New Mexico entomologists excited over ‘wildlife' designation for insects
Dr. David Lightfoot, Collection Manager for the Arthropod Division at the Museum of Southwestern Biology at the University of New Mexico, said this is huge. 'The main advantage or reason that that is a good thing for the insects in New Mexico is that now there will be state funding available to us from Game and Fish – or the Department of Wildlife – to do research on insects that are rare and potentially threatened with extinction,' said Lightfoot. 'That was not present before.'
Now, Lightfoot said, research into insects that are less popular in the public eye can take place. 'We probably know all the species of butterflies in New Mexico,' he said. 'Simply because they've received a lot of attention, they get posted on [nature website] iNaturalist. We've got a pretty good handle on the butterflies in New Mexico.'
Registration open for warm-water fishing workshop in Roswell
Even though Lightfoot's focus includes grasshoppers and crickets, there's another species he wishes got the 'butterfly-level' of attention – microarthropods like mites, springtails, and termites. 'The ones that [are] scavengers, the decomposers that live in soil, on soil. They are so essential to ecosystems and ecosystem function because they break down organic material like leaf litter; when plants die, when leaves fall to the ground, when grass dies and falls to the ground…they are absolutely essential to convert all that dead biomass back into mineral nutrients that can be taken up by plants and then becomes available to herbavores, that are in turn eaten by higher level consumers,' said Lightfoot.
He said that research on those species of insect is greatly needed. 'We don't have a good accounting of what all the species are or what they even do,' Lightfoot said.
'The wildlife belongs to all of us here': A look into New Mexico's wildlife law violation checkpoints
Protecting endangered species of insects is another vital reason the Wilderness Department protection is important. 'We currently have about 300 species of insects in New Mexico that we're aware of, that are rare, endemic to the state, that is, they don't occur anywhere else in the world but within New Mexico, and/or threatened by human activities,' said Lightfoot. 'Most of which are habitat loss due to agricultural development, urbanization, and pesticide use.'
Lightfoot said a new project aimed at addressing endangered insect species in the state, The New Mexico Rare Arthropods Resource, is a culmination of the efforts of UNM and the ABQ BioPark Society. The site is built and maintained by New Mexico Natural Heritage, along with the arthropod division and the BioPark.
Funding from the Caroll Petrie Foundation is currently going to research insects and build the website. New Mexico Game and Fish has also given a grant to develop a list of 100 species of pollinator insects in New Mexico to be added to the 2025 State Wildlife Action Plan.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
7 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Forrest Claypool: Chicago leaders show no signs of changing their fiscal behavior
For years, city and state officials have marched Chicago toward a cliff. This budget season will determine if they have the will to finally pull back from the abyss. Leaders of three prominent Chicago civic organizations recently outlined principles in the Tribune that they hope will guide those officials as they tackle billions in budget deficits at the city, public schools and the CTA. Although sound, their admonitions seem almost quaint, reflecting a bygone era when elected officials exercised a modicum of responsibility for their constituents' futures. Some history, juxtaposed with paraphrasing of the civic leaders' recommendations, is illustrative:For decades, city mayors have used one-time revenues to present the illusion of balanced budgets. Both Mayor Richard M. Daley and his successor Rahm Emanuel used 'scoop and toss,' refinancing bonds with new 30-year debt and spending it to close annual deficits. A Tribune investigation called this practice, along with Daley's use of bonds to cover legal settlements, back pay and sundry expenses, 'equivalent to taking out a 30-year mortgage to buy a car and making your children — or grandchildren — pay it off, with interest.' Mayors Lori Lightfoot and Brandon Johnson used one-time COVID-19 relief dollars, among other short-term revenues, to balance budgets. Stealthy deficit spending has been the choice of mayors and city councils since at least the late decades of economic growth under Daley and Emanuel, financed in part by tax increment financing districts, Lightfoot and Johnson have raided these funds to balance budgets, shrinking job creation and future revenues. Further dampening growth, Lightfoot instituted automatic annual property tax increases and raised the gas tax. Johnson pushed through new taxes falling largely on businesses, making the city less competitive. He is seeking a new tax on each private sector job in the late! With Johnson's passive acquiescence, Gov. JB Pritzker imposed new pension sweeteners on the city Aug. 1, adding $60 million to 2027's pension tab and a whopping $750 million a year by 2055. It increases pension debt in the police and firefighters' funds by $11 billion, reducing funding levels to pay retirees from 25% to 18%, the worst ratio in the nation. As Yogi Berra would say, the governor's action was deja vu all over again. Pritzker signed similar pension sweeteners in 2021 and 2023, contributing to Chicago budget deficits. In contrast to Johnson, Lightfoot fought hard to block the unfunded mandate, but Pritzker and legislators beholden to powerful government unions ignored receives ideas for government cost efficiencies in the same way a vampire reacts to a gift of garlic. His only answer to budget challenges is a supplicating plea for more money from Chicago and Illinois taxpayers. Unlike the crushing pension debts imposed on Chicago by Springfield, this civic recommendation is within the control of local leaders. The CTA, for example, can match its bus and rail service to actual rider demand rather than running pre-pandemic schedules, pretending that despite the rise of remote work, 2019 ridership will return any minute. Chicago Public Schools, hemorrhaging students for years, can right-size its system by closing near-empty schools, giving students better opportunities and sending more dollars to classrooms. When combined with strategic neighborhood investments, guided by community leaders, these changes can both improve educational outcomes and help spur local renewal. Improving services also means putting customer needs first. The Chicago Park District, for example, should reconsider its obtuse plan to close 57 swimming pools by mid-August, the peak of the heat season amid a near-record heat wave. Chicago's civic leaders are right, but state and local officials show no signs of turning over a new leaf. Unless and until they do, expect more of the same — high unemployment, sky-high taxes, endemic violent crime and a declining quality of life. As the Tribune wrote nearly a half century ago, at a time of a similar existential crisis in 1981 Chicago, 'cities stricken in this way become irrelevant. Business moves away. So do the best young people. The population ages. The city becomes a backwater.' Chicago rose like a phoenix from that historic nadir because strong and effective leaders made difficult decisions. It's long past time for today's leaders to start doing the same. Forrest Claypool is author of 'The Daley Show: Inside the Transformative Reign of Chicago's Richard M. Daley.' He served twice as Daley's chief of staff and was CEO of Chicago Public Schools from 2015 to 2017.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Revenue forecast: NM took in $390 million more last year than previously projected
Aug. 19—SANTA FE — New Mexico took in $390 million more in the just-ended budget year than previously projected, giving lawmakers more wiggle room to respond to federal reductions to health care and food assistance programs. But a projected decrease in oil prices and a tepid outlook for future job growth could signal a looming slowdown to the state's recent revenue boom, top state budget officials told lawmakers during a Tuesday committee hearing. Those trends could also complicate the state's ability to absorb the federal funding changes on a long-term basis, assuming the reductions are left in place. The top budget official in Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration, Finance and Administration Secretary Wayne Propst, said the larger-than-expected revenue collections could allow lawmakers to put more money into two new state trust funds created this year — a behavioral health trust fund and a Medicaid trust fund. "We'd like to see those filled up as soon as possible," Propst told members of the Legislative Finance Committee at a Tuesday meeting in Las Cruces. Moving more state dollars into the trust funds could be the primary focus of a special session Lujan Grisham is expected to call next month. Top Governor's Office staffers have been meeting with legislative leaders in recent weeks about a special session spending package that could exceed $400 million, according to lawmakers involved in the discussions. The federal budget bill signed by President Donald Trump could lead to more than 90,000 New Mexico residents losing health care coverage and the possible closure of rural hospitals, state health officials have warned. The federal budget bill is projected to cost the state an average of $206 million per year over the next five years, executive and legislative branch economists projected. Sen. George Muñoz, D-Gallup, the LFC's vice chairman, said he's especially concerned about federal changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, and said most state agencies should expect largely flat budgets in the coming year. "We've put a lot of money out into the economy, but we haven't seen the returns," he said during Tuesday's hearing. Muñoz also expressed concern that some of the state's revenue growth has been caused by rising inflation, which boosts state gross receipts tax revenue but negatively affects consumers. But Lujan Grisham described the new state revenue estimates as good news, given the state's future funding challenges. "Today's announcement that our state can expect nearly a half-billion dollars in additional revenue will help us protect the essential services for New Mexicans that Washington has abandoned," the governor said in a statement. Positive trends amid looming uncertainty Despite the uncertain future, the revenue estimates released Tuesday show positive recent state labor trends. New Mexico averaged 1,817 new jobs created per month over the first six months of this year, with 2,900 jobs added in June alone, according to Taxation and Revenue Department data. Much of that job creation was in the construction, health care and education fields. Meanwhile, the state lost jobs in the leisure and hospitality industry and also saw its number of federal workers decline. The state's overall growth in gross receipts tax revenue and positive investment returns were among the reasons the state took in more revenue during the fiscal year that ended in June than was projected eight months ago. "The base is higher, but the expectation for growth is lower," said state Taxation and Revenue Department Secretary Stephanie Schardin Clarke. Surging oil production in southeast New Mexico's Permian Basin has been a primary driver of the state's revenue boom over the last several years, while also allowing lawmakers to set aside millions of dollars in the newly-established trust funds for future use. Despite a recent dip in oil prices, the New Mexico State Land Office announced Tuesday it had broken a revenue record from oil and gas leases, driven by a newly implemented 25% royalty rate on certain extraction activities in the Permian Basin. The agency recorded $256 million in revenue at an August auction, in which 10 leases were offered in Lea and Eddy counties. Nine of the leases included the new rate. Preparing for 'rainy days' Looking ahead, legislators are projected to have roughly $485 million in "new" money during the coming fiscal year — a figure that represents the difference between projected revenue levels and current total spending. That budgetary windfall could allow for additional backfilling of safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Senate Minority Whip Pat Woods, R-Broadview, said Tuesday some of the money could also be used to provide tax breaks for New Mexico residents, after a tax package approved by lawmakers this year was vetoed by the governor. But Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo, said legislators should also continue with the strategy of investing some incoming revenue for future use. "We're not just blowing money," he said. "We're putting it away for rainy days." In fact, with the total value of the state's various permanent funds having recently surpassed $64 billion, investment income is on track to overtake oil and natural gas as the state's primary revenue source in the coming years, Propst said. But the state's investment largesse could also prompt a new debate over how much of the money should be invested — and how much should be spent more immediately. "We are a very, very fortunate state and it is ironic that we have the poorest population in the nation," said Rep. Rebecca Dow, R-Truth or Consequences, during Tuesday's hearing. Journal business editor Matthew Narvaiz contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court tosses New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for gun buys
Aug. 19—New Mexico's seven-day "cooling off" period for most gun purchases violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday. A three-member panel of the Denver-based court reversed the decision by U.S. District Judge James Browning of Albuquerque, who refused to grant a preliminary injunction in July 2024 to halt enforcement of the law. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, in a statement on Tuesday, appeared to favor appealing the ruling, a sentiment echoed by state Sen. Joseph Cervantes, D-Las Cruces, who co-sponsored the measure during the 2024 legislative session. "We have tried very hard in the Legislature to stay within the lanes that the U.S. Supreme Court has put up," Cervantes told the Journal. "The challenge is that the Supreme Court keeps changing the goal posts." He said the 10th Circuit's conclusion was unexpected, considering that a number of other courts at the same level as the 10th Circuit have upheld such waiting periods as constitutional. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers joined gun shop representatives in lauding the appeals decision. "Justice delayed is justice denied," said Jason Archie, manager of Right To Bear Arms gun shop at 11200 Montgomery NE. "It was represented as a way to prevent crime, but I didn't see that crime went down at all." He said enforcement of the waiting period was a "hassle" that most customers weren't happy about. The legal challenge to the law, which was enacted in early 2024, was filed on behalf of two gun owners, one from Farmington and the other from Albuquerque, who complained about trying to buy a firearm for personal purposes only to be told they had to come back a week later to pick it up. Supporters argued that the waiting period would help reduce gun violence and gun deaths in New Mexico. "Even though the potential to reduce impulsive gun violence might be true, once we acknowledge that the Waiting Period Act likely burdens Second Amendment activity, that potential is outweighed," wrote the appeals panel. The appeals court found that the law applies "a blanket burden across all of society, assuming that everyone is dangerous or unstable before they can exercise their Second Amendment right." In her statement, Lujan Grisham said the decision was "deeply disappointing, plainly wrong and likely to cost lives in New Mexico. New Mexico's waiting period law was carefully crafted to minimize gun violence while respecting Second Amendment rights." She said the dissenting opinion in the ruling even notes that New Mexico's law "is likely to save approximately thirty-seven lives per year." "This ruling ignores a recent binding Tenth Circuit precedent that upheld Colorado's law barring gun purchases by anyone under the age of 21 — a law that requires 18-year-olds to wait three years to purchase a weapon," she added. The ruling also mischaracterizes New Mexico's gun purchase waiting period, saying it applies to "everyone" when, in fact, it doesn't apply to those who sell guns to immediate family members, those with a concealed carry permit and law enforcement officers, the governor stated. "The evidence is clear — waiting periods prevent impulsive acts of violence and suicide, giving people time to step back and reassess their emotions during moments of crisis. I'm disappointed that today's ruling doesn't take this into account," she stated, adding that her administration was reviewing its legal options in reaction to the "misguided ruling." The New Mexico House initially approved a 14-day waiting period in early 2024, but a Senate floor amendment cut the wait time to seven days before the final passage. Meanwhile, Rhode Island, Maryland and New Jersey have adopted a seven-day waiting period, with four states, Colorado, Florida, Illinois and Vermont opting for three days. California has a 30-day waiting period. Browning, after hearing legal arguments and testimony from historian witnesses, also considered the plain language of the Second Amendment. He concluded that the right to acquire a firearm in New Mexico, which mandated the waiting period, didn't impede the right to "keep and bear" a firearm. But the appeals court held the opposite view, stating that "the constitutional injury to the Plaintiffs is so broad and clear that they have met their higher burden entitling them to an injunction changing the status quo." The court reversed Browning's ruling, and sent the case back for further proceedings. Republican legislators predicted this outcome during debate on the bill in 2024, but Democrats nonetheless passed HB 129 without a single Republican vote, stated Brandon Harris, spokesperson for the state Senate Republican Leadership office. Senate Republican Leader Bill Sharer of Farmington welcomed the appeal court ruling, reiterating that "the clear language of the 2nd Amendment says that 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.'" Sharer also questioned the logic behind the law itself, pointing out that "Criminals certainly don't wait seven days before breaking into our homes and threatening our families and properties... What sense does it make to require law-abiding citizens to wait seven days before being able to defend themselves?" Solve the daily Crossword
