David Souter, Retired Supreme Court Justice and Symbol of a Bygone Era, Dies at 85
Appointed in 1990 by Republican President George H.W. Bush, Souter defied expectations by siding with the court's liberal wing on major decisions throughout his nearly two decades on the bench. His legacy lives on not only through the cases he helped shape, but in the cautionary tale his career became for future Republican judicial nominations.
Souter's tenure is widely seen as the reason the GOP became far more rigid in vetting Supreme Court nominees. His liberal rulings, especially in key social cases, gave rise to the phrase "no more Souters"—a rallying cry that reshaped how justices are chosen. That shift has helped solidify the current conservative supermajority, which in 2022 overturned Roe v. Wade.
Though current justices occasionally diverge from partisan expectations—Chief Justice John Roberts, for example—none have mirrored Souter's ideological journey. In a statement following Souter's death, Roberts praised his former colleague:
'Justice David Souter served our Court with great distinction for nearly twenty years. He brought uncommon wisdom and kindness to a lifetime of public service... He will be greatly missed.'
Following his retirement in 2009, Souter returned to New Hampshire and continued to serve the judiciary by hearing cases on the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
His retirement, during President Barack Obama's first term, enabled the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reinforcing a now-rare moment of ideological transition. Obama's other nominee, Justice Elena Kagan, replaced John Paul Stevens—another Republican appointee who ultimately aligned with the liberal bloc.
Today's court reflects a more hardened partisan divide. It is now rare, if not unthinkable, for a justice to retire under a president from the opposing party, a sharp contrast to Souter's era.
As ideological battle lines continue to shape judicial appointments, David Souter remains a quiet but profound reminder of a time when unpredictability was still possible on the nation's highest court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
7 minutes ago
- NDTV
Actor Emma Thompson Says Trump Called Her On Day Of Divorce For A Date
Oscar-winning actress Emma Thompson has joked about Donald Trump "stalking" her after the now-US president called her to ask her on a date the very same day her divorce was finalised. The 66-year-old British actress said she could have "changed the course of American history," had she accepted his offer. Speaking at the Locarno Film Festival in Switzerland on August 8, where she received the Leopard Club Award for her career achievements, Ms Thompson recounted the surprising call she got from Trump while filming the 1998 dramedy 'Primary Colors'. Ms Thompson said she was in her trailer when the phone rang, and answering, she heard him say, "Hello, this is Donald Trump." "I thought it was a joke and asked, 'How can I help you? Maybe he needed directions from someone,'" Ms Thompson told The Telegraph. Donald Trump then invited her, saying, "I'd love you to come and stay at one of my beautiful places. Maybe we could have dinner." Her response was, "Well, that's very sweet. Thank you so much. I'll get back to you." Ms Thompson said, "I realised that on that day, my divorce decree had come through. And I bet he's got people looking for suitable people he could take out on his arm. You know, a nice divorcee, that's what he was looking for." She added, "And he found the number in my trailer. I mean, that's stalking." Joking about what might have happened if she had accepted, she said, "I could have gone on a date with Donald Trump, and then I would have a story to tell. I could have changed the course of American history." Emma Thompson's divorce from actor Kenneth Branagh was finalised after their marriage from 1989 to 1995. She later married Greg Wise in 2003. Donald Trump had separated from his second wife, Marla Maples, around the same time and later married Melania Trump in 2005. Earlier, actress Salma Hayek shared a story of Trump asking her out while she was in a relationship. Ms Hayek described how Trump got her phone number after an encounter where he draped his coat over her shoulders at an event. Despite her boyfriend at the time being present there, Trump asked her out. "He's asking me out, and I said, 'What about my boyfriend? Are you crazy?'" she recalled. Trump allegedly replied, "He's not good enough for you. You should go out with me." Salma Hayek is now married to French billionaire Francois-Henri Pinault.
United News of India
16 minutes ago
- United News of India
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy denounces upcoming Trump-Putin talks, says his exclusion will lead to ‘dead solutions'
Kyiv, Aug 9 (UNI) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has slammed the upcoming talks between Russian President Vladmir Putin and the US President Donald Trump, stating that Ukraine's exclusion would only lead to 'dead solutions". According to CBS News, taking to social media, the Ukrainian President posted on Telegram that Kyiv's territorial integrity, enshrined in its constitution, is non-negotiable, and that any lasting peace must include Ukraine's voice at the table. Zelenskyy said Ukraine "will not give Russia any awards for what it has done" and that "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier." He further echoed Kyiv, and Europe's concerns over the August 15 meeting, arguing that Trump and Putin's meeting without Zelenskyy risks marginalising their interests. "Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work." The two leaders are set to meet in Alaska on Aug 15, in what has been called a possible breakthrough by some. An anonymous White House official told the platform that efforts are underway to include Ukraine in the upcoming talks. The POTUS had earlier said that a settlement could be reached without involving Zelenskyy, though also expressed confidence that he could hold a trilateral meeting with both his Russian, and Ukrainian counterparts. One of the key contentions of the peace process remains Trump's greenlighting of letting Russia keep some of the territories it captured from Ukraine, such as Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Oblast among others. Zelenskyy firmly stated that ceding any territory was out of the question. The summit in Alaska would mark the first face-to-face meeting between Putin and an American leader since former President Joe Biden met with his Russian counterpart in Switzerland in June 2021, eight months before the beginning of the now-three-year-long Russia- Ukraine war. "It seems entirely logical for our delegation to fly across the Bering Strait simply, and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska," Putin's foreign affairs advisor, Yuri Ushakov, said Saturday in a statement posted to the Kremlin's news channel. UNI ANV RN
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The ‘Turnberry system' – what the US' new global economic order looks like
Last week, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra touted India's 'bright prospects in the changing world order' in the medium term, adding that 'opportunities are there for the taking'. But will India be able to get its hands on any of these opportunities? Turnberry, of course, is a Trump-owned hotel and resort on the western coast of Scotland where in late July the US President and his European Commission counterpart, Ursula von der Leyen, announced their bilateral trade agreement. As part of the deal, goods from the European Union (EU) will face a tariff of 15 per cent when entering the US. However, it did not end there: by 2028, the EU will buy $750 billion of American energy products and invest $600 billion in the US. The deal has been called a 'capitulation' and humiliating for the EU. According to Julian Hinz, head of Research Center Trade Policy at Berlin-based Kiel Institute for the World Economy, it was an 'appeasement' and abandoned the World Trade Organization's (WTO) principles. 'Under WTO rules, member countries must apply the same tariffs to all other members. Deviations are only permitted under free trade agreements in which both sides reduce their tariffs to zero. The current deal clearly violates these principles and sets a dangerous precedent,' Hinz warned on July 28, adding that Trump's strategy of 'pitting other economies against each other' had only been strengthened. Greer's New York Times column, however, made no bones about abandoning the WTO and its doctrines. According to Greer, the legacy of the Bretton Woods system lived on in the form of an arrangement dominated by the WTO he said was 'untenable and unsustainable' – while the US lost industrial jobs and economic security, others did not undertake key reforms. China, meanwhile, was the winner. But now, 'reform is at hand', with the US-EU deal 'oriented toward serving concrete national interests rather than vague aspirations of multilateral institutions'. Multilateral institutions such as the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund have been criticised for decades for their policy suggestions, especially when it comes to debt-laden developing nations, as shown by the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the European debt crisis. Momentum to meaningfully reform them has gathered pace in recent years. Greer, however, has a more US-centric world order in mind. 'It took over 50 years from that first meeting at Bretton Woods until the creation of the WTO. It has been 30 years since. Fewer than 130 days from the beginning of the Trump Round, the Turnberry system is by no means complete, but its construction is well underway,' Greer concluded, calling the current round of global trade negotiations as the 'Trump Round' of discussions – a reference to the several rounds of talks held between countries that led to the formation of the WTO at the Uruguay Round in 1994. But what exactly is the Turnberry system? Going by Greer's column, the Turnberry system involves nations aligning on economic and national security interests and rebalancing trade in a 'more sustainable direction' such that the US' manufacturing sector is back on its feet. This, he said, warrants a 'generational project to re-industrialize America'. The era of the US getting other countries to lower their trade barriers by removing the tariffs that defended its own manufacturing sector is over; in its place, the removal of foreign trade barriers is being done 'while ensuring sufficient tariff protection at home'. This system also intends to enforce these new priorities in a far more telling manner than 'drawn-out dispute settlement process'. Should the US detect non-compliance, there will be swift retribution in the form of higher tariffs – the 'formidable stick' to the 'mighty carrot' that is the opportunity to sell your goods in the 'world's most lucrative consumer market', Greer said. Clearly, the Turnberry system is one which serves only one country. The US gets its pound of flesh in the form of re-industrialisation, while foreign companies get the opportunity to have access to the world's richest consumers. Or at least that's what the US government thinks. Leading academics have repeatedly warned that Trump's tariff war will not solve the country's problems. For instance, Robert Z Lawrence of the Peterson Institute of International Economics and a professor of trade and investment at Harvard University has said it is a 'fool's errand' to make the US economy go through a massive disruption just to create a relatively small number of manufacturing jobs. Moreover, dealing with bilateral deficits individually does not balance overall trade and without policies that cut American expenditure relative to its output, Trump's tariffs will only result in the shifting of its trade deficit from targeted countries to non-targeted ones, Lawrence has argued.
