logo
QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs Badenoch was perkier than usual. Does she finally glimpse hope?

QUENTIN LETTS: Mrs Badenoch was perkier than usual. Does she finally glimpse hope?

Daily Mail​21 hours ago

Does Kemi Badenoch finally glimpse hope? The rotten economic growth figures were published shortly before she made a speech in the City of London.
By that time the nation had been subjected to downbeat verdicts on the government's spending splurge and to the sight and sound of Rachel Reeves on the breakfast airwaves. Captain of sinking pedalo urges passengers not to abandon ship.
Mrs Badenoch strolled into the low-ceilinged, implausibly-chandeliered function room of one of those modern hotels on the edge of the Square Mile. The event was the FTSE 250+ conference, an assembly of 'key risk-takers' seeking 'sharp perspectives from the front lines of our turbulent, opportunity-rich markets'. A fruit-juice-and-Danish-pastries affair.
The session was chaired by an economist, Kallum Pickering, who bluntly told the Tory leader 'we're all a bit grumpy'. Skinny, bearded Kallum explained that the audience – youthful, cologned – felt 'like a stalled engine but with a bit of clear road we could be pumping pistons'. He was resentful of political embuggeration and did not exonerate the last Tory government. Kemi rather agreed with him. She thought Net Zero targets were nuts.
She was at ease with these people. It was an easier gig for her, say, than a hall full of public sector workers. She recalled her own City days when she came to 'loathe compliance culture'. The room warmed to that. These were people whose lives are made a misery by human-resources nags.
She attacked big corporate outfits that 'profited from bureaucracy'. Did she mean the 'big four' accountancy firms? The audience had not expected her to swipe at their bigger rivals. It gave a purr of approval.
Time and again she attacked the 'bloated' state and a Labour cabinet that lacked business experience. A mention of Ms Reeves's fictitious curriculum vitae earned a laugh.
Nigel Farage's lot wanted to nationalise industries, keep big benefit bills yet loosen tax bands. 'It's a scam. It's my job to expose this stuff. These are not serious people.'
Kallum stroked his beard and pointed out that Reform was ahead in the opinion polls, with the Tories trailing in third place, a distant Austin Allegro with smoke billowing from its bonnet.
Kemi: 'We have four years of Labour. From the way people are discussing the opinion polls you'd think there was an election next year. We have to tell people the truth.'
Just before Christmas she had spoken to the Canadian Tory leader Pierre Poilievre, who at that point had a 23-point lead in the opinion polls. He has since lost both an election and his parliamentary seat. Things changed fast.
Mrs Badenoch can be a dull performer. This time she was perkier. Maybe it was because she could say wonkish things and know that the audience would follow. Maybe it was because of 'events'.
In the past fortnight Reform has had internal squabbles and taken a peculiar turn leftwards economically, while taking an anti-liberty step towards a burka ban. Has Mr Farage sacrificed both his authenticity and his cheerfulness?
Then came Wednesday's spending review, with its mad billions and the inevitability of tax rises. Dreadful for the country but possibly a reprieve for Mrs Badenoch's Tories.
'It's going to be a revolution,' she said of her plans, breezily. 'We need to unleash animal spirits.' Animal spirits! Helen Whately, shadow welfare secretary, is more mouse than lion.
Kemi feared 'the bond vigilantes' were circling over Ms Reeves. The Government's economic policy was 'in a death spiral' and this created a gap for the centre-right. 'That is the space I fill.'
Coolly informal, she addressed them conversationally, more a colleague than a would-be political leader. 'I'm on your side,' she cooed, 'but I need you to be on mine, too.' She implored them to 'speak up' and 'tell your customers to speak up, too'. Was that a gurgling 'help, I'm drowning'? Or was it a sense, at last, that her refusal to panic in recent months might finally start to produce buds of a political recovery?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ministers on resignation ‘watch list' over welfare reforms, Harman warns
Ministers on resignation ‘watch list' over welfare reforms, Harman warns

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Ministers on resignation ‘watch list' over welfare reforms, Harman warns

Ministers are on a resignation 'watch list' over Labour's planned welfare reforms, Baroness Harman has claimed. The former party chairman said there were fears in the Government that frontbenchers could quit over Sir Keir Starmer's plans to slash disability spending by more than £4 billion. It comes as up to 130 Labour MPs are preparing to abstain on or vote against the plans when they are put before the Commons in the coming weeks. Many in the party are concerned about changes that would mean only the most severely disabled adults could claim Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Under-22s would also become ineligible for Universal Credit under proposals by Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, that would cut the benefits bill by £4.3 billion. Speaking on Sky News's Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harman was asked whether it was likely ministers would resign over the cuts. She replied: 'There might be, but I don't think… Not Cabinet [ministers].' Asked whether more junior ministers may feel unable to stay in post, she said: 'There are people on a watch list at the moment, but not Cabinet ministers. 'And I still think that although Labour MPs will feel very badly about it, and feel 'this is not what I got into Parliament in order to do', most of them will think: 'it's a difficult time, we'll stick with it, we don't want to undermine our Government'.' Baroness Harman also argued that the issue would be 'harder' for Labour MPs to vote on because they would have to 'put themselves on the line, whether they are for or against it'. She added: 'There is a lot of rumbling about this, there's a lot of discontent. And there's quite a lot of wild talk that there's going to be over 100 MPs who are going to rebel, and the Government could even lose their majority on this. 'And I would be very surprised about that. There is definitely a lot of nervousness about it, but I would be surprised because I think these MPs have only recently been elected. 'And if they vote in such large numbers that they actually cut across a major plan from the Chancellor and the Prime Minister, it's almost like a vote of no confidence.' The Telegraph understands that a handful of parliamentary private secretaries (PPS), who hold the most junior ministerial rank, are said to be wavering on the issue. The revolt follows an outcry over Sir Keir and Ms Reeves stripping 10 million pensioners of their winter fuel payments last summer, a decision that has now been partially reversed. In a letter that was sent last month to Alan Campbell, the Government's Chief Whip, about 130 MPs called on Sir Keir to change course or risk defeat over his welfare plans. The Government has a working majority of 165 in the Commons, meaning that 83 MPs would need to vote down the legislation in order to force a parliamentary defeat. Sir Keir has doubled down on his policies and repeatedly insisted that there is nothing 'progressive' about the current size of the welfare state. He said the moral thing to do is to tackle the worklessness crisis and ensure more disabled people find employment. The Government's own figures predict that the benefit changes will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children, while about 3.2 million families will lose out financially. Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is understood to be engaging with concerned MPs. Ms Kendall is convinced she has a strong argument to make and believes MPs will be won round once details of the bill have been published. Speaking in the Commons in May, she said that at the heart of the reforms is a push to get long-term sick and disabled people back into work where possible.

Man Utd chief Sir Jim Ratcliffe locked in legal battle with Tottenham over broken multi-million sponsorship deal
Man Utd chief Sir Jim Ratcliffe locked in legal battle with Tottenham over broken multi-million sponsorship deal

The Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Man Utd chief Sir Jim Ratcliffe locked in legal battle with Tottenham over broken multi-million sponsorship deal

SPURS are locked in a legal battle with Manchester United owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe in a row over a broken sponsorship deal. Ratcliffe 's Ineos chemicals giant and its Grenadier car brand agreed a five-year deal as Spurs ' 'official 4x4 vehicle partner' in December 2022. 1 It followed a 2020 contract with Ineos unveiled as the club's 'official hand sanitiser supplier' during the pandemic. Following Ratcliffe's takeover at Prem rivals United last year it was confirmed that the company intended to pull out of the agreement. It was believed that a break deal in the multi-million pound agreement had been reached between the two parties. But now Spurs have instigated a High Court legal action against Ineos. As part of what is listed as a 'general commercial contracts and arrangements', Tottenham have lodged a claim against Ineos Automotive Limited, a subsidiary of Ineos. That suggests negotiations have failed to find an agreement, with the Tottenham claim lodged on June 12. Tottenham declined to comment while Ineos said in a statement: "INEOS Automotive has been a partner of Tottenham Hotspur since 2022, expanding on a partnership agreement that INEOS Group had in place with the club since 2020. "We have a contractual right to terminate our partnership contract and in December 2024 exercised that right." SunSport understands it is hoped a deal can be reached to prevent a full High Court hearing. Spurs appointed Thomas Frank as their new manager on Thursday, six days on from the departure of Ange Postecoglou. The Lilywhites paid Brentford around £10million in compensation for the Dane. Frank's move took time to be completed due to negotiations over backroom staff - specifically highly-rated head of coaching Justin Cochrane. Man Utd considered the Brentford boss as a potential replacement for Erik ten Hag last summer. However, the Red Devils instead opted for Ruben Amorim in October.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store