Kemi Badenoch disowns Robert Jenrick's bizarre traitor insult against Keir Starmer
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has distanced herself from a widely condemned tweet by one of her top team describing Keir Starmer as a 'Quisling'.
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick has faced criticism for using the phrase, a term for someone who collaborates with an occupying force in their own country, in a row over the Chagos Islands.
Ms Badenoch's official spokesman effectively disowned the comment, saying she was 'not responsible' for Mr Jenrick's tweets.
But he added that the Tory leader considered Mr Jenrick a 'valued member of the shadow cabinet', saying 'she is not someone who polices tweets'.
Vidkun Quisling was a Norwegian politician and Nazi collaborator who led the puppet government of Norway during World War II.
Mr Jenrick was condemned for his comments by Brendan Cox, the husband of the murdered MP Jo Cox, who said: 'Calling fellow MPs 'quislings' and 'traitors' isn't just a pathetic, and painfully inauthentic, attempt to sound populist - it's also dangerous.
'MPs know they are all at risk from violence, threats and even murder - yet Jenrick uses language that he knows will increase that threat.'
The row centres on the government's plan to hand the Chagos Islands over to Mauritius.
Mr Jenrick's intervention came after reports the UK could end up paying £18 billion instead of the original £9 billion under the original agreement to lease back Diego Garcia for 99 years.
Unlike the original deal, which new Mauritian PM Navin Ramgoolam said was 'not good enough', there would also be no automatic extension mechanism after 99 years.
Shadow home secretary Priti Patel also hit out at the deal.
She said: 'It absolutely looks like a betrayal of the British people, a betrayal of our territory.'
Ms Patel said: 'We should go back to base camp, look at the judgment and say there are other ways of doing this without just handing over a sovereign territory, and certainly without committing anything from £9 billion to £18 billion at a time when we constantly hear from the government there is a financial crisis here.'
Sir Keir has defended the deal, saying: 'This is a military base that is vital to our national security and international security. A number of years ago, the legal certainty of that base was thrown into doubt.
'Without legal certainty, the base cannot operate in practical terms as it should, that is bad for our national security, and it is a gift to our adversaries.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Reform and Tories want to ban burkhas but don't give a damn about Muslim women'
At the end of last week, Zia Yusuf, the millionaire 'patriotic Muslim' chairman of Reform, left the party with this goodbye email: '11 months ago I became chairman of Reform… I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office'. This came after Sarah Pochin, a new Reform MP, urged the PM to ban the burka, 'in the name of public safety'. Yusuf thought it was a 'dumb' intervention and flounced off. Now he is back in the fold, being flattered and coddled by Nigel Farage and his motley lot. Nige actually looked grey with shock when he first commented on the unexpected resignation. Now the perma smile is back. Now Kemi Badenoch, a hungry political scavenger, has picked up the burka theme. She wants bosses to be able to ban burkas. Lots of votes in that, she calculates, as her party sinks. Neither Reform nor the Tories give a damn about us Muslim females. They just want to incite hatred. Anti-Muslim bones are thrown and are grabbed by ISLAMOPHOBES. The burka is used, as it was by the ghastly Boris Johnson, as a code to incite fear of an enemy within. Muslims make up only 6.7% of the UK's population, but you would not know that from the hysteria they/we generate in the media and politics. Farage previously accused Muslims of wanting to take over the UK and, last May, told the nation that Muslims do 'not subscribe to British values'. As defined by him. So Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood, Tory peer Sayeeda Warsi, Olympian Sir Mo Farah, polymath Adil Ray, actor Riz Ahmed, TV chef Nadiya Hussain, broadcaster Mishal Husain, etc, are aliens living among us. Me too. Dangerous rubbish. And they know it. Yusuf, the born again Reform chairman, manifestly does. That said, the burka is not a brown and white issue. Modernist Muslims like me have, for many years, expressed dismay and opposition to all forms of veiling. I even wrote a book, Refusing the Veil, some years ago, outlining its history, exposing fake claims about what the holy texts say and revealing the long history of resistance to it. There are only five fundamental obligations in Islam. Veiling is not on the list. Aisha bint Talha, a granddaughter of Abu Bakr, head of Sunni Muslims after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, refused to cover herself: 'Since God has put upon me the stamp of beauty, it is my wish that the public should view that beauty… No one can force me to do anything.' Egyptian, Iranian, Iraqi and Afghan women, through the centuries, have done what she did. And keep on challenging the practice today. I also am forthright about grooming circles of men of Pakistani heritage and their white victims. As a feminist Muslim, I feel I must continue to do that. However, as an anti-racist leftie, I must take on vicious politicians who are going after people of my faith. The genuine anxieties and problems experienced by citizens across the Western world are being exploited by the far right to whip up xenophobia against migrants and Muslims. Reform tries to project itself as inclusive – Yusuf was a useful mascot – but this does not bear scrutiny. Farage, like Trump, has savaged equality policies because they 'disadvantage' white people. A year ago, a Channel 4 investigation recorded Reform canvassers making explicitly Islamophobic and racist comments. The Great Leader has posed with far-right activists who show off their swastikas. With more voters flocking to his party and unending media sycophancy, Farage seems unstoppable. Yusuf is back on the mission to make him PM. He may succeed. Then Reform's messiah will dump on the common people. Those who pick on minorities should not be trusted. Ever. Muslims will have to battle against these xenophobes as well as misogyny within our families and communities. And for British democracy, hard times are coming. I read excerpts of Sarah Vine's new book, How Not to Be a Political Wife with, first, amusement, then annoyance. The stridently anti-EU Daily Mail columnist and ex-Mrs Michael Gove was once in the top Tory girl gang led by Samantha Cameron. The great Brexit swindle broke them up. Vine was devastated – no more holidays together, no cheery dinners, no children's sleepovers. Her marriage, she claims, crashed too. I feel her pain. Sort of. But there is no concern that the country fell apart and will never recover. Her lot live in a bubble of privilege and vanity. That's why the voters kicked them out. No lessons have been learnt.
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Union membership increases in Reform-led councils
The GMB said workers were 'flocking' to join unions amid fears of cuts to pay, jobs and conditions by Reform. Councils where the GMB has seen an increase in membership include Durham, Lancashire, Derbyshire, Staffordshire, Nottinghamshire and Doncaster. Nigel Farage? Weak on Putin. Threatens our NHS. #GMB25 — GMB Union (@GMB_union) June 8, 2025 GMB national officer Rachel Harrison told the PA news agency: 'Reform spouts a lot of nonsense about being on the side of workers, but these figures show people aren't buying it. 'Workers in Reform-led councils are flocking to join unions because they know the first thing Farage and his cronies will do is attack low-paid staff's terms and conditions.' GMB general secretary Gary Smith launched an angry attack against Reform in a speech to the union's annual conference in Brighton at the weekend, saying Nigel Farage and his 'ex-Tory soulmates' were no friends of workers. 'They've spent a political lifetime attacking trade unions and the rights we have all fought so hard for. Decent pay, better conditions, protections we cherish. 'Why is it always the posh, private schoolboys who want act like they're working-class heroes? 'Do they really think we can't see the bankers, the chancers, the anti-union blowhards? 'If Reform are so pro-worker, why did they just vote against protections against fire and rehire? Why did they vote against sick pay for all workers? Why did they vote against fair pay for carers? Why did they vote against trade union rights to access and organise in places like Amazon? 'Now they are going to run town halls, and the first thing they want to do is sack council workers. 'It's high time they were called out for their sneering, snooty attitude about so-called 'gold-plated' pensions. Go ask a local authority care worker, refuse collector, street cleaner, school support staff member if they think their meagre pension is gold-plated. 'Reform's abuse and name-calling of low-paid public sector workers is an utter disgrace.'
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Rachel Reeves makes statement after reversing Winter Fuel Payment cut
Rachel Reeves makes statement after reversing Winter Fuel Payment cut Reeves said there was still 'work to do to ensure the sums always add up' Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves Chancellor Rachel Reeves has made a statement after it was announced the cuit to the Winter Fuel Payment would be cut, meaning nine million pensioners will qualify this year. Rachel Reeves insisted she had 'listened to people's concerns' as she announced changes to the threshold for winter fuel payments. The Chancellor told broadcasters: 'From this winter, nine million pensioners will now receive winter fuel payments. It will be still means-tested, but at a higher level, we've listened to people's concerns around the level of the means test. 'Because of changes we've made and the stability we've brought back to the economy, we are able to increase that amount. We will set out in the normal way, in the budget, how everything is funded, but no-one should be in any doubt about my commitment to the fiscal rules to ensure that the sums always add up.' Reeves said there was still 'work to do to ensure the sums always add up'. The Chancellor told Sky News: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility increased the growth forecast for every other year in the forecast, they said that our reforms to the planning system would make the economy £6.8 billion bigger, bringing in additional tax revenue as well. 'And in the first quarter of this year, we were the fastest growing economy in the G7. There's still work to do to ensure that the sums always add up, but because of the decisions that we've made, because of the stability we've returned to the economy, we are now able to pay the winter fuel payment to more pensioners. Article continues below 'We're not going back to the universal system. I don't think it is right that the very richest pensioners have their fuel bills subsidised, but this year nine million pensioners will get the winter fuel payments.' Downing Street said an improved economy was the reason it could raise the threshold for winter fuel payments. The Prime Minister's press secretary said: 'We are confirming the changes now to give people certainty and ensure the payments can be received in time for winter. 'No pensioner will need to take any action as they will automatically receive the payment this winter. Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but it was the right decision. We inherited a £22 billion black hole from the Tories who lost control of the economy, leaving working people paying the price. 'We had to stabilise the economy with tough decisions and it's because of those tough decisions that the economy is beginning to improve. We've had the highest growth in the G7, four interest rate cuts in a row and real wage levels have risen by more since July 2024 than over the first 10 years of the previous Tory government.' She added: 'As the economy improves, we want to make sure that more people feel those improvements in their everyday lives. That's why we are acting to ensure that more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments going forward.' Some nine million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the winter fuel payment this winter, the Chancellor has announced. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Those with an income above this threshold will also receive the payment, but it will then be reclaimed from them in tax. To be eligible for the winter fuel allowance, a person will need to have reached state pension age by the week starting September 15 this year. Devolved authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland will each receive a funding uplift so they too can meet the new threshold. Pensioners who do not want to receive the payment will be able to opt out, according to the Treasury. The decision to limit the winter fuel payment to only those who claimed pension credit was one of Labour's first acts in Government, aimed at balancing what was described as a £22 billion 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. But Sir Keir Starmer announced there would be a partial U-turn on the policy in May, after it was thought to have contributed to Labour's drubbing in the local elections. The Treasury claims the new arrangement will cost £1.25 billion in England and Wales, while means-testing winter fuel will save the taxpayer £450 million. Reeves said: 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the winter fuel payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. 'This will mean over three-quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' Some two million pensioners who earn more than £35,000 will see their winter fuel payments clawed back via the taxman, the Treasury estimates. Kemi Badenoch, Leader of the Opposition, claimed the Prime Minister had 'scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making'. The Conservative leader added: 'I repeatedly challenged him to reverse his callous decision to withdraw winter fuel payments, and every time Starmer arrogantly dismissed my criticisms. This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The Prime Minister should now apologise for his terrible judgment.' Liberal Democrat Leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Finally the Chancellor has listened to the Liberal Democrats and the tireless campaigners in realising how disastrous this policy was, but the misery it has caused cannot be overstated. Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the Government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering. 'We will now study the detail of this proposal closely to make sure those who need support actually get that support. The pain they went through this winter cannot be for nothing.' Independent Age Chief Executive Joanna Elson CBE said: 'We are pleased that the UK Government has listened to the voices of older people on a low income and reconsidered what was an incredibly damaging change to the Winter Fuel Payment. By widening the eligibility criteria, more older people in financial hardship will now receive this vital lifeline in time for winter. Article continues below 'Our helpline receives thousands of calls from older people making drastic cutbacks just to get by and the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment made this worse. For millions living on low incomes, the entitlement supports them to turn their heating on and stock up on food during the colder months. 'While the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment are positive, they are not a silver bullet that will end pensioner poverty. Around 2 million older people still live in poverty, and measures must be taken to ensure the long-term financial security of all people in later life. There needs to be a cross-party consensus on the adequate income needed in later life to avoid financial hardship. Once this is established, every older person should be supported to receive this amount. Nobody should have to live in poverty as they age.'
