Mortgage-free retirement? Not so for 29% of soon-to-be retirees
A third of Canadians approaching retirement in the next two years expect to keep paying their mortgages after they have stopped working, a new report by Royal LePage shows.
A survey of 1,626 Canadians conducted by real estate firm Royal LePage in May found that two per cent of Canadians expect to retire in 2025 and three per cent in 2026. Of these, around one-third (29 per cent) say they will continue to pay down their mortgage into their retirement years.
Less than half (45 per cent) of people retiring soon have already paid their mortgages off and only six per cent said they will be able to pay off their mortgages before retirement.
Another 18 per cent said they do not own their primary residence, and the rest said they either don't know if they'll pay off their mortgage before retirement or don't know.
Story continues below advertisement
'This generation is far more likely to have carried mortgage balances that would have been unimaginable to their parents or grandparents,' said Phil Soper, CEO of Royal LePage.
Soper said while the 'bank of mom and dad' has helped younger Canadians, it is taking a toll on some getting closer to retirement.
Get weekly money news
Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'Our research confirms they are also much more likely to have provided financial assistance to their children to assist in their home ownership dreams,' he said.
4:28
House hunting amid economic uncertainty
However, this will not be as much of a strain on some Canadians, Soper said.
'While previous generations may have viewed mortgage-free retirement as the only option, today's retirees tend to be more open-minded. Traditional employment income may have dried up, but many are still comfortably managing their expenses and servicing mortgage payments, with income from investments, part-time work, or a working spouse,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
Of those approaching retirement (five per cent of respondents) or those who have already retired (28 per cent of respondents), there was a roughly even split between those who plan to downsize and those who don't.
'Downsizing in retirement is far from a given. For many homeowners, the decision to stay put or move to a smaller property is influenced by a combination of economic realities, lifestyle needs, and personal attachments,' said Soper.
According to the report, 47 per cent said they don't plan to downsize withing two years of retiring, while 44 per cent said they do. The rest were not sure.
The most popular downsized dwelling was a standard condominium, with 43 per cent saying they would prefer to downsize to a condo and a quarter (25 per cent) preferring to downsize to an senior living community.
Only 16 per cent said they would live in a detached home and 11 per cent said they would prefer live in an attached home. The rest were undecided.
Condominium prices have been dropping rapidly in some of Canada's hottest housing markets. According to one report, condo prices will have dropped by 15-20 per cent in the Greater Toronto Area by the end of the year, compared to a 2023 high.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Canada Post, union trade shots Monday as progress stalls
After talks last week aimed at paving the way for binding arbitration, Canada Post and the union representing its 55,000 employees were back trading public potshots Monday, with both sides accusing the other of not negotiating seriously. Monday afternoon, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) blasted the Crown corporation, saying it was counting on government action to force an end to the dispute. 'CUPW's ultimate goal in returning to the bargaining table remains new negotiated ratifiable collective agreements,' CUPW said in a written statement. 'However, Canada Post's actions suggest it does not want to negotiate. It wants to rewrite our agreements — and is seeking to use government interference to further its goals.' The union pointed to Canada Post's request to federal jobs minister Patty Hajdu late last month to order a vote on its 'final' contract offer, as well as then-federal labour minister Steven MacKinnon's decision last December to 'pause' a 32-day strike by creating an Industrial Inquiry Commission run by veteran arbitrator William Kaplan. 'The historic rights and benefits our union has gained for our members — and for Canadian society — such as maternity leave have been won through our collective bargaining rights,' CUPW added. 'The attempt to trample over them should send a chill through the labour movement. CUPW will be standing against a forced vote — and for collective bargaining rights.' In a written statement Monday, Canada Post said two days of talks last week to set the terms for arbitration didn't result in any progress. The Crown corporation also said the union still hadn't provided an official response to its final offer. It also suggested Kaplan's report should be part of the terms of reference for any arbitration. 'The final report of the Industrial Inquiry Commission clearly outlines the critical issues we face and the immediate actions that need to be taken. It should therefore be the foundational document that guides any discussions about Canada Post's path forward. The union's refusal to recognize the IIC report and its recommendations in their proposed terms of reference for arbitration is unacceptable,' Canada Post said. 'After 18 months we urgently need a fair resolution that begins to address our challenges while respecting the important role our employees play, and the voice they have in our future.' A spokesperson for Hajdu said the minister was still reviewing Canada Post's request for a vote on the 'final offer,' and urged the two sides to get back to the bargaining table. 'Last week Minister Hajdu asked the parties to return to the negotiating table with federal mediators to do two things: to seek to negotiate terms for an arbitration process to conclude this round of bargaining, and to have the union table its response to Canada Post's last global offers,' said Hajdu spokesperson Jennifer Kozelj. 'Canadians expect the parties to resolve this dispute. Both parties must meet and pursue these paths with urgency.' Labour experts say it's unclear exactly how the impasse can be resolved. Both sides, suggested University of Toronto professor Rafael Gomez, could be waiting for clearer signals from the federal government on whether it will act on Kaplan's recommendations. 'If the government hems and haws, then of course the parties aren't going to negotiate strongly,' said Gomez, director of U of T's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. 'If they said 'here's what we're doing about the report. We're implementing everything Kaplan has said,' that would move the needle.' While a full-blown strike might be another option for the union to try and force the issue, it's not clear if it would work, argued Stephanie Ross, a labour studies professor at McMaster University. The union doesn't have nearly as much leverage as it did last winter, Ross said, because it's not nearly as busy a time of year for parcels, but also because Kaplan's report was largely in line with the Crown corporation's arguments for restructuring. 'It's not clear how much pressure a walkout is going to put on the employer right now,' Ross said. Earlier this month, Canada Post rejected the union's request for binding arbitration, saying it would take too long, and could exacerbate their financial struggles. On May 28, Canada Post made what it called its 'final' contract offer, which includes a 13 per cent wage increase spread over four years, as well as a $1,000 signing bonus. Two days later, it asked Hajdu to order a vote on the offer, a request blasted by CUPW.
Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG
Proponents often claim that Canada's LNG will reduce global warming by displacing coal in other countries. However, we have run out of time for a 'transition fuel' if we're to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. In this context, new LNG infrastructure isn't a climate solution, but rather a substitute for investment in clean energy. Luckily, the price of renewables has dropped dramatically, making this transition both feasible and affordable. LNG is also a bad economic bet. The International Energy Agency has projected that LNG capacity will exceed demand by the next decade, making new capital investments especially risky. This is presumably why private investors are wavering and looking to Canadian governments to subsidize their projects with public dollars. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. A recent poll found that 56 per cent of respondents, both in B.C. and nationally, oppose multibillion-dollar public subsidies for foreign-owned LNG projects. Only 18 per cent of Canadians, and 22 per cent of British Columbians, are supportive while the rest are unsure. In B.C., where most LNG projects are proposed and LNG Canada will soon come online, people have other priorities for their tax dollars. In fact, supporting oil-and-gas is at the bottom of a list led by health care, housing, education, renewable energy and transit. The lack of public support for subsidizing fossil fuels has been consistent for years. In 2018, two-thirds of Canadians opposed subsidizing oil-and-gas, 41 per cent strongly. More than half remained unsupportive, even after being told oil-and-gas subsidies would create jobs and economic growth. In 2021, 62 per cent of Canadians wanted the federal government to stop fossil fuel subsidies and there was mounting frustration that the government hadn't acted on a 2015 campaign promise to do so. In 2023, the majority of Canadians felt that oil companies, not taxpayers, should foot the bill for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. Only 30 per cent of British Columbians supported subsidies for LNG. A 2023 poll found 96 per cent of Canadians felt the federal government should disclose subsidies for fossil fuels. That year, the government of Canada signed a joint ministerial statement at the UN climate talks that committed them to do just that by the end of 2024. There is still no inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in mid-2025, undermining Canadians' ability to understand where their tax dollars are going. Canada claims to be a global leader on climate change, yet we continuously fail to meet our climate targets. The main reason is that emissions growth from oil-and-gas production has offset progress in other areas. According to the UN Environment Programme , governments around the world, including Canada, are planning for continued fossil fuel production that will result in more than double the global emissions scientists advise are consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C. Canada, unfortunately, is one the biggest funders of the fossil fuel industry globally. That includes billions of taxpayer dollars that the federal and B.C. governments have already committed to LNG in the form of direct subsidies, lower tax and electricity rates, and public loans. Canadian taxpayers have been footing the bill for fossil fuel developments that threaten our own climate, health and economy. In this critical moment, Canada's leaders should instead use public funds to support projects that advance Canada's economy and safety, not only today but for decades to come. Kathryn Harrison is professor of political science at the University of B.C. Cara Pike is co-founder and senior adviser to at Carleton University in Ottawa.
Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll
B.C.'s NDP government is defending itself in the wake of new reports detailing the dramatic increase in public sector employees and the cost of payroll. The province is in the midst of a staffing shortage across key public sectors – currently short more than 1,000 teachers and six times as many nurses. But while critical positions go unfilled, the size of the public sector continues to grow, with British Columbia leading the country in the growth of taxpayer-funded jobs. 'It's gone from $5 billion worth of people (earning) over $75,000 to now $11.5 billion, so it's more than doubled,' BC Conservative finance critic Peter Milobar said. 'This government has a real problem when it comes to hiring, reining in costs and bringing things under control, and that leads to our structural deficit of over $12 billion.' Story continues below advertisement 1:57 B.C. database shows public sector salaries Critics say the size of government has increased across the board under the NDP's watch. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In 2017, there were just over 29,000 public servants. That number has increased to nearly 39,000, jumping 32 per cent over eight years. While the public sector is growing, private sector job growth is half of its historical average. The B.C. General Employees Union acknowledges the unionized workforce has grown, but says the real issue is the growth of non-union positions, and that management has increased at a pace nearly double that of union members. It's a claim that is echoed in health care, where the B.C. Nurses' Union says health authorities are top-heavy. 'Anecdotally, that's how it appears,' BCNU president Adrianne Gear said. 'From my members' perspective, it does seem like there is a lot of senior management leadership. Story continues below advertisement 'At any given time, we are almost 6,000 nurses short, that's how many vacancies we have, and when we move to full implementation of nurse-patient ratios … we are going to need many, many more nurses.' 1:20 How much could a new B.C. public sector contract cost taxpayers? The B.C. government has committed to hiring more front-line workers in health care, education and other critical occupations. But competition worldwide is intense. B.C. Premier David Eby said much of the growth is related to tackling that competition. 'They are doctors, they are nurses, they are teachers, they are people who provide vital services in our province. It is why we are leading Canada in recruiting family doctors and why we are on track to ensuring every British Columbian gets access to a family doctor. Ensuring we are competitive in wages for those doctors, ensuring we are competitive in wages for nurses, that we are the best place for a nurse to work in Canada,' Eby said. Story continues below advertisement 'It is how we are getting a handle on the big challenges we've faced in terms of closures at hospitals or shortages of nurses that are raising concerns among the profession here.' However, he admitted he was 'very concerned' about the growth in health care administration costs. He said the province is currently doing an 'extensive review' of B.C. health authorities to minimize those administrative costs. A renewed focus on B.C. resource economy, meanwhile, could bring an increase in private sector job creation. The business community is optimistic that the government is sending the right signals, but says it is waiting for the needed follow-through.
