PharmaEssentia to Participate at Morgan Stanley 23rd Annual Global Healthcare Conference
Senior members of the Company's management team will be available for investor meetings September 8-9.
About PharmaEssentia
PharmaEssentia USA Corporation, located in Burlington, Massachusetts, is a subsidiary of PharmaEssentia Corporation (TWSE: 6446). PharmaEssentia Corporation, headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan, is a global and rapidly growing biopharmaceutical innovator. Leveraging deep expertise and proven scientific principles, PharmaEssentia aims to deliver effective new biologics for challenging diseases in the areas of hematology, oncology, and immunology with one approved product and a diversifying pipeline. Founded in 2003 by a team of Taiwanese-American executives and renowned scientists from U.S. biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, today PharmaEssentia is expanding its global presence with operations in the U.S., Japan, China, and Korea, along with a world-class biologics production facility in Taichung, Taiwan.
For more information about PharmaEssentia USA, visit the website, LinkedIn or X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns of AI bubble, says investors are ‘overexcited': report
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned that the billions of dollars being plowed into the artificial intelligence arms race risks causing a bubble comparable to the dot-com crash of the early 2000s. 'When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth,' Altman said during a dinner with a group of journalists, The Verge reported on Friday. 'Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes. Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes.' Advertisement 4 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testifies before a Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. AP Altman likened the AI funding rush to 'the tech bubble,' when investors 'got overexcited' about internet-based companies in the late 1990s. Between March 2000 and October 2002, the Nasdaq lost nearly 80% of its value after many of these online companies failed to turn a profit. Advertisement In a report released last month, Torsten Slok, head economist at Apollo Global Management, argued that the AI bubble is actually bigger than the internet bubble, with the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 more overvalued than they were in the late 1990s. Ray Wang, research director for semiconductors, supply chain and emerging technology at Futurum Group, took a more optimistic stance. 'From the perspective of broader investment in AI and semiconductors… I don't see it as a bubble. The fundamentals across the supply chain remain strong, and the long-term trajectory of the AI trend supports continued investment,' he told CNBC in a statement. However, there is a high amount of speculative capital being thrown at companies who only have perceived potential – which could lead to pockets of overvaluation, Wang added. Advertisement 4 OpenAI chief Sam Altman likened the AI funding rush to the internet bubble of the early 2000s. REUTERS 'Calling it a bubble is too simplistic. What we're really seeing is a supply chain bottleneck – too much capital with real need, chasing too little compute,' Kyle Okamoto, chief technology officer at Aethir, a decentralized cloud GPU network, told The Post on Monday. 'Until infrastructure catches up, prices and hype will stay inflated, but that's not a bubble bursting – that's a market maturing.' Fears that the US might be in an AI bubble grew earlier this year after the explosive rise of DeepSeek, a Chinese tech firm that claimed to make a competitive AI model with a fraction of the time and money it took American rivals. Advertisement DeepSeek said its AI chatbot had been trained for under $6 million, far below the billions spent by US counterparts. OpenAI is on track to pass $20 billion in annual recurring revenue but it remains unprofitable, Altman said earlier this month. 4 OpenAI is on track to pass $20 billion in annual recurring revenue, but it remains unprofitable, according to Altman. AFP via Getty Images Its recent launch of ChatGPT-5 was so disappointing that customer complaints pushed the company to go back to the drawing board while reverting to the GPT-4 model. During the dinner with reporters, Altman said the term artificial general intelligence, or 'AGI,' is losing its relevance. AGI refers to a form of AI that can perform any intellectual task that a human can – which Altman previously said could be achieved in the 'reasonably close-ish future.' Altman's startup continues to draw in big investments. In March, OpenAI raised $40 billion at a $300 billion valuation – far above the largest amount ever raised by a tech company. Advertisement It now is preparing to sell around $6 billion in stock at roughly a $500 billion valuation. 4 Sam Altman jabbed at rival Elon Musk's Grok chatbot. REUTERS Altman said that he expects OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on data center expansions. He has also expressed interest in buying Chrome if the US government forces Google to sell off the web browser as part of an antitrust case. Advertisement Separately, Altman confirmed reports that OpenAI is planning to launch a brain-computer interface startup similar to Elon Musk's Neuralink – and took a jab at his rival's firm xAI. 'You will definitely see some companies go make Japanese anime sex bots because they think that they've identified something here that works,' Altman said in a dig at Musk's Grok chatbot. 'You will not see us do that. We will continue to work hard at making a useful app, and we will try to let users use it the way they want, but not so much that people who have really fragile mental states get exploited accidentally.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Newsmax agrees to $67 million settlement with Dominion over 2020 voter fraud claims
Newsmax, the conservative cable news channel loyal to President Trump, has agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $67 million to settle a lawsuit it brought against the network over its coverage of the 2020 election. Dominion sued Newsmax in 2021 over a series of false claims alleging the company's machines were manipulated to swing votes in former President Biden's favor and against Trump in the 2020 election. A judge in Delaware ruled in April the statements made on Newsmax's air were defamatory, but a trial in the case was delayed for months. The channel said on Monday the settlement amount will be paid out in installments over three fiscal years, which it 'expects to fund through revenues.' 'Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' the network said in a statement it published on its website on Monday. 'We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' Newsmax, a smaller conservative media channel featuring a bevy of pro-Trump hosts, gained notoriety after the 2020 election after it was promoted by the president for its coverage his false claims of widespread voter fraud and the coronavirus pandemic. Dominion was paid a separate settlement in 2023 by Fox News, which it also sued over that network's coverage of the 2020 election and Trump's claims of voter fraud.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Newsmax to pay $67M settlement to Dominion Voting Systems over 2020 election lies
Conservative cable network Newsmax has settled a defamation lawsuit brought by voting-machine company Dominion Voting Systems over the airing of 2020 election lies, the company said in a regulatory filing Monday. It will pay $67 million over the next two fiscal years. Why it matters: It's the second major defamation lawsuit the company has settled following allegations that it aired falsehoods related to the 2020 election. Newsmax settled a similar lawsuit brought by voting-machine company Smartmatic last year for $40 million. Zoom in: It's unclear how Newsmax and Dominion came to the $67 million dollar amount. In the filing, Newsmax said it would be making the payments to Dominion in three installments: $27 million paid on Aug. 15; $20 million on or before Jan. 15, 2026; and $20 million on or before Jan. 15, 2027. The statement does not include any information that indicates Newsmax would be required to issue an on-air retraction or apology to Dominion. What they're saying: A Dominion spokesperson said the company is "pleased to have settled this matter." In a statement posted to its website, Newsmax defended itself and accused the court and judge overseeing the case of undermining "the role of the press in a free society." "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020. We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism," Newsmax said. Zoom out: Both settlements allow Newsmax, which recently went public, to avoid high-profile trials over the airing of false claims that former President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory was rigged. The big picture: Newsmax's settlement represents the latest outcome from a long list of litigation waged by Smartmatic and Dominion against conservative media companies and personalities following the 2020 election.
