How Warren Buffett made $13 billion while others bled
In 2025's turbulent market, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway thrived by holding substantial cash reserves. While tech giants suffered losses, Buffett's strategy of exiting the 2024 bull market and investing in safe US Treasury Bills yielded significant returns. His approach, characterized by patience and a focus on value, contrasts sharply with chasing fleeting trends.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
But how? What did he do differently? More importantly, what can you learn from it?
Let's break it down.
'How's the market bloodbath feeling?' a friend casually asked.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Buffett's Secret? Doing Nothing!
Popular in Markets
And then?
But Why Did Buffett Sell?
1. Valuations Were Too High
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
2. The Return of Trump & Tariffs
3. No Good Deals
Let's rewind.
In 1999, as dot-com mania soared, Buffett didn't join the frenzy. He waited for the crash—and then bought.
In 2008, during the financial crisis, he moved fast—bailing out Goldman Sachs and GE through strategic investments.
In 2020, during the COVID crash, he was cautious—not because he lacked funds, but because the opportunities weren't juicy enough.
The Power of Cash
It gives you:
The freedom to wait.
The clarity to ignore hype.
The firepower to strike when prices crash.
Lessons From the Oracle of Omaha
Restraint is a superpower
You don't need a billion-dollar portfolio to invest like Buffett. Just the ability to wait.
Don't overpay for hype
'It's better to buy a great company at a fair price than a fair company at a great price.' That's Buffett's mantra.
Cash is underrated
Whether you're eyeing stocks, real estate, or mangoes at your sabzi mandi, cash gives you options. You can walk away when the price is too high—and come back when it's fair.
Act when fear returns
Buffett is already investing again—this time, in undervalued Japanese stocks. And he'll keep doing what he's always done—buy value when others are running scared.
Final Thoughts: What Can You Do?
Build a little emergency fund—not just for emergencies but for opportunities.
Stay calm when the markets turn red.
Tune out the hype. Tune into value.
Don't fear sitting on cash if nothing looks good.
Be ready. Because when others panic, that's your time to pounce.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
In 2025, as market chaos wiped billions off net worths, Warren Buffett calmly added $13 billion to his wealth . While tech billionaires like Elon Musk Jeff Bezos , and Mark Zuckerberg watched their portfolios shrink, Buffett sat back—likely sipping a Cherry Coke—and watched his cash pile do all the work.It's a valid question. With markets correcting sharply in 2025, many investors were scrambling. But those who had prepared—like Buffett—were just sitting tight.And if there was ever a time to feel part of the Buffett tribe, this was it.While others were riding the euphoric highs of 2024's bull market, Buffett was quietly exiting. Berkshire Hathaway sold a staggering $134 billion worth of equities.He didn't chase the AI wave. Didn't bet on crypto. Didn't initiate buybacks or jump into hot IPOs.Instead, he took all that money and parked it into boring but safe US Treasury Bills—earning about 5% annually. That's more than $14 billion in interest income a year for just sitting on the sidelines.As of now, Berkshire holds $330 billion in cash, with a majority in short-term Treasuries. To put that in perspective, that's more than the combined market value of Starbucks, Ford, and Zoom.This wasn't random. This was classic Buffett.Buffett is obsessed with buying quality at a fair price. Not at any price. And in 2024, he saw the market soaring beyond reason.His favorite warning signal—the Buffett Indicator (Total Market Cap to GDP)—had breached 200%, a level he once called 'playing with fire.'Historically, such levels preceded major market crashes. The last time this ratio peaked so high was just before the dot-com bubble burst in 2000 and the Great Financial Crisis in 2008.Another red flag? The S&P 500's price-to-book ratio, which hit levels not seen since the late '90s—another period of overvaluation.With Trump's return to power came talk of tariffs. Again.Buffett has previously likened tariffs to economic warfare. And Berkshire doesn't make bold moves when the world is on the verge of a trade war. Instead, Buffett's rule is simple: Don't lose money.Despite all that cash, Buffett didn't go on an acquisition spree. Why? Everything was just too expensive. The valuations didn't justify action. So, he stayed patient.And that patience paid off.This Isn't Buffett's First RodeoBuffett has always done the opposite of the crowd. When others get greedy, he becomes fearful. And when others panic, he gets greedy.Cash isn't just protection. It's power.While markets panicked in 2025, Buffett wasn't scrambling to sell. If prices fell further, he'd buy. If not, he'd collect interest. Win-win.Also, Berkshire's massive cash pile may also be part of a succession strategy. At 94, Buffett has already handed the reins to Greg Abel. That war chest? It's not just a defensive shield. It's a loaded gun for the next leader—ready to strike when the time is right.You don't have to be Warren Buffett. But you can learn from him.So, how's the market bloodbath feeling to you?If you've been playing it smart, pat yourself on the back. And if not, maybe now's a good time to build that war chest.Because when the next big opportunity comes, you'll want to be ready—not just with(The author Chakrivardhan Kuppala is Cofounder & Executive Director, Prime Wealth Finserv. Views are own)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Conditioning a cool behavioural move
Agencies In a warming India, ACs are a necessity. Yet, only about 7% of households own one. That's changing fast. 14 mn units were sold last year alone, and residential ownership is projected to grow 9x by mid-century. This surge could require tripling electricity production. But before that, the grid needs protection. In a welcome step, GoI announced on Tuesday that it plans to soon mandate temperature settings between 20° C and 28° C for all ACs - residential, commercial, and even those in vehicles. The move aims to improve energy efficiency, smooth out demand spikes and cut consumer power bills. Many ACs allow settings as low as 16° C and as high as 30° C, encouraging energy 2050, air conditioning could account for a quarter of India's GHG emissions and nearly half of nationwide peak electricity demand, according to UNEP's Cool Coalition. Yet, India has so far declined to sign the coalition's Global Cooling Pledge, which seeks to reduce the sector's climate impact. There is, however, some good news. Consumers are increasingly opting for energy-efficient, star-rated ACs. But high prices remain a significant barrier, especially for lower- and middle-income buyers. A CEEW report, 'Do Residential AC Buyers Prioritise Energy Efficiency?', recommends measures like tax breaks, bulk procurement and cross-brand incentive programmes to improve affordability and encourage wider adoption. The report also highlights another crucial, but often overlooked, factor: good servicing practices (GSPs). Buying an energy-efficient AC is not enough. Without regular servicing, performance declines over the unit's 7-10-year lifespan, undermining expected energy and cost savings. To promote GSPs, awareness campaigns must stress their impact on efficiency. Without this behavioural nudge, tech and policy efforts may not deliver their full potential. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Benchmarked with BSE 1000, this index fund will diversify your bets. But at a cost. Yet another battle over neem; this time it's a startup vs. Procter & Gamble Warren Buffett-fan Pabrai is betting big on Edelweiss' Rashesh Shah. Will it pay off? Move over tariffs, China wields rare earths in an economic war of a different kind Stock Radar: MGL trades above upwards sloping trendline, reclaims 100-EMA; check target & stop loss F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Spread in GAIL to play a bullish bet These 7 banking stocks can give more than 20% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Being an Amul shareholder is not possible; the next best dairy sector bets: 4 stocks, different market caps, upside potential is incidental
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk supports world's richest investor Warren Buffett's 5-minute plan to erase America's deficit, shares emoji
Warren Buffett The U.S. government has been grappling with persistent budget deficits, spending far more than it collects in revenue year after year. Despite efforts from both political parties, the national debt has ballooned to $33.8 trillion as of June 2025, with no clear end in sight. Amid this fiscal crisis, a radical idea from legendary investor Warren Buffett is gaining renewed attention and high-profile support. In a 2011 CNBC interview, Buffett proposed a strikingly simple solution to curb runaway deficits: 'I could end the deficit in five minutes. You just pass a law that says that any time there's a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.' The resurfaced clip has gone viral, sparking a heated debate about accountability in Washington. Tesla CEO Elon Musk responds with emoji Utah Senator Mike Lee amplified the idea by reposting the video on X, asking, 'Would you support this amendment?' The post ignited a firestorm of responses, including a resounding endorsement from Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk, who wrote, '100%. This is the way.' Other prominent voices, including economist Peter Schiff, chimed in, tweeting, 'Buffett's plan is brutal but brilliant. Congress would finally feel the heat of their own fiscal mess.' Lee isn't just stirring the pot online—he's taking action. 'I'm drafting a constitutional amendment to oust every member of Congress whenever inflation exceeds 3%. It's better to disqualify politicians than for an entire nation to suffer under the yoke of inflation,' he wrote on X. Lee's proposal tweaks Buffett's original idea, tying congressional eligibility to inflation rather than deficits, though both metrics are closely linked to government spending. US economy in tough place The U.S. fiscal situation paints a grim picture. In fiscal 2024, the U.S. economy generated $28.83 trillion in GDP, while federal spending reached $6.75 trillion against $4.92 trillion in revenue, resulting in a $1.83 trillion deficit—6.3% of GDP, double Buffett's proposed threshold. The Congressional Budget Office projects deficits will climb to $2.6 trillion by 2034, driven by rising interest payments on the national debt, now costing over $1 trillion annually. Economists have long warned about the link between deficits and inflation. Nobel laureate Milton Friedman famously argued, 'What produces [inflation] is too much government spending and too much government creation of money and nothing else.' Recent data supports this: inflation hit 3.2% in 2024, above the Federal Reserve's 2% target, fueled partly by expansive fiscal policies. The M2 money supply, a key driver of inflation, grew by 6% in 2024, according to Federal Reserve reports, reflecting continued monetary expansion. Warren Buffet and Mike Lee proposal aims to fix responsibility Buffett's and Lee's proposals aim to force accountability by tying lawmakers' jobs to economic outcomes. However, passing a constitutional amendment is a daunting task, requiring two-thirds approval in both the House and Senate and ratification by 38 states. Critics argue the plan could backfire. 'Kicking out every member of Congress during a deficit spike could paralyze governance and lead to inexperienced replacements,' said political analyst Sarah Klein in a recent Washington Post op-ed. Others note that deficits often surge during crises—like pandemics or recessions—when spending is necessary, potentially punishing lawmakers for unavoidable decisions. Supporters counter that the threat of mass ousting would incentivize fiscal discipline. 'Congress has no skin in the game,' tweeted economist Nouriel Roubini. 'Buffett's idea flips that script.' Public sentiment on X leans heavily in favor, with polls showing 68% of 12,000 respondents supporting Lee's amendment. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Liquor excise duty hiked to cover last fiscal losses?
Nagpur: The state government may have approved a hike in excise duty on liquor with an eye on raising an additional ₹14,000 crore, but data reveals that the excise department failed to meet its revenue target in the last fiscal year in Nagpur. The excise department collected over ₹825 crore during the financial year ending March 2025, which was more than 20% below the target. Collections across the entire Nagpur division — which includes Gondia, Bhandara, and Chandrapur districts in addition to Nagpur — also fell short. The total mop-up in the division stood at ₹872 crore, missing the target by 20%. In the first two months of the current financial year, the department has collected ₹111 crore. The revenue target for Nagpur district has been set at ₹1,051 crore. Based on a monthly break-up, the excise department needs to collect around ₹175 crore per month to meet the target. The current mop-up stands at 63% below the required mark. In FY 2024-25, over 4.7 crore litres of liquor were produced by various entities in the district. Country liquor accounted for the majority at 3.8 crore litres, followed by 40 lakh litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL), and over 50 lakh litres of beer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo While production of country liquor and beer remained as expected, IMFL production declined by 6.4 lakh litres, which sources attributed as one of the primary reasons for the revenue shortfall. Sources said that despite a year-on-year increase in actual collections, the targets could not be achieved. The collections include both excise duty and licence renewal fees paid by vendors. Excise duty is levied at the manufacturing stage and passed on to wholesalers and retailers. The government had fixed the revenue target, anticipating an increase in production, particularly of IMFL, which did not materialise. Production in Nagpur remains significantly lower compared to other centres in the state. The department is now awaiting the final government resolution (GR) on the excise duty hike, after which the revised rates will apply to fresh batches of production.
