FBI leaders say jail video shows that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide
The FBI's top two leaders said in interviews on Fox News that the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and promised to release a surveillance video from the federal jail in New York City where Epstein was found dead.
Officials in the first Trump administration ruled that Epstein's death in 2019 was a suicide. But it has remained the subject of conspiracy theories suggesting that he was murdered because of his connections to high-profile celebrities and politicians.
Deputy FBI director Dan Bongino, a former pro-Trump podcaster, said in a Fox News interview on Thursday morning that the video showed that no one entered or approached Epstein's cell at the time of his suicide. Bongino also said that no forensic evidence had been found suggesting that another individual was present.
'There's no DNA, there's no audio, there's no fingerprints, there's no suspects, there's no accomplices, there's no tips, there is nothing,' sad Bongino, who asked members of the public to share any evidence of wrongdoing in the case. 'If you have it, I'm happy to see it.'
'There's video clear as day,' Bongino added. 'He's the only person in there and the only person coming out. You can see it.'
In a separate interview on Fox News on Wednesday night, FBI director Kash Patel also said that Epstein had died by suicide and promised to release additional information about the case.
'We are diligently working on that,' Patel said. 'It takes time to go through years of investigations.'
Past Epstein conspiracy claims
But before Bongino became deputy FBI director, he repeatedly promoted conspiracy theories about Epstein's death, according to the Washington Post.
In a Jan. 4, 2024 podcast, Bongino played a clip where a journalist said she was '100 percent' convinced that Epstein was killed 'because he made his whole living blackmailing people.' Bongino told his listeners that he'd heard the same claims from another reporter and said they were 'super important.'
'This is where I get really upset at the media,' Bongino said later in the podcast, contending that reporters had 'done almost like no — maybe because I was an investigator before, it's like, I'm amazed at how few people are putting two and two together.'
Roughly two weeks before Trump named Bongino FBI deputy director, Bongino spoke again about Epstein. He said again that a reporter had told him about the existence of tapes that Epstein used to blackmail powerful people and then mentioned an allegation he'd heard involving Bill Clinton.
'I'm not ever gonna let this story go,' Bongino promised on Feb. 10. 'I'm not letting it go ever.'
For years before taking office, Patel and Bongino also claimed that the Biden administration and corrupt 'deep state' actors had 'weaponized' the FBI against Donald Trump.
They accused the bureau of covering up what it knew about pipe bombs placed outside the offices of the RNC and DNC in Washington before the Jan. 6 attack. They suggested that FBI operatives helped ignite the Capitol riot. And they said FBI agents committed crimes and tried to 'overthrow' Trump.
But large numbers of Trump supporters who believe those claim sare publicly asking: Why aren't Patel and Bongino arresting and prosecuting the people Patel labeled 'government gangsters?"
An FBI spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the interview, on Fox & Friends, Bongino also said that the job was taking a toll on his family. 'The biggest lifestyle change is family-wise,' he said.
'It was a lot, and it's been tough on the family. People ask all the time, do you like it? No. I don't,' Bongino said. 'But the president didn't ask me to do this to like it — nobody likes going into an organization like that and having to make big changes.'
Last weekend, Bongino announced on X that the FBI is re-examining multiple cases from the Biden era, including the 2021 pipe at the DNC and RNC, the 2022 leak of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, and a small bag of cocaine that was found in the White House in 2023.
On Thursday, Bongino said the FBI is close to solving one of the three cases without saying which one.
'We got a fascinating tip on one of these cases, one of the three,' Bongino said. 'We're going to run it out. We're not going to be able to make that public, obviously, right away, because we have to make sure.'
Focus on pipe bomb case
Three weeks before the Trump administration took office, the FBI released what it said was new video of the masked person planting bombs outside the Republican and Democratic headquarters in Washington. But FBI officials said they hadn't identified a suspect or even determined for certain whether the figure was a man or a woman.
Before he was named deputy FBI director, Bongino accused the FBI of lying about that person on one of his podcasts. 'I believe the FBI knows the identity of this pipe bomber on January 6th, four years ago, and just doesn't want to tell us because it was an inside job,' he said.
In an interview with conspiracy theorist and political commentator Julie Kelly, Bongino said, 'I'm convinced the person who planted that pipe bomb at the DNC on January 6th was there to create a fake assassination attempt because they needed to stop Republicans from questioning in front of a national TV audience what happened in the 2020 election.'
Patel also said in his Fox News interview on Wednesday that the FBI now has new leads in the pipe bomb case. He accused the Biden administration of having 'slow rolled' the investigation but offered no specific examples.
Bongino defended the reopening of the investigation into who left a small bag of cocaine in the White House during the Biden administration. Bongino, a former Secret Service agent, argued that the probe was relaunched for safety reasons, not to score political points.
'I was a Secret Service agent. A potentially hazardous material made its way into the White House,' Bongino said on Fox News. 'Nobody seems to know how it got there, and nobody seemed to get to investigate it fully. … What planet do we live on where that's not of public interest?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wisconsin judge who shielded illegal migrant from ICE shares latest defense: 'I am absolutely immune'
A Wisconsin judge indicted for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant evade ICE is now claiming 'absolute judicial immunity' in a broader legal effort to dismiss all charges. Hannah Dugan, 66, a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge, was arrested by FBI agents on April 25 for allegedly preventing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from detaining a man in her courtroom. The man, 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, was reportedly subject to a federal detainer at the time. Federal prosecutors allege Dugan directed ICE officers to the chief judge's office while allowing Flores-Ruiz and his attorney to exit through a door typically used by jurors. The long-time judge was later indicted on May 13 on charges of obstructing a federal agency and aiding Flores-Ruiz's escape. However, in a 37-page memorandum filed May 14, her attorneys argued the indictment is an 'ugly innovation' that threatens long-standing legal precedent. They claim Dugan is protected by 'absolute judicial immunity' for actions taken as part of her official duties, even if those actions are later contested. 'Judges can be and are charged for actions wholly unrelated to their role, like taking bribes or kidnapping,' the memo notes, adding that Dugan's conduct occurred squarely within her judicial capacity. Her high-powered legal team, including attorney Dean Strang, warned the case could set a 'dangerous precedent,' undermining judicial independence. 'This is an extraordinary prosecution that poses a threat to federalism and judicial independence,' the filing states. 'Dismissal here flows from a straightforward application of long-settled law. The indictment itself is an ugly innovation. Its dismissal will not be.' The filing continues: 'Nothing in the Constitution allows the federal government to superintend the administration and case-by-case, daily functioning of state courts as this indictment proposes.' This latest motion expands on an earlier filing with more detailed arguments about federal overreach and the constitutional role of judges. Dugan's attorneys maintain she acted within her jurisdiction and broke no laws in declining to facilitate the detention. The US Department of Justice, however, characterizes the incident as obstruction of federal law, triggering a contentious legal and political debate. An amicus brief filed on Friday by 138 former state and federal judges supports Dugan, arguing she is entitled to 'absolute immunity for her official acts.' The brief compares this protection to that granted to members of the legislative and executive branches. It calls the prosecution an 'egregious overreach by the executive branch' that 'threatens public trust in the judicial system and the ability of the public to avail themselves of courthouses without fear of reprisal.' But, the Justice Department maintains that no one - including judges - is above the law when it comes to obstructing federal immigration operations. 'Since President Trump was inaugurated, activist judges have tried to obstruct President Trump and the American people's mandate to make America safe and secure our homeland - but this judge's actions to shield an accused violent criminal illegal alien from justice is shocking and shameful,' Assistant Secretary Department of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Dugan, who was released after her arrest, pleaded not guilty earlier this month. Her trial is set to begin the week of July 21. If found guilty of both charges, she could face up to six years in prison and $350,000 in fines. She has served as a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge since 2016, winning election with about 65 percent of the vote and running unopposed for reelection in 2022, according to CBS News. As for Flores-Ruiz, he had appeared in Dugan's court on April 18 for a status conference in a misdemeanor battery case, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He is accused of repeatedly hitting and briefly strangling his roommate, and also striking two women who tried to intervene. Flores-Ruiz has pleaded not guilty to three battery charges and to a separate federal charge of illegally re-entering the US after being deported to Mexico 12 years ago. Six federal agents were present at the courthouse on April 18 to arrest him. He was ultimately taken into custody after a short chase outside the courthouse.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Subtle way Trump humiliated Elon Musk in Oval Office showdown... and other telltale signs that reveal truth about their breakup
After Elon Musk 's surprise public break from President Donald Trump this week, everyone in Washington is desperately trying to determine the status of their once thriving bromance. Perhaps now we have a clue.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song
It was billed by the president as a press conference.. But that was accurate only to the extent that there were a few select reporters asking questions in the Oval Office. They were part of the 'pool', a chosen group of journalists on a rota to cover the president's movements each day. The rota used to be drawn up by the White House Correspondents Association on a rotating basis. The Trump administration has changed that. They now compile the pool. And today, as it happens, the media seemed particularly compliant. The questions were soft. Painfully so. There was one on whether the president had any marital advice for his French counterpart - who appeared to be shoved by his wife the other day. Another was about whether Mr Musk thought it was harder to colonise to Mars or reform government. There were one or two about the pressing issues of the day, like Gaza, but nothing that could be described as probing or doing what we are supposed to be there to do - hold power to account. And Musk, under Trump, has without question wielded immense power over the past few months; unprecedented for an unelected official. He upended the workings of federal government, slashing thousands of jobs. He forced the closure of whole departments like USAID, changing America's global footprint. He did it all with a sense of enjoyment. The literal chainsaw to bureaucracy was memorable. 0:53 There is little debate in America about the need to cut government bureaucracy or cut the debt. America, more than any country I have lived in, is a place full of bloat and waste. Yet it was Mr Musk's methods which caused so much unease among his many critics. They argued that where a scalpel was definitely needed, Musk instead deployed a sledgehammer. At times, his flamboyant style was a neat distraction from the substance of Trump's sweeping policy changes. But none of that was interrogated in this 'press conference'. Instead, the inane questions went on. Trump was asked if he would pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs should he be convicted - he didn't say 'no', but there was no follow up to examine why. He was asked if he wished he'd become a judge given that they are blocking so much of his legislation. He laughed. There was a moment when irony appeared to have died altogether. In the same breath as trumpeting his success in cutting government waste - when he has, in fact, achieved a fraction of the $2 trillion savings he promised - Musk congratulated Trump for deploying so much gold around the Oval Office. The presidential office has had an extensive, gaudy gold makeover costing undisclosed sums. One reporter did ask about Musk's alleged drug use. But by attributing the story to the New York Times - who have made the allegations - Musk had an easy out. "Why believe that fake news," he essentially said. Surely the obvious question was "Mr Musk, when was the last time you took ketamine or ecstasy?" It never came. We did get the answer to one burning question, trivial though it was, given what's going on in the world. But it took 41 minutes for any of the reporters to ask it: Why was Elon Musk sporting a shiner on his right eye? 0:42 His 4-year-old son, X, whacked him, he said. Maybe young X has some sympathy for the thousands of federal workers - ordinary Americans - who Musk fired at his president's pleasure.
