Kid Rock praises 'dragon slayer' Trump for implementing divisive measure in his first 100 days
Kid Rock has proudly branded Donald Trump a 'dragon slayer' for implementing the controversial war on DEI.
The 54-year-old Bawitdaba hitmaker, real name is Robert James Ritchie, was celebrating the president's first 100 days in office when he took a second to commend him for getting rid of the 'woke' initiative.
It comes after Trump declared Diversity, Equity and Inclusion measures to be 'illegal and immoral and barred the government from funding them. He also prohibited federal funds from promoting ' gender ideology.'
Making an appearance on Fox & Friends on Wednesday morning, Kid Rock described the president's tenure since his inauguration on January 20 as 'fan-frickin-tastic.'
He began: 'I mean I think I heard it this morning, he is the commander-in-chief, but [he is] a businessman-in-chief.
'The business of America has been terrible, especially the last four years, but really decades before this.'
Turning his attention to DEI, he continued: 'To have someone come in who is putting our country first and curing the border, I mean I call him the dragon slayer for all this woke, DEI stuff that he took out.
'Just bringing the real fabric of America back, you know, patriotism is at an all time high.
'Our people are joining our military again. How much time have you got, I could go on and on and on.'
Some viewers agreed with Kid Rock's remarks and equally hailed Trump for his efforts.
'Absolutely agree,' one said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Trump is restoring traditional values and focusing on what matters most to everyday Americans. That's real leadership in action.'
Another added: 'Best 100 days of my 60 plus years.'
Kid Rock is a staunch supporter of Trump and even lives atop the hills outside of Nashville, Tennessee, in a mini version of The White House, which took 20 years to build.
Of all the amenities - which no doubt seems to be an homage to the president - surely the most talked about is the gold urinal.
Last month, Kid Rock was in attendance when Trump signed an executive order aimed at protecting fans from 'exploitative ticket scalping' and reforming the U.S. live entertainment ticketing industry.
Trump signed the directive in the Oval Office, with the artist standing next to him in a patriotic American flag-themed outfit.
Kid Rock said ticket scalpers' use of bots to buy large numbers of tickets at face value and then selling them for a profit is a big problem in the industry.
'I want the fans to have fair ticket prices,' Kid Rock said, adding that legislation was eventually needed to cap ticket purchases.
Trump called Kid Rock, who performed at last summer's Republican National Convention, a 'friend.'
'So it's an honor to have you back, a friend of mine, Kid Rock, sometimes referred to as Bob. I know him as Bob. But he's been a good friend for a long time, many years, and he's been after something that is for the good of a lot of people,' Trump said.
The order directs Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to ensure that ticket scalpers are in full compliance with the tax-collecting Internal Revenue Service and other applicable law, a White House fact sheet said.
It also orders the Federal Trade Commission to work with the U.S. attorney to ensure that competition laws are appropriately enforced in the concert and entertainment industry, according to the fact sheet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later
Organising a women's networking event in the US has become an act of defiance. Companies with equality-driven agendas risk losing government contracts. Some are receiving McCarthy-like letters asking them to confirm that they have no diversity policies. Activities designed to support women, including healthcare research, are being threatened, and companies are backtracking on former commitments. Women's networking events, the gathering of diversity data and targeted training are being questioned. And some companies are requesting that charities focused on women and girls consider changes to their programmes in order to navigate the current climate. The one I founded, Inspiring Girls, has already been asked to 'include men as role models'. This anti-diversity wave isn't just a social backlash to the many excesses of wokeness – it is politically orchestrated and driven. It crystallised in 2021, when the senator Josh Hawley devoted his entire keynote speech at the second National Conservatism Conference to 'reclaiming masculinity', calling for boys (not girls) to be taught competitiveness, strength, honesty and courage – as if those were only male values. Since then, the movement has reached the highest offices of power: the White House is its headquarters and its commander-in-chief is Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who promised last year to tackle 'anti-white racism' if Trump won a second term. The anti-diversity brigade has no shortage of money or allies: several 'tech bros' (whether out of conviction or FOMO) have joined in – as have tech venture capitalists and other Maga financiers. These are men who operate in fields dominated almost exclusively by other men and who wield enormous wealth and influence, yet they often cast themselves as victims. They hide their anti-diversity stance under the disguise of meritocracy. On the progressive side, there is a movement claiming that it is actually boys – particularly white working-class ones – rather than girls who are 'in crisis'. It is led by the American Institute for Boys and Men, which last week received a $20m grant from Melinda French Gates. They argue that boys lag behind girls in education and employment. It is true, of course, that many of the manufacturing jobs that many young men used to rely on are vanishing due to automation and tech (ironically, for the benefit of mostly male tech moguls). Unfortunately, however, this well-meaning movement is fuelling the anti-diversity brigade's narrative – because they can now claim that even progressives admit it is white men who are suffering. The Trump administration has not yet imposed specific obligations on businesses to withdraw diversity programmes beyond companies who have contracts with the government – including, now, some companies across the EU, but many are taking spontaneous actions. Some companies are doing so because their diversity policies were just for show, while others are simply acting out of fear. The trend is clear: many are eliminating references to diversity and equality from their websites and in their reporting; others are reneging from aspirational targets, stopping data-gathering on recruitment and promotions, and dismantling training programmes. Some of the companies that are backtracking have headquarters in the UK or Europe. And many of the US tech companies and funds that are leading the diversity backlash have subsidiaries and offices on this side of the Atlantic. Their actions are in straightforward conflict with the letter and the spirit of British and EU legislation on equality, such as EU corporate sustainability reporting rules or equal opportunities and equal pay directives. And yet the equality ministries in the British and other European governments – and in the European Commission – have remained largely silent. Most equality ministries and agencies are led by herbivorous politicians and officials who favour performative programmes over meaningful action. Confronting Trump is far too scary for them, which is why they have not set the limits of what companies can and cannot do, whether specifically or in general guidelines. Over time, it is possible the anti-diversity movement will yield some positives, as it could drive companies who continue to believe in diversity towards more meaningful, effective and data-based policies. Besides, in a litigation-led country such as the US, it is only a matter of time before the courts impose some limits on government-led anti-diversity intimidation. When they do, the backlash against companies that have acted spinelessly will have its own consequences. But the UK and the rest of Europe cannot be passive spectators waiting for the pendulum to swing again. Our equality authorities should counteract Trump's raid on diversity by providing clear official guidance to companies on what they can and cannot do – it is their legal and moral duty to do so. America First should not mean America Everywhere when it comes to the fundamental principles of diversity, equality and inclusion. Miriam González Durántez is an international trade lawyer and the founder and chair of Inspiring Girls
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says
President Donald Trump 's White House advisers were 'caught off guard' by Elon Musk 's astonishing attack on his 'big, beautiful bill' this week while Trump himself is said to be 'losing patience' with his billionaire ally, according to a report. Just days after Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee came to an end, the world's richest man began lashing out at Trump's signature tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in an X post on Tuesday. A senior White House official now tells The Wall Street Journal that the president is not happy about Musk's intervention and is 'confused' by the billionaire's stance, given that they have spent the past four months working closely together. Asked whether it had hurt the relationship between the two men, the Journal 's sources indicated it was 'too soon to tell' but noted that, while Trump can be forgiving, he does not easily forget slights. Musk's bond with Trump certainly appears to be fraying, with the Big Tech boss cutting an increasingly beleaguered figure and reportedly annoyed by the bill's inclusion of a cut to an electric vehicle tax credit that benefits his Tesla customers and by Trump's recent decision to scrap his friend Jared Isaacman 's nomination to lead Nasa. The Tesla CEO last intervened over a Republican spending bill six months ago, firing out a string of tweets that forced House Speaker Mike Johnson into hasty rewrites just hours before Congress broke up for the Christmas recess. Musk's tweet on Tuesday sent shockwaves across the corridors of power in DC. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk wrote. He followed that up on Wednesday with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' Musk's opposition has garnered the support of conservative fiscal hawks like Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who share his concern that the bill could add at least $2.4 trillion to America's national debt over the next decade, with some estimates placing the total closer to $5 trillion. Invited to respond on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill; it doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' While that has not yet happened this time, Speaker Johnson has expressed frustration. 'We had a great, very friendly, very fruitful conversation together,' Johnson said of Musk at his weekly press conference on Wednesday. 'Twenty-four hours later, he does a 180 and he comes out against the bill. And it surprised me, frankly.' Johnson argued that Musk is 'flat wrong' in his objections and said that while he himself was 'not upset,' Trump was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180,' a statement that might well be interpreted as a warning. One person who was delighted with Musk was Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, one of just two House Republicans who voted against the bill in the lower chamber last month. 'I figured he would eventually get there,' Massie told the Journal. 'You don't land rockets backwards or get cars to drive themselves by ignoring the people who are lying to you.'
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Hollyoaks star confirms exit as he breaks silence on shock goodbye just a year after returning
A HOLLYOAKS star has confirmed his exit as he addressed his character's shock goodbye. This departure comes just a year after the fan favourite made a shock return. 4 Charlie Clapham has confirmed his exit from Hollyoaks Credit: Instagram 4 Viewers were sad to see Freddie Roscoe go Credit: Channel 4 4 The character was forced to write a suicide note Credit: Channel 4 Charlie Clapham has again bowed out from playing Freddie Roscoe. Taking to Instagram following his final scenes, Charlie posted: "What a ride. "This isn't goodbye @hollyoaksofficial just a see you soon… Or maybe not, who knows!? Thank you for your kindness. Ciao 4 now." A fan commented: "What an absolute joy it's been having you back! Good luck with your next epic adventure Charlie!" Another shared: "Oh no and we'll miss you on our screens." A third shared: "I've always enjoyed watching Freddie roscoe shame he's gone again great job you did @charlieclapham91 best of luck hopefully Freddie shall return one day." While a fourth remarked: "Going to miss you! Freddie Roscoe owns my heart!" Viewers watched as Warren Fox (Jamie Lomas) cornered Freddie while armed with a gun. The gangster wanted revenge after Freddie ensured a letter he'd written to Mercedes (Jennifer Metcalfe) never reached her. Hollyoaks killer to return after three years in shock recast He proceeded to intimidate his love rival into writing a suicide note. Warren also taunted Freddie by saying everyone in his life would be better off without him. Ultimately, Freddie complied and wrote a goodbye letter to "soulmate" Mercedes - who was crushed over his apparent death. The actor originally played Freddie from 2013 until leaving in 2017. From Hollyoaks to Hollywood James Corden played a caretaker in the early days of the soap. The former American TV host doesn't have much positive to say about his time on the soap, claiming it was "hell on earth." Since his short-lived time on the show he has gone on to bigger things including smash hit comedy Gavin and Stacey. Rachel Shenton joined the soap as aspiring glamour model Mitzeee Minniver in 2010. Over two years her character was sent to prison, got pregnant and had a number of romantic affairs. Since leaving Hollyoaks she has won an Oscar for best live action short film, The Silent Child. Rachel has also starred in White Gold and All Creatures Great and Small Emmett J. Scanlan played gangster turned anti-hero Brendan Brady. Emmett played the love interest of Steve Hayes, with their romance delighting fans until it turned violent. Since his departure Emmett has appeared in Peaky Blinders, The Fall, Gangs of London and even appeared in Guardians of the Galaxy Emma Rigby joined Hollyoaks when she was 15 as Hannah Ahsworth. Hannah's eating disorder storyline was the first of it's kind on TV while other plots included being caught in a fire, gangland drug dealing and running away. Since leaving the soap in 2010 Emma has gone on to star in ABCs Once Upon a Time in Wonderland as the Red Queen. Other roles include guest appearances in Death In Paradise, Ripper Street and Fresh Meat Nico Mirallegro got his big break with Hollyoaks starring as emo Barry 'Newt' Newton. Nico's main storyline in the soap was developing schizophrenia which culminated in a suicide pact. He left the soap in 2010 and went on to star in My Mad Fat Diary, Our Girl, Rillington Place, The Ark and Common, Penance, as well as the Mike Leigh movie Peterloo and was nominated for a Bafta for his role in period drama The Village. Ricky Whittle used Hollyoaks as a stepping stone to break America. He played one of the soap's resident hunks, Calvin Valentine, from 2006 to 2011 - when he was killed off at his wedding. After leaving the soap Ricky cracked America starring in teen drama The 100 and America Gods. He also appeared in Strictly Come Dancing in 2009. Warren Brown joined Hollyoaks in 2005 for a year as evil Andy Holt. His stint on the show consisted of date rape storylines and a crime spree, before eventually being killed off. After leaving Hollyoaks, Warren became a big hitter in TV playing DS Justin Ripley in Luther, as well as major roles in a number of dramas including Liar, The Responder, Homefront and Good Cop. Wallis Day played Holly Cunningham in the soap for years before leaving. In 2021 Wallis won the role of Batwoman in DC's series, taking over from Ruby Rose. Earlier this year, The Sun revealed Charlie would be exiting the soap again. A source said at the time: 'Charlie has finished his stint filming. 'He's hugely popular and everyone's really sad to see him go but the storyline is great and it was all planned out before his return. 'There's going to be a big send off for Freddie as the soap ramps up for a huge summer leading to the 30th later this year.'
