Running mate of Kansas governor candidate accuses him of fraud: ‘Grifter'
Doug Billings, an Olathe podcaster running to be the next governor of Kansas, has been accused of soliciting a $2,700 donation for campaign software and pocketing the money.
The accusation is being levied by the man who wrote the check as well as April McCoy, Billings' original pick for lieutenant governor, who has since filed paperwork with the Secretary of State's office seeking to have her name removed from next August's Republican primary ballot.
In an interview with The Star, Billings, 62, denied any wrongdoing and called the dispute over the check a misunderstanding.
He said the donation was intended not for his gubernatorial bid but as a token of support for his podcast, 'The Right Side With Doug Billings,' which he started in 2020 after more than two decades in human resources at various companies.
'I would never have had him make (the check) out to the campaign if it was for me,' Billings said.
Joe Marvil Sr., 77, of Olathe, remembers it differently. Marvil said he signed the check after an hours-long campaign staff cookout at McCoy's house in Basehor, where a quote was presented for a software program that Billings said was necessary for his nascent campaign to survive.
The Star reviewed a copy of the $2,700 check, dated May 13, 2025, which was made out to Doug Billings. The subject line reads 'Software'.
The Star also reviewed a $2,700 quote from Minnesota-based Buzz360, LLC, issued to the Billings campaign on May 8 for subscriptions to 'SwipeRed,' a software product that promises to boost candidates' voter turnout by 'up to 10 percentage points.'
Billings said that the software estimate was unfamiliar to him and that he never purchased the product.
He claimed that McCoy and her husband, Sean, misled Marvil and fabricated the story about the check being for campaign software.
'I'm not claiming he's stupid. I'm not claiming he's misguided,' Billings said of his donor. 'But April and Sean have got him convinced that that check was for the campaign. He made it out to me. It was for the show — completely separate.'
Marvil said Billings followed him to his car as he was leaving the meeting and asked for a donation, saying that without the money, 'There's no way we can win.'
'I wrote on the check, 'Software,'' Marvil said. 'I said, 'This isn't for you, so what do I put down there? So I mean, it's for the software. We've got a quote for software.'
Confrontation at GOP club meeting
The dispute over Marvil's donation and why it wasn't deposited in campaign coffers spilled into the public July 17, when McCoy posted a video of a verbal confrontation between herself and Billings at a Leavenworth County Elephant Club event they had been invited to as running mates.
The clip begins with an audience member asking Billings to explain what happened with the $2,700 check, which he says he heard about on Facebook.
'There's been a huge slander scheme and a huge defamation scheme that's been launched against me,' Billings said. 'It's BS, and I don't give oxygen to the BS.'
Sean McCoy then cuts Billings off and April McCoy informs the room that Marvil is present at the restaurant.
Marvil can be seen at the end of the video standing up and addressing the candidate.
'He said (the money) was for the campaign, and now he's saying it isn't,' Marvil said, telling event attendees he has too much respect for them to be dishonest about what happened.
'This is not some kind of hoax, Doug.'
'That's not true, Joe,' Billings replied.
'The Right Side With Doug Billings'
On the same day as the confrontation in Basehor, Billings took action to control the narrative around the $2,700 check. He had a lawyer send the McCoys a cease and desist letter demanding that they stop talking about the donation.
In the letter, Florida-based attorney Peter Ticktin accused the McCoys of making defamatory statements about Billings in social media posts on Facebook and X.
'The statements include claims of ethics violations by supposedly taking campaign contributions which were allegedly taken for personal use,' reads the letter, dated July 17.
'I am not going to get into any details as you are fully aware of the international torts you committed,' Ticktin continued. 'However, I want to make it understood that demand is hereby made on you to stop this nonsense. It is harmful and actionable. You need to remove any and all posted statements and cease and desist from making and further untrue statements.'
The Ticktin Law Group did not respond to repeated requests for comment and clarification about whether Ticktin is still representing Billings.
A former classmate of President Donald Trump's at New York Military Academy, Ticktin claimed in an Aug. 4 podcast with Billings to legally represent roughly 400 people who participated in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
In the intro to the Aug. 4 podcast featuring the two men, which largely centered discussions about Ticktin's other clients, Billings said the Trump world lawyer was drawn to his campaign 'precisely because of the kooks that are spewing lies and defaming me in the process.' The intro was recorded while Ticktin was not on the call.
Billings went on to make a claim that he repeated in his interview with The Star: McCoy was an ineffectual campaigner whom he planned to dump as running mate.
'We have got someone out there with whom I could never have won, who didn't want to give a speech, didn't want to fundraise, couldn't give an interview, couldn't speak in front of people — was just not a good choice,' Billings said. 'And so I think what happened is, that person got angry and they began to slander and defame.'
Billings campaign staff exodus
McCoy, 52, said she was outraged by Billings' treatment of Marvil and has no ulterior motive for speaking out against him.
She cited the July exodus of Billings' other top campaign staff, including treasurer Joel Goedken, as evidence of the candidate's malfeasance.
Billings said he had always meant for Goedken's role as treasurer to be temporary. Goedken provided text messages between himself and Billings in which the candidate repeatedly asked him to reconsider leaving.
In an interview, Goedken called Billings 'a habitual liar' and said the candidate never mentioned to him that he had received a check for the same amount as the coveted campaign software.
'This not only placed the entire campaign in jeopardy but also exposed me, particularly in my capacity as treasurer, to serious legal risk, including potential fines or even jail time,' Goedken said.
McCoy, who mounted an unsuccessful bid in February to chair the Kansas GOP with Billings on her ticket as vice chair, said the dispute over the check has left her unsure whether she would run for office again.
'I have better things to do,' McCoy said. 'I have kids. I have grandkids. I live on a golf course. I have a nice life. I don't need to be starting and stirring things up for fun.'
The McCoys first met Billings in Branson at a political event hosted by the eventual governor candidate, where the couple was also introduced to MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and Mark McCloskey, the St. Louis man who, along with his wife, brandished firearms at Black Lives Matter protesters when they walked past their home.
McCoy said that when she signed up to be his running mate, she didn't have any concerns about Billings' character. Now, she warns fellow conservatives to steer clear.
'He's been referred to as a grifter,' McCoy said.
Jeri Bailey, who Billings hired to replace his former campaign treasurer, said the McCoys have a personal vendetta against the candidate and are attempting to ruin his reputation. They 'seem like activists slash terrorists,' she said.
Bailey said during the heated exchange at the meeting of Leavenworth County Republicans, she was worried one of the McCoys would physically attack Billings.
'Their behavior was just unbelievably immature, juvenile and full of hatred,' Bailey said.
Candidate's past legal issues
This is not the first time Billings has been accused of financial wrongdoing.
Public records show Billings was convicted in Johnson County in March 2010 on a count of felony theft of more than $25,000 and less than $100,000. Eight counts of fraud filed on the same day as the theft charge were dismissed by the prosecutor, public records show. They do not indicate what his sentence was.
Documentation of Billings' conviction no longer appears on the Johnson County District Court's records page. Asked whether the case number is still on file, a court records custodian told The Star, 'That is a confidential case.'
Billings said his record was expunged and that he never served time behind bars in connection with the conviction. He declined to say why he was arrested or where he was working when the arrest occurred.
He said he doesn't have any problem passing background checks.
'I could get top-secret clearance if I needed to,' Billings said, telling a reporter that the best way to understand his past legal troubles is to read his 2010 Christian self-help book, 'Your Wonderful Life.'
In that text, published seven months after his conviction, Billings made repeated references to his past 'integrity issues' and his journey to becoming a better person.
'I am intimately aware of what it is like to lose integrity. I have done so in my life,' Billings wrote. 'I have been a participant in dishonesty, deception, and half-truths. I'm one who has padded expense reports and pocketed extra money.'
Later in the book, he again referenced his past financial impropriety.
'Fired from jobs because of integrity issues. I lost relationships because of my own ego and lies. I squandered a career. I falsified expense reports at work and lost my job for it,' one passage reads.
Official investigation?
McCoy said the incident with Marvil and the check demonstrates a lack of growth and the continuation of a pattern of abuse.
The day after Marvil told her about his $2,700 going to Billings' personal bank account, McCoy said she traveled to the Secretary of State's office in Topeka to file the paperwork asking to have her name removed from the ballot next to Billings'.
Wade Wiebe, executive director of the Kansas Public Disclosure Commission, which is responsible for enforcing state campaign finance laws, declined to say whether the commission has received a formal complaint or launched an investigation into Billings.
Kansas Election Director Bryan Caskey said it's unclear whether the Secretary of State's office will be able to act on McCoy's request to be removed from the ballot. He said his office is researching and consulting with the attorney general to determine how to proceed.
'Kansas requires the governor and lieutenant governor to run as a ticket, as a team, and to the best of my knowledge, we've never had a situation where prior to Primary Election Day, a lieutenant governor candidate wanted to get off the ticket,' Caskey said.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Iowa administrator Adam Steen announces GOP campaign for governor
Adam Steen, former Iowa director of Administrative Services, was joined by his sons, Maverick and Ryker and his wife Kasey Steen, as announced he was running for governor Aug. 19, 2025 at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill. (Photo by Robin Opsahl/Iowa Capital Dispatch) Republican Adam Steen, former director of the Iowa Department of Administrative Services, announced his campaign for governor Tuesday, labeling himself as a 'faith guy' in the race to succeed Gov. Kim Reynolds. Steen held a campaign kickoff event Tuesday at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill, starting with a musical performance from Nathan Thomas and the A17 worship band and an introduction from Pastor Gary Pilcher. As he introduced himself, Steen said there had been some speculation online about what type of candidate he would be. 'Let me tell you, from my own lips, who I am: I am the faith guy,' Steen said. 'I'm a Jesus guy. I'm a Make America Great Again guy. I'm a common-sense policy, America first, people first guy.' In addition to being a credentialed minister, Steen said some of his highest profile commitments to faith were as DAS director. The department had canceled a Satanic Temple of Iowa holiday celebration event at the Iowa Capitol in December 2024, with Steen saying the event was denied because it included 'elements that are harmful to minors.' Steen said at the campaign event he was 'the guy that stood in front of the Satanists when they blatantly targeted our children, and I'm the guy getting sued by the Satanists for protecting our children.' He also said there was another event request at the Capitol he denied, for an all-ages, family-friendly drag show. He said this planned event was not as well known, but that he believed it was the right thing to do despite being at risk of getting sued. Steen, appointed in 2021 to serve as DAS director in Reynolds' administration, said he led some of the major policies changing state government, like the government agency restructuring signed into law in 2023. Speaking with reporters, Steen said he had discussed running for the seat with Reynolds and came to a 'mutual agreement' that he would resign from his position if he ran for the office. 'Today, at 10 a.m., I walked into the governor's office and I submitted my resignation,' Steen told the crowd. 'Today I walked away from a job that I loved. I walked away from a job that I loved, so I could join the fight and defend the state that I love.' Before leading DAS, Steen was the director of business development at Syverson Strege, a financial services firm, and had previously owned a management consulting firm called 25 Connections. He also was a minor league baseball relief pitcher in 2002, playing for the Philadelphia Phillies and Batavia Muckdogs. Steen highlighted his commitment to protecting private property rights, but did not go into detail on his views about the use of eminent domain for carbon capture pipeline projects — the subject of a contentious bill that was vetoed by Reynolds this session. 'I was working with her at this time, and I support everything that Governor Reynolds is doing,' Steen said. When asked about his views on the use of eminent domain in these projects, he said 'I'm a pro-property rights, pro-private ownership person.' Steen is the latest Republican to join the field of GOP candidates seeking to take the mantle from Reynolds after she announced she would not run for reelection in 2026. U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra and state Sen. Mike Bousselot, R-Ankeny, currently have 'exploratory' committees for governor, while Rep. Eddie Andrews, R-Johnston, and former state legislator Brad Sherman have announced campaigns. Iowa Auditor Rob Sand is considered the current frontrunner to become the Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Former political operative Julie Stauch and Democrat Paul Dahl are also running to become the party nominee.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Explainer-Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
By Jack Queen (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel
Intel (INTC) rose roughly 7% on Tuesday, a day after SoftBank Group announced it would take a $2 billion stake in the struggling chipmaker. News of SoftBank's investment follows a Bloomberg report last week that said the Trump administration is considering taking up to a 10% position in the company. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview Tuesday that the investment would involve the US government converting Intel's grants from the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act — worth $10.9 billion — into an equity stake aimed at stabilizing the company's US manufacturing business. Bessent did not confirm the size of the stake the government would take. Intel has fallen behind in an industry it once dominated. Its manufacturing division is bleeding cash, just as its legacy computer chip segment forfeits market share to rivals Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Qualcomm (QCOM) in the PC space. Intel is also woefully behind AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the AI race. The company's market capitalization of $111 billion is less than half of its value in 2021. And CEO Lip-Bu Tan has been forced to lay off 15% of the company's workforce and shelve plans to build plants in Europe. But the troubled chipmaker is the only large-scale US-based leading-edge chip manufacturer, giving it geopolitical significance as the nation looks to reshore semiconductor production. Intel's problems, however, may be too big for either SoftBank or the Trump administration to solve on their own. Intel in need of direction Deutsche Bank analyst Ross Seymore said news of the US potentially taking a stake in Intel, combined with the SoftBank investment, shows that "[Tan] is taking bold actions to solidify Intel's financial and strategic positioning during its ongoing difficult transformation process." Tan became CEO in March after Intel's board ousted former CEO Pat Gelsinger late last year. But others on Wall Street expressed skepticism that those investments would be enough to save Intel from its decline, which resulted from years of missteps. Loop Capital analyst Gary Mobley wrote in a recent note to clients that the support from SoftBank and, potentially, the US government may be "akin to a lifeline with no secure anchor at the other end," because while Intel may be "finding new buyers of its primary equity capital," that may not guarantee it can find customers for its manufacturing business. Gelsinger established Intel's third-party chip manufacturing business, otherwise known as its Foundry, in 2021 as a means of competing with rival TSMC, which produces chips for companies including Nvidia, Apple (AAPL), AMD, and others. But so far, its Foundry business has been a disappointment, struggling to secure customers. While Intel has said it reached agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), the company is still its own largest manufacturing client. Intel's plan includes building chips based on newer technologies, including its 18A and upcoming 14A node design processes, part of Gelsinger's plan for five process nodes in four years. But 18A, which was initially supposed to roll out in the first half of 2025, is now slated to debut in 2026. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon was similarly critical of Intel's cash infusion in his own investor note, writing, "We do not believe that Intel's capability gap has anything to do with money." Rasgon also questioned whether the US taking a stake in Intel would be enough to complete the company's domestic manufacturing expansions. "Intel was originally supposed to get these CHIPS Act funds for free; giving up 10% of the company for them seems worse," he wrote in a note to clients. "And if the goal is to help Intel build substantial US capacity, $10.9B really isn't enough." Moor Insights and Strategy founder and chief analyst Patrick Moorhead told Yahoo Finance that while SoftBank's $2 billion investment and the prospect of a potential US stake are good things, the company would require as much as $40 billion to build out its next-generation 14A technology. Still, getting the US government involved, at least in the short term, could prove to be a boon for the company. "My short-term answer is that the US government is a kingmaker, and they just made Intel the king, and they are going to wrap policy around that to make Intel foundry successful," Moorhead said. If the government sticks with Intel for the long haul, though, Moorhead said it could further complicate the company's development problems, leading to a lack of innovation, inefficiencies, and growing costs. "My hope is that Intel gets back on its feet, it turns itself into a reputable, leading-edge foundry, and the government sells the stake," he said. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio



