Bilston Outdoor Market's £5m redevelopment set to get under way
The council said the market will deliver "the absolute best market in the West Midlands" - with more modern, accessible and "vibrant spaces" for traders and the local community.The new market will have better access for pedestrians from the bus and Metro station, a new canopy, new toilets, stall improvements and improved public spaces.
'Challenging ground conditions'
Council leader Stephen Simkins, said that despite the discovery of difficult ground conditions at the market site, the council was "100% committed" to delivering the full scheme as agreed with traders.He said: "Unfortunately, surveys revealed far more challenging ground conditions at the site than we had anticipated, so we have had to re-engineer parts of the project. "This has driven up the cost of the scheme - but I can assure traders we will not compromise on our ambition and will deliver the full scheme exactly as agreed with them."Council bosses have identified additional contingency funds of up to £2.5m to address the re-engineered scheme and other factors.The council also said it will freeze rent costs of the indoor and outdoor market traders and is investing £15,000 in activities and events in and around the indoor market to help drive footfall.Simkins added: "We promised traders they'd be the first to know once we got the timeline of the works, and I met with them face to face first this morning to talk through the plans and let them know how we're supporting them."
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough farmland homes granted despite affordability worry
More than 1,000 homes on farmland on the outskirts of a city have been approved, despite a concern over the number of affordable to build the properties land in Paston, Peterborough - which would join 870 homes already granted - was unanimously approved by city councillors on Tuesday.A request had been made for 30% of the homes to be affordable, but an independent consultant concluded that these figures were "unviable" .It was agreed that one in 10 of the homes would be Asim Mahmood supported the application, but had reservations over the "extremely low" percentage proposed."I think as an authority we should be doing more than just going for the 10%, but I do understand that viability sometimes doesn't allow us to do that," he Dickinson, assistant director at the applicant's agent Deloitte, told the planning committee the development would bring "significant benefits to Peterborough".He said it included "important infrastructure which is essential to delivery of the whole allocation". Tracey Westley, from the area, told the BBC the new homes were a "really good idea"."But I do think the infrastructure needs to be in place first," the 54-year-old said. "Quite a lot of the time, they build a housing estate and then add the rest afterwards. I'd like to see it done the right way round." Specific designs for the 2,000 planned homes will be submitted at a later date.A new A16 roundabout and improvements to Newborough Road have already been agreed, as well as £26.5m towards local Jeeves, 35, said she welcomed the homes. "If they're treated well, I can't see why it wouldn't succeed and the families that go in them, succeed as well," she said. "If they're going to put people out of bad situations and into a better one, why not?" But Tim Clark, 53, suggested the homes should be closer to the city centre."I think it's a bit out in the sticks," he said. "It should be a bit nearer to Peterborough itself. I'm not too bothered about it being greenbelt land, but make it local. Make it closer to the city." Jurga Ziliene, 49, also had reservations, suggesting the roads were too narrow to deal with an influx of traffic."We already have a lot of new homes here," she said. "Why does everything have to be in Peterborough?" Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Martin Lewis reveals green way to save hundreds on your energy bills
Money expert Martin Lewis has shared how households can save hundreds every year on their energy bills by taking advantage of an often misunderstood green technology. Solar panels are becoming an increasingly common sight on UK homes, but many people are still unsure of how to install them or if their property is eligible FOR WHAT?. Advice from Mr Lewis' Money Saving Expert service says that the high upfront cost of installing solar panels – which averages around £6,100 – means that homeowners should be sure about the move before they commit. But the high cost can be worth it for the savings on energy bills – making them up to £350 cheaper a year, according to experts. At this rate, the break-even point is around 10 years, meaning anyone looking to move to a new property within a decade might want to consider it. There is also a lot of support on offer for those looking to install solar panels. Several solar panel grants and funding schemes are available, particularly for low-income households, which can help them fund up to the entire cost of the project. Can you save more money if you already have solar panels? With more homes now being fitted with solar panels, a rising number of people are finding themselves living in houses that had the technology fitted when they moved in. Around 1.5 million UK homes now have solar panels, research by energy company Sunsave has found. This is up 500,000 since 2022, with 5.5 per cent of properties now fitted. Pre-installed solar panels give homeowners or renters an automatic saving on energy bills. However, there could be scope for even more money to be saved, Mr Lewis has found. The key factor is whether the panels were installed before or after April 2019. If they were installed after, the owner will be on the Smart Export Guarantee (SEG) system. This sets the tariff for how much the household is paid for units of electricity they generate, and separately for how much they export back to the grid. Many solar panel owners may mistakenly believe they are stuck with their current rate, but they are free to switch. Shopping around for a better deal can save hundreds a year, so it is well worth doing. Those with solar panels installed before April 2019 will likely instead be on a 'Feed-In Tariff' (FIT) system. This pays a good rate for generating electricity (up to 7.39p per kWh), although it has dropped in recent years. Mr Lewis advises that those on the FIT system can switch to the SEG system, but still keep the previous electricity generation rates while boosting export rates. This can raise the amount paid for generating electricity to a market-leading 30p per kWh, resulting in big savings.
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Taylor Wimpey slumps to loss on £222m fire safety hit
Taylor Wimpey has plunged to a half-year loss after taking another £222 million cost hit for removing cladding from high-rise buildings following the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy. The housebuilder reported pre-tax losses of £92.1 million for the six months to June 29 against profits of £99.7 million a year earlier. It said this was largely due to an extra £222.2 million provision for fire safety measures. The company also said full-year earnings would be lower than expected at £424 million after taking an unexpected £20 million charge for historical defective work by a former contractor. Experts at AJ Bell said the latest cladding cost has seen Taylor Wimpey's total bill swell to more than £550 million in the wake of the Grenfell fire in 2017, which killed 72 people. They estimated the cost to FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 housebuilders had now reached more than £3.5 billion. Large housebuilders agreed in 2022 to pay to fix cladding issues on their properties following public and political pressure. Taylor Wimpey's shares fell 5% on Thursday after its interim results laid bare the impact of the costs. Jennie Daly, chief executive of Taylor, said: 'The safety of our customers remains our highest priority – this principle has consistently guided our approach, and we have increased our cladding fire safety provision to reflect findings from updated fire risk assessments and investigations in the first half.' The group said it was also pushed to a loss by an £18 million payout after an investigation into information sharing in the sector by the UK competition watchdog. Taylor was one of seven builders that recently agreed to pay a record £100 million between them as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the probe by the Competition and Markets Authority into whether they shared commercially sensitive information. In its latest results, Taylor said it saw 'softer' market conditions in the second quarter as affordability continues to hamper demand, particularly from first-time buyers. 'While affordability remains constrained, particularly amongst first-time buyers, lenders remain committed to the UK mortgage market and long-term fundamentals are positive, with significant unmet need for UK housing,' Ms Daly said.
