Grantham public toilets reopen after £190k refurbishment
A set of public toilets in Grantham have reopened after a £190,000 refurbishment. The toilets at Conduit Lane have been fully redecorated and have new windows, doors, fixtures and fittings. A separate accessible toilet has also been installed. The project was funded through the £4.1m Grantham Future High Streets Fund which was awarded to South Kesteven District Council by the government.Improvements, including raising the road levels, have been made to the market place in the town centre as a result of the funding programme.
Station Approach has also been resurfaced with upgraded pedestrian access and improved traffic signals.Last summer, residents complained of major disruption as a result of much of the work taking place simultaneously. The projects build on previous initiatives to enhance shopfronts and improve the town's appeal, the council said.The toilets will be open every day from 09:00 to 16:00 and will cost 20p to use.Councillor Richard Cleaver said: "I am delighted to see the refurbished toilets at Conduit Lane reopen for public use after a number of years."The much improved facilities are a fantastic addition to the town centre and demonstrate the council's commitment to enhancing Grantham's offer to visitors and residents."
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Plans for 270 homes at Exeter Fields in Stamford approved
Plans to build more than 250 homes and an 80-bedroom care home in Stamford will go ahead, despite concerns about the "long-term sustainability" of the town. The Exeter Fields development, for agricultural land off Empingham Road, was approved by South Kesteven District Council (SKDC) at a meeting on councillor Barry Devereux was among opponents who argued the site should be retained for employment use, because more housing without job opportunities would threaten the viability of the Andrew McPheat, from applicant Commercial Estates Group said there was no "appetite or demand" to justify "a strategic employment site". The plans cover a 22-acre site between a Taylor Wimpey housing estate and the A1, the Local Democracy Reporting Service the 268 homes, 80 would be "affordable" and there would be a local centre with shops and community in 2012, Exeter Fields was set aside for industrial and commercial use. During the meeting, residents and councillors argued it should remain reserved for employment, noting Stamford's growing population. Councillor Richard Cleaver, the cabinet member for property at SKDC, said the site was "completely irreplaceable" and allowing the application would deprive the town "of any employment opportunities within its boundaries forever".The idea that a site so close to the A1 was unsuitable for employment was "frankly laughable", he McPheat said the landowners had spent 10 years marketing the site to potential occupiers, but had found no demand for it as an employment argued a local centre in the estate could create up to 155 direct and 78 indirect planning officers acknowledged the concerns but warned that if developers were "not willing to develop" then the land could not be retained "indefinitely". Councillor Helen Crawford backed the application, noting that "employment has changed", particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic, with more people now working from total, nine committee members voted to approve the development while two voted proposal was put forward by Commercial Estates Group and the Cecil Estate Family Trust. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Daily Mirror
6 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis helped me get £14k in council tax but I'm not happy
One of the consumer champion's fans shared a story on how he successfully challenged his council tax payment, only for there to be a sting in the tail Consumer champion Martin Lewis was heaped with praise online after his sage advice helped a man claim back more than £14,000 in excess council tax payments – yet the story took a bittersweet turn. One of his followers heeded the expert's advice and was over the moon to get tens of thousands of pounds back after discovering his property was placed in the wrong council tax band, only later to share there was a "sad" twist to the tale. Martin had initially uploaded a video on his X account encouraging the public to tune in to the latest instalment of his self-titled BBC Sounds podcast. In it, he complained about the council tax band system in England and Scotland. His message was paired with the caption: "Are you in one of 400,000 homes that are in the wrong council tax band? If so, you could be due £1,000s back!" He added: "It really is quite unbelievable that if you live in England and Scotland, the council tax band you are in today is still dictated by a stop-gap, drive-by valuation done back in 1991 that was only meant to last a couple of years. "And when I say drive-by, I'm literally talking a couple of estate agents in a car often, with a clipboard in second gear going, 'Band C, Band D, Band E' – and that is still in place today. So no surprise up to 400,000 homes are in the wrong band. If you're in the wrong band and if you challenge it, not only can you get it lowered, you can get a backdated payout back to when you moved in or 1993, whichever was sooner." The expert, who also hosts The Martin Lewis Money Show on ITV, later told people not to dispute their council tax band without doing their research first, adding: "However, don't just do this speculatively because then you could get it wrong and they put your band up or even your neighbour's band up. You need to follow my full, step-by-step check and challenge process that I go through in detail in the podcast." Taking this advice on board, one fan, Rob Dean, sought about correcting the council tax band for not only his mother's property but also that of his neighbours. He replied to Martin's video: "Did that for my mum following your guidance and got £6000+ back and then told the three neighbours who were also in the wrong band. Overall total was £14.5k. Only sad part is that we'd all overpaid the water rates too!" He made no suggestion that he had managed to claw back any of that money. Others also shared their experiences of challenging their council tax bands. One person said: "I've been waiting for a decision for more than six months," while another follower added: "Just checked mine as I've always thought it seemed too high – turns out I am in the right band, but right at the bottom of it!" A third person sought Martin's help, saying: "My sister challenged her band last October. VOA [Valuation Office Agency] said it can take up to a year before they decide!! Is this right??" Challenging your council tax band Martin's Money Saving Expert website offers a comprehensive guide on how to contest your council tax band, detailing the steps homeowners can take to secure a refund if they believe they've been incorrectly categorised. For an in-depth look at the procedure, click here. But in brief, he proposed two approaches for those looking to challenge their council tax band. The first step is to compare your band with that of neighbours in similar or identical properties, with resources available on his website for residents in England and Scotland to facilitate this comparison. The second step involves a valuation check, where individuals can use the Money Saving Expert site to estimate the value of their property back in 1991, which was when the current bands were established, despite the tax being introduced in 1993. Martin pointed out that anyone who purchased their home after 1991 can "use its price and date of sale" as a basis for valuation. However, he warned: "This can't be used as evidence if you challenge your band. But it enables you to check out various property prices on your street and is an important test that you're on the right track." If both criteria are met, Martin said that you can then present a challenge to the VOA, either formally or informally, recommending the formal route although acknowledging it's "available to fewer people". Those eligible to lodge a formal challenge must have "lived in the property for six months or less (it doesn't matter whether you own or rent, though if renting you should notify the landlord as a courtesy)". For individuals who can't make a formal challenge, Martin suggested: "Over the years we've heard feedback from people who've been told they can't challenge as they've lived in their property too long – yet the VOA has a statutory duty to uphold the integrity of Council Tax bands list. "This means you can still submit a request for an 'informal review' of your Council Tax band, though the burden is on you to provide compelling evidence that your band is wrong, to persuade the VOA to do the review."
Daily Mirror
7 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis explains new ISA rule change for anyone with more than one account
Martin Lewis has explained how a change in the rules now means savers can take out several different cash ISAs or stocks and shares ISAs within the same tax year Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis has offered crucial guidance for individuals with more than one Cash ISA, in light of a recent change in government regulations. On the latest episode of The Martin Lewis podcast, the founder of MSE clarified to his listeners and co-host Adrian Chiles how Cash ISA rules now operate following a fiscal rule alteration in 2024. Previously, a long-standing rule restricted people to only one Cash ISA or Stocks and Shares ISA per year, but this has now been scrapped. This means savers can now utilise several different Cash ISAs and Stocks and Shares ISAs, including fixed-rate and easy access, all within the same tax year. During the July 5 episode of The Martin Lewis Podcast on BBC Sounds and Spotify, Martin Lewis explained: "Ever since ISAs were set up, there's been a limit on the amount of money you can have in, and you've been able to open a Cash ISA and a Stocks and Shares ISA in the same year. "But you've only been able to open one of each type. But, from April 6 2024, the rules were changed, and the restriction on subscribing to one ISA of each type, in a year, was removed. "You may now open as many different ISAs of one type, for example a Cash ISA, you can have a fix, and you can have two different Cash ISAs, all of which you've opened and put money into, within one tax year." There are whispers that changes to Cash ISAs could be imminent, after the government declined to dismiss a potential reduction to the limits in the future, reports the Express. Currently, savers can stash up to £20,000 into Cash ISAs within a single tax year, across various accounts. However, there's buzz that the government might slash this limit to as little as £4,000, potentially from 2026. This move could, insiders claim, nudge more Brits towards investing rather than hoarding cash in ISAs, with stocks and shares ISAs reportedly not facing the same cuts. Earlier in the year, money guru Martin weighed in on the potential changes, remarking: "The concept behind it is that it'd encourage people to put the money in shares ISAs instead (personally, I'm sceptical if it'd work - many will just keep saving but pay more tax). "Of course, everything is pure supposition - I doubt any firm decision has been made yet. But if it happens as rumoured, it WOULDN'T impact money already in cash ISAs, it'd just cut what you can put in, in future. "Whether it'd start immediately, or in January or April 2026, no one knows (including at this point, I suspect, Rachel Reeves). Yet if you plan to save in a cash ISA, all of this would suggest getting it in sooner would seem safer."
