Fingerprint of human-caused global warming was likely detectable 140 years ago, far earlier than previously thought
The human fingerprint on global warming was likely evident in Earth's atmosphere far earlier than previously thought—even before the invention of modern cars, a new study says.
Using a combination of scientific theory, modern observations and multiple, sophisticated computer models, researchers found a clear signal of human-caused climate change was likely discernible with high confidence as early as 1885, just before the advent of gas-powered cars but after the dawn of the industrial revolution.
The findings, detailed in a paper published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, raise the likelihood that humanity has been remaking the planet's climate in a detectable way for longer than previously believed—and highlight the importance of tracking changes in the upper atmosphere.
Scientists had begun to record surface temperature observations by the mid-19th century. The start date for a detectable human signal in surface temperatures has generally been thought to be in the early-to-mid-20th century, though other parts of the climate system showed signs of change at different times.
For this study, the veteran climate researchers posed the question: With the observational tools of today, when is the earliest that the signs of human-caused climate change would have been detectable in the atmosphere?
The study looked specifically at signals in the stratosphere – the second level of the atmosphere. Most weather occurs in the lowest level, the troposphere. While greenhouse gas emissions warm the lower atmosphere, they exert the opposite effect on the stratosphere, particularly its upper regions.
Researchers used this knowledge to examine climate models looking back in time for signs of these effects.
The findings surprised lead author Ben Santer and co-author Susan Solomon, who did not expect to find such a clear human signal in the upper atmosphere so early in the climate record.
'It was surprising, really surprising to me the answer that we could have identified with high confidence a human-caused stratospheric cooling signal within 25 years of the start of monitoring, if we had back then in 1860 the measuring capability that we have today,' Santer, of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, said.
The signal of climate change was detectable in the 19th-century atmosphere after just a 10 parts per million increase in carbon dioxide concentrations in the 40 years between 1860 and 1899. For comparison, planet-warming carbon dioxide levels skyrocketed by about 50 parts per million between 2000 and 2025, Santer said.
Overall, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have increased by about 140 parts per million since the initially detectible point the scientists pinpointed.
'The results show it would have been detectable very quickly,' said Gabi Hegerl of the University of Edinburgh, who was not involved with the new paper. 'This highlights the strong influence that greenhouse gas increases have on the upper atmosphere compared to the variability there.'
Andrea Steiner, a climate scientist at the Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change at the University of Graz in Austria, told CNN the study shows human-caused climate change can be detected earlier in the atmosphere than at the surface.
'This confirms that temperature change signals of the atmosphere are effective not only for detection, but also as early indicators of the success of climate mitigation efforts,' she said. Steiner was not involved in the new study.
Both Santer and Solomon emphasized the results show the importance of continuing to closely monitor the upper atmosphere.
That message comes at a time of steep scientific budget cuts, when crucial climate satellites and research programs are being targeted. This is particularly the case in the NOAA, NASA and Department of Energy budget proposals, Santer noted.
The NOAA budget proposal, for example, would eliminate the air and oceans agency's research division, which includes carbon dioxide monitoring functions. In addition, the Trump administration's NASA budget proposal would cut some climate-relevant satellite missions, while stripping future NOAA satellites of climate science sensors.
'I do think it's important for non-scientists to know what's at stake here. That when we lose the capability to measure and monitor how our world is changing, it makes us all less safe,' Santer said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
There may be a ‘third state' between life and death
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. As humans, we typically look at life and death as two sides of the same coin. However, some researchers believe there could be a 'third state' between the two. One piece of evidence for this additional state is the way we continue to use organs, tissues, and cells beyond when the organism they're attached to dies. Somehow, they continue living. In a post on The Conversation, researchers behind a new paper break down exactly how they think these biobots exist, and how they were able to take cells and turn them into multicellular organisms with new functions after their death. Despite how it sounds, these aren't zombie cells. Instead, they appear to be new organisms with an entirely different life to live. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 But how exactly does this prove that there is a third state beyond life and death? Well, typically death is viewed as the irreversible end of an organism. At that point, there's no more functioning for the organism in question. But that isn't the case here. Instead, the researchers proved that certain cells could live on and be changed into something completely different. This third state then, challenges everything scientists understand about cell behavior. Because they can turn the already existing cells into new organisms with different purposes, they have started calling them living robots. These organisms could have multiple uses in medical and scientific fields, though researchers are still working to understand exactly how this happens. There are plenty of examples of organisms transforming or transitioning into something different. However, it is very rare that an organism can change in ways that are not already predetermined. That's the real difference between this third state of being and the transformations seen in some creatures like butterflies or tadpoles. Depending on the origin of the living robot, the functions they unlock upon their transformation can vary. For instance, the researchers found that solitary human lung cells can actually self-assemble into new multicellular organisms called anthrobots. These living robots then behave in new ways. They can both navigate the area around them as well as repair themselves and injured neuron cells that are placed nearby. But there are conditions for how these cells continue living after their host organism's death. The researchers write that several factors, from how long it has been since the organism died to how active metabolic activity is at the time of death, can greatly affect the birth of this third state of being. Additionally, factors such as health, sex, and age can shape the postmortem landscape, too. Understanding exactly how this third state comes into play in the wild will require deeper research. For now, though, this new study is at least evidence that there is something out there beyond life and death, at least for certain cells. What that means in the grand scheme of things remains to be seen. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Powerful solar flare erupts from sun triggering radio blackouts across North America (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An Earth-facing sunspot has turned into a prolific flare factory, firing off multiple powerful M-class solar flares in less than 24 hours, along with several minor C-class eruptions. The most intense of these solar flares erupted on June 15, peaking at 2:25 p.m. EDT (1825 GMT) and registering as an M8.46-class — just shy of the X-class category, the most powerful type of solar flare. This eruption also unleashed a coronal mass ejection (CME) — a massive plume of solar plasma and magnetic field — now partially headed toward Earth. Forecasts suggest the CME's flank could strike on June 18, according to If the CME does reach Earth, space weather forecasters say we could see minor (G1-class) geomagnetic storm conditions, potentially sparking northern lights as far south as northern Michigan and Maine. Solar flares are caused when magnetic energy builds up in the sun's atmosphere and is released in an intense burst of electromagnetic radiation. They are categorized by size into lettered groups according to strength: X-class: The strongest M-class: 10 times weaker than X C, B and A-class: Progressively weaker, with A-class flares typically having no noticeable effect on Earth. Within each class, a numerical value indicates the flare's relative strength. The June 15 flare came in at M8.46, making it a near X-class event. Because flare radiation travels at light speed, it hits Earth in just over eight minutes. When it arrives, it ionizes the upper atmosphere (specifically the thermosphere), which can disrupt shortwave radio communication on the sunlit side of the planet. During the M8.46 event, North America was directly facing the sun, making it the prime target for the resulting shortwave radio blackouts. The sunspot region behind this activity isn't slowing down. It unleashed another M6.4 flare early on June 16 at 5:30 a.m. EDT (0930 GMT) and remains in an Earth-facing position. More solar flares — and possibly more CMEs — could erupt in the coming days. If they do, we may be treated to more northern lights displays as our planet remains in the strike zone of this highly active region. Keep up to date with the latest aurora forecasts with our aurora forecast live blog and for the latest geomagnetic activity breakdown, check out NOAA's 3-day forecast.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dark matter 'lampshades' dimming stars could solve one of the greatest scientific mysteries
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Dark matter clumps could act as stellar lampshades, drifting between Earth and distant stars, dimming them by an almost imperceptible amount, a new study suggests. If this idea is correct, such "dark matter lampshades" could help solve the mystery of what dark matter is made of. This is a huge problem in science because, despite making up around 85% of the matter in the cosmos, no one knows what dark matter actually is. The team's research mainly focuses on one particular candidate for dark matter: massive astrophysical compact halo objects, or "MACHOS." The difference between MACHOs and other possible candidates for dark matter is that MACHOs are thought to be composed of the same type of matter that makes up stars, planets, and our bodies: baryonic matter. So, whereas other dark matter candidates remain effectively invisible because they are composed of non-baryonic matter that does not interact with light, MACHOs do interact with light, albeit weakly. "While we usually say dark matter does not interact with light at all, making it totally transparent and invisible, the truth is, it is allowed to interact with light a tiny bit," team member Melissa Diamond, from Queen's University in Ontario, Canada, told "Dark matter might form large clumps or clouds, often called MACHOs," she said. "There may be enough dark matter in these MACHOs that their weak interactions with light collectively block light from passing through the cloud, like how a lampshade blocks some but not all light from getting through." She added that, if one of these lampshade-like MACHOs passes between the Earth and a distant star, we might see it block out some of the starlight, making the star look a little dimmer temporarily. The technique also works for any form of dark matter that has weak interactions with light and which can weakly interact with itself to come together and form compact clumps. "Certain types of millicharged dark matter or self-interacting dark matter models are some examples which may fit this description," Diamond said. "It is possible we have not seen this lampshade effect because we have not looked for it yet. "It is also possible that we have not seen this because the types of MACHOs that could cause the lampshade effect do not make up all of the dark matter." The fact that dark matter seems not to interact with light (or electromagnetic radiation), or does so incredibly weakly, means that, to hunt it, astronomers have to rely on its interaction with another of the universe's four fundamental forces: gravity. Dark matter has mass, and according to Einstein's theory of gravity, general relativity, objects with mass create a curvature in space-time (the four-dimensional unification of space and time) from which gravity arises. When ordinary matter or light rides this curvature, its motion is impacted. For light, this curvature gives rise to a phenomenon called "gravitational lensing," during which the path from a background source is curved by a body or "lens" coming between it and and Earth. This amplifies the background source. In some cases, this amplification is so small it can't be seen for a single source but can be determined when statistically considering a multitude of background sources en masse. This is known as "gravitational microlensing." "Compact clumps of dark matter are usually searched for with microlensing," Diamond said. "When the clump passes between the Earth and a distant star, the clump's gravity will bend space-time a little bit. This will bend the path of the starlight and focus it, like a lens, causing the star to briefly appear brighter." Currently, microlensing surveys monitor the stars to see if any of them briefly brighten, perhaps due to passing clumps of dark matter. However, Diamond pointed out that, when the dark matter clumps become too large and puffy or diffuse, they lose their lensing power and become harder to observe in microlensing surveys. "This is where the lampshade effect can make a big difference," she continued. "While the clump might be too puffy to make for a good lens, it can still block some starlight, causing the star to dim instead of brightening. "The advantage of this technique is that it works for dark matter objects that are difficult or impossible to search for using available techniques." Diamond pointed out that there are astronomical surveys, such as the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), dedicated to watching large numbers of stars over time to see if they get any brighter due to microlensing. However, these surveys could also be used for this newly proposed dark matter lampshade hunting technique. "We can use the existing data from these surveys for free to also look for dimming from this lampshade effect," Diamond continued. "This technique lets us get new use out of existing data, and lets us look for new types of MACHOs that microlensing surveys might not otherwise be sensitive to." One of the big issues that remains for the team is to determine how they can distinguish between dimming caused by a dark matter lampshade or dimming caused by the passage of a more conventional astronomical object. "That is very tricky to do. Things like planets, other stars, or gas clouds might also pass in front of a distant star and cause it to dim," Diamond explained. "We would first want to estimate how often we expect 'normal' astrophysical objects to pass in front of a star and compare this to how often we expect dark objects to do the same." She added that the team could also try to compare how the star's brightness evolves as the object passes in front of it, reasoning that something opaque, like a planet, would cause the star to appear to dim differently than something semi-transparent, like a dark matter cloud, would. "If we see the lampshade effect in action, it will tell us about what dark matter could be, which is exciting," Diamond said. "However, if we do not, that is also exciting, because it shows us what dark matter cannot be." Related Stories: — Something 'fishy' is happening with the Milky Way's dark matter halo — How the Large Hadron Collider's successor will hunt for the dark universe — Massive galaxy with no dark matter is a cosmic puzzle "I was surprised to learn that microlensing surveys, which are designed to look for stellar brightening, are also really sensitive to stellar dimming," Diamond said. "We have not applied this technique to existing data yet, but we would be happy to do so, especially if we can work with groups that have specific MACHO models they want to search for. "We may try to look through the existing microlensing data to see if there is any evidence for stellar dimming that could come from MACHOs." The team's research was published in April in the journal Physical Review Letters.
