
I've cut my energy bills to nothing and set to earn £600 this year – a little-known scheme could help you do it too
SAVVY homeowners can save thousands of pounds on energy bills without cutting down on usage, thanks to a clever scheme.
Judith Leary-Joyce, 75, not only saves but actually makes money through this home improvement and green energy initiative.
2
2
She had a 'deep retrofit ' on the Victorian end-of-terrace in St Albans, Hertfordshire she has shared with husband John, for more than 47 years.
As part of the makeover to improve the property's energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions, the couple had two sets of solar panels installed.
This has saved more than £1,000 a year on their annual energy bil l, plus 'earns' them cash by exporting surplus electricity generated.
It comes after the average energy bill jumped up to £1,849 a year last month.
Judith, author of Beginner's Guide to Eco Renovation and blog EcoRenovationHome.com, told The Sun: 'Solar panels may cost a lot upfront, but over time, you will recoup the cost.'
The couple got their first eight panels installed in September 2021 at a cost of around £6,000.
A few years later, in October 2024, they got a further 10 panels installed for £14,300 – and this included a battery.
With a battery storage system, energy from the solar panels is stored to provide power irrespective of the weather or the time of day.
'The decision to get solar panels was primarily down to me really caring about the planet,' said Judith.
'But at the same time, I like the idea of saving a shedload of money, too.'
What is the energy price cap?
Finding an installer was relatively straightforward, according to the energy-saving whizz, though she recommends speaking to friends for recommendations.
She also suggests getting three or four quotes.
'Our house faces east-west, so we decided to put as many panels on the roof as we could fit in the space,' said Judith.
'In the first installation, we got five on the front of the roof and three on the back.'
The couple then got an additional 10 panels installed a few years later after building a large garden room extension with a south-facing roof.
Thanks to this – and the retrofit – Judith and John have been able to get rid of gas altogether, considerably lowering their energy bills.
In addition to this, it's possible to 'earn' money from having solar panels by selling or exporting energy back to the National Grid.
Judith said: 'It was only in October last year that we went onto the tariff that pays us for exporting electricity generated.
"The amount we earn will, of course, vary, according to the time of year.'
In March this year, the household used 550 kWh (kilowatt hours) of energy – and generated 501 kWh, according to Judith.
'As a result, we paid just £22.72 to Octopus Energy, our energy supplier, that month,' said Judith.
As the days have become longer and sunnier, the couple have made more energy than they have used meaning they have been able to export £300 worth back to the National Grid.
On summer days, Judith reckons her solar panels will mean she has to pay 'next to nothing.'
She added: 'I anticipate we will be pretty much self-sufficient over the coming months.'
With big savings up for grabs, the solar panels are a win for Judith and John.
'According to Octopus, our annual energy consumption as a household is around £1,700,' said Judith.
'However, thanks to the 'export', we will make a very healthy £2,300 worth of energy over the year.
This means we'll be 'quids in' – earning around £600 more than we're paying out for the year.'
Actual savings will depend on what happens to energy prices and the specific earnings will depend on the weather.
How much do solar panels cost?
You need to be aware that the initial outlay for solar panels is high. If you are thinking about getting panels installed, you need to view this as a long-term investment.
Solar panels are usually fitted on to the roof to absorb the sun's rays and turning them into electricity to power your home.
The position and size of your property determines how many panels you can get - and the overall cost.
However, the average home can expect around ten solar panels which is a typical investment of around £5,000-£6,000, according to energy firm Ovo.
Surplus energy produced can be sold back to the grid.
If you want to store extra energy, you'll need to invest in a battery, costing another £5,000 on average.
The amount you sell energy, depends on your provider.
As a guide, you may be able to recoup the cost of installation in as little as five to seven years – though in some cases it will take longer.
Judith says her solar is due to be paid back through savings in six years
Earlier this month, we reported how thousands of homes could qualify for free solar panel grants.
Judith said: 'For me, there's no two ways about it, I love my solar panels – not least because I know we're making energy from the sun.
"When it's sunny, I love looking at my smart meter and thinking that we can essentially use the washing machine – and other appliances – more or less for free.'
The rate of solar panels installations on UK homes was up 40.7% in March, from the same period last year, according to analysis from Coventry building society.
More than 17,000 solar panels were installed on UK homes in March, a jump from the 12,168 installations during March 2024.
To get an idea on how much you could potentially save by getting panels installed, check out the free calculator from the Energy Saving Trust.
Other ways to save money on bills
Solar panels are just one of a wide range of energy-efficient measures that Judith has put in place.
'We got a lot of 'green' improvements done during Covid in 2020,' she said.
'John and I spent many months living in a cramped corner of an extremely dusty room.'
The couple added more insulation to the loft and external walls.
They also installed insulation under the suspended floors themselves – before calling in the experts to put in under-floor heating.
At the same time, the pair have taken a number of steps to cut out draughts.
Some of the more costly measures the couple have invested in include triple glazing and an air source heat pump.
'All the windows on the extension are triple glazed,' said Judith.
'We also paid around £13,000 four years ago for a heat pump – though we did take advantage of the Boiler Upgrade Scheme to bring the cost down to £5,500.'
This scheme provides homeowners with up to £7,500 to install heat pumps and other green technologies.
Judith said: 'I love the fact that making my home warmer and comfortable not only means it's cheaper to run – it's also having a big impact on carbon emissions.'
She also estimates the house is now worth at least £90,000 more than its equivalent house without a retrofit - making all the energy efficient investments financially worthwhile too.
How to save on your energy bills
SWITCHING energy providers can sound like a hassle - but fortunately it's pretty straight forward to change supplier - and save lots of cash.
Shop around - If you're on an SVT deal you are likely throwing away up to £250 a year. Use a comparion site such as MoneySuperMarket.com, uSwitch or EnergyHelpline.com to see what deals are available to you.
The cheapest deals are usually found online and are fixed deals - meaning you'll pay a fixed amount usually for 12 months.
Switch - When you've found one, all you have to do is contact the new supplier.
It helps to have the following information - which you can find on your bill - to hand to give the new supplier.
Your postcode
Name of your existing supplier
Name of your existing deal and how much you payAn up-to-date meter reading
It will then notify your current supplier and begin the switch.
It should take no longer than three weeks to complete the switch and your supply won't be interrupted in that time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK trade secretary to seek exemption from US steel and aluminium tariffs
The UK's trade secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, will meet his US counterpart next week to thrash out a timeline for exempting the UK from US steel and aluminium tariffs after Donald Trump announced he would double them. British officials are seeking clarity on the implications of Trump's announcement on Friday night that he planned to double the tariffs from 25% to 50% from Wedneday 4 June, piling further pressure on global steel trade. Reynolds is expected to meet his US counterpart, Jamieson Greer , at the OECD meeting in Paris next week. He will seek to agree a timeline for implementing the deal agreed to lower steel, aluminium, auto and other product tariffs. A UK government spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel.' 'We are engaging with the US on the implications of the latest tariff announcement and to provide clarity for industry.' The Guardian reported that British officials were intensifying trade talks with the US and hope to see the deal implemented within weeks. A government source said: 'Some countries are viewing the court ruling as an indication that they were right not to negotiate over tariffs. We're taking the opposite view, and trying to get this deal implemented as soon as possible.' Trump and Keir Starmer announced a US-UK trade deal earlier this month under which on British steel and aluminium will be reduced to zero, and tariffs on up to 100,000 British cars a year will be reduced from 25% to 10%. The deal did not cover Trump's blanket 10% tariffs on all foreign imports, which a federal court overturned last week, arguing that the US president had overstepped his powers. An appeals court paused the ruling and said Trump's tariffs could continue while it examines the arguments. The European Commission said on Saturday that it 'strongly' regretted Trump's decision to double steel and aluminium tariffs, and warned that the EU was prepared to retaliate. 'This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic,' a spokesperson for the commission said, adding that 'the tariff increase also undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution'. 'The EU is prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to the latest U.S. tariff increase.' 'The European Commission is currently finalising consultations on expanded countermeasures. If no mutually acceptable solution is reached, both existing and additional EU measures will automatically take effect on 14 July – or earlier, if circumstances require.'


The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Plymouth confirm exit of Wayne Rooney replacement in blunt 13-word statement as chairman sends surprise message
Dear Green Army, I am sorry to have not written earlier after relegation was confirmed, earlier this month. Jane and I had personal issues in the US that forced us to cut short our visit to the UK, and we have been occupied taking care of them for a few weeks. Our thanks to those who sent best wishes, and all is ok now. We are making plans for a return to the UK later this summer. We are disappointed at Miron Muslic's departure – not at his joining a club with a profile such as Schalke, but in the timing and manner of his leaving. We hired Miron in January, giving him a three-and-a-half-year contract. Shortly after his joining us, we also hired the staff he requested, in an assistant head coach, head of elite performance, performance analysis and, a little later, a set-piece coach. A recruitment team was in place for the season, augmented by our securing the services of Stuart Webber, a very experienced and well-regarded Sporting Director, to assist with the post-season rebuild of our squad, along with Tom Randle, who has subsequently joined us on a full-time basis as Head of Recruitment. After the season ended, and with rumours flying that Miron was attracting interest from other clubs, I called him personally and he assured me that he was 100% committed to Argyle. As a result, Miron continued to take part in all recruitment meetings and was involved with interviewing and recruiting players until just last week. His colleagues had no indication that he wanted to leave. Last Saturday, Miron informed the club that he wished to speak with Schalke with a view to joining them. Under his contract, a club wishing to speak with him needs Argyle's prior permission. We were unwilling to give such permission, but Miron informed us that under no circumstances was he going to return to Plymouth. Thus, we reluctantly gave the necessary permission. By making clear his intention never to return, Miron gave us no choice but to move on. We could have insisted on the full compensation and gone to court to enforce his contract but would not have had his services as head coach, and progress on recruiting a replacement would have been blocked. Rather than get mired in a protracted, and highly disruptive, process we settled for an amount of compensation that, while below the contracted sum, is a strong financial outcome for a League One head coach, enabling us to move on positively. As you know, we have been in talks with a prospective new investor in our club for over a year. Those talks led to an application for approval of that investment being lodged with the EFL in February. Unfortunately, negotiations have taken too long and the key information that both we and the EFL required to complete the deal has not been forthcoming. I no longer believe that news of the new investor is imminent. As a result, existing shareholders (I, Argyle Green and the Holliday family) will provide the funds to ensure that we stay on course with our plans. This means making funds available to ensure we have a competitive football budget to aim to return us to the Championship as soon as possible, as well as continued investment in Foulston Park. Our budget next season will be twice that we had the last time we were in League One. These additional funds equate to the same level of financial support that was written into the investor plan for year one. I completely understand that this will be very frustrating for fans, as it is extremely frustrating for me and the rest of the Argyle Board. I have said constantly that my resources can enable us to be a sustainable Championship club, but that if we wish to aspire beyond that we would need new investment. I can provide some of that new investment, with the Holliday family's and Argyle Green's help, but not all. While progress towards a transaction in its current form looks to have stalled, we will continue to explore alternative routes, including being open to revised terms with other investment groups. It is important that we get the right investor, not the quickest investor, and this may take some time. We are committed to this, but in the meantime, current shareholders can (and will) support the club through its next stage of development. This current situation is disappointing, obviously, but honesty and transparency are important to us. It's been a long, ponderous process, but one we thought would come to a successful conclusion. It has not, but we remain in a very strong financial position. Over the past five or six years, we have set out a clear pathway to achieving success at Argyle. In that time, we progressed from League Two to the Championship, where we spent two seasons, before suffering relegation. Our mission has been, and remains, to be a sustainable and competitive Championship club, but some of the decisions we have made in the last two seasons have not worked as we had hoped. Those decisions obviously contributed to our relegation, but were decisions made by the entire board, and it is entirely unfair to blame any individuals. Unfortunately, in sport, as in life, decisions made do not always work out. We are sorry and will do everything we can to put it right. Argyle's long-term strategy is set by the board and executed by Andrew Parkinson, our CEO, and his team. Away from the pitch, the club continues to make significant strides. Thanks to the efforts of all staff, we have seen remarkable off-pitch progress including record revenues this year. We've also been recognised with several industry awards - testament to the quality of work happening every day behind the scenes. This progress is a direct result of the hard work and commitment of staff across all departments. Our focus on sustainable growth has led to significant infrastructure investments that now generate substantial revenue which supports our football operations. The first and still the largest of those investments was the refurbishment of the Mayflower Grandstand. Today, that not only provides outstanding match-day hospitality to our fans, but a facility for businesses and other organisations in the area. The revenues generated now number in the millions, and go directly into the running of the football club, primarily the football budget. The Grandstand refurbishment was the first and remains the biggest investment, but has been followed by the acquisition of Higher Home Park, part of which is now used as the Biffa Fan Zone; by the Green Taverners' building, now the Far Post; by the acquisition of Goals, now Harpers; and by many smaller investments that have improved the experience for fans and sponsors. As a result, the stadium has been full for most home games. We have also invested in players, breaking the club transfer record several times and realising substantial surpluses on subsequent sales of players. The result is that your club is now financially stronger than it has ever been with a strong and diversified revenue base. Those revenues have, until last season, helped lead to our success on the pitch. We have consistently achieved more than would be suggested by what we are able to spend on the first-team squad alone. Sometimes, our results flattered our performances but, overall, the strategy to compete by outsmarting not outspending our competitors has been successful. Last season, it was not, and the board took the decision in January that our best hope of avoiding what by then was a very likely fate was to hire a Head Coach who could introduce a new playing style. We narrowly failed, despite the efforts of our staff and our players. I thank them all. We will play the coming season in League One, as we did three years ago. Our circumstances, though, are much changed, because of the investments we have made and the support you have given us. We will have the financial resources to compete strongly at the top end of the division. Relegation is always disappointing, but we are now in a position where we end up stronger than we began. In the long-term, this is not being a yo-yo club, this is being a club that invests for the long term and emerges stronger from any setbacks. You will know that former Head of Recruitment Jimmy Dickinson has left Argyle after a successful six years. Jimmy has been a positive influence on the club, and we wish him well in the future. We also congratulate Ross Goodwin, our Head of Football Data, who will return home, and take on a senior role as Head of Recruitment at Dundee United. We are delighted to welcome David Fox back to Home Park in a senior management role as Head of Football Operations. He will be responsible for helping formulate and executing strategy on the football side of the club. Initially, he will be aided by Stuart Webber, whose experience and abilities as a Sporting Director will be hugely beneficial to Argyle. David and Stuart have been actively engaged in the process of recruiting a new head coach, and we hope to have an appointment in place as soon as possible. David will be provided with the support, resources and structure he needs. As I mentioned above, we also welcome Tom Randle as Head of Recruitment. He, David and Stuart have already been working behind the scenes to identify and recruit the players who will join us this summer. Recruitment is led by David and Tom, with other senior executive involvement. This structure means recruitment continues regardless of any changes in coaching staff, ensuring alignment with the club's long-term football strategy. We have already seen the fruits of this combined effort, and I'd like to welcome Jamie Paterson, Caleb Watts and Jack MacKenzie to Argyle. I'll be back in the UK over the summer, when we will host a Fans Forum ahead of the new season. I'll be very happy to address the questions I'm sure you will have on the investment setbacks and how we intend to take things forward to achieve our goals. Finally, to you, the fans - you have been outstanding. Week after week, match after match, home or away, your support never wavers, and all at your club are grateful to you. We've never been more determined to succeed and, alongside your unrivalled backing, through the highs and the lows, together we'll do this. See you soon, Simon


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Breakthrough breast cancer treatment could help 1,000 women a year
A new triple-drug treatment for aggressive advanced breast cancer can cut deaths by a third, a major trial has found. The international research used liquid biopsies – described as the 'golden key' to unlocking precision medicines – that identified suitable patients. All were suffering from one of the most common forms of breast cancer, which accounts for seven in 10 cases, and had a common mutation which makes it more deadly and aggressive. The three-drug therapy comprises two targeted drugs – palbociclib, a type of cancer growth blocker, and a new drug called inavolisib, which blocks the activity of the PI3K protein – as well as the hormone therapy fulvestrant. Until now, treatment options for such patients have been limited. The trial involving the Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust enrolled 325 patients from 28 countries, including the UK. In all cases, cancer had spread or returned after hormone therapy and for those who had not yet received systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Of the total, 161 were given the three-drug combination. The placebo group, which included 164 patients, was given a dummy pill plus palbociclib and fulvestrant. The study found the median overall survival in the inavolisib group was 34 months, compared with 27 months in the placebo group. The therapy was far more likely to result in significant shrinkage of tumours. In total, 62.7 per cent of patients in the inavolisib group saw their tumours shrink by more than 30 per cent, compared with 28 per cent in the placebo group. The randomised, double blind trial also showed that the new combination delayed the progression of the disease by 17.2 months, on average, compared with 7.3 months in the control group. Women taking inavolisib were able to delay subsequent chemotherapy treatment by almost two years longer than the patients in the control group. Around 55,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year, and 11,500 will die from the disease. The study involved women with one of the most common types of disease, who had a mutation which is more aggressive and deadly. Experts said around 1,000 women a year could be helped by the drug combination. The study, funded by pharmaceutical company Roche, which manufactures inavolisib, was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine. Lead author Nick Turner, professor of molecular oncology at the Institute of Cancer Research and consultant medical oncologist at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, said the therapy 'not only helped patients live longer, but it more than doubled the time before their cancer progressed or worsened. 'It also gave them more time before needing subsequent chemotherapy, which we know is something that patients really fear and want to delay for as long as possible,' he said. The oncologist said he hoped the triple therapy would become the standard of care for women who can benefit. Previous trial results led the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to grant 'breakthrough therapy' designation for inavolisib in May 2024 with costs of around $23,000 (£17,000) monthly. It has yet to be licensed in the UK. Professor Kristian Helin, chief executive of the Institute of Cancer Research, London, said: 'This research demonstrates how this triple combination approach, effectively shuts down cancer's escape routes, giving people with metastatic breast cancer the opportunity to live well for longer.' Dr Nisharnthi Duggan, research information manager at Cancer Research UK, said: 'These results are really positive news for people living with a type of hard-to-treat breast cancer. The trial showed that adding inavolisib to targeted treatment plans improved survival. On top of this, it also delayed the progression of people's cancer and the need for chemotherapy, which could improve quality of life. 'We hope that more research like this will help to give people kinder cancer treatment options, and more time with their loved ones.'