
Dinner parties, listening and lobbying. How does the pope get elected
It was in this period of pre-conclave huddling in March of 2013 that Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the retired archbishop of Westminster, and other reform-minded Europeans began pushing the candidacy of an Argentine Jesuit named Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Their dinner table lobbying worked, and Pope Francis won on the fifth ballot.
Cardinal Vincent Nichols may have inherited Murphy-O'Connor's position as archbishop of Westminster, but he's not taking on the job as the front-man papal lobbyist in these days of canvassing of cardinals to try to identify who among them should be the next pope.
'We're of quite different styles,' Nichols said Friday, chuckling during an interview in the Venerable English College, the storied British seminary in downtown Rome where he studied in the 1960s. 'Cardinal Cormac would love to be at the centre of the party. I'm a little more reserved than that and a little bit more introverted".
Nevertheless, Nichols, 79, provided an insiders' view of what's going on among his fellow cardinal-electors — between meals of Rome's famous carbonara — as they get to know one another after bidding farewell to the pope who made 108 of them 'princes of the church".
Nichols says he is spending these days before his first conclave listening, as cardinals meet each morning in a Vatican auditorium to discuss the needs of the Catholic Church and the type of person who can lead it. These meetings are open to all cardinals, including those over 80, while the conclave itself in the Sistine Chapel is limited to cardinals who haven't yet reached 80.
"Not a boys' brigade that marches in step"
Nichols said a picture of the future pope is beginning to form, at least in his mind, as cardinals look back at Francis' 12-year pontificate and see where to go from here when they begin voting on Wednesday.
'I suppose we're looking for somebody who even in their manner, not only expresses the depth of the faith, but also its openness as well,' said Nichols.
Pope Benedict XVI named Nichols archbishop of Westminster in 2009, but he did not become a cardinal until 2014, when Francis tapped him in his first batch of cardinals. Francis went on to name Nichols as a member of several important Vatican offices, including the powerful dicastery for bishops, which vets bishop nominations around the world.
'My experience so far, to be quite honest with you, is there's a lot of attentive listening,' Nichols said. 'That's listening to the people who might have an idea today of who they think is the best candidate, and I wouldn't be surprised if by Monday they might have changed their mind".
Nichols said the picture that is emerging is of seeing Francis' pontificate in continuity with the more doctrinaire papacies of St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI, and of appreciating the multicultural reality of the Catholic Church today. Francis greatly expanded the College of Cardinals to include cardinals from far-flung places like Tonga and Mongolia, rather than just the traditional centres of European Catholicism.
Yes, divisions and disagreements have been aired. 'But I can never remember a time when Catholics all agreed about everything,' Nichols said.
'We're not a boys' brigade that marches in step.' But he said he sensed that cardinals believe Francis' reforming papacy and radical call to prioritise the poor and marginalised, to care for the planet and all its people, needed further consolidating with another papacy.
'There's a sense that the initiatives that this man of such originality took, they probably do need rooting a bit more to give them that stability and evident continuity,' Nichols said. 'So that these aren't just the ideas of one person, one charismatic person, but they are actually consistently part of how the church reflects on humanity, our own humanity and our world".
"Team Bergoglio"
In his book 'The Great Reformer,' Francis' biographer Austen Ivereigh described the 2013 election of Francis and how Nichols' predecessor, Murphy-O'Connor and other reform-minded Europeans within the College of Cardinals seized the opportunity to push Bergoglio after it was clear the Italians were fighting among themselves over the Italian candidate, splitting their vote.
'Team Bergoglio,' as these reform-minded cardinals came to be known, had tried to talk up Bergoglio in the 2005 conclave, but failed to get their man through after Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's momentum grew and Bergoglio bowed out.
In 2013, with many too old to vote in the conclave itself, 'Team Bergoglio' talked up the Argentine at dinner parties around Rome in the days before the conclave to try to ensure the Argentine could secure at least 25 votes on the first ballot to establish himself as a serious candidate, the book said.
'The Great Reformer' recounts a dinner party at the North American College, the US seminary in Rome, on March 5, 2013 to which Murphy-O'Connor and Australian Cardinal George Pell were invited and where the British cardinal talked up Bergoglio's name.
'He held a number of these dinners, and I think there were a few of them involved, a few who had grown convinced that Bergoglio was what the church needed,' Ivereigh said Friday.
Nichols doesn't have any such calculations or candidate, at least that he is willing to divulge.
'For me, it's no good going into a conclave thinking it's like a political election and I want my side to win. I'm not going to do that,' he said. 'I'm going to go in certainly with my own thoughts but ready to change them, to listen and maybe try and persuade others to change theirs too".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
UK faces more protests and legal action after asylum seekers hotel injunction
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox LONDON - The British government policy of housing thousands of asylum seekers in hotels was facing severe pressure on Wednesday, as opponents leapt on a court ruling to call for protests and legal action to have them all evicted. According to a regular tracker of voters' concerns, immigration has overtaken the economy as the biggest issue amid anger over record numbers of asylum seekers arriving in small boats across the Channel, including more than 27,000 this year. On Tuesday, the High Court in London granted a temporary injunction to stop asylum seekers from being housed in the Bell Hotel in Epping, about 20 miles (32 km) northeast of London in the county of Essex. The hotel had become a focal point for regular protests after a resident was charged with sexual assault, a crime he denies, with large numbers of police separating anti-immigration protesters and pro-immigration groups. The injunction in the Epping case centred around a specific planning issue and could be reversed when the case is heard in full later this year. But other councils said they would also urgently seek legal advice on evicting asylum seekers from hotels in their areas. Nigel Farage, the leader of the populist Reform Party which is leading in opinion polls, said all the 12 local authorities his party controlled would do everything in their power to do so. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Emergency broadcast system to alert S'pore public to disasters via their mobile phones: Edwin Tong Singapore COE prices up in all categories except motorcycles; Cat A hits $104,524, highest since Oct 2023 Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Singapore New annual course will groom future leaders of Singapore's Chinese community Life S'pore bands mark milestones with gigs: Silver Strings at 60, Mel & Joe at 55 and Lovehunters at 40 Singapore Singapore indie cinema The Projector owes over $1.2m to creditors Life Five things to do at Singapore Night Festival – from kampung chilling to spotting luminous crabs Asia Calls to cut ties: Malaysia flag furore tests PH-BN relations "Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win," Farage wrote in the Daily Telegraph newspaper. "No doubt we will be attacked as 'far Right' provocateurs for daring to suggest that people follow the lead of Epping's parents and residents by protesting peacefully." ASYLUM HOTELS Britain currently houses about 30,000 asylum seekers who are awaiting decisions on their claims in more than 200 hotels across the country and, although the government has said it intended to close all of these by 2029, it now faces a major headache if others are able to follow Epping's lead. In the court hearing, the Home Office (interior ministry) said the injunction would have a "substantial impact" on the government's ability to comply with its legal duty to provide accommodation, and security minister Dan Jarvis said they would look closely at the decision and whether to appeal it. "The big challenge remains, which is, we need to process asylum claims much more speedily and much more effectively than was the case previously," Jarvis told BBC TV. Critics say that housing asylum seekers in hotels, often young men who are not allowed to work, puts the local community at risk, and point to recent incidents such as in Epping and other locations where some migrants have been accused of serious crimes including the rape and sexual assault of young girls. They also contrast the facilities provided to migrants in hotels with the difficulties many in Britain are facing with rising living costs and shortages of affordable housing. However, pro-migrant groups say far-right groups and opportunistic politicians are deliberately seeking to exploit and enflame tensions for their own ends. Across Europe governments have struggled with how to house asylum seekers, with far-right and anti-migrant groups in France also leading protests against dedicated centres in recent years. During riots in Britain last year, hotels containing migrants were attacked when unrest involving some far-right supporters erupted after misinformation that the murderer of three girls in Southport was a radical Islamist migrant. REUTERS

Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
US, Nato planners start to craft Ukraine security guarantee options
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Russia's Foreign Ministry has ruled out the deployment of troops from Nato countries to help secure a peace deal. US and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, US officials and sources told Reuters on Aug 19, following President Donald Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's war. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Mr Trump's promise during a summit on Aug 18 of security guarantees for Kyiv, but many questions remain unanswered. Officials told Reuters that the Pentagon is carrying out planning exercises on the support Washington could offer beyond providing weapons. But they cautioned that it would take time for US and European planners to determine what would be both militarily feasible and acceptable to the Kremlin. One option was sending European forces to Ukraine but putting the US in charge of their command and control, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The sources added that the troops would not be under a Nato banner but operate under their own nations' flags. The Pentagon and Nato did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the idea. In a press briefing, the White House said that the United States could help coordinate a security guarantee for Ukraine. Russia's Foreign Ministry has ruled out the deployment of troops from Nato countries to help secure a peace deal. Mr Trump has publicly ruled out deploying US troops in Ukraine but appeared on Aug 19 to leave the door open to other US military involvement. In an interview with Fox News, he suggested Washington could provide air support to Ukraine. 'When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground, we're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, ... by air because nobody has stuff we have, really they don't have,' Mr Trump said. He did not provide further details. US air support could come in a variety of ways including providing more air defense systems to Ukraine and enforcing a no-fly zone with US fighter jets. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022, the United States has shipped billions of dollars worth of weapons and munitions to Kyiv. The Trump administration briefly halted those weapons shipments, including after a contentious White House meeting between Mr Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in February and again in July. Shipments have resumed and Mr Trump has pledged to send weapons, primarily defensive ones, to help the war-torn country. Nato military chiefs will focus on Ukraine and the way forward when they meet virtually on Aug 20, a conference first reported by Reuters. US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, who also oversees Nato operations in Europe, will brief the chiefs of defence on the Alaska meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. A US official speaking on condition of anonymity said US General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was expected to attend the meeting. The official added that Mr Caine would meet with some of his European counterparts in Washington on Aug 19 evening. Mr Trump has pressed for a quick end to Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, and Kyiv and its allies have worried he could seek to force an agreement on Russia's terms after the president last week rolled out the red carpet for Mr Putin. Russia says it is engaged in a 'special military operation' in Ukraine to protect its national security, claiming Nato's eastward expansion and Western military support for Ukraine pose existential threats. Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab. REUTERS

Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump says US may provide air support to back a Ukraine peace deal
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald J Trump (right) meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office of the White House on Aug 18. WASHINGTON/KYIV - President Donald Trump said on Aug 19 he has ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in the country. A day after Mr Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit, the path to peace remained uncertain as the US and allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include. 'When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air,' Mr Trump said in an interview with the Fox News 'Fox & Friends' program. Mr Trump did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, Mr Trump characterised his negotiating style in trying to end the war as 'probably instinct more than process.' Following Aug 18's meeting, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. The energy ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery. Mr Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying, 'We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks.' The nature of US military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear. Air support could take many forms, such as missile defense systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that US air support was 'an option and a possibility', but, like Mr Trump, she did not provide any details. 'The president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies,' she said at a news briefing. Analysts say more than 1 million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trilateral meeting? Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky hailed the White House talks as a 'major step forward' toward ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump. Mr Zelensky's warm rapport with Mr Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February. Mr Trump discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Aug 19, a White House official said. Istanbul, where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official said. Hungary is one of the few European places that Mr Putin could visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges as Mr Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader. It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Mr Putin for any peace talks. 'They are in the process of setting it up,' Mr Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin/Zelensky meeting. But Mr Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. 'Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go,' he said. Mr Trump, asked by Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said, 'Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts.' Ukraine's allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Aug 19, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia. The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet US counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine. Nato military leaders were expected to meet on Aug 20 to discuss Ukraine, with US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters. Mr Putin has said Russia will not tolerate troops from the Nato alliance in Ukraine. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit with Mr Trump on Aug 15 in Alaska. Mr Neil Melvin, a director at the International Security at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation. Mr Melvin said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving 'not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process.' 'They're all tiptoeing around Trump' to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Mr Trump's statements on security guarantees were 'so vague it's very hard to take it seriously'. REUTERS