Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion
Millions of UK homes are still being supplied with electricity from a nuclear power station fuelled by Russian imports.
The Mirror can reveal that Sizewell B in Suffolk continues to use imported uranium from Russia - three years after President Vladimir Putin 's deadly invasion of Ukraine. It comes despite French owner EDF previously indicating it would switch to an alternative source. The company has admitted it could take another three years to end its use of Russian uranium.
The discovery comes as the UK government has thrown its weight behind nuclear to help power the UK in the future, partly in an effort to reduce the country's reliance on imports in the wake of Russia's war, which has led to household energy bills soaring. Last week saw the go-ahead given for Sizewell C, a new £38billion nuclear plant that will sit alongside the existing station on the Suffolk coast.
Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire, said: 'It is incredibly concerning that EDF is still using Russian uranium, despite indicating that they were going to look for an alternative source. Three years on from Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, this is simply unacceptable.
'The Government should do everything in its power to ensure that no UK company is using uranium, liquefied natural gas or any other resources from Russia - and they should also urgently look to address the use of Russian uranium at Sizewell B. The UK must close every possible avenue that could be used to fund Putin's imperialism.'
Dr David Lowry, a former member of the independent advisory panel for the Chief UK Nuclear Safety and Security Inspector and a nuclear policy consultant, said: 'It is sheer hypocrisy for energy ministers to say we need new nuclear to stop being dependent on imported Russian energy, when our biggest and newest nuclear plant is fully fuelled by Putin's uranium.'
Sizewell B is the UK's newest existing nuclear power station, despite having been completed 30 years ago. It has an operating pressurised water reactor, capable of supplying 2.5 million homes, or around 3% of the UK's entire electricity needs.
The plant uses enriched reprocessed uranium sourced from Russia by EDF's fuel supplier Framatome. Sources say Sizewell B is unique in the UK and that Russia is home to the only facility in the world which can prepare the required material.
EDF says it has the potential to generate for at least a further 20 years beyond its current end of generation date of 2035.
Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, claimed the limited sources for uranium called into question the rationale for backing nuclear. "It is a major stumbling block," she said.
Estimates vary on how much money Russia is raking from uranium exports. The Royal United Services Institute has pointed to a range of sources showing $2.7billion (£2billion) of enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2023.
An EDF spokesperson said: 'EDF remains in full compliance with all sanctions placed by the EU, UK and French Governments, regarding business with Russia. We have removed Russian input to the nuclear fuel supply chain for all UK plants except Sizewell B, due to long term commitments struck years before Russia invaded Ukraine.
'The fuel assemblies we load into our reactor come from our fuel supplier, Framatome, from a facility in western Europe, and the aim is to remove all Russian involvement from Sizewell B's fuel supply chain by 2028. EDF continues to work closely with UK companies, and the government, to create facilities which will be central to the future of the UK and Europe's long term energy infrastructure.'
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'While the procurement of nuclear fuel, including uranium and enrichment services, is a commercial matter for operators, we have committed to prevent the import of nuclear fuels from Russia by 2030.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
12 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia over 'foolish and inflammatory statements'
Donald Trump has ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned over what he described as " inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. It comes amid a war of words between the pair that started after the US president set a '10 or 12 day' deadline for Russia to agree on a ceasefire with Ukraine during his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday. Writing on his Truth Social platform on Friday evening, Trump said: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" It comes after former Russian president Medvedev, Vladimir Putin's right-hand-man, warned Trump against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' following his shortened deadline. 'Russia isn't Israel or even Iran,' Medvedev, wrote on X. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Medvedev said. After Trump responded on his Truth Social platform by telling Medvedev, "the failed former president of Russia, who thinks he's still president" to "watch his words", Medvedev reminded Trump of Moscow's Soviet-era automatic, retaliatory nuclear strike capabilities.
Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines closer to Russia in power-play with Putin
Donald Trump has threatened higher tariffs and has vowed to use American nuclear submarines in order to protect itself following statements made by Dmitry Medvedev Donald Trump has ordered nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia in response to threats made by the country's former president. In a post shared to his Truth Social, Mr Trump called out ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev following statements that he made. The US President said in response he would move nuclear submarines "appropriate regions" closer to Russia. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Mr Trump said. It comes after Donald Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Mr Trump and Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after the Republican said on Tuesday that Russia had 10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil, with higher tariffs. Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and said Russia still possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities after the Republican told the former president to "watch his words." The battle of words emerged after Mr Trump reportedly undid months of denying or limiting aid to Ukraine as he aimed to broker a peace between Kyiv and Moscow. Mr Trump agreed to send more lethal aid to Ukraine, sparking fury in Moscow where Putin and his allies had relished the US President's previous unwillingness to support Kyiv as much as his predecessor Joe Biden. Medvedev meanwhile has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of its troops into Ukraine. Kremlin critics slammed him as an irresponsible loose cannon, though some Western diplomats have said his statements underscore the thinking in the Kremlin. Experts have warned Russia is pursuing its ambition to rebuild its influence and recreate a relevance not seen since its Soviet and imperial eras. Multiple foreign policy analysts have raised the alarm that Putin could pursue a war with NATO by targeting the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The countries were once member states of both the Russian Empire and, following brief inter-war periods of independence, the Soviet Union.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's nuclear submarine statement doesn't actually change anything
US President Donald Trump says he has moved two 'Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions ' in response to threats from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of the dictator Vladimir Putin. It's an almost completely meaningless gesture, however. The United States has 14 Ohio class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines: at least two of them will already have been ready to strike Russia before the current war of words between Medvedev and Trump began. Each boat carries up to 24 Trident II missiles, each of which generally carries four warheads – each one powerful enough to rip the guts out of a city. For many decades now, every second of every day, around the clock, every day of every year, there have been US (and French, and British) submarines ready and in position to destroy Russia. There was no need to move any of them to achieve that. Indeed, there would be good reasons not to do so, at least in the case of the subs already in place. A deterrent submarine on patrol is trying extremely hard not to be found: that's the whole point of putting ballistic missiles on submarines – doing so means they are all but impossible to locate, and so all but impossible to knock out in a pre-emptive strike. A patrolling deterrent boat, therefore, moves through the water very slowly and stealthily. Changing location significantly would probably involve speeding up and becoming easier to find, which would not be a particularly good idea. The President might, of course, have ordered additional boats onto station: but the ones already on duty would be plenty. And of course, as commander-in-chief, Mr Trump could perfectly well claim to 'have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned' simply in the normal course of business. Words matter, especially in the context of nuclear armageddon. Mr Trump's intention is no doubt to signify that he is not cowed by Medvedev's bluster. But as a practical matter, the action he says he has taken doesn't change anything very much.
