Fresh wave of asylum hotel protests expected after Epping ruling
It comes as the latest figures showed there were more than 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels, marking a rise of 8% during Labour's first year in office.
Stand Up To Racism is preparing to hold counter-protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers on Friday, including in Bournemouth, Cardiff and Leeds, with further demonstrations expected on Saturday.
Meanwhile, councils across the country controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK are investigating whether they could pursue legal challenges against asylum hotels.
This follows a judge granting Epping Forest District Council a temporary injunction on Tuesday that blocked asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Essex.
The council had argued the injunction was needed amid 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation.
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said the people of Epping who protested and its council have 'led the way', writing in The Telegraph that 'our country's patience has snapped'.
His Conservative colleague Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said on Thursday that people have 'every right' to protest over asylum hotels in their areas.
Labour has pledged to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this parliament in 2029.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper insisted Labour had taken 'crucial steps' in the past year towards this by cutting the asylum backlog and money spent on the asylum system, increasing returns of failed asylum seekers and overhauling appeals.
While the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has risen, Government spending on asylum in the UK is down 12%, data published on Thursday showed.
The number waiting on an initial decision on an asylum application in the UK at the end of June dropped below 100,000 for the first time in four years.
Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available.
When there is not enough housing, the Home Office – which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute – can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases.
Amid hotel protests, campaigners including Rape Crisis and Refuge have warned conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' which they argued fuels divisions and harms survivors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Federal judge orders closure of Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail
A federal judge in Miami late on Thursday ordered the closure of the Trump administration's notorious 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail within 60 days, and ruled that no more detainees were to be brought to the facility while it was being wound down. The shock ruling by district court judge Kathleen Williams builds on a temporary restraining order she issued two weeks ago halting further construction work at the remote tented camp, which has attracted waves of criticism for harsh conditions, abuse of detainees and denial of due process as they await deportation. In her 82-page order, published in the US district court's southern district of Florida on Friday, Williams determined the facility was causing severe and irreparable damage to the fragile Florida Everglades. She also noted that a plan to develop the site on which the jail was built into a massive tourist airport was rejected in the 1960s because of the harm it would have caused the the land and delicate ecosystem. 'Since that time, every Florida governor, every Florida senator, and countless local and national political figures, including presidents, have publicly pledged their unequivocal support for the restoration, conservation, and protection of the Everglades,' she wrote. 'This order does nothing more than uphold the basic requirements of legislation designed to fulfill those promises.' No further construction at the site can take place, she ruled, and there must be no further increase in the number of detainees currently held there, estimated to be about 700. After the 60-day period, all construction materials, fencing, generators and fixtures that made the site a detention camp must be removed. The ruling is a significant victory for a coalition of environmental groups and a native American tribe that sued the state of Florida and the federal government. Williams agreed that the hasty, eight-day construction of the jail at a disused airfield in late June damaged the sensitive wetlands of a national preserve and further imperiled federally protected species. 'This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,' said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit. 'It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government, and there are consequences for ignoring them.' The alliance plans to hold a press conference on Friday morning to discuss the ruling in detail. Conversely, the ruling is a blow to the detention and deportation agenda of the Trump administration. The president touted the camp, which recently held as many as 1,400 detainees, as a jail for 'some of the most vicious people on the planet', although hundreds of those held there have no criminal record or active criminal proceedings against them. There was no immediate reaction to Williams's ruling from the Florida department of emergency management, which operates the jail on behalf of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice), or from the Department of Homeland Security. But lawyers for the state told Williams in court last week that they would appeal any adversarial ruling, the Miami Herald reported. In addition, hundreds of detainees were moved from 'Alligator Alcatraz' to other immigration facilities at the weekend in anticipation that Williams would order its closure, the outlet said. Ron DeSantis, Florida's Republican governor, announced earlier this month that the state will soon open a second immigration jail at a disused prison near Gainesville to increase capacity.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Britain is facing an autumn of discontent: Essential services to be crippled by weeks of strikes
Britain is bracing itself for an autumn of discontent with essential services across the country crippled by strikes in coming weeks. London Underground workers are to walk out next month in a dispute over pay and conditions, the RMT union announced on Thursday. The workers will begin the week-long walkout on Friday, September 5, just as schools reopen and office staff return to their normal routines. Union leaders said rail bosses had 'refused to engage seriously' with their demands on pay as well as concerns about fatigue management and 'extreme shift patterns'. Underground workers were also demanding a reduction in the working week and to honour previous agreements made with staff. In a separate dispute over pay and conditions, workers on the Docklands Light Railway will also be striking during this period. The union said the action would bring 'significant disruption to the capital's transport network'. Meanwhile, GPs, junior doctors and nurses indicated they may strike during the winter months demanding higher pay and funding. And discontent has hit other sectors, including bin collectors in London, as well as Birmingham, where a five-month walkout is set to continue until Christmas over pay cuts. The threat of further strikes will come as a blow to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who had hoped to tame the unions with promises of backdated public sector pay rises, as well as Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has attempted to balance demands from the unions with struggling government budgets. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the government had a 'responsibility' to stand up to pay rise demands and keep the country working. 'You look at the range of pressures we're facing domestically, internationally, economically, public services, the expectations of the country, the pain that families are feeling in their pockets and I'm always conscious that over and above everyone else, Keir and Rachel are carrying all of those pressures together', he told the Political Currency podcast. 'And so I think it is our responsibility to say to our own departments, or own audiences, or the people we're responsible for and the services that we're responsible for, 'you need to understand that we can't do everything for everyone, everywhere, all at once'.' Martin Beck, WPI Strategy's chief economist, told The Telegraph that the impending train strikes could hugely impact the capital: 'We estimate that it could cost the London economy up to a quarter of a billion pounds in the form of lost revenue to TfL and London businesses, more congestion on the roads and extra travel time for commuters.' Labour Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan also blasted the walkouts. A spokesman said: 'Nobody wants to see strike action or disruption for Londoners. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the government had a 'responsibility' to stand up to pay rise demands and keep the country working 'The mayor urges the RMT and TfL to get around the table to resolve this matter and avoid industrial action.' RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: 'Our members are doing a fantastic job to keep our capital moving and work strenuous shift patterns to make sure Londoners get to their destinations around the clock. 'They are not after a King's ransom, but fatigue and extreme shift rotations are serious issues impacting on our members health and wellbeing- all of which have not been adequately addressed for years by LU management. 'Coupled with the fact there are outstanding issues around staff travel arrangements, an atmosphere of distrust has been created, where our members feel like no one is listening to them. 'RMT will continue to engage LU management with a view to seeking a revised offer in order to reach a negotiated settlement.' A Transport for London spokesperson said: 'We regularly meet with our trade unions to discuss any concerns that they may have, and we recently met with the RMT to discuss some specific points. 'We are committed to ensuring our colleagues are treated fairly and, as well as offering a 3.4% pay increase in our ongoing pay discussions, we have made progress on a number of commitments we have made previously. 'We welcome further engagement with our unions about fatigue and rostering across London Underground, but a reduction in the contractual 35-hour working week is neither practical nor affordable. 'Given the improvements we have recently put in place in response to concerns raised by our unions, we urge the RMT to put our fair, affordable pay offer to their members and to continue to engage with us rather than threaten strike action, which will only disrupt Londoners.' The strikes will involve different parts of the rail network striking at different times. On Friday September 5 and Saturday 6, managers at Ruislip depot are set to strike over pay, in a separate walkout to the main dispute. The Central Line is likely to be affected. On Sunday 7, track access controllers, power control and Emergency Response Unit (ERU) workers will refuse to work. This is likely to cause long delays in the case of any incidents and could affect all Tube lines. On Monday 8 and Wednesday 10, the majority of engineers and station workers will walk out, which will likely lead to stations closing from lack of staff and fewer trains available on the network. While on Tuesday 9 and Thursday 11, signallers, service control and ERU members will strike. This is likely to cancel most of the services as trains are not able to safely run without signalling staff.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Britain is buying new air defence missile systems - but can they protect us?
Why you can trust Sky News The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has announced it will buy £118m worth of air defence missile systems for the British Army. But will this new purchase protect an increasingly vulnerable UK from attack, and why now? For more than 50 years, the British Army relied on the Rapier air defence missile system to protect deployed forces. In 2021, that system was replaced by Sky Sabre. The new system is mobile, ground-based, and designed to counter various aerial threats, including fighter aircraft, attack helicopters, drones, and guided munitions. It's known for its speed, accuracy, and ability to integrate with other military assets, including those of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force (and NATO). What is the Land Ceptor missile, and why do we need more of them? Sky Sabre includes radar, command, and control capability and - most importantly - a missile to intercept incoming threats. The Land Ceptor missile weighs around 100kg, has a 10kg warhead, and can intercept threats out to around 15 miles (25km), making it around three times more effective than the Rapier system it replaced. When the MoD made the decision to replace the Rapier system, the global threat environment was very different to that experienced today. Since the end of the Cold War, the UK has been involved in expeditionary warfare - wars of choice - and generally against less capable adversaries. So, although the Land Ceptor missile is very capable, defence planning assumptions (DPAs) were that they would not need to be used in a serious way, commensurate with the threat. However, as the Russian invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated (as has the series of Iranian attacks on Israel), significantly larger stockpiles are required against a more capable enemy. Is the UK vulnerable to missile attack? In short, yes. Although the Land Ceptor missile does provide an excellent point-defence capability, it is not an effective counter to ballistic or hypersonic missiles - the Sea Viper mounted on Royal Navy Type 45 Destroyers using the Aster 30 missile has that capability. In the Cold War, the UK had Bloodhound missiles deployed around the UK to provide a missile defence capability, but as the perceived risks to the UK abated following the collapse of the Soviet Union, UK missile defence fell down the priorities for the MoD. Although the radar based at RAF Fylingdales forms part of the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (BMEWS) can detect incoming threats, the UK no longer has an effective interceptor to protect critical national infrastructure. Instead, the UK relies on the layered defences of European allies to act as a deterrence against attack. In the near term, this timely order for Land Ceptor missiles doubles the British Army's tactical capability. However, as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have demonstrated, ballistic (and increasingly hypersonic) missiles are being produced in increasing quantity - and quality. Without significant (and rapid) investment, this critical gap in national military capability leaves the UK vulnerable to attack.
