German customs officials show images of tarantulas hidden in spongecake boxes after smuggling bust
Customs officials found the shipment at Cologne Bonn airport in a package that had arrived from Vietnam, tipped off by a 'noticeable smell' that didn't resemble the expected aroma of the 7 kilograms (about 15 pounds) of the confectionery treats, Cologne customs office spokesman Jens Ahland said.
'My colleagues at the airport are regularly surprised by the contents of prohibited packages from all over the world, but the fact that they found around 1,500 small plastic containers containing young tarantulas in this package left even the most experienced among them speechless,' Ahland said in a statement.
Ahland hailed an 'extraordinary seizure,' but one that 'saddens us to see what some people do to animals purely for profit.'
Many of the eight-legged creatures didn't survive the trip, in a suspected violation of German animal-welfare rules, while survivors were given to the care of an expert handler, the office said. Reached by phone, Ahland said that the estimated value of the shipment was being assessed.
Criminal proceedings are underway against the intended recipient in the Sauerland region, east of the airport, in part for alleged violations of failure to pay the proper import duties and make the proper customs declarations, the office said.
The tarantulas were discovered about three weeks ago, but the customs office only made the images public on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Hertz rival also uses controversial AI scanners to charge customers for bogus damage claims: report
Hertz customers aren't the only ones getting burned by artificial intelligence-powered damage scanners. Sixt, the Germany-based rival which operates more than 100 branches in 25 US states, has reportedly been sticking car renters with bogus repair bills for pre-existing damage. The company uses what it calls a 'Car Gate' system that photographs vehicles when customers pick them up and again when they return them. 4 Sixt customers say they were charged for damage based on wheel photos taken at vehicle pickup rather than return, triggering complaints about AI scanning errors. REUTERS Staff members review all computer-flagged damage before issuing charges to customers. But two separate incidents, first reported by The Drive, revealed serious flaws with the system. One customer, identified as Badi, rented a Mazda CX-50 from Sixt at Atlanta's Hartsfield Airport and received a bill for $605.82 three weeks later for alleged wheel damage, according to The Drive. When Badi requested evidence, Sixt provided a photograph that initially appeared to show an undamaged wheel. Only after an employee zoomed in could the supposed scuff marks be identified. The critical error became apparent when Badi examined the photo's timestamp, according to the report. The image was dated from when the vehicle was first picked up, not when it was returned — meaning Sixt was attempting to charge for damage that existed before the rental period began, The Drive reported. 'I immediately contacted Sixt, explaining they were using the wrong photo,' Badi told The Drive. 4 Hertz has begun installing AI-powered scanners like these at major U.S. airports to speed up and automate rental car inspections. UVEYE 'After escalating to management, they dropped the claim entirely. Had they not accidentally shared the exit photo, they likely would have proceeded with collections.' Before acknowledging the mistake, a Sixt employee reportedly threatened to send the matter to collections if payment wasn't received within a specified timeframe. A nearly identical situation occurred with Ray, another Sixt customer, who rented a vehicle at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington, DC. 4 Car rental customers have been complaining after getting hit with charges over seemingly minor scuffs detected by AI scanners. @professor_pimpcain/Reddit After returning the rental during a storm, Ray received an email showing two small scratches on a wheel and fender — with a payment demand for $650 in repairs or insurance information, according to The Drive. Ray noticed the vehicle appeared completely dry in the photographs, despite being returned on a rainy day. Upon closer inspection, the images were stamped with the date of the initial pickup scan, not the return inspection. The photos even contained the word 'exit,' indicating they were taken during vehicle departure rather than return. When Ray challenged the charges, pointing out the timestamp error, Sixt closed the case within a week. Both Sixt cases involved relatively minor cosmetic damage that would typically be considered normal wear and tear. The customers were only able to dodge being ripped off because they carefully examined the photographic evidence and discovered the timestamp errors, according to The Drive. When asked about the Sixt incidents, the company apologized but provided no explanation for how the errors occurred. 'We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience to the customer. This experience does not reflect our high service standards,' Sixt told The Drive. 'In the rare event a discrepancy occurs, our team is committed to reviewing it thoroughly and resolving it promptly — as was done here in response to the customer's feedback.' The incidents come as Hertz customers complained that they were charged hundreds of dollars for minor scrapes and dents that were detected by the rental car giant's new AI-powered scanner — with little recourse to dispute the charges. Meanwhile, the rental car industry appears to be expanding its use of digital scanning technology beyond Hertz and Sixt. Customers have reported scanners at Avis locations at Los Angeles International Airport and at Enterprise facilities at Houston's George Bush Intercontinental Airport, though those individuals didn't experience billing disputes, according to The Drive. Hertz is leading the rollout, aiming to equip over 100 airport sites with UVeye technology by the end of 2025. Avis Budget Group is experimenting with AI at select facilities like LAX but maintains that inspections remain human-led. Enterprise says it does not use the technology at all. When contacted about their scanning practices, Avis Budget Group told The Drive that 'the damage assessment process at Avis remains human-led' while acknowledging that artificial intelligence 'may be used to support internal efficiencies.' 4 Sixt, the Germany-based company, operates more than 100 branches in 25 US states. REUTERS The company emphasized that technology doesn't replace employee judgment and that fair, transparent customer experiences remain their priority. Avis previously tested an AI-based inspection system at London's Heathrow Airport in 2019. Enterprise Mobility, which operates Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental and Alamo, explicitly denied using digital damage scanners. 'Enterprise Mobility is not using digital damage scanners at check-in, check-out, or in our damage review process for any of our car rental brands,' a company representative told The Drive. The Post has sought comment from Sixt, Avis Budget Group and Enterprise.
Associated Press
6 hours ago
- Associated Press
BE-EEIG prepares class action lawsuit against allegedly fraudulent crypto projects - close cooperation with international authorities
TheBE EuropeanEconomicInterestGrouping (BE-EEIG), which specialises in investigating international economic crime, is looking for victims of the crypto projects SAFIR, ZENIQ, XPRO, GSPartners & APERTUM. Based on extensive research, witness statements and incriminating documents, a class action lawsuit is currently being prepared. SAFIR/ZENIQ: Crypto promises without substance SAFIR and ZENIQ were advertised as technological innovations with the 'ZENIQ Hub'. In reality, investors report that devices were never delivered, support was lacking and cash flows were non-transparent. The successor projects VOO and are also suspected of continuing to be linked to the initiators of SAFIR/ZENIQ. The Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) have already warned against the parties involved. APERTUM: Critical developments APERTUM is under regulatory pressure due to the allegedly misleading distribution of unregistered APTM tokens. The media criticises opaque structures, offshore companies and parallels to GSPartners. Those affected report delayed payments and blocked accounts. Investigation and class action lawsuit in preparation 'Our research is based on reliable evidence and international cooperation,' emphasizes BE-EEIG C.E.O Mr Ben Ecker. 'Now it's time to hold the perpetrators accountable and get justice for those who have been harmed.' Call to victims Have you lost money with SAFIR, ZENIQ, XPRO, GSPartners or APERTUM? Get in touch now Together, we can increase your chances of getting your money back. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us!Contact
8 hours ago
Woman becomes third person charged under Australia's foreign interference laws
MELBOURNE, Australia -- A Chinese citizen was charged Monday under Australia's recent foreign interference laws with covertly collecting information about an Australian Buddhist association, police said. The woman, an Australian permanent resident based in the capital Canberra, is only the third person charged since the laws were passed in 2018 and the first to be accused of interfering with the general population, Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt police said. She was charged in a Canberra court with covertly gathering information about a local branch of the Buddhist association Guan Yin Citta on behalf of the Public Security Bureau of China. The association is banned in China. Police have not detailed her alleged objectives. 'We allege the activity was to support intelligence objectives of the China's Public Security Bureau. This is the first time the AFP has charged a person with foreign interference that allegedly involves targeting members of the Australian community,' Nutt told reporters. 'Foreign interference is a serious crime that undermines democracy and social cohesion. It is a crime carried out by or on behalf of a foreign principal that involves covert and deceptive conduct or threats of serious harm or menacing demands,' Nutt added. The woman, who was arrested at her home Saturday, cannot be named publicly due to a court order. She was remanded in custody and faces a maximum 15 years in prison if convicted. The Chinese Embassy in Canberra did not immediately respond on Monday to a request for comment. She is the first foreign national to be charged under the sweeping laws that created a rift between Australia and China when they were first announced in 2017. Vietnam-born Melbourne businessman and local community leader Di Sanh Duong was sentenced to two years and nine months in prison last year over an attempt to influence a former federal government minister on behalf of China. Sydney businessman Alexander Csergo also was charged with foreign interference for allegedly accepting payments for information from two suspected Chinese spies. He pleaded not guilty to the charge. Mike Burgess, director-general of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, said the nation's main domestic spy agency had made a signficant contribution to the latest arrest. 'Foreign interference of the kind alleged is an appalling assault on Australian values, freedoms and sovereignty,' Burgess said in a statement. The charge comes as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese mends bilateral relations with China that plumbed new lows under the previous Australian administration over issues including foreign interference laws. Xi Jinping for the fourth time since the Australian leader was first elected in 2022.
