logo
Minerals and sanctions: Trump's terms, conditions to aid Congo peace process

Minerals and sanctions: Trump's terms, conditions to aid Congo peace process

Zawya16-04-2025

The US peace bid in the Democratic Republic of Congo will involve cash for investments into the mineral sector, just as much as a whip of sanctions to those who cross the line.
It is a dual-track initiative to end armed conflict in the country, but it could also retest old tools used in this war before.
This week, Massad Boulos, the new Senior Adviser for Africa for President Donald Trump, completed his tour of the Great Lakes region, having visited Kinshasa, Nairobi, Kampala and Kigali, seeking to discuss a peace bid that will involve the US tapping minerals in the east of the DRC, for peace.
In Kigali, Boulos said Washington's proposal will benefit both DRC and Rwanda and will be 'rooted in regional stability and peace as well as economic development.''During our discussions, President Kagame committed to pursuing this vision of peace. I can confirm that the United States also remains committed to this effort and is ready to facilitate an end to this conflict, obviously a peaceful end to this conflict,' he told the media on Tuesday evening at the US Embassy in Kigali.
But there was a subtle threat: Those who won't toe the line will face consequences. Washington is especially keen on ensuring Rwanda ceases backing rebels across the border in the Congo and pulls back any military support it had deployed.
According to diplomatic sources familiar with the discussions, this will ensure each country can carry its can on internal security challenges. Boulos said the US wants an end 'that allows countries to secure their borders and lays the foundation for a thriving regional economy.
This relationship has great potential, and we appreciate the opportunity to discuss the way forward with our counterparts here in Kigali. The deal is to benefit American access to minerals in the Congo, such as cobalt, lithium, uranium, gold and coltan.
And while Washington demanded that Rwanda tone down rebel backing, it also wants Kinshasa to provide state authority in eastern DRC, whose absence has previously fuelled armed conflict.
Kinshasa will also be required to tame corruption in its agencies, end the activities of the FDLR, a rebel group hiding in DRC and which Kigali blames for insecurity in Rwandan territory, and provide easier entry for American investments, including mining companies.
A State Department spokesperson told The EastAfrican the US would support peace initiatives based on each country's responsibilities, and added that there will be 'consequences for those who undermine our shared desire for peace.' The official said the US is first insisting on a ceasefire, requiring both Rwanda and the DRC to commit to ending hostilities.
According to a diplomatic source, Washington knows Rwanda has political leverage on the M23, while Kinshasa has leverage of possessing minerals but is weakened by its inability to provide proper governance in eastern DRC.
Cutting dealsThe US is leveraging Trump's history of ending wars by cutting deals with protagonists.'We absolutely would like to see lasting peace in the region, President Trump is a president of peace, he supports peace, he is the only president in the recent US history to have not started any new wars. In his first term, he ended many wars,' Boulos said.'President Trump wants this conflict to end and quickly. He strongly believes that the people have suffered immensely. This particular conflict has gone on for close to three decades, it's about time to see a peaceful end to it.'Read: US open to minerals partnerships with DR CongoUganda and Kenya won't be playing direct roles in the deal, but the diplomatic source said bringing them on board would somewhat localise the solution and help monitor violations. The two countries are also important for other conflicts in the region such as South Sudan and Sudan.
In Kinshasa, Boulos, did not name the value of investments the US wants to put into the Congo, but he did admit security will be a factor when he met with President Félix Tshisekedi on April 3.'Of course, we need an environment that is as conducive to business as possible to achieve this objective. Rest assured that American companies are operating transparently and will stimulate local economies.'We're talking about multibillion-dollar investments. We're talking about jobs, knowledge transfers and investment in infrastructure. There can be no economic prosperity without security.'The presidency said the meeting 'focused primarily on the security situation in eastern DR Congo and the economic prospects between the USA and the DRC, two countries that enjoy strategic cooperation.'Boulos was accompanied by Corina Sanders, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, and Dan Dunham, Director of the National Security Council for Africa.'You have heard about an agreement on minerals. We have heard about the DRC's proposal, and I am pleased to say that the President and I have agreed on a path forward for its development,' said Boulos.'I look forward to working with President Félix Tshisekedi and his team to build a deeper relationship that benefits the Congolese people and the American people, and to stimulate US private sector investment in the DRC, particularly in the mining sector, with the shared goal of contributing to the prosperity of our two countries.'The Congolese president has pursued his argument that all Rwandan mineral exports be labelled 'blood minerals' so that buyers across the world are barred from purchasing them.
He has argued that the conflict in eastern DRC continues because Rwanda is arming rebels to extract them. Boulos said American interests in the Congo will be transparent.'We want a lasting peace that affirms the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the DRC, and lays the foundation for a thriving regional economy. This relationship has great potential, and we welcome the opportunity to discuss the way forward with our counterparts here in Kinshasa,' he concluded.
Mines for securityThe authorities in Kinshasa are banking heavily on a mines-for-security-assistance deal to help the DRC defeat the armed groups in eastern DRC, principally the M23.
For the DRC, the partnership with the United States of America represents an important lever for silencing the weapons in the east of the DRC.
But diplomatic efforts are not preventing fighting from continuing in certain localities in North and South Kivu, in the east of the DRC.
A source on the M23 side said that the rebels were due to launch an assault on the town of Kisangani, even though they, on Friday, pulled out of a major town ahead of planned direct talks in Qatar.
But some officials were also aware that the US is focused now mainly on M23 and FDLR groups, something that could allow other armed groups to perpetrate conflict.
In eastern DRC, a UN Panel of Experts has said there are at least 120 armed groups, all fighting over one grievance or another, or just enticed by the free flow of illegal mineral revenues.
To end all that, the US will help build infrastructure, help support Congolese security agencies and provide technological support.
But Washington also demanded a robust obligation on the side of Kinshasa: establish services and a stronger state authority and tame corruption as well as work on establishing a professional army, a source explained.
As it is, the war in the DRC is currently in a fight-and-talk mode. The combatants have engaged in deadly clashes, even as they also concede that dialogue is key.
Military expert Kibel Bel Oka said the success of the peace talks between the M23 and the Congolese army depends essentially on how the warring parties behave on the ground. 'Violent fighting could jeopardise the Doha meeting on April 9,' he said.
On March 18 this year, the M23 cancelled its participation in the peace-seeking meeting in Luanda, claiming to have done so in protest at the European Union's sanctions against M23/AFC leaders and other Rwandan dignitaries.
Meanwhile, the five facilitators appointed by the joint EAC-SADC summit met with President William Ruto, chair of the EAC, this week to prepare for work on mediation.
Their immediate task will be to extract ceasefire pledges from the warring sides, as well as between Rwanda and DRC. They are former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo (Nigeria), Uhuru Kenyatta (Kenya), Catherine Samba-Panza (CAR), Kgalema Motlanthe (South Africa) and Sahle-Work Zewde (Ethiopia).
© Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The best of UAE's dining scene, celebrated by talabat's DineOut Awards
The best of UAE's dining scene, celebrated by talabat's DineOut Awards

What's On

time36 minutes ago

  • What's On

The best of UAE's dining scene, celebrated by talabat's DineOut Awards

Sponsored: The best of the UAE… Talabat may be the go-to name for food delivery in the UAE, but since April 2024, it's also been helping foodies save when dining out. Enter DineOut Deals – a game-changing feature that unlocks exclusive discounts for diners at over 1,200 restaurants across the UAE. From sunny breakfasts to midnight cravings, DineOut Deals makes dining out both exciting and affordable. Just choose your restaurant, dine out, and pay your bill through DineOut Deals on the talabat app to unlock your discount. Now, talabat is taking it a step further with the launch of 'The Plate Awards' -DineOut's new annual celebration of excellence in dining. The Plate Awards honour 20 standout restaurants across 20 cuisine categories, recognised for their culinary brilliance, commitment to great experiences, and the love they've received from thousands of happy diners across the UAE. Here are the 2024 Plate Awards winners – get ready to add these to your must-try list: Best Dessert: Chocomelt Best American: Buffalo Wild Wings Best Arabic: Sultan Al Arab Best Bakery: Mondoux Best Breakfast: IHOP Best Burgers: Slaw Best Café: The Hamptons Best Coffee: Olab Best Asian: Chinatown Dubai Mall Best Fast Food: Popeyes Best Healthy: Boga Superfoods Best Indian: Gazebo Best Lebanese: Allo Beirut Best Italian: C House Milano Best Mexican: Maria Bonita Taco Shop & Grill Best Turkish: Otantik Best Nightlife: Hitchki Best Barbecue Grills: Absolute Barbecues Best International: Falla Best Vegetarian: Kamat talabat applauds these brands for their incredible dedication to quality and innovation – and for bringing unforgettable dining experiences to customers across the country. Ready to try them all? Whether you're in the mood for sizzling grills, rich desserts, or a perfect cup of coffee, DineOut Deals is your passport to the UAE's top restaurants – at exclusive discounted prices. Just open the talabat UAE app, browse DineOut Deals, and start exploring. @talabatuae

Two Israeli ministers sanctioned by 5 Western democracies
Two Israeli ministers sanctioned by 5 Western democracies

Gulf Today

time43 minutes ago

  • Gulf Today

Two Israeli ministers sanctioned by 5 Western democracies

For the first time, five Western democracies, Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway, have sanctioned two far-right Israeli politicians, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who are also ministers in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government, for 'inciting extremist violence' against Palestinians in the West Bank. Former American President Joe Biden had also sanctioned Israeli settlers in West Bank violence, but these sanctions were lifted when President Donald Trump took office this January. In a joint statement, the five countries stated that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. Extremist rhetoric advocated the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous.' United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary David Lammy accused Ben-Gvir and Smotrich of 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months' and 'encouraging egregious abuses of human rights.' Ben-Gvir and Smotrich remain defiant in the face of sanctions imposed by the five countries. Ben-Gvir, who belongs to the extreme religious right-wing said, 'We overcame Pharoah, we'll povercome Starmer's wall,' referring to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Smotrich, the finance minister, learned of the sanctions decision while inaugurating a new West Bank settlement. He said, 'We are determined to continue building.' Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the sanctions 'outrageous'. On the other hand, Israeli human rights activist Eitay Mack describing the sanctions against Ben-Gvir and Smotrich as 'historic', elaborated, 'It means that the wall of immunity that Israeli politicians had has been broken. It's unbelievable that it took so long for Western governments to sanction Israeli politicians, and the fact that it's being done while Trump is president is quite amazing.' He said, 'It is a message to Netanyahu himself that he could be next.' The International Criminal Court (ICC) has already issued a warrant against Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant of human rights violation against the Palestinians in Gaza along with Hamas leaders. Netanyahu retorted saying that the ICC was biased. And the United States sanctioned four of the judges of the ICC for their action against Netanyahu. The four judges were ICC Second Vice President Reine Alapini-Gansou (Benin), Solomy Balungi Bossa (Uganda), Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza (Peru) and Beti Hohler (Slovenia). It had been the case that the whole countries faced sanctions as in the case of Russia after the Ukraine war, and Iran because of its alleged uranium enrichment programme. The question of course is how effective the sanctions against individuals are. In many, the countries can continue to do business with each other once the individuals have been named for sanctions. In May, Britain had suspended free trade talks with Israel. If Western democracies believe that Israeli violence in Gaza and in West Bank violated human rights of Palestinians, then the sanctions have to more than against individuals. There have to be economic sanctions against the erring country, and in this instance it happened to be Israel. Due to historical reasons where the whole of Europe had felt guilty of the Nazi genocide of European Jews, most countries have held themselves back acting against Israel. But Israel has stretched the patience of the European countries, and it had shown no restraint against the Palestinians, apart from refusing to implement the Oslo Accords which would have led the two-state solution of Palestine and Israel. Tel Aviv had been obstinate in its refusal to vacate West Bank as it did Gaza.

Oman confirms next round of US-Iran nuclear talks amid fears of regional risks
Oman confirms next round of US-Iran nuclear talks amid fears of regional risks

Zawya

time2 hours ago

  • Zawya

Oman confirms next round of US-Iran nuclear talks amid fears of regional risks

DUBAI: The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks will be held on Sunday in Muscat, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday, after U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated that Tehran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Trump said on Wednesday U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place". Reuters reported earlier that the U.S. was preparing an evacuation of its Iraqi embassy and would allow military dependents to leave locations around the Middle East due to heightened security risks in the region, according to U.S. and Iraqi sources. The four U.S. and two Iraqi sources did not say what security risks had prompted the decision. Reports of the potential evacuation pushed up oil prices by more than 4% before prices eased on Thursday. Foreign energy companies were continuing their operations as usual, a senior Iraqi official overseeing operations in southern oilfields told Reuters on Thursday. A U.S. official said the State Department had authorized voluntary departures from Bahrain and Kuwait. The State Department updated its worldwide travel advisory on Wednesday evening to reflect the latest U.S. posture. "On June 11, the Department of State ordered the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel due to heightened regional tensions," the advisory said. The decision by the U.S. to evacuate some personnel comes at a volatile moment in the region. Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appear to be deadlocked and U.S. intelligence indicates that Israel has been making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens," Trump told reporters. "We've given notice to move out." Asked whether anything could be done to lower the temperature in the region, Trump said: "They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon." Trump has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if stuttering talks over its nuclear programme fail and in an interview released earlier on Wednesday said he was growing less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium, a key American demand. While the evacuation of non-essential personnel raised concerns about a possible regional escalation, a senior Iranian security official told Iran's Press TV on Thursday that U.S. military dependents leaving did not constitute a threat. SHIPPING WARNING On Wednesday, Iran's defence minister warned Washington that Tehran would hit U.S. regional bases if drawn into a war in the case of nuclear talks failing. The United States has a military presence across the major oil-producing region, with bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the Middle East, a U.S. official said. Another U.S. official said that was mostly relevant to family members located in Bahrain - where the bulk of them are based. On Wednesday Britain's maritime agency warned that increased tensions in the Middle East might lead to an escalation in military activity that could impact shipping in critical waterways. It advised vessels to use caution while travelling through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Straits of Hormuz, which all border Iran. Tensions inside Iraq have heightened since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, with Iran-aligned armed groups in the country repeatedly attacking U.S. troops, though attacks have subsided since last year. (Reporting by Daphne Psaledakis, Idrees Ali, Humeyra Pamuk and Steve Holland and Jeff Mason in Washington, Michelle Nichols in New York, Ahmed Rasheed and Timour Azhari in Baghdad and Parisa Hafezi in Dubai and Ahmed Elimam; Additional reporting by Sam Tabahriti in London; Writing by Michael Georgy; Editing by Aidan Lewis)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store