Cadbury-parent Mondelez calls for delay to EU deforestation law
The company supports the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) in principle, Massimiliano Di Domenico, vice president of corporate and government affairs for Europe said, but urged policymakers to account for "on-the-ground realities."
Di Domenico was speaking at the European Parliament last week and later posted his comments on LinkedIn, opens new tab.
In July last year, Reuters reported that Nestle (NESN.S), opens new tab, Mars Wrigley, and Ferrero backed the law in a joint paper, while urging Brussels to provide clearer guidance and support to help companies meet the compliance deadline.
The proposed law, which aims to end 10% of global deforestation fuelled by EU consumption, requires companies and traders importing soy, beef, cocoa, coffee and related products to prove their supply chains do not contribute to the destruction of the world's forests, or face hefty fines.
Di Domenico said the cocoa sector is "under huge pressure" due to soaring prices, declining production, and digital infrastructure gaps in origin countries which could affect compliance and disrupt supply chains.
"That's why we are respectfully, transparently and responsibly calling for a 12-month delay — not to dilute ambition, but to enable practical, inclusive, and effective implementation," Di Domenico said in his post.
The EU has already delayed its launch by a year to December 2025, following complaints from trading partners including Brazil and the U.S., and cut back reporting rules after industry criticism.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU, Indonesia strike political agreement to advance free trade deal
BRUSSELS, July 13 (Reuters) - European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Sunday that a political agreement was reached to advance the EU-Indonesia free trade deal. "There's a lot of untouched potential in our trade relationship and therefore this agreement comes at the right time because the new agreement will open new markets", von der Leyen said at a press conference with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why Musk may be running out of road at Tesla
One way to antagonise Elon Musk is to mention that he did not found Tesla. The electric car maker was incorporated by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning in 2003, a year before Musk led an investment in the company. But for most of Tesla's history, Musk has been synonymous with it. Few motorists could tell you who runs Kia or Nissan, but many Tesla owners talk as if they are on a first name basis with 'Elon'. Imagining Tesla without its mercurial boss, who sparked the electric vehicle revolution, is like imagining Disney without Mickey Mouse. But an increasingly loud chorus is questioning whether Tesla might be better off without its volatile chief executive (his official title at the company is Technoking). The company's sales have fallen sharply in recent months in a move tied to his support of Donald Trump and far-Right parties including Germany's AfD, with the historically progressive consumer base that bought most electric cars distancing themselves from Musk. In recent weeks, the company's shares have also fallen heavily as Musk has fallen out with the US president and set up his own 'America Party'. His row with Trump, which has seen the president threaten to deport Musk, appeared to scotch any chance of the company receiving favourable treatment over EV credits and driverless car regulation. It could also turn off millions of Maga drivers who might have filled the void left by Tesla's more liberal former fans. 'In real life he would be sacked from Tesla and somebody would actually run the company,' says Ross Gerber, an early investor who has called for Musk to go. 'If he's going to do politics, then he shouldn't be the chief executive. There's a lot of work that needs to be done at Tesla.' Political distractions Most investors have said they want Musk to stay in charge of the company, but they want him to commit to the job full time. Despite his frequent controversies, he is recognised as a uniquely talented executive who has repeatedly defied his doubters. Sales may be in decline, but the company is pressing ahead with the launch of driverless taxi rides in the US, a business that Musk has said is Tesla's future. In May, a group of shareholders wrote to Tesla's board asking that Musk commit to working 40 hours a week at the company. 'The current crisis at Tesla puts into sharp focus the long-term problems at the company stemming from the CEO's absence, which is amplified by a board that appears largely uninterested and unwilling to act,' it said. At the time, Musk acknowledged the concerns, promising to pare back his work at the White House's department of government efficiency and return '24/7' to his businesses, which also include rocket company SpaceX and social network X. But his spat with Trump and promises to end America's two-party system indicated that he had once again become distracted. On Monday, Tesla's shares fell 8pc as Musk's launch of the America Party reignited questions about his commitment to Tesla. James Fishback, a Trump-supporting investment manager, has written to Tesla's board asking it to force Musk to clarify his political ambitions. 'This [running a party] is a full-time job, and the question is whether this full-time job is compatible with his full-time job as Tesla chief executive,' he says. 'When Elon deviates from its core competency and does things that are self destructive, the share price rightfully responds.' Individual shareholders, however disgruntled, have little influence over Musk. The company's board, which would be formally responsible for firing him if it came to it, contains several Musk allies. In May, Robyn Denholm, the company's chairman, swiftly denied a Wall Street Journal report that the company had started looking for a successor. And the majority of shareholders last year backed a $56bn (£41bn) pay package for its chief executive. Who could replace Musk? There would also be the tricky task of replacing Musk, who, as the company's largest shareholder, would continue to be actively involved. Last week X's chief executive Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years in which she had regularly been undermined by Musk's behaviour. The most likely candidate would be an insider such as JB Straubel, the company's former technology chief, or Tesla's chief designer Franz von Holzhausen. Musk would bristle at any attempt to replace him. He has said he wants to run Tesla for another five years, predicting that it will be the most valuable company in the world. When Wall Street analyst Dan Ives last week called on the board to rein him in, Musk tweeted back: 'Shut up, Dan'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Junior doctors' strike to cost Britain almost £13m a day
Resident doctor strikes are poised to cost Britain almost £13m for each day of walkouts, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR). Analysis for The Telegraph found the five-day strike would deliver a £64m hit to the economy as Britain loses working days and suffers lower productivity. However, the overall cost is likely to be far higher as the findings do not factor in indirect losses, such as the consequences of missed appointments. The figures will come as a blow to Sir Keir Starmer after he gave away big pay rises last year to end industrial action. Samuel Miley, from CEBR, said: 'You will have people who unfortunately miss hospital appointments because of the strike or receive care that would have been better. 'Those people will face negative consequences in terms of their own health, which subsequently can be measured in economic terms. 'For instance, if they are forced to spend more time off work, or their condition worsens such that they are no longer able to return to work at all.' More than 200,000 hospital appointments risk being cancelled as a result of the walkouts, which will take place from July 25. Junior doctors are demanding a 29pc pay rise despite receiving the largest public sector salary increase for the second year in a row. Blow to Starmer The walkout is embarrassing for Sir Keir Starmer who last year highlighted ending NHS strikes as a key factor in 'fixing the foundations of this country'. It is also a major setback for his mission of bringing down Britain's ballooning benefits bill, with surging long-term sickness blamed as a key driver by experts. Britain's tattered public finances leave little room for outsized pay rises, suggesting strikes will be difficult to resolve. Economists have warned Rachel Reeves may already be as much as £30bn short of fiscal rules ahead of the autumn Budget. Mr Miley said: 'The financial situation is tight, which means that any increase in public sector expenditure is fraught with difficulties. 'That being said, doctors are clearly an essential part of the workforce and have probably more bargaining power than other public sector workers. Hence, I think a pay rise is probably the more likely outcome.' The resident doctor strikes also threaten to in bringing down NHS waiting lists, putting a key Labour manifesto pledge at risk. The Office for National Statistics recently found the healthcare system was still 9.6pc less productive than in 2019, despite receiving £30bn more in funding. The NHS employed a record 2m people in March, an increase of 44,000 from a year earlier.
