
Solving Crime: When a Bengaluru cop acted as auto driver to rescue Kannada movie financier's son from kidnappers
The case concerns the kidnap of the son of a movie financier's son. But what followed was a nail-biting operation where a police inspector had to don the role of an autorickshaw driver and engage in a gunfight to bring the criminals to justice.
On 3 June, 2001, close to 4 pm, then DCP (West) Nissar Ahmed asked many of the police inspectors to come to the Upparpet police station immediately, recalled S K Umesh, then a police inspector.
When the police inspectors arrived, a middle-aged man, Gulabchand Pagariya, was in the DCP's chamber. Unknown men had kidnaped his son Prashanth Pagariya, 15, demanding Rs 10 lakh ransom.
Gulab Pagariya was a well-known financier at the time, providing loans to businessmen, movie producers, and others. Coming from an affluent family and living in a palace-like mansion in Rajajinagar, Gulab Pagariya was also a well-connected man. He was also a family friend to Dr Rajkumar and other prominent politicians and celebrities.
According to a police officer, Prashanth had just completed Class 10 at Baldwin School. Around 1 pm, his mother, Premalatha, received a call informing her that her son had been kidnapped. The kidnappers demanded a ransom of Rs 10 lakh for his release and threatened to kill him if she contacted the police. They warned that any delay would result in the gruesome dismemberment of her son's body.
Premalatha was shocked and informed her husband, who decided to contact the police. A retired police officer involved in the investigation remembered that Premalatha was strongly opposed to police intervention because she feared that her son could be harmed.
A team of police and technical experts arrived at Pagariya's residence and installed devices that could record calls and track the caller's location. By then, the police had determined that one call originated from K M Doddi in the Mandya district.
By evening, Premalatha received another call on her landline. A police officer recalled that during this call, the caller threatened Premalatha, saying that he would send her son's right hand to her because she had informed the police. The caller instructed her to bring Rs 10 lakh to the ISKCON temple in Rajajinagar and insisted that she come alone.
Umesh recalled that by then, Premalatha was furious with the police. 'What she did not like about the police was that we were buying time and her anxiety grew every minute. She was crying and was also arguing with the police. I came outside of the house and was standing outside,' he said.
In the next few minutes, Umesh heard Premalatha shouting that she would go to the ISKCON temple in an autorickshaw and bring her son back. 'I saw an autorickshaw parked a few meters away from her house and I immediately went to it. I didn't speak much, but I took away his khaki uniform and took his autorickshaw. Fortunately, I came near the gate as Premalatha stepped out with the suitcase carrying Rs 10 lakh cash,' he said.
Premalatha, who got into the autorickshaw, asked the driver to take her near the ISKCON temple. But on the way, she also scolded the driver, Umesh in disguise, for not driving properly and even asked if he was drunk. 'This was my first experience as an autorickshaw driver. It was not easy to drive the three-wheeler. I was yet to get it under control and got scolded by her,' recalled Umesh.
Upon reaching near the temple, Premalatha asked Umesh to wait inside the auto. 'I was just watching the public movement on the road, and the other police personnel who were aware of it had cordoned the area, but were not visible. I saw one autorickshaw going back and forth on the same road twice, and it was a confirmation for me that the abductors were in the vehicle,' he added.
After some time, the autorickshaw in which the abductors were present stopped the vehicle a few meters away from where Umesh had stopped. Umesh stepped out, and then one of them called him, believing he was an autorickshaw driver.
'One of them called me and said, 'Hey Driver, tell that woman that the people she is waiting for have come',' said Umesh.
Umesh said he realised this was the moment. 'I took out my revolver and asked all of them to get down, including the driver. That autorickshaw driver knew nothing about this kidnapping episode. Then, the people inside the autorickshaw jumped out and tried to flee. I had no choice but to open fire at their legs. It was only after the first bullet sound that Premalatha and the police came to know that the action had begun.'
The police inquired about the whereabouts of Prashanth, and one of the suspects, who had been shot at, informed them that they were in a Maruti van on a service road, approximately one kilometre from the ISKCON temple. The police teams quickly responded to the location, successfully rescuing Prashanth and apprehending the other suspects.
On June 4, 2001, the Bengaluru city police announced the arrest of Ramakrishna, 28, R Ramesh, 27, and Gopi, 23. Ramakrishna and Ramesh sustained gunshot wounds to their legs. Later, the police arrested another suspect named Shiva, along with others allegedly involved in the crime. Ramakrishna worked as a gym instructor, Ramesh was employed at a garage, while Gopi and Shiva were employees at Anjali Garments in the city.
The investigations revealed that the idea to kidnap Prashanth originated in the gym. A police officer stated, 'At that time, Bengaluru was grappling with several abduction cases. Many incidents did not even come to light because the ransom demands were met. In this particular case, Ramakrishna, a gym instructor at Royal Multi Gym in Rajajinagar, decided to make a quick profit. The gym was located close to Prashanth's residence, and Prashanth frequently visited the gym, where he had formed a friendship with Ramakrishna.'
After forming a team, Ramakrishna decided to kidnap Prashanth and also bought a new SIM card. However, due to their misfortune, the SIM card had not been activated. On June 3, 2001, when Prashanth was returning home on a two-wheeler, Ramakrishna allegedly stopped him and asked a financial favour from his father, stating it was an emergency. He asked Prashanth to join him in his car to meet Gulabchand, said the police. But Prashanth got to know that it was a meticulous plan to kidnap him only after getting into the van.
Umesh said, 'In the van, Ramakrishna and others assaulted him and told him that associates of his gang also kidnapped his sister and if he failed to cooperate, she would be killed. They took him to K M Doddi near the Mandya district and from there made him call home from an STD booth.'
'We came to know about this call location quickly as the STD booth employee suspected that there was something wrong. He dialled back the number (to Premalatha) and informed them that the call originated from KM Doddi. So, a team was also dispatched. But later, everything transpired in Bengaluru and at the footsteps of Lord Krishna,' Umesh said.
The swift police operation became a sensation in the city. In fact, Dr Rajkumar invited the police officers to his residence and distributed sweets. 'He was thrilled to know how the operation unfolded and asked me many questions. He became more curious after I told him that I acted like an autorickshaw driver and then attacked them,' said Umesh.
The Upparpet police later filed a chargesheet against the accused. In 2007, a Bengaluru court convicted all the accused and sentenced them for life. Umesh said that all of them still continue to be in jail.
'Their greed to make a quick buck by kidnapping sent them to prison,' he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Two amendment bills passed to tighten slum revamp Act, bring drug peddling under MCOCA
The Maharashtra state Legislative Assembly on Wednesday passed two key amendment bills — one aimed at tightening enforcement in slum redevelopment and rehabilitation projects the other expanded the scope of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) by bringing the drug peddling under the purview of organised crime. Both bills will now be sent to the Legislative Council (Upper House) for approval. The bill amends the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, granting the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) stronger powers to recover pending transit rent from defaulting developers or builders by attaching their personal properties. Under the revised provisions, if a builder fails to pay dues, the SRA can now treat the unpaid rent as arrears of land revenue and recover it by attaching personal properties of directors or partners, not just company assets. The amendment also reduces the consent window for dissenting slum dwellers from 120 to 60 days once a majority supports a redevelopment plan. Those who fail to join within this period risk losing their eligibility for on-site rehabilitation. Additionally, land under slum redevelopment can now be handed over to government agencies within 30 days of issuing a letter of intent, expediting project execution. The second bill involves a proposed amendment to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). It aims to bring drug peddling under the purview of 'organised crime' by expanding the definition to include activities involving narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The bill was introduced by Minister of State for Home (MoS) Yogesh Kadam who said that narcotics substances like hydroponic weed and synthetic drugs were being peddled through networks and stringent laws were needed to crack the peddlers network. Kadam informed the House that in the five years, over 10,000 people were booked for possessing commercial quantities and drugs worth Rs 11,000 crore were seized. Kadam said out of this, drugs worth Rs 10,000 crore were synthetic drugs. Both bills are expected to be tabled in the Upper House later this week for further discussion and clearance.


New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Officials fined by Karnataka HC for withholding caste, income certificate
BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court has imposed an exemplary cost of Rs 2 lakh on the then chairman and members of the District Caste and Income Verification Committee of Hassan which has to be paid from their pockets to the petitioner for declining to issue her a certificate validating the caste and income certificate that had already been issued. The committee had told the petitioner that the income of her husband, who worked as a lecturer at a private college, is beyond the permissible threshold of the grant of such a certificate. The petitioner, Muthulaxmi BN -- a resident of Channarayapatna -- suffered a delay of 12 months in getting the assistant public prosecutor's post because of the committee's unwillingness to issue her the certificate, which was given after the court's order. She moved the high court in 2024, challenging the committee's order dated March 6, 2024. After the court's order, the certificate was issued to her on April 24, 2024, and then she got the job. The petitioner's counsel submitted that all others who were selected along with her on January 17, 2023 were given appointments. Noting that the caste and income certificate would always depend on the father's income and not the income of the husband, Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that the state has time and again repeated same mistake of bringing the applicants to knock on the doors of courts. It is high time the state set its house in order and refrain from generating unnecessary litigation. The state, as its wont, has again repeated the same mistake, the judge said. The court said that for 12 months, while others from the same select list stepped into service, the petitioner languished in anxious limbo. Her legitimate aspirations were swept under the weight of official indifference. This court cannot permit the curtain to fall on this matter with a mere note of closure. The law was clear, the precedent was binding, yet the officers, with impunity, chose to act in contravention, the court said. It is a case where members of the committee must be mulcted with exemplary cost, as it is necessary not only to recompense the petitioner but to become a cautionary call to all those who hold public office, that dereliction cloaked in ignorance shall find no refuge before this court, the court added.


New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala Governor orders probe into allegations of Digital University fund misuse
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: In the wake of complaints over alleged misuse of funds in the Digital University Kerala (DUK), Governor Rajendra Arlekar has directed the police to inquire into the charges and also asked the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General to conduct a thorough audit of the varsity funds. The governor's action came in the wake of a report by DUK Vice-Chancellor Ciza Thomas that flagged major irregularities in varsity fund utilisation and demanded a thorough independent audit. The irregularities included a lack of proper accounts to the tune of Rs 3.94 crore for a Rs 98.45-crore graphene research project, implemented through DUK with funds from the Union and state governments. Though a private firm was the initial implementing partner for the graphene aurora project, it was incorporated only after the official order sanctioning the project was issued. Later, DUK was directly chosen for the role after the Union government detected certain irregularities. The VC, in her report, said Rs 3.94 crore from the Centre was routed to the private firm by the university in 2024-25. When DUK demanded utilisation certificates, the firm produced bills relating to food, travel and accommodation expenses of its officials, leading to suspicion of fund misuse. The report to the governor also pointed out that projects sanctioned in the name of the university were being taken over by faculty members through companies floated by them. Notably, the university's resources were being used to carry out the work related to such projects. The VC has also highlighted that a building leased out by DUK and renovated at a cost of Rs 2.9 crore was being used to lodge employees of private firms that claimed association with the university. The payment of rent and maintenance of the facility was being carried out using varsity funds. Ciza pointed out that neither statutory audit nor an audit by an external agency has been conducted in DUK. 'The huge public funds involved and the number of questionable projects being undertaken warrant an independent and comprehensive audit into the university funds,' the vice-chancellor recommended in her report.