MK Party calls for secret ballot in no-confidence vote against Ramaphosa
The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has formally requested that the upcoming motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa be decided by a secret ballot to safeguard Members of Parliament (MPs) from potential reprisal.
On Friday, the party's parliamentary leader, Dr John Hlophe, wrote to National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza, urging her to exercise discretion in allowing MPs to vote confidentially.
In his letter, Hlophe emphasised the importance of privacy in such a critical vote, citing constitutional principles and judicial precedents.
'A secret ballot will ensure that Members of Parliament can exercise their constitutional duty freely and without fear of intimidation or reprisal,' he stated.
'This is particularly important given the sensitive nature of the motion and the potential political consequences for individual members.'
According to Hlophe, the MK Party's request is rooted in the 2017 Constitutional Court ruling in United Democratic Movement v Speaker of the National Assembly, which affirmed that the Speaker has the discretion to permit a secret ballot, guided by constitutional principles of accountability, transparency, and individual conscience.
'Justification for a secret ballot includes protection against intimidation, safeguarding the integrity of the voting process, and ensuring that the outcome accurately reflects the will of the Members,' Hlophe wrote.
The motion, submitted last week, accuses President Ramaphosa of failing to address soaring crime rates, economic mismanagement, and lapses in national security.
The party also claims that Ramaphosa's leadership has eroded public trust and allowed the country to unravel.
Recent allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who accused political interference within law enforcement agencies, have fuelled the controversy.
In light of these revelations, the MK Party opposes Ramaphosa's decision to retain Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, who has been placed on leave amid ongoing investigations.
The party contends that the president's move undermines the independence of law enforcement and jeopardises public confidence.
Furthermore, the MK Party has challenged Ramaphosa's decision in the Constitutional Court, contesting his move to place Mchunu on special leave and the appointment of Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister.
In the letter, Hlophe urged the Speaker to consider the constitutional and judicial precedents.
'We kindly request that this submission be considered in line with the Constitution, the Rules of the National Assembly, and relevant judicial precedents. We further request that the Speaker consult with relevant stakeholders and decide on this matter at the earliest opportunity, given the urgency of the motion.'
[email protected]
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa seeks apartheid damages case delay, but victims' families argue perpetrators are dying
The court was told that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. President Cyril Ramaphosa has asked the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to stay a damages case brought by families of victims of apartheid-era crimes. However, lawyers for the applicants have warned that the alleged perpetrators are old and dying. The legal action, initiated by 25 families and survivors of apartheid victims – including relatives of the Cradock Four – seeks R167 million in constitutional damages. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays The applicants accuse the government of blocking the investigation and prosecution of murder cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Ramaphosa has since established a commission of inquiry chaired by retired judge Sisi Khampepe to investigate the lack of prosecutions. Ramaphosa urges court to delay apartheid damages case On Wednesday, Advocate Timothy Bruinders, representing Ramaphosa and government, argued in court that the commission should be allowed to complete its work before the damages case proceeds. 'There was notice put out by judge Khampepe in which she set out what the progress will be over the next month. 'I think she has just started work on it so it's settled that there is a commission,' he told the court. Bruinders pointed out that both the TRC and the families had previously called for the establishment of such a commission to investigate the apartheid-era crimes. 'The reason for the commission of inquiry is because the facts are as yet unknown,' he said. ALSO READ: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen, however, raised a concern about whether it was not the applicants' prerogative to go ahead or withdraw their case. Bruinders responded that the case relied on the commission's findings in order for the court to make a ruling on damages. He argued that former National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli did not provide enough detail to conclude that interference occurred in one of the TRC cases. 'One could conclude from that there was an attempted interference.' Watch the case below: Bruinders added that the government and president sympathise with the families. 'They don't have closure. As they say, the prosecutions haven't happened. 'This is of concern to any government who cares about its citizens and those who died in fighting for what he ultimately sees now in the Constitution.' He emphasised that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. 'It is not to fight the families on procedural matters. One can imagine how that would go down politically. I do not think it would go down very well.' Victims' families demand justice Later, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson – representing the families – criticised the government's request to the court to delay the damages case, particularly as it had years to establish the commission. 'The applicants are seeking justice for crimes that were committed 30 and 35 years ago. That's the period we are dealing with. 'The perpetrators of these crimes have either already died or are dying at a rapid rate,' he said, pointing out that most suspects are now likely in their 70s. Chaskalson told the court that the applicants themselves are aging and that some have already died. 'They do not have time to wait indefinitely for the commission of inquiry to report and for relief to be recommended,' the lawyer said, adding that the applicants are entitled to their day in court while they are still alive. He further argued that commissions of inquiry have a tendency to 'drag on and on'. 'It is an extraordinarily optimistic proposition to put forward the idea that this commission will be able to do a thorough job on its investigation and report in four months' time, which is all it has left of the originally six months.' The court has reserved the judgment. NOW READ: Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Ministers under fire for tardy replies to parliamentary questions
Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest ministers to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs why they fail to provide responses to written questions within stipulated timelines. Image: Photographer: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Minister are blaming the long time it takes to compile responses to written parliamentary questions for their delayed responses. This happens as parliamentarians are taking some ministers to task for failing to respond to written questions within the stipulated 10 days and the 10-day additional time. Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi as well as her Social Development counterpart Sisisi Tolashe are the latest to find themselves having to explain themselves to MPs, instead of being reprimanded in the sitting of parliamentary session when found to be on the wrong side of the rules. DA MP Janho Engelbrecht asked Kubayi to provide the reasons for not responding to his questions published on April 25 within the period stipulated by parliamentary rules. In her response, Kubayi said she took her responsibilities and accountability very seriously. 'I am aware of the Rule 145(5) which stipulates that Parliamentary Questions should be responded to within 10 working days. 'I would like to confirm that the reply was submitted to Parliament on 22 May 2025, however, due to the process of sourcing the required information as well ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the response, as a result, the tabling of the said reply was delayed,' she said. ActionSA MP Dereleen James enquired from Tolashe why she provided a reply to her written question only as late as 10 March, which was 12 working days from when the reply should have been provided. James asked whether Tolashe has found that her failure to respond within the stipulated time frame undermined parliamentary accountability and oversight as provided for in the rules of the National Assembly and the provisions of the Constitution. Tolashe said the delay with regards to the James' response was regretted and she apologised. She said the question required very extensive and detailed answers as it dealt with expenditures, to ensure that little or no mistake was committed. 'The nature of the question that the honourable member asked requires that we reconcile different records of all expenditures so that we can give an accurate account. The other issues were that (the) honourable member will realise that most of the officials are still new in the organisation; to recognise the need for asking for an extension while we compile her responses,' she said. This development comes as Parliament published a report of outstanding parliamentary questions for both and written reply on August 1. The report is prepared for submission to Leader of Government Business, Deputy President Paul Mashatile, to take up the non-compliance with affected ministers. It shows that a total of 3,282 written questions were asked as at May 30. At least 323 written questions were not responded to as at August 1.
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Fikile Mbalula declares ANC members will not sing ‘Kill the Boer' despite court ruling
ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula stated that no party member will sing 'Kill the Boer,' emphasising that it is unnecessary in today's democratic South Africa despite the Constitutional Court ruling that it does not constitute hate speech. Image: ANC/ X ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said no member of the ANC would be allowed to sing the controversial struggle song 'Kill the Boer', despite a Constitutional Court ruling that found the song does not constitute hate speech. Addressing the media after the ANC National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting on Wednesday, Mbalula said the party had done enough to defend its legacy and should not continue engaging in distractions aimed at distorting its historical role. 'No member of the ANC today will be allowed to sing Kill the Boer. Simple as that. Even if the Constitutional Court said you can sing, why should we sing Kill the Boer in a democratic dispensation?' Mbalula said. He explained that the song was originally sung in the context of the liberation struggle, when ANC combatants were infiltrating the country from frontline states and fighting against apartheid-era military formations. 'We sang the song because we were fighting the commandos when we infiltrated the country from the poor. ''They deployed the poor's commandos to kill the guerrillas as we infiltrate the country. From Angola and in the frontline states, we sang kill the boer, kill the farmer, in order to infiltrate the country and come inside and fight,' he said. Mbalula also dismissed claims made in a recent podcast that ANC members were involved in drug dealing while in exile. He described such allegations as a direct insult to the legacy of the liberation struggle. 'I mean, we're not fighting. Clowns openly in these podcasts insult our struggle and the memory of brave men and women of our struggle. And insult them, that no, we were in exile selling drugs. ''How can you sell drugs in Angola? In the bush, where we're training alongside FAPLA and the Cubans to defeat the poor in the battle of Cuito Cuanavale. We've got graves and soldiers who never came back home and died. We rebury them every day,' he said. He further rejected as false the claims that the ANC received funding from Iran or supplied weapons to Russia in its war with Ukraine. 'We didn't get money from Iran. Another clown again says no, ANC got money from Iran and they keep repeating this lie. We didn't get any money from Iran,' Mbalula said. 'Even the CIA, I'm sure they can tell you, they regard themselves as the best intelligence outfit, can tell you that it's not true that the ANC got money from Iran.' On South Africa's diplomatic posture, Mbalula defended President Cyril Ramaphosa's balanced approach to the war in Ukraine, saying the President personally engaged with both sides of the conflict. 'Our president travelled 10 hours on a train to meet the president of Ukraine, and advanced to Moscow to meet President Vladimir Putin,' Mbalula said. 'And then somebody from the United States, her, with a bow tie, made a statement briefly that now we supply arms. And then we established a commission of inquiry.' He said the inquiry found no evidence of arms supplied to Russia, but opposition parties like the DA rejected the findings, claiming it compromised national security. He accused the DA of actively working against South Africa's interests by lobbying for punitive trade measures. 'They advocate for sanctions against our country disguised as tariffs to hit us,' Mbalula said. 'And then these people, they agree with them. Where is national interest, and where do we draw the line?' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He questioned how the DA could justify lobbying foreign governments to take actions that would harm South Africa's economy, especially when millions of citizens faced unemployment and poverty. 'The DA, where do they draw the line in terms of partisan interest and national interest? They hate this country. They go to America, go and tell Donald Trump what he wants to hear, and all of that, and come back to this country again. ''Hurt our economy. When our people are unemployed, we no longer trade with the biggest markets like the United States, and all of that. They will be coming back and blaming us.' Mbalula said the ANC had moved swiftly after the 2024 election to form a government of national unity and prove its commitment to democracy. 'They said to the United States we must be hit with sanctions as politicians of the ANC, like Zimbabwe. What did we do? We are not a dictatorship. ''We have just formed a government of national unity,' he said. 'In less than 14 days, we formed a government of national unity. Not persuaded by anyone in the world, independently here in this country.' Mbalula said South Africa must assert its sovereignty and build trade relationships based on mutual respect, not foreign pressure. 'We are not a branch of the United States. We are a country, full country, state, president, and everything else. So, we have to be dealing with these matters with that clear understanding,' he said. He insisted the ANC has 'worked very hard to rebut the lies of the United States of America' and urged the country to focus on building international trade ties in new markets. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
