Howard County Board of Appeals to decide fate of homemade go-kart racetrack Thursday
Chris Siperko built the half-mile-long, 24-foot-wide track between December 2023 and January 2024 on his Highland property for his son, Achilles, who hopes to become a professional driver. Siperko said he consulted with a paving company and believed no permits were necessary for the project.
But neighbors opposed the track, citing concerns about noise, environmental effects, safety, and property values.
Following complaints, a county inspection determined the track violated zoning and subdivision codes.
The Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning denied Siperko's conditional use application, stating go-karting was not a permitted activity under the county code.
That changed in June, when the Board of Appeals overruled the department's interpretation and decided the track qualified as an athletic field under county regulations. This decision allowed the permit application process to restart and led to a series of hearings stretching for hours over multiple sessions.
During a July 10 hearing, nearly a dozen neighbors testified against the track, many citing noise as the primary issue.
"I went to an indoor go-kart track to see what a go-kart sounded like," said neighbor Michael Mulcare. "Even at fairly low speeds, 35 miles an hour... they have a distinct whine. They also have screeching tires."
Kelly Rudden, who works remotely, said the sound from the track disrupted her workday. "That's not my responsibility, but I will say that you guys didn't even use your own track for your testing, so how would we?" she said during the hearing.
Sang Oh, Siperko's attorney, brought in two experts to testify that the proposed racetrack meets county code requirements. G. Macy Nelson, the attorney representing Siperko's neighbors, focused his case on environmental impacts and the potential for encroachment on neighboring properties.
Both attorneys had until 4:30 p.m. on July 24 to submit written summaries of their cases. The Board of Appeals will reconvene at 9 a.m. on Thursday to issue its final ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
NCAA exonerates Chris Partridge in ‘signgate,' clearing him of major allegations
On the eve of the Michigan football vs. Maryland game in 2023, there was a buzz that something was about to happen to the Wolverines coaching staff, exactly one week after Jim Harbaugh was summarily suspended by the Big Ten according to its sportsmanship policy. The latter came as a result of a campaign by coaches and athletic directors around the conference as the Connor Stalions saga was just starting to infiltrate the college football landscape. And then a bombshell: then-Michigan linebackers coach Chris Partridge had allegedly instructed a student-athlete to lie to NCAA investigators and then destroyed crucial evidence. If that was the case, it was certainly a warranted firing. According to The Michigan Insider's Sam Webb ($), Partridge, 'Advised some of the players on what to say (to investigators) about their interaction with Stallions. One or more of the players told investigators (what Partridge instructed them to do). When Michigan found out, they reacted with immediate termination. So it wasn't involvement in the scheme itself, but it was an attempt to quell suspicion.' Yahoo Sports' Dan Wetzel and Ross Dellenger also reported that, 'Partridge is not alleged at this time of knowing about the advanced scouting by Stalions, but acted after the fact to cover up evidence.' The covering up of evidence, according to Wetzel and Dellenger, involved the, 'Destruction of evidence on a computer after the scandal broke.' But as it turns out, according to the NCAA's findings, that account turned out to be wholly inaccurate, and it found no wrongdoing whatsoever. Finally, on November 14, 2023, Partridge had two exchanges with student-athlete 1. Specifically,student-athlete 1 had an upcoming interview related to the investigation and sought out Partridgefor advice on the interview process. The first exchange occurred prior to practice, when studentathlete 1 announced to Partridge and a group of about five other student-athletes that he was beinginterviewed the following day. Partridge stated that student-athlete 1 then followed Partridge intohis office to ask for advice about the interview. During that exchange, Partridge suggested thatstudent-athlete 1 retain counsel and talk to his father. Partridge said that student-athlete 1 thenasked if they could talk again later. In support of this account, Partridge submitted an affidavitfrom one of the other student-athletes who was present in the room. Following practice, Partridge said he received a text from student-athlete 1 stating that he waswaiting in Partridge's office. Partridge walked by his office and told student-athlete 1 to walk withhim and talk. Student-athlete 1 gave Partridge a summary of the conversation with his father, andPartridge reiterated that he thought student-athlete 1should get a lawyer, then they parted ways. Inaddition to the affidavit, Partridge's account of the interactions is closely supported by camerafootage from around the facility. The NCAA had also alleged that he had improperly contacted recruits, held improper workouts, and also gave out gear improperly. While it did say that he had some improper contact (a Level II violation), the rest of what was alleged did not happen. More via the NCAA report: The NOA alleged additional violations for Partridge, including: (1) arranging and conductingimpermissible tryouts with prospects; (2) providing an impermissible inducement to a prospect;and (3) failing to cooperate during and after his employment at Michigan. The recruitingallegations were presented as Level II. The failure to cooperate allegations were presented asLevel I. Partridge disputed each of the allegations. The panel concludes that the case record doesnot demonstrate that these violations occurred. Impermissible TryoutsThe enforcement staff alleged that Partridge conducted impermissible tryouts with prospects onfour occasions during the spring and summer of 2023. Three of those alleged tryouts consisted ofindividual workouts with prospect 1 at Michigan's practice facilities. The other alleged tryout wasa group workout on Michigan's practice field. Across his interviews with the enforcement staff, prospect 1 stated that he engaged in multipleindividual workouts with Partridge. However, some of prospect 1's statements were unclear, andhe seemed to have trouble recalling the total number of workouts that may have occurred. Partridge consistently denied conducting any individual workouts and suggested that prospect 1could have been referring to other, permissible interactions. Specifically, Partridge gave prospect1's stepfather 'film drills' to run and worked on technique with prospect 1 while watching film inPartridge's office. Moreover, at the hearing, Partridge recalled that prospect 1 attended camps atMichigan in May and/or June, during which he and Partridge would have interacted. Notably, the panel considered several text exchanges between Partridge and prospect 1 referencingworking out. During those conversations, Partridge made statements about needing 'to do that inthe summer' because there were '[t]oo many people around now.' He also encouraged prospect1 to visit in May and June 2023 so they could 'do some more ball' and 'talk [football] and train.'At the hearing, Partridge explained that, although several of the text exchanges indicatedPartridge's interest in working out with prospect 1, his messages were crafted in an attempt to pushoff the workouts until football camps started at Michigan in May and June. In that way, Partridgewas attempting to be responsive to prospect 1, while still complying with tryout legislation. Thepanel is persuaded by Partridge's account of these events. The panel is also persuaded by Partridge's explanation of Michigan's BBQ at the Big House three prospects were registered camp attendees, and the timing of the workout appeared toalign with a scheduled camp activity.34 In light of Partridge's arguments, the panel does notconclude that any individual or group workouts constituted violations. Impermissible Recruiting InducementsThe enforcement staff alleged that, on one occasion, Partridge walked prospect 1 to the equipmentroom to receive gear. As addressed previously, Michigan disputed that prospect 1 received anygear from football staff members. Partridge also denied that he provided any gear to prospect 1,other than a camp T-shirt given to all attendees of the BBQ at the Big House Camp. In prospect 1's interview with the enforcement staff, he did not initially mention that Partridgeprovided him gear. After being asked multiple times, prospect 1 stated that Partridge, as well asClinkscale, each walked him to the equipment room on one occasion. The record contains a photoof Partridge and prospect 1, with prospect 1 holding the camp T-shirt. Although the panel concludes that the other inducements are sufficiently supported by informationin the record, the panel does not believe that there is sufficient information to conclude thatPartridge directly provided or assisted in providing prospect 1 with an impermissible inducementin the form of gear. There are certainly some questions that should be raised. First, who was the player who alleged that Partridge instructed him to lie to the NCAA when it turned out that that wasn't the case? Also, what did Michigan know (or in this case, how was the athletic department deceived) through the process that resulted in Partridge's dismissal? Also, why did the program note in Partridge's firing that he's not eligible for rehire when the facts had yet to be determined? Back on November 7, 2023, Partridge released a statement denying wrongdoing, indicating he was being railroaded -- which now looks prescient given the NCAA's findings: Unfortunately, the manner in which the termination of my employment and my role as a Coach at Michigan has been reported is inaccurate and has resulted in people speculating and making assumptions about my knowledge of, and connection to, the sign-stealing allegations within the football program. I want to be clear: I had no knowledge whatsoever of any in-person or illegal scouting, or illegal sign stealing. Additionally, at no point did I destroy any evidence related to an ongoing investigation. Partridge has been a coach with the Seattle Seahawks the past two years and doesn't appear to have interest, as of current, of returning to the college game. What's more, the once-favored son in Ann Arbor who had helped Jim Harbaugh from his first year until 2023 -- minus a couple of years at Ole Miss -- was railroaded for what ended up being no reason. It will be interesting to see if we ever learn who was behind the purported lie that lost him his job in Ann Arbor.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can Cowboys buck short, strange, painful history vs their most uncommon opponent?
It's not whether you win or lose; it's how you play the game. That old adage is especially true in the NFL preseason, when coming away from a game with quality evaluations of individual players, specific personnel groupings, and newly-designed plays and schemes matters a whole lot more than the final score. No one will complain about an August loss if the team looks crisp and disciplined and healthy and ready to roll into September, when the results actually count. Nevertheless, if the Cowboys are able to come away from Saturday night's contest with a W, it will be among the rarest achievements in franchise history. That's because the Cowboys have only ever beaten the Baltimore Ravens- preseason or regular season- one time. The Ravens, celebrating their 30th anniversary this year, are easily the Cowboys' most uncommon opponent. They've played just seven times in the regular season. That number is tied with the Houston Texans, but the Cowboys have squared off against their intrastate rivals many times- it used to be an annual preseason tradition- in what is informally known as the Governor's Cup. The Cowboys and Ravens, on the other hand, have just one previous preseason meeting. At eight total head-to-head games ever, the Ravens are by far the team most unfamiliar to the Cowboys. The few occasions the interconference foes have met, though, have provided some noteworthy moments. 2000: Ravens 27, Cowboys 0 The first time Dallas and Baltimore tangled was in the 2000 season. The punchless Cowboys didn't manage to score at all against what many consider the greatest NFL defense ever assembled, losing 27-0 after a three-interception outing from Troy Aikman and a 48-yard day from Emmitt Smith. The Ravens went on to win Super Bowl XXXV two months later. 2004: Ravens 30, Cowboys 10 The 2004 Week 11 game wasn't much of a game at all, with Cowboys quarterbacks Vinny Testaverde and Drew Henson combining for just 128 total passing yards. Dallas actually led 3-0 at halftime before giving up 30 straight points after the break. 2008: Ravens 33, Cowboys 24 The two teams' 2008 meeting was memorable as the final home game ever played in Texas Stadium. The Ravens ruined that party with a 33-24 win, sealed by a late Le'Ron McClain 82-yard score, the longest run by a Cowboys opponent in the building's history. Baltimore eventually lost to Pittsburgh in the AFC championship. 2012: Ravens 31, Cowboys 29 2012's Week 6 date provided plenty of drama just off Baltimore's Inner Harbor. Jacoby Jones tied an NFL record with a 108-yard kickoff return in the third quarter, but Tony Romo and the Cowboys would not go quietly. His touchdown throw to Dez Bryant (capping an 18-play drive) brought the Cowboys to within two points with :32 to play. The pair couldn't connect, however, on the tying conversion attempt. Dan Bailey's onside kick was recovered by Dallas, and a defensive pass interference call on the next snap helped set up a 50-yard field game-winning goal try... which sailed wide left. Baltimore ended the season as Super Bowl champs once again. 2016: Cowboys 27, Ravens 17 Dallas's only win ever against the Ravens came in 2016. It was Week 11, and Dak Prescott, in his magnificent debut season, led the Cowboys to a 27-17 victory and the franchise's first-ever nine-game win streak. Prescott went on to be named the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year. That game also featured Ezekiel Elliott breaking Tony Dorsett's single-season record for most rushing yards by a Cowboys rookie. The Cowboys' .143 regular-season win percentage versus the Ravens remains- by a large margin- their lowest against all opponents. 2020: Ravens 34, Cowboys 17 Originally scheduled for the Thursday after Thanksgiving, a COVID-19 outbreak within the Ravens organization caused the game to be postponed. The two teams met in an incredibly rare Tuesday game- a first for the Cowboys- that saw the depleted Dallas squad get trounced. Andy Dalton filled in admirably for an injured Prescott, but kicker Greg Zuerlein missed three field goal attempts, and the Cowboys defense gave up nearly 300 yards on the ground. 2024: Ravens 28, Cowboys 25 Last year's Week 3 battle looked much closer in the box score than it was on the field. A furious 19-point Cowboys rally wasn't enough to overcome the 28-6 lead Baltimore had built up over the first three quarters. The majority of the damage was done by running back Derrick Henry, who Dallas had elected not to pursue in free agency; he gashed the Cowboys for 151 yards and two scores. Dallas had been beaten badly by New Orleans the week prior, but this was the game that confirmed to Cowboys fans 2025 would be unbearingly long and painful. Previous preseason meetings The Cowboys and Ravens have met in the preseason just once before, in 2014. Baltimore won that mid-August exhibition by a 37-30 score behind quarterbacks Joe Flacco and Tyrod Taylor, but early miscues by Dallas gave Baltimore two touchdowns before either of them even took the field. For Dallas, Tony Romo started and tossed a touchdown on his surgically-repaired back but then turned the offense over to Brandon Weeden, who struggled. Dallas and Baltimore were supposed to meet in the 2020 preseason as well, but the NFL memorably scrapped its entire preseason slate that year due to COVID-19. Follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans! This article originally appeared on Cowboys Wire: Will Cowboys' painful series history vs Ravens continue in preseason?
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
BMW Championship live leaderboard updates, tee times, how to watch Friday's second round
The second leg of the 2025 FedEx Cup Playoffs has moved to the second day. The second round of the 2025 BMW Championship is here and the top 49 remaining players (Sepp Straka was a WD) in the playoff standings are battling it out in Owings Mills, Maryland, at Caves Valley Golf Club. Follow along all day Friday right here during the second round of the BMW for tee times, live leaderboard updates, highlights, breaking news and more. 2025 BMW Championship leaderboard Keep an eye on this link for all the latest scores on the BMW leaderboard. You can click this link for second-round tee times. Who's leading the BMW Championship after Day 1? That would be Robert MacIntyre, who torched the final third of Caves Valley with six straight closing birdies. The Scotsman shot 8-under 62 and leads by four over world No. 1 Scottie Scheffler after rolling in 195 feet of putts on Thursday. There was a 2 hour, 10 minute weather delay and 48 of the 49 golfers finished their first rounds. Bud Cauley's approach to 18 ended up 67 feet, 11 inches away from the cup and that's where his day ended due to darkness. Who's up, who's down in the FedEx Cup Playoffs standings? Golfweek's Adam Schupak has the breakdown here, including who's on the bubble after 18 holes. Where to watch, stream, listen to BMW Championship 2025 This is the TV channel, streaming and radio schedule for the 2025 BMW Championship, with NBC, Golf Channel, Peacock, ESPN+ and PGA Tour Radio on SiriusXM all teaming up for the coverage. All times listed are ET. Second round, Friday, August 15 9:15 a.m. - 6 p.m., PGA Tour Live on ESPN+ 12 p.m. - 6 p.m., PGA Tour Radio on SiriusXM 2 p.m. - 6 p.m., Golf Channel, NBC Sports App We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. Golfweek operates independently, though, and this doesn't influence our coverage. Watch Golf Channel for free on Fubo What is the cut at the 2025 BMW Championship? Just like last week, there is no 36-hole cut on the PGA Tour this week, but there will be a top-30 cutoff come Sunday for those who will advance to the Tour Championship. What is the prize money at the 2025 BMW Championship? The BMW has a $20 million purse and a $3.6 million first-place prize. This will also be the final week for PGA Tour golfers to compile earnings for the official money list, as the Tour Championship payouts are considered "bonus" money. Flashback to the top 20 in prize money at the 2021 BMW Four years ago was the last time Caves Valley hosted the BMW. Patrick Cantlay won in a playoff that year and the top 20 in the final money featured several golfer who would later defect to LIV Golf. Pos. Player Score Earnings 1* Patrick Cantlay -27 $1,710,000 2 Bryson DeChambeau -27 $1,026,000 3 Sungjae Im -23 $646,000 4 Rory McIlroy -22 $456,000 5 Erik van Rooyen -21 $380,000 T6 Sergio Garcia -20 $330,125 T6 Dustin Johnson -20 $330,125 8 Sam Burns -19 $294,500 T9 Abraham Ancer -18 $256,500 T9 Jon Rahm -18 $256,500 T9 Alexander Noren -18 $256,500 T12 K.H. Lee -17 $199,500 T12 Webb Simpson -17 $199,500 T12 Harold Varner III -17 $199,500 T15 Tony Finau -16 $166,250 T15 Jason Kokrak -16 $166,250 T17 Viktor Hovland -15 $133,000 T17 Kevin Na -15 $133,000 T17 Charl Schwartzel -15 $133,000 T17 Hudson Swafford -15 $133,000 T17 Aaron Wise -15 $133,000 What is the weather forecast for the 2025 BMW Championship? The temperatures in Owings Mills, Maryland, during the four tournament rounds is expected to be high 80s, perhaps reaching 90 by Sunday, according to Accuweather. Expect it to be hot and humid all week, especially on the weekend. BMW Championship has changed locations every year since 2011 The BMW is the only one of the three FedEx Cup Playoff events to not have a permanent home. In 2025, Castle Pines served as the host venue. This year's locale, Caves Valley Golf Club, hosted in 2021. Other recent golf courses that had the BMW include Olympia Fields (2023, 2020), Wilmington Country Club (2022), Medinah (2019) and Aronimink (2018). This article originally appeared on Golfweek: BMW Championship leaderboard Friday live updates FedEx Cup Playoffs
