Texas House OKs bill to allow smaller homes on smaller lots amid housing affordability crunch
But the House made significant tweaks that would limit how many new homes could be built under the bill, setting up a potential showdown with the Texas Senate over one of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's biggest priorities.
Senate Bill 15 would reduce how much land cities say single-family homes in new subdivisions must sit on. The idea is to let homebuilders construct homes on smaller amounts of land, thus reducing the overall price of the home.
'This bill allows the option of building homes at different types and price points to meet the demand and needs of buyers,' said state Rep. Gary Gates, a Richmond Republican who carried the bill in the House. 'Lowering the size and type of residential housing will increase the amount of housing that can be built and lowers housing costs.'
Initially, SB 15 would forbid major cities from requiring homes in new subdivisions to sit on more than 1,400 square feet as first proposed in the bill. Gates amended that provision Tuesday to 3,000 square feet. The state's biggest cities tend to require single-family homes to sit on around 5,000 to 7,500 square feet of land, a Texas Tribune analysis found.
The provision would only apply in new subdivisions with at least five acres of land, and wouldn't touch existing neighborhoods. The bill would only apply to cities with at least 150,000 residents in counties with a population of 300,000 or more — 19 of the state's largest cities, per a Tribune analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data. It also wouldn't apply in cases in which homeowners association and restrictive covenants prevent smaller lot sizes.
Tuesday's 87-48 vote came after a dramatic turn of events at the tail end of the legislation in which a Democrat tried to kill the bill on a technicality, but supporters managed to revive it in time to reach the full House before a key deadline.
Some Democrats weren't convinced the bill would tame housing costs — though evidence broadly suggests that homes on smaller lots have lower values than those on bigger lots. Some of them expressed uneasiness about the state weighing in on what kinds of homes can be built and where, a power the state grants to cities.
'They (residents) didn't elect their state representatives to decide how their city would develop, not on that level, not with this kind of density,' said state Rep. Ramon Romero, D-Fort Worth, who previously moved to kill the bill on procedural grounds.
Romero successfully tacked on an amendment that will require cities to adopt a separate zoning category to comply with the bill, essentially meaning the bill wouldn't automatically apply to existing single-family zoning categories.
A majority of the chamber's Republicans and Democrats voted in favor of the bill Tuesday.
It has to clear a second, final vote Wednesday in order to advance. From there, the Senate would have to sign off on changes the House made to the bill — or appoint a conference committee to hash out the differences between the two chambers.
SB15 is part of a constellation of proposals in the Texas Legislature aimed at curbing the state's high housing costs, chiefly by clearing red tape and cutting local regulations in order to allow more homes to be built.
Texas needs about 320,000 more homes than it has, according to an estimate by the housing group Up For Growth. That shortage, housing experts and advocates argue, played a key role in driving up home prices and rents as the state boomed.
Lawmakers on Monday sent a bill to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk that would allow apartments and mixed-use developments along retail and commercial corridors. Both chambers have approved bills to make it harder for property owners to stop new homes from being built near them and encourage cities to allow the construction of smaller apartments. They've also initially approved a bill to relax local rules in college towns that say how many unrelated adults can live in a home.
House lawmakers also gave preliminary approval to a bill intended to reduce hurdles to convert vacant office buildings into residences. Whether a separate bill to allow additional dwelling units in the backyards of single-family homes, which died in the House two years ago, will make it over the finish line before a key deadline in the House on Tuesday night remains to be seen.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Long Island town's GOP majority shuts down Dem's motion to kill controversial ICE contract
The Town of Islip has doubled-down on its partnership with Immigration and Customs Enforcement — shutting down a motion by the lone Democratic board member to end the town's contract with the feds. Jorge Guadrón, the only Democrat on the Town's five-person board, proposed a motion to terminate the deal that allows ICE agents to use Islip's taxpayer-funded gun range as a training grounds — but no other board member seconded the motion, which killed the proposal before even getting to a vote. 'In the interest of safeguarding the mental integrity and well-being of the constituents of the town, the town board wishes to suspend the access to the rifle range for ICE,' Guadrón said in his motion. 3 The Town of Islip has shut down an effort by the town board's lone Democrat to end the partnership allowing ICE to train at a taxpayer-funded shooting range. Google/Stephen Wicelinski 3 Board member Jorge Guadrón proposed the motion to terminate the partnership with ICE — but no other members seconded it. islipny But when Town Supervisor Angie Carpenter asked if any other legislators supported the proposal — it was crickets — shutting down Guadrón's ask in the face of dozens of community members and activists who spoke for over two hours, mainly in support of the contract's termination. With the motion dead, ICE will get to keep training at the range until at least next June, when the contract is set to expire. After the long silence, chaos erupted and shouting broke out from many in the crowd, ending with activist Joshua Chan having to be dragged out by two cops after an emotional outburst to the motion failing. 'Angie, you're disgusting,' Chan screamed at the supervisor as he was being pulled away. Other crowd members started chanting 'shame,' while some approached the legislators and spoke their minds up close as they exited the Town Hall. But the GOP majority walked out of the meeting seemingly unfazed by the screams and insults being thrown at them. 3 ICE agents detain a person in Southhold, Long Island. WABC None of the members of the majority commented after the meeting, but later issued a joint statement. 'Those attempting to politicize this matter are unnecessarily causing more distrust of our law enforcement agencies, especially in communities that are already vulnerable and underreporting crimes,' Town of Islip officials wrote. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The safety and protection of all of our residents, despite race, religion or Country of origin — remains our utmost concern.' Guadrón defended his constituents' reaction and told reporters that the 'audience was beyond upset' with the 'the lack of human empathy' shown by the board. He added that he will continue speaking with fellow council members in hopes of ending the contract before next June and bringing the proposal back for a future vote.


Politico
5 minutes ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats signal they are poised to end redistricting walkout
'We're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts,' Texas House Democratic Caucus chair Gene Wu said in a statement. Democratic Texas state Rep. Gene Wu speaks during a press conference in Elmhurst, Ill., Friday, Aug. 8, 2025. | Paul Beaty/AP Photo By Andrew Howard 08/14/2025 03:01 PM EDT Texas Democrats gave their clearest signal yet on Thursday that they will soon return to the Lone Star state, after decamping to stop the passage of a redrawn congressional map that adds five new GOP-leaning seats. A statement from the state House Democratic Caucus said that the lawmakers will return on two conditions, both of which are expected this week. First, that the Texas Legislature ends its first special session on Friday, and second that California lawmakers introduce their expected proposal that could offset the GOP gains in Texas. 'Now, as Democrats across the nation join our fight to cause these maps to fail their political purpose, we're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts,' Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said in a statement.


CBS News
5 minutes ago
- CBS News
California Democrats announce redistricting effort to counter Texas GOP
California Democrats are preparing to counter Republicans' attempt to reshape a series of Texas congressional districts for political advantage in a back and forth that could define next year's midterm elections and with it, the final two years of President Trump's second term. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is set to make an announcement Thursday as national tensions rage over changing congressional lines mid-decade. Districts are usually redrawn after the decennial census. Newsom has vowed his state would respond after Texas Republicans released plans earlier this summer to redraw five seats held by Democrats and make them more favorable to the GOP. "California won't stand by and watch Trump burn it all down — we are calling a special election to redraw our Congressional maps and defend fair representation," Newsom said Thursday in a post on X ahead of his expected remarks. Newsom's team participated in a series of conversations with the state's Democratic congressional delegation and the California Legislature as drafts of possible maps were discussed. According to U.S. Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the conversations were initially centered on the question, "Is this even conceptually possible?" California Democrats concluded that it was possible to gain five Democratic seats to counter Texas' gains, according to Lofgren. "I'm confident that if we need to move forward, we will do that successfully. There's tremendous unity on the Democratic side." Republicans currently control both chambers of Congress and hold the White House. At the moment, if Democrats were to win back as few as three seats in next year's midterms, they could flip control of the House. That path would be threatened however if Republicans and Mr. Trump succeed in convincing GOP-led states like Texas, Indiana and Missouri to take some of their Democratic-held districts and alter them to favor Republicans instead. The potential developments in California Thursday come as Texas Republicans struggle to pass the maps that have become a national issue. Breakaway state House Democrats fled Texas earlier this month, denying the chamber the quorum it needed to take action on the new maps during a special legislative session. Since then, national Democrats have sought to call attention to what Republicans are trying to do in Texas, even as it's opened the left up to accusations of hypocrisy. During the standoff, some Texas Democrats have spoken out from Illinois, a blue state that was criticized for drawing its congressional maps after the 2020 Census to give Democrats the advantage. For both sides, the issue of congressional districts has become even more starkly partisan this summer. Various attempts have also been made in court to bring state House Democrats back to Texas, or to create a path that will help Republicans get their way. During a floor speech — before the maps passed the Texas Senate earlier this week in what amounted to a moot effort, given the House's obstacles — Republican Phil King bluntly said an objective of his "was to support a plan that, simply put, elects more Republicans to the U.S. Congress." With the special session in Texas set to end in just a few days, Republicans have been adamant about eventually passing the maps, even if it takes more time and special sessions. With Democratic power limited in the state, there is a sense that Republicans will eventually be able to get their way. But the situation has left an opening for Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, to create a new front in the political fight, given that Democrats may have a path to redrawing Republican-held congressional districts in the blue state of California. But California's effort will likely prove to be far more difficult and time intensive than the Republican-led push in Texas. In California, only nine of the state's 52 U.S. House districts are held by Republicans. Earlier this century, voters in the state signed off on putting in the state's constitution an independent citizens redistricting commission to decide new boundaries following the once a decade census process. The state-level differences between Democrat-led California and Republican-led-Texas essentially makes it harder for California Democrats to redraw districts in their state than it currently is for Texas Republicans. In Texas, GOP leaders and Mr. Trump allies just need to go through the normal legislative process to change districts. Because of California's constitution, changing the redistricting process in the state ahead of the 2026 midterms would likely require a new amendment. To take effect, it would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in both the Assembly and Senate, and then be approved by California voters in an election. That election could prove costly, with major implications for the country on the line. California lawmakers are scheduled to return to Sacramento on Aug. 18 amid the redistricting talk. The Legislature will have five days to conduct public hearings and formalize the process.