Chatham-Kent council defers decision on possible encampment relocation
Residents of a Chatham-Kent homeless encampment will have to wait until next month to find out if they have to move again.
Municipal council voted to defer a decision that could relocate the encampment on the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) lands.
Councillors passed a motion at a special meeting Monday night to have staff prepare a report outlining which municipal properties homeless people could camp on if they had to stay up to 100 metres away from residential properties.
Staff will present options specific to the community of Chatham at council's August meeting and to the rest of the communities in the municipality in September.
"My reason for asking for this is just to make sure that we don't repeat what just happened," said Coun. Allyson Storey, referring to the outcry from neighbours of the PUC lands that precipitated Monday's special meeting.
"It is not an attempt to delay," Storey said.
Where else could campers go?
Many homeowners near the PUC lands say they were blindsided by the arrival of the campers approximately two weeks ago after the municipality broke up an encampment on the riverfront to make way for slope stabilization work.
They told councillors Monday they were angry at not having been consulted over decisions about where campers could move.
Storey's motion was a response to a motion by Mayor Darrin Canniff, which proposed amending Chatham-Kent's encampment protocol to prohibit camping within 100 metres of a residential property.
Currently, the proscribed distance is within 10 metres.
Storey said she wanted to know what options would be available to campers if the set-back radius was set at 25, 50 or 100 metres — and to give residents a chance to weigh in on any changes.
If council had passed Canniff's motion as moved, there would only be two places in all of Chatham where homeless people could camp, Bruce McAllister told councillors.
"It would be Thames Grove," said the municipality's general manager of development services.
"If you go to 100 metres, you could still accommodate at the very southeast corner of the property a number of tents there. … The other potential option is Paxton's Bush."
Councillors did adopt the remaining components of Canniff's motion, which laid out a number of measures aimed at eliminating homelessness and reducing complaints about encampments in the meantime.
Those steps include:
Requesting that staff prepare reports on options for delivering permanent supportive housing and more transitional cabins; identify properties that could be converted into supportive housing; and engage partner organizations such as mental health service providers to provide services in encampments.
Transitioning as many homeless people as possible into the municipality's new transitional cabins.
Continuing to work with R.O.C.K. (Reach Out Chatham-Kent) to house as many homeless people as possible.
Permitting only one tent per person in encampments and requiring all possessions to be kept inside tents except for bicycles and small structures for pets.
Hiring additional bylaw officers to enforce bylaws in encampments.
Having police install CCTV cameras as needed at their discretion.
Beginning regular communication with residents in the area around the PUC property.
Councillors did not consider a motion put forward by Coun. Michael Bondy, which would've required campers to dismantle their campsites and disperse during daytime hours.
The four-hour meeting opened with 17 delegations from neighbours of the encampment and advocates for homeless people.
Some residents expressed concern about their property values and spoke of feeling unsafe in their neighbourhoods.
They complained of garbage, vandalism and attempted break-ins.
"When it was announced that the homeless population of Chatham would be relocated to the waterworks facilities, many teams decided they would no longer practice at that location," said John Foster, president of the Chatham Soccer Club.
"Many parents are concerned with their children using a facility with such close proximity to possible drug use exposure, drug paraphernalia hazards, lewd behaviour ... including going to the washroom in public fully exposed."
But some residents also said they wanted better solutions than to simply move the encampment to another neighbourhood.
Larry Hutchins called for increased policing, 24-hour security and regular reports about addressing neighbourhood concerns.
Advocates for the homeless, meanwhile, urged residents to view homeless individuals as members of their community who have had to resort to camping in public spaces because of systemic failures to address poverty, mental health issues and addiction.
The general manager of Chatham Hope Haven said many of her clients live in the encampment, and they don't like it any more than their neighbours do because they are farther from the services they need for survival.
It's absurd to think that moving them will help, Loree Bailey said.
"I get being angry," she said.
"I'm really angry too. I'm angry at every single system that these folks rely on to live being broken."
Priest and soup kitchen volunteer Michael Bolohan urged the community to go beyond managing the housing crisis to experiencing what he called a "conversion of heart."
"The ego driven part of us, obsessed with control, comfort and certainty, will always resist the presence of those who disrupt our illusions of safety and prosperity," he said.
"Encampments do just that. They confront us with the failure of our systems, fragility of human life, and the lie that success and worth is the same thing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
28 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
CSIS warns threats from Iran in Canada could increase this year, and it is using criminals to target critics
Canada's spy agency is warning that threats from Iran's theocratic regime could increase this year and Tehran will continue to use members of criminal gangs to target its critics in Canada. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service told The Globe this week it is investigating death threats in Canada orchestrated by the republic of Iran. And depending on developments in the Middle East, such threats could escalate here, CSIS cautioned. The spy agency issued its warning after it emerged that two Canadian journalists working for a London-based Persian news outlet have faced threats from Iran. One was told repeatedly they would be abducted, placed in a bag and smuggled out of the country if they did not stop reporting. Lawyers acting for the news outlet, Iran International, have asked experts at the United Nations to intervene with the regime urgently after death and abduction threats to its journalists and their families escalated in the past six weeks. Ottawa strengthens vetting after officials failed to pass on new human-rights chief's alias to RCMP, CSIS CSIS warns 'extremist actors' rhetoric around Israel-Hamas war could lead to violence The escalation coincided with the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites and Israel's offensive, which killed dozens of Iranian senior security officials and nuclear scientists. In a statement, CSIS warned that the level of threat posed in Canada by people acting on the Iranian regime's behalf could be influenced by the situation in the Middle East. 'CSIS continues to investigate threats to life emanating from the Islamic Republic of Iran. Given the need to protect our sources, tradecraft, and methods however, we cannot confirm or deny specific investigative details,' said CSIS spokesperson Magali Hébert in a statement. 'CSIS assesses that Iran will continue to use proxies, such as individuals involved with transnational organized crime networks, when it targets perceived enemies living in foreign countries, including Canada.' 'Iranian threat-related activities directed at Canada and its allies are likely to continue in 2025, and may increase depending on developments in the Middle East and the Iranian regime's own threat perceptions,' it added. An alleged plot by agents of Iran to assassinate former justice minister Irwin Cotler was foiled, the RCMP told him last year. The lawyer and founder of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, who has supported dissidents targeted by Tehran, remains on Iran's hit list and has 24-hour police protection. Lawyers acting for Iran International earlier this week asked five experts at the UN to intervene with the Iranian regime over threats to its journalists and their families, including two in Canada. It appealed to the UN experts to take action to protect the safety of journalists in seven countries: Canada, Britain, the U.S., Sweden, Germany, Turkey and Belgium. The appeal was lodged with five UN special rapporteurs, including Professor Ben Saul, UN special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, and Irene Khan, UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression. Carlos Nagore Diaz, a spokesman for Ms. Khan, said in an e-mail that 'several UN Special Rapporteurs are considering taking urgent action on the renewed credible threats to life,' but any communications with the Iranian regime are currently confidential. 'The Special Rapporteur has consistently raised concerns about threats to reporters working for Iran international and will continue to do so,' he said. Last year, a group of UN rapporteurs, including Ms. Khan and Mr. Saul, wrote to leaders of Iran's regime expressing concerns about threats to journalists working for Persian language outlets abroad including Iran International. Founded in 2017, it has become the most-watched Persian language TV channel in and outside Iran on satellite and online platforms. Headquartered in London, with bureaus in 14 countries, its reporting is often critical of Tehran's theocratic regime. The rapporteurs' May 2024 letter alleged that the Islamic Republic of Iran was directly, and through proxies, menacing journalists working for Iran International as well as their family members in Iran. 'We note that acts and threats of violence, and other measures of intimidation and harassment by the Iranian authorities or its proxies against persons in the United Kingdom and other states, may amount to violations of the sovereignty of those states,' the letter said. It detailed how in March last year Iran International journalist Pouria Zeraati was stabbed in the legs by two assailants outside his home in Wimbledon, London. Two Romanian nationals were subsequently charged with the attack. In its reply to the UN experts' letter, Iran's permanent representation to the UN, rejected 'allegations made about the threats or kidnapping plans' against journalists working for news outlets such as Iran International, whom it referred to as 'agents.' 'To the Islamic Republic of Iran, this anti-Iranian Network and its operatives are terrorists, they will be dealt with according to the relevant laws and will be tried in a fair court, as the case against some agents of this network is being processed,' the letter said. Adam Baillie, spokesman for Iran International, said 'the idea of there being such a thing as a fair trial in Iran under the current regime is an absurdity.' 'The allegations about us being terrorists are ridiculous. We are journalists doing our job and we should be doing it from within Iran itself,' he said. 'Furthermore you should not underestimate the level of threat, both in scale and nature, to journalists working for our channel, including in Canada.' Last week, Canada joined a group of countries including Britain, the U.S., France, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark, to publicly condemn a growing number of threats from Iranian intelligence services on their soil. The joint statement, issued by the British foreign office, said Iranian intelligence operatives were increasingly collaborating with international criminal organizations to target journalists, dissidents and others.
CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Cowichan regional district urges B.C. to intervene on 6-month transit strike, citing toll on most vulnerable
More than six months into what is believed to be the longest transit strike in B.C.'s history, the Cowichan Valley Regional District (CVRD) is asking the province to help resolve the dispute for the sake of locals, who are paying a steep price due to a lack of public transit. In a letter to B.C.'s Labour Minister Jennifer Whiteside on Friday, CVRD Board of Directors chair Kate Segall called for the province to "explore all appropriate means of supporting a resolution," such as encouraging options like a voluntary cooling-off period or binding arbitration. "This labour dispute between B.C. Transit's contractor – Transdev Canada – and their unionized employees is disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable people in our communities," she said in a statement. Examples of the hardship, as described by the CVRD, include a family with seven children in the isolated community of Honeymoon Bay, with no transportation to access healthcare for their serious health conditions. Then there's the Shawnigan lake family facing high travel costs to commute to adult education and apprenticeship programs, putting their professional development at risk, says the district. People have also messaged the CVRD to share that they've lost jobs, faced barriers to accessing food security programs, struggled with isolation, and taken on the risk of hitchhiking since the strike began in February. Segall says B.C.'s "leadership and influence" could help bring Transdev and Unifor, the union representing the transit workers, closer to an agreement. Minister Whiteside was not available for an interview with CBC News on Friday. In a statement, the Ministry of Labour said it is reviewing the situation to determine how to support a resolution. Transit workers voted on Aug. 7. to reject a proposed binding-arbitration process, following a vote in July to reject recommendations from a provincially appointed mediator to resolve the strike. The union members also voted against a potential deal in April. Transdev's senior vice president for western Canada, Emily Watson, expressed disappointment in the decision to reject the arbitration process. "Transdev and Unifor representatives mutually agreed to an arbitrator and binding arbitration dates that would have seen a return-to-work plan commence immediately and a full resumption of service in late August," she said in a statement. "The fact that it has been rejected by union members on August 7th, along with the previous mediator's recommendations, is a disservice to the community." Union wants help from municipalities Gavin Davies, a national representative for Unifor, said members were concerned that arbitration would not address the root cause of their concerns around wages, bathroom access, and bathroom breaks. "One of their fears is, we've been out on strike for six months, [if] we go back to work with no commitment to address these issues then we're back out on strike in a year-and-a -half from now," said Davies, who said workers have lost half a year's wages for the job action. To end the strike, Davies says some of the issues go beyond what Transdev is able to address. Transit workers want to see commitments from the CVRD, B.C. Transit, and municipalities to meet with the union and Transdev in order to work on a resolution to the issues around bathroom access and breaks, he said. When asked if he sees an end in sight for the strike, Davies said, "not until these parties step up to the plate." He says that drivers are aware of the impact this strike has had on the community, with some coming to tears over it. "We truly are sorry for the hardship – and sorry doesn't cut it to somebody who's lost their job or can't get to the grocery store, can't pick up their medications," Davies said. "I know that sorry falls far short, but it's the only thing that we can say." Segall, North Cowichan Mayor Rob Douglas, and Duncan Mayor Michelle Staples were not available to comment on whether they would commit to meeting with the union and Transdev to help resolve the strike. B.C. Transit spokesperson Jamie Weiss said in a statement that while street infrastructure is the responsibility of local governments, it has worked to jointly fund and build washrooms for transit employees in several other communities. "With regards to washroom access for Operators in the Cowichan Valley, B.C. Transit has engaged with Transdev Canada, our local government partners and others in the past to support a resolution," he wrote. "B.C. Transit will not interfere with the collective bargaining process, but our organization will continue to support ongoing communications around this issue."
Montreal Gazette
an hour ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Maybe it's time to hit pause on our dizzying dance with Trump
I remember as a kid frenetically chasing after a rubber Superball as it bounced around, careening off everything, not knowing where it would bounce next, constantly out of reach. That's what it must feel like to deal with Donald Trump and try to figure out a way to pin down a complicated trade agreement, of all things. International trade, commerce and business need economic stability and predictability. In Canada's history, we've never had to face such a wild card U.S. presidency and been forced to navigate as volatile a relationship with our largest trading partner. Every day seems to bring a different turn. The goalposts seem to move whenever a new idea or insult pops into Trump's head — which he broadcasts on social media — surprising our politicians. There's often no common-sense rationale with Trump. It's dizzying, infuriating and in many ways surreal. One day his chiding of Canada could be related to fentanyl, the next illegal immigrants or imaginary trade imbalances. Perhaps disdain due to slights by our former prime minister still lingers, or maybe current PM Mark Carey hasn't been flattering enough. Who knows? Many Canadians boldly want to see an 'elbows up' approach of defiance. But let's face it — economically we're at the mercy of our much bigger U.S. neighbour. Particularly with this president, as with most bullies or egomaniacs, any attempt at fighting back is likely to backfire. When Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to impose a 25-per-cent surcharge on electricity exports to three U.S. states, Trump roared, threatening a 50-per-cent retaliatory tariff the next day, causing Ford to meekly scurry backwards. Trump's flunky, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said '(Trump) needed to break some guy in Ontario who said he was going to tax American energy.' Lutnick himself often looks foolish, talking in a vacuum without any idea what his boss might decide the next day. Our politicians don't seem to have any game plan or know how to handle this, as they have no idea what to expect next. Federal ministers Dominic LeBlanc, François-Philippe Champagne, Anita Anand and Mélanie Joly seem to be running like hamsters on a wheel. You also get the sense Carney is constantly biting his tongue to avoid criticizing the president, knowing it could boomerang. Last week, not having reached a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline, Trump raised the tariff rate from 25 to 35 per cent on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, again evoking Canada's failure to control the 'ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs.' Fentanyl seizures from Canada are less than 0.1 per cent of total U.S. seizures of the drug, but facts are irrelevant in this alternate reality. Perhaps it's time our federal government just went back to governing and stopped this dance. The more we dance, the more Trump will make us dance. If a deal is struck, fine — but patience may be a more sensible approach than scrambling for a deal, any deal. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington is soon expected to rule on whether Trump's tariffs are even legal under the Constitution, which grants Congress powers over trade. Trump has circumvented this by claiming he can use presidential emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, something the judges hearing the case have skeptically questioned. Also, the cost impact of tariffs — the higher wages to American workers to produce goods and materials in the U.S., rather than importing at a lower price — presumably will soon start hitting Americans in their wallets. Only if Americans wake up and start questioning Trump's policies will he likely blink. Maybe it's time to stop chasing the ball for now and let the courts and other economic indicators shape the narrative. Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, mayor of Côte-St-Luc and a member of the Montreal executive committee. He was a Conservative candidate in the 2015 federal election.
