Trump criticises London mayor Khan again during UK visit
When asked if he planned to visit London in September, Trump confirmed his intention but took the opportunity to criticise Khan.
'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job,' Trump said. 'The Mayor of London... a nasty person.'
Starmer, standing beside Trump, quickly interjected, 'He's a friend of mine, actually.'
However, Trump doubled down, stating, 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.'
The tension between Trump and Khan is long-standing. Khan, a Labour Party member like Starmer, has been a vocal critic of Trump.
In January, ahead of Trump's return to the White House, Khan warned of the dangers posed by 'reactionary populists' in an article.
Their feud dates back to Trump's first term when Khan criticised the US travel ban on citizens from several Muslim-majority countries.
Trump retaliated by calling Khan a 'stone cold loser' and accusing him of mishandling terrorism.
In a podcast recorded before Trump's 2024 re-election, Khan suggested that Trump's hostility was racially motivated.
'He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion,' Khan said.
Despite their differences, Khan acknowledged the democratic process after Trump's victory, telling AFP in December that the American people had 'spoken loudly and clearly.'
Responding to Trump's latest remarks, a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world,' adding that Trump would see how London's diversity strengthens the city. - AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
New Zealand moves to end same-day registration, ban prisoner voting; attorney general warns of rights impact
WELLINGTON, July 29 — The New Zealand government today introduced a law that will prevent people from enrolling to vote on election day and bar prisoners from casting their ballot while in jail, in a move critics say could reduce voter participation. The proposed law, which passed its first of three readings in parliament on Tuesday, will allow people to enrol to vote only up to 13 days before an election. Currently potential voters can enrol up to and on election day. The law will also ban all prisoners from voting and require voting to open 12 days ahead of the official election day. 'This bill overhauls a number of outdated and unsustainable electoral laws. The package of amendments will strengthen the system, helping to deliver timely election results, manage the costs, clarify rules and provide more efficient services to voters,' said Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith, who proposed the bill. However, a report by Attorney General Judith Collins concluded that the bill 'appears to be inconsistent' with the country's Bill of Rights, including the right to freedom of expression and the right to vote. The changes are, in part, prompted by delays in results at the 2023 election, when it took nearly three weeks before an official result was released due to the high number of special votes. Special votes are cast by New Zealanders living or travelling overseas, voting outside their constituency or newly enrolled. The Attorney General's report, which was released publicly on Friday, said in the last election special votes included over 97,000 people who registered for the first time during the voting period, and nearly 134,000 people who changed electoral districts during the voting period. 'This gives some indication of the number of people who may be affected,' said Collins, who is a member of the ruling party. Duncan Webb, a lawmaker from the opposition Labour Party opposing the bill, on Tuesday called it 'a dark day for democracy'. 'Politicians should be making it easier for people to vote, not harder. It's how we make sure that everybody's voice is heard, that everyone gets a say,' he said. — Reuters
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Netherlands bans Israeli ministers over Gaza violence incitement
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands has barred two Israeli ministers from entering the country, accusing them of inciting violence and advocating ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir were declared persona non grata following their inflammatory remarks. Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp stated, 'They repeatedly incited settler violence against Palestinians, promoted illegal settlement expansion, and called for ethnic cleansing in Gaza.' The decision follows the Netherlands' earlier support for EU sanctions against the ministers, which failed to pass in June. Smotrich responded on social media, accusing European leaders of yielding to 'the lies of radical Islam' and rising antisemitism. Ben-Gvir dismissed the ban, vowing to continue advocating for Israel despite being unwelcome in Europe. The Dutch government emphasized its commitment to alleviating suffering in Gaza. Veldkamp noted that while airdrops of food aid are costly and risky, the Netherlands is exploring land-based aid delivery options. Humanitarian pauses announced by Israel have allowed limited aid to resume in Gaza, where famine conditions persist. A UN-backed report confirmed that famine thresholds have been breached, with over 20,000 children treated for acute malnutrition since April. Veldkamp warned that the Netherlands may push to suspend the EU-Israel trade agreement if Israel fails to meet humanitarian obligations. Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated the urgency of unfettered aid access for Gaza civilians. The conflict, triggered by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, has resulted in nearly 60,000 Palestinian deaths, according to Gaza's health ministry. - AFP
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Violent videos fuel terror plots among French teens, prosecutors warn
PARIS: French prosecutors have raised alarms over a growing trend of teenage boys allegedly plotting terror attacks, with many influenced by violent videos consumed online. Cases range from a 14-year-old planning to bomb an Israeli embassy to a 16-year-old convicted of plotting attacks on far-right bars. The National Anti-Terror Prosecutor's Office (PNAT) noted a sharp rise in minors charged with terror-related offences, from 15 in 2023 to 18 in 2024, with 11 cases already recorded by July this year. Most suspects are boys aged 13 to 18, often with no prior criminal history but described as introverted or from troubled family backgrounds. A judicial source told AFP that many of these teens consume violent content unrelated to terrorism, such as videos from Latin American cartels. 'They think they're proving themselves as men by watching them,' the source said. Sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar explained that adolescents in this age group seek recognition through violence, even if it means embracing negative role models. Social media algorithms play a significant role in accelerating radicalisation. Researcher Laurene Renaut highlighted how platforms like TikTok can quickly funnel users into extremist content. 'In less than three hours, you can find yourself in an algorithm bubble dedicated to the Islamic State,' she said. One convicted teen, motivated by a sense of injustice after watching footage of the 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks, told investigators his radicalisation began at 13 while playing Minecraft. He was later sentenced to four years in prison for planning attacks on far-right bars. Critics argue that France's legal system, which charges minors for associating with terrorist criminals, often imposes harsh penalties without clear evidence of radicalisation. Defence lawyers claim some cases involve little more than aggressive online statements rather than concrete threats. Despite interventions like therapy and social media bans, experts remain uncertain about long-term deradicalisation. 'We do not know if these youth could again be drawn in by extremist ideas,' a judicial source cautioned. - AFP
