Labuan-Kota Kinabalu airfare soars to RM1,207, pricier than flights to Seoul, Bangkok
LABUAN: Travellers from the duty-free island here are voicing frustration over skyrocketing airfares for the Labuan-Kota Kinabalu route, whish is now more expensive than international flights to Bangkok and Seoul.
For many in Labuan, air travel is not a luxury but a necessity – yet tickets for the 35-minute domestic flight are as high as RM1,207 for a one-way trip on July 2.
By comparison, tickets for flights from Kota Kinabalu to Bangkok, which takes about three hours, start at RM411, while flights to Seoul, a journey of over five hours, are priced from RM661.
David Lee, 49, who frequently travels between the two locations for an oil and gas business, told Bernama the fares were "absurd" and "unacceptable".
"I was planning my usual trip to Kota Kinabalu for a meeting and was shocked to see fares exceeding RM1,200. How can a flight under one hour cost more than an international trip to Korea?" he said.
Another traveller, Nurul Shafiqah Abdullah, 34, a government officer based in Labuan, said such high fares strain those who rely on the route for essential reasons.
"This isn't a holiday route. It's a lifeline for many who depend on travelling for medical check-ups, work commitments or family matters. These prices are pushing people to the edge," she said.
For Raymond Chong, 41, who runs a logistics company, the limited choice of carriers only adds to the frustration.
"It's either MasWings or Malaysia Airlines, sometimes small planes, sometimes a Boeing. There's no real competition, so you either pay or don't go," he said.
Local entrepreneur Faridah Musa, 45, urged the federal government and aviation authorities to address the pricing mechanism, calling the issue more than just a travel inconvenience.
"We are an island with no road access. Flights are essential, not optional. At this point, it's not just an inconvenience, it's an economic disadvantage for us."
She said calls are mounting for transparency in fare structures and for greater efforts to introduce more airline competition to ensure affordable travel for the people of Labuan. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Basic banking, ATM and e-wallet spared
PETALING JAYA: Basic banking and financial services related to current and savings accounts, and other similar services such as e-wallet, will be exempted under the scope of the expanded service tax which will take effect on July 1. Basic transactions at the counter or using an automated teller machine (ATM) are exempted from the service fee, according to the Customs Department Sales and Service Tax Division's guide on Financial Services. Other basic banking services include deposit, withdrawal, payment or fund transfer as well as printing of account statements. For instance, the RM1 ATM withdrawal fee for money taken out of a savings account is not subjected to service tax because it falls under the basic banking service. Similarly, bill payments done through online banking or transfer between two e-wallet accounts are not subjected to service tax. Processing fees for managing investment deposits however would be subjected to the tax. Aside from basic banking services, financial services and charges excluded from service tax, include interest or profit charged under conventional or Islamic financial services, punitive charges such as late payment fees and dishonored cheque fees, financial services related to goods, land or matters outside Malaysia as well as brokerage or underwriting services for individual medical or life insurance. Buy Now, Pay Later providers must register for service tax if its total administrative fees exceed RM500,000 per year. If no administrative fees are charged, it will not be required to register for service tax. Taxable services include credit facilities, insurance, payment systems, investment advice, fund management, factoring and financial leasing, are among the services subjected to service tax. The annual fee of a credit card facility is not subject to service tax. 'For the provision of credit line facility or shariah compliance financing services through the activation of a primary credit card, primary charge card, supplementary credit card or supplementary charge card, the rate of tax is RM25 for each card, on the date the card is activated and every twelve months thereafter or part thereof after the card is activated,' it said. For home loans where a setup fee and interest on the loan are charged, the setup fee will be subject to service tax while the interest will not be subject. Meanwhile, banking associations have reassured that the upcoming expansion of the service tax scope, effective July 1, will not affect basic banking services commonly used by the public. 'Basic banking services that involve fees or commissions such as those related to current accounts (cheque accounts), savings accounts or similar accounts, including e-wallets are not subject to service tax,' the Association of Banks in Malaysia, the Association of Islamic Banking and Financial Institutions Malaysia and the Malaysian Investment Banking Association said. These services include fees imposed on cash deposits, withdrawals, payments, or local fund transfers; issuance of debit cards and subsequent annual fees; basic transactions done at bank branches or ATMs such as bill payments, printing of current or savings account statements. 'These are considered essential banking services and remain out of scope for service tax purposes. In addition, annual fee imposed on creditor charge card will also be excluded.' Interest or profit and penalties or other punitive charges will not be subject to service tax. The above exclusions are intended to ensure that day-to-day banking activities for individual consumers remain unaffected by the service tax expansion,' they said.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Muted impact on firms
PETALING JAYA: The mandatory Employees Provident Fund (EPF) contribution for foreign workers will have little impact on most businesses for now, except for those with heavy reliance on foreign labour. The impact will be greater if such companies also operate in price-sensitive markets where cost pass-through is limited. Sectors that would be most affected are plantation, gloves, technology and construction, according to CIMB Securities Research. 'Overall, we view the mandatory 2% EPF contribution as mildly negative for corporate earnings. 'We expect the earnings impact from higher labour costs – alongside the recent expansion of the sales and service tax – to be reflected progressively in the results for the second half of 2025, with a more pronounced full-year effect in 2026,' stated the research house. Starting with October's wage, foreign workers and their employers must each contribute 2% of the monthly pay to the EPF. CIMB Research foresees the initial cost impact to likely be manageable. 'However, pressure may build if the contribution rate for foreign workers is gradually increased in line with that of Malaysian workers,' it said in a note. The advantage of this EPF plan, according to economist Geoffrey Williams, is that it is being rolled out at a 'very low rate and very low cost'. This avoids imposing substantial additional cost pressures on businesses, at a time when many industry players are complaining about margin compressions. On the flip side, however, the 2% EPF contribution will hardly benefit the foreign workers, said Williams. 'The employees will save virtually nothing, the EPF will have millions of extra members but most will have virtually no savings and employers will have minimal extra costs. 'For example, for a foreign worker on a minimum wage of RM1,700, the new scheme will cost RM34 per month (employer's portion). For employers complaining of higher costs due to this, they need a reality check. If they cannot afford RM34 per month, they do not have a viable business model.' As for those with large numbers of foreign workers, Williams urged them to reduce dependency on low-wage workers if such employers feel that the cumulative cost of 2% contribution is too high. 'Employ Malaysians or invest in technology,' he said. The EPF announced that this mandatory contribution will apply to all foreign workers in Malaysia – excluding domestic helpers – who possess valid passports and work permits issued by the Immigration Department. Previously, the EPF contributions for foreign workers were voluntary. This policy change should not come as a surprise to the market, as it was first announced in Budget 2025. Under the revised framework, foreign workers will be allowed to withdraw their EPF savings upon returning to their home countries, provided their work permits have expired and there is evidence that their permanent employment has ended. With the new mandatory policy, CIMB Research said the EPF stands to benefit from higher annual contributions. 'Based on an estimated 2.5 million foreign workers earning an average monthly salary of RM2,000, the combined 4% contribution from employers and employees could generate approximately RM2.4bil in additional annual contributions to the EPF.' Meanwhile, the Small and Medium Enterprises Association of Malaysia (Samenta) national president Datuk William Ng described a 2% contribution as 'reasonable' and not something that Samenta would object to. He also told StarBiz that most SMEs which engaged foreign workers did not have a large number of such workers. 'In fact, we are more concerned over the availability of these funds to the workers upon them ceasing to work in Malaysia. 'Ideally, they should be able to withdraw the fund in its entirety upon termination of their employment and such funds allowed to be repatriated to their home country to repay loans, build houses and any other uses they may deem fit,' he said.
Barnama
9 hours ago
- Barnama
Push For Gaza, Ukraine Peace Like Iran-Israel Deal
Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan speaks during a press conference at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. REUTERS/Piroschka Van De Wouw ANKARA, June 26 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Thursday hailed United States (US) President Donald Trump's efforts in achieving a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. "I told Trump that, referring to his efforts in the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the same level of effort is expected to help end the conflicts in Gaza as well as in the Russia-Ukraine war," Erdogan told reporters aboard his return flight from the NATO summit in the Netherlands. 'The closure of the Strait of Hormuz would cause major problems. We believe Iran would not take such a step,' the Turkish president said. bootstrap slideshow Erdogan underlined that the latest conflict between Iran and Israel has once again highlighted how important energy supply security is. 'As Türkiye, we are carrying out intensive efforts to increase our own energy resources,' Erdogan said. 'At the same time, we are continuing our oil and natural gas exploration activities with seriousness and determination,' he said. 'We do not consider it even remotely possible that Iran would cut off our natural gas supply,' Erdogan said, adding: 'At the moment, our natural gas from Iran is flowing, and we are not facing any issues.' Israel launched air strikes on several sites across Iran on June 13, including military and nuclear facilities, alleging that Tehran was on the verge of producing a nuclear bomb, a claim vehemently denied by Iran. While Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone strikes, the US joined the conflict by bombing three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday.
