but conditioned $500 million in AI infrastructure grants on states pausing enforcement of AI laws. Behind these provisions is a desire by some lawmakers to prevent a nationwide patchwork of AI regulations that hampers innovation amid competition with China. But Cox, and Utah's top tech policymakers, said the approach taken by Trump's bill interferes with the state's right to react to rapidly evolving technologies. 'Our hope is that the last version of this bill that passes, whatever that looks like, will allow for the smart type of regulation that we're doing in Utah, and prevent the bad kind of regulation that would stop AI from reaching its fullest potential,' Cox said Tuesday during a monthly PBS broadcast. Utah has been recognized around the world for having the 'first and smartest of the AI regulations that have been proposed,' according to Cox. These policies include bills that create a state-run AI policy lab, clarify consumer protection liability for AI and require AI disclosures in industries like finance and mental health. The governor said that multiple members of the U.S. House have told his team that they were not aware of the AI moratorium when they voted on the bill. Members of the White House and Senate have also said that they don't want the 'BBB bill' to eliminate Utah's law, Cox said. 'AI companies actually support what we're doing because they recognize that this is the right way to do AI regulation as opposed to just piecemeal,' Cox said. Cox agreed that 'a hodgepodge' of AI laws around the country would cause the U.S. to 'fall behind and we would lose this global race that is happening right now.' But he said a moratorium on AI policy shouldn't come at the expense of Utah's novel approach which doesn't actually tell AI companies how they can develop their models. Utah Rep. Doug Fiefia, R-Herriman, said the problem goes beyond counterproductive policy. It targets the foundation of states rights that has allowed Utah to lead out on so many issues, according to Fiefia, a freshman lawmaker who previously worked at Google. 'States are laboratories for innovation when it comes to policy, and I believe that the federal government should not overreach on this process and allow it to work,' Fiefia said. 'We will not give over our control because the federal government believes that it's the right thing to do to win this race.' On Tuesday, Utah House legislative leadership, and 62 state senators and representatives, sent a letter authored by Fiefia to Utah's congressional delegation arguing that the moratorium hindered 'Utah's nationally recognized efforts to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' Not only would the moratorium harm state efforts to legislate guardrails, it would also hurt businesses that are using AI responsibly by allowing their competitors to engage in unethical behavior, according to Fiefia. States have shown they are more nimble than the federal government when they need to adapt to change, Fiefia said. And this is the approach Fiefia believes Utah has demonstrated in opening up legal pathways for innovation while updating the law for the threats posed by AI. 'Just because we want to move fast in this global arms race of AI doesn't mean we can't do so with a seat belt,' Fiefia said. 'I believe that we can both win this AI race, but also doing it in a thoughtful and meaningful way.' The AI moratorium faces procedural hurdles in addition to ideological pushback. Utah Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, pointed out that reconciliation bills are meant only to amend the annual budget and not make substantive policy shifts. Some senators have alleged that the AI moratorium does not comply with the 'Byrd Rule,' a procedural requirement that prohibits 'nonbudgetary' additions during the budget 'reconciliation' process. Cullimore, who was the sponsor behind most of Utah's AI legislation, was in Washington, D.C., last week, speaking with members of the House Commerce Committee, which oversaw the inclusion of the AI moratorium provisions. The intentions behind the moratorium, Cullimore said, were to prevent states from implementing what are called 'foundational regulations' that restrict the kind of technology AI companies can develop. Utah's laws do not do this, according to Cullimore, who also signed Fiefia's letter, but they would still be sidelined by the 'big beautiful bill' even if the moratorium is replaced by the conditioned federal funding. 'I think the drafting of the moratorium was so broad that it potentially encompassed all of that stuff,' he said. 'So I hope that that we can refine the text a little bit, and then if they want to put those conditions in on foundational regulation, I think that'd be appropriate.'
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House rips 'shameful' LA riots as Trump steps in where Newsom, Bass failed, Leavitt says
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt condemned the protest and riots in Los Angeles as "shameful" on Wednesday, blasting California officials for failing to reign in "left-wing radicals." Leavitt made the comments as soon as she took the podium at a Wednesday press briefing. She emphasized President Donald Trump's efforts to quash the "mob rule" seen in the city while accusing California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to serve their constituents. "They didn't have the courage to do the right thing and protect law-abiding Californians from rioters," Leavitt said of the officials. "That's why President Trump deployed the National Guard and mobilized Marines to end the chaos and restore law and order." "The mob violence is being stomped out. The criminals responsible will be swiftly brought to justice, and the Trump administration's operations to arrest illegal aliens are continuing unabated," she added. Watch: Dem, Media Outlets Insist La Anti-ice Riots Are 'Peaceful' Despite Violence, Injured Cops Leavitt went on to field questions from reporters about the "specific criteria" that Trump used to federalize California's National Guard. Read On The Fox News App CNN White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins argued members of the military would not be able to conduct arrests unless Trump invoked the Insurrection Act. "As you know, the president federalized the national guard under U.S. Code 10," Leavitt responded. The Politics Of Trump's Move To Quell Anti-ice Unrest In Los Angeles Appear To Put Democrats On Defense Trump deployed 2,000 National Guardsman to Los Angeles this week, as well as 700 U.S. Marines. Trump suggested earlier this week that he would be willing to arrest Newsom if his administration obstructs ICE operations amid riots in Los Angeles. "He's daring Tom Homan to come and arrest him. Should he do it?" Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy asked. Newsom Say Los Angeles Rioters Will Be Prosecuted, Slams Trump For 'Traumatizing Our Communities' "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump responded. "I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity. But I do think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job. I like Gavin Newsom. He's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent. Everybody knows." Trump has also been vocal about his belief that many of the rioters and protesters in Los Angeles are professional agitators rather than real protesters. "The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail," Trump said. Newsom swiftly responded to Trump's comments in a post on social article source: White House rips 'shameful' LA riots as Trump steps in where Newsom, Bass failed, Leavitt says