
SPPS Board of Education to vote on cell phone policy Tuesday
The St. Paul Public Schools board will vote Tuesday on a cell phone policy it spent the fall drafting.
Districts across the state are adopting district-wide policies on cellphone use since the Legislature mandated them last April. The deadline for districts to set school board-approved policies is March 15.
SPPS's policy draft to be presented to the board states that the use of personal electronic devices will not be permitted during school hours and must either remain at home, in lockers or turned off and put away. That includes cell phones, tablets, laptops, smart watches, gaming systems and earbuds.
In addition to some exceptions — such as students with medical conditions requiring monitoring, students with individual education plans, students who are parents or those working as first responders — schools can develop their own documented plans with school stakeholders for grades 9 and above that must be reviewed annually.
Schools could then decide for those grade levels to allow cell phone use before and after school, between class periods or during lunch, but must have an objective of reducing their use. Electronic devices still would not be permitted during class periods, in bathrooms or in locker rooms.
Parents and guardians also are asked to limit calling or texting their children and students are asked to review their school's policies.
As part of the April legislation, a best practices guide called 'The Cell Phone Toolkit' was developed by the Minnesota Elementary School Principals Association and the Minnesota Association of Secondary School Principals and released in July.
Those guidelines recommend no cellphone use during the academic day for elementary and middle schoolers and no use — except perhaps during passing time and lunch — for high schoolers.
Much of the change is putting cell phone policies at the district level.
'One of the things that we started with in planning was, where do we currently stand?' said Jodi Danielson, SPPS director of schools and learning and facilitator of the district's cell phone policy workgroup. 'What's currently happening in our schools? And we found that many of our schools are already doing something very similar to what is in this language already. There may be some slight modifications, but I think that for the most part, the next step for schools is going to be to clearly communicate any changes that their students will be experiencing,'
The majority of SPPS schools already do not allow the use of cell phones during the entire school day, according to the district's summary of its policy planning report.
While no SPPS elementary schools allow cell phone use during the school day and most middle schools don't allow their use either, that changes at the high school level. For the majority of high schools, some use of cell phones, such as during lunch, is permitted.
'School teams should take a positive, preventative, educational and restorative approach to personal electronic device use, creating clear and consistent expectations for use,' the draft policy states.
According to the policy, staff will refer to the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook when responding to policy violations. This can include students losing the privilege to bring devices such as cell phones to school.
Consequences cannot exclude students from learning, should include teaching expected behavior and 'repairing harm caused and using interventions that are the least severe disciplinary response that is appropriate,' as well be consistently applied, according to the draft.
In the months leading up to the March 15 deadline, the SPPS workgroup Danielson facilitates led student and staff focus groups, sent out surveys to staff, families and 6th to 12th grade students, held a student roundtable with state senators and met with each of the district's eight Parent Advisory Councils. That outreach informed what the draft looks like, Danielson said.
In total, more than 10,500 people responded to the surveys, including close to 4,000 students, though response rates for students, staff and families each hovered around 20%.
The first reading of the draft policy was made to the board Dec. 19, with the second reading at its Jan. 21 meeting. It will be discussed again Tuesday in accordance with district policy before it can be approved with a majority vote.
'I do think, once the policy is adopted, then the next steps will be to plan for implementation throughout the spring and summer. And so, we'll then move to, throughout this spring, 'What do schools need in order to implement the policy effectively in September?' And I think those require ongoing conversations and kind of a planning team to prepare for that work,' Danielson said.
If approved by the board, implementation of the new district-wide policy begins Sept. 2.
See the full policy draft available on the SPPS website by going to spps.org/about/board-of-education/2025-meeting-materials. The draft can be found by going to the Board of Education section and selecting the Feb. 18 BoardBook.
Education | St. Paul, other big districts cancel Tuesday classes because of cold weather
Education | St. Paul Public Schools cancels school, after-school activities Tuesday due to weather
Education | Confirmed case of pertussis/whooping cough in St. Paul school district
Education | St. Paul Public Schools begins open house tours before priority enrollment deadline
Education | Joe Soucheray: Don't dissolve into a sea of acolytes and school district bureaucracy, Stacie Stanley

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas bill allocates $13M for animal spay and neutering services
The Brief The budget passed by the Texas Legislature allocates $13 million to a pilot program to spay and neuter cats and dogs. Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to approve this funding. This builds off of recently passed legislation, Senate Bill 1568, which created specialty license plates to fund animal sterilization. Texas lawmakers passed a budget that sets aside $13 million for animal spaying and neutering services in order to limit the spread of infectious diseases. If approved by the governor, the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) would lead a statewide pilot program over the next two years. What we know The program was created in an effort to reduce the prevalence of infectious diseases such as rabies, toxoplasmosis, and leptospirosis. These diseases, which can be transferred from animals to humans, can cause adverse side effects in people. What they're saying Shelby Bobosky, executive director of the Texas Humane Legislation Network (TLHN), said the pilot program is a crucial step forward in protecting both animals and people. "Shelters, veterinarians, and local communities have long struggled with limited resources to manage stray and feral animal populations," she said. "This funding is not only indispensable, but it also reflects a clear understanding by the Legislature that animal welfare is a vital part of our public health infrastructure." Bobosky believes the effort will help to tackle Texas' pet overpopulation problem while working to improve community health. The backstory The pilot program is a continuation of previous legislation the TLHN led: Senate Bill 1568, which passed on May 24, 2025. This bill, authored by State Senator Judith Zaffirini, a Democrat from South Texas, created specialty license plates to promote public participation in animal sterilization. The new license plates would include the phrase "Spray. Neuter. Adopt." The sales of this license plate would support the Animal Friendly Account to help fund programs and organizations that support animal sterilization in order to reduce stray populations. What's next If signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott, the DSHS will begin forming the plans and procedures to implement the pilot program over the upcoming months. The TLHN plans to work with animal shelters, veterinary professionals, rescue organizations, and local municipalities to collect feedback to share with the DSHS. The Source This information was gathered from Texas Policy Research, as well as a news release sent by the Texas Humane Legislation Network.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
House won't override DeSantis' ‘free kill' repeal veto
A trio of flashing billboards less than two miles from the Florida Capitol is slamming Gov. Ron DeSantis for vetoing the "free kill" bill on medical malpractice. (Photo credit: Christine Sexton/Florida Phoenix) House Speaker Daniel Perez said Thursday the chamber will try again next year to pass a repeal of the 'free kill' statute following Gov. Ron DeSantis' veto of the proposal. DeSantis on May 29 vetoed the Legislature's attempt to remove the bar on parents of adult children and the adult children of single parents from suing hospitals and physicians for non-economic damages for the deaths of loved ones. The governor said repealing 'free kill' would increase health care costs for Floridians and make it harder to keep physicians in the state. 'Of course, the governor has in his right the power to veto this bill, and he chose to do so,' Perez told reporters. 'I disagree with the veto, and we will be bringing that bill back next year for a continued conversation.' Lawmakers passed HB 6017 with bipartisan support. Repealing the ban on suits to recover non-economic damages is one of the perennial arguments in Tallahassee, as business interests and medical groups oppose the move. Perez said he remains opposed to placing caps on the pain-and-suffering damages, which is something that DeSantis said could make him support the repeal in the future, along with caps on attorneys' fees. The family members barred from suing for pain-and-suffering damages can recover economic damages, such as lost wages, medical bills, and funeral costs. 'I don't think that we should determine how much a person's life is worth when someone negligently ended it,' Perez said. The Senate also rejected a bid to cap the damages at $1 million on April 30. Florida, for now, remains the only state banning the recovery of pain-and-suffering damages for parents of adult children and adult children of single parents. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


E&E News
4 days ago
- E&E News
Texas legislators bury prison cooling bill, risking court fight
Texas lawmakers ended the state's most recent legislative session without advancing a plan to install air conditioning in the state's prison system — likely putting Texas on a collision course with a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit by prisoners. Texas runs the nation's largest state prison system — with about 140,000 inmates — but only about a third of the beds are air conditioned. Temperatures inside the prisons regularly exceed 100 degrees in the summer, and researchers estimate that heat contributed to the deaths of 14 inmates annually in Texas from 2001 to 2019. The Republican-controlled Legislature has tried to address the issue in its past three sessions, but this year lawmakers were under increased scrutiny because of a preliminary ruling in an inmates' lawsuit. Advertisement U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled in March that the conditions are 'plainly unconstitutional' but stopped short of issuing an injunction on behalf of a group of inmates. He noted at the time there were bills pending in the Legislature to provide air conditioning and said a court order would divert resources that could be better spent fixing the problem.