
Opposition CDP moves away from no-confidence motion against Japan PM
TOKYO -- Yoshihiko Noda, head of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP), on June 9 began arranging to forgo the submission of a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Cabinet this Diet session
As Ishiba has indicated his willingness to comply with opposition camp requests to hold meetings between ruling and opposition party leaders to explain Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations before and after the Group of Seven summit to be held in Canada from June 15, Noda apparently judged that there is little reason to press for a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet.
Under the minority government, if the opposition bloc were to jointly pass a no-confidence bill through the House of Representatives, Prime Minister Ishiba would be pressed to resort to a Cabinet resignation en masse or to dissolve the lower chamber for a snap election. The Ishiba administration has accordingly kept the opposition camp in check by threatening to dissolve the lower house "upon the submission of a no-confidence motion."
Noda had indicated that if his party were to submit a no-confidence bill, he would consult with other opposition parties in advance to jointly do so, but Nippon Ishin (the Japan Innovation Party) co-head Seiji Maehara and Democratic Party for the People leader Yuichiro Tamaki have remained cautious about the idea.
It appears the decision was also driven by a desire to avoid political turmoil given the lack of prospects for the opposition parties to reach consensus over issues such as the election of a new prime minister following a Cabinet resignation, as well as possible campaign cooperation among the opposition forces in the event the July upper house contest coincides with a lower house election.
According to a senior CDP official, Noda told a party executive board meeting on June 9, "My stance of (doing things) 'at the right time and in an appropriate manner' remains unchanged, so I hope everyone will do the same." Noda had previously suggested that if the government shelves the submission of a pension system reform bill to the Diet, it could serve as a reason for submitting a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet, but the CDP eventually agreed with the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its junior coalition partner Komeito on a modified bill incorporating the CDP's demands.
A senior CDP official noted, "Noda didn't intend to submit a no-confidence motion in the first place. He doesn't think it cowardly not to submit it, either."
Regarding the meeting between ruling and opposition party leaders requested by Noda and others, LDP Secretary-General Hiroshi Moriyama announced June 9 that Ishiba was willing to provide explanations on June 12 prior to his departure for the G7 summit, and also suggested a plan to hold a meeting upon his return to Japan. Noda told reporters on June 10, "I appreciate that they made the effort to arrange the meeting.". He reiterated his aim of achieving a change of government in the next House of Representatives election, and added, "We are not necessarily assuming a double election (simultaneous lower and upper house polls)."
Within the CDP, however, there remain strong calls for submitting a no-confidence bill to highlight the party's confrontational stance against the Ishiba administration ahead of the upper house race.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Kyodo News
2 hours ago
- Kyodo News
Japan remains 118th in 2025 gender gap report, worst among G7
KYODO NEWS - 7 minutes ago - 12:08 | All, Japan Japan remained at 118th among 148 countries in the gender gap rankings in 2025, still worst among the Group of Seven nations, affected by poor political participation by women, the World Economic Forum said Thursday. The report by the Swiss think tank showed Japan improved women's participation in the economic arena, but ranked 125th in political empowerment, reflecting how few female government ministers it has and the fact the country has never had a female prime minister. The country lags far behind other G7 advanced economies, with Italy ranking second-lowest at 85th but still well ahead of Japan, according to the report, which tracks progress toward gender equality in the fields of economy, politics, education and health. While the world has seen major improvements in women's economic participation and political empowerment, the think tank estimated it "will take 123 years to reach full parity globally." Japan recorded the most progress in economic participation and opportunity, reflecting the increased presence of women in the workforce, but remained poorly ranked at 127th in the category showing female participation in management positions. The country's overall performance slightly improved from last year, scoring 0.666 compared with 0.663 in 2024. The benchmark used in the study ranges between 0 and 1, with 1 being full parity between men and women. Japan's progress in narrowing the gender gap has been slow, with its score improving marginally from 0.6447 in the 2006 edition, below the average trend of improvement for the 100 countries analyzed since the report's inception. In 2025, Iceland topped the overall ranking, followed by Finland and Norway. New Zealand was the highest-ranked country in the East Asia and Pacific region in fifth place and Japan was 17th in the area. Related coverage: Japan lags in closing gender gap: government report Pioneering women's sports bar draws crowds, eyes path to equality


Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
Group of Seven tries to avoid Trump conflict by scrapping joint communique
Group of Seven nations won't try to reach a consensus on a joint communique at next week's leaders' summit in Canada, people familiar with the matter said, an acknowledgment of the wide gulf that separates the U.S. from the other members on Ukraine, climate change and other issues. In place of a single document, G7 leaders are likely to release standalone joint leaders' statements on various topics, according to the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. That approach is the preference of the Canadian hosts, they said. Prime Minister Mark Carney is looking to ease tensions with U.S. President Donald Trump and push forward with talks about trade and security. Agreeing on a final communique is usually a ritual for leaders gathered at meetings such as the G7 summit. While the document has no legal authority, it amounts to a statement of principles and is intended to display unity among the participants on topics of global importance. The communique from last year's summit, for example, was 36 pages long and included pledges to support Ukraine in the conflict with Russia, tackle climate change and foster gender equality. But Trump has upended U.S. policy on all those issues and many more, declining to voice support for Ukraine over Russia, scrapping climate-change initiatives and dismissing gender initiatives as part of a "woke' agenda by Democrats. Carney wants to avoid a repeat of 2018, the last time Canada hosted the G7 leaders, when Trump pulled out of the joint communique hours after signing it because he was annoyed by comments made to reporters by then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. In addition to trade, the leaders of the group of wealthy economies — the U.S., the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Japan and Canada — are set to discuss artificial intelligence, energy security, wildfires and global conflicts, including in Ukraine and the Middle East. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will join the summit, along with the leaders of India, Brazil, Mexico and others. Following the 2018 meeting, final documents tended to be shorter so that they were less time-consuming to negotiate but also included less text that members could disagree with, said Caitlin Welsh, who served in Trump's first administration. "Moving forward to this year's G-7 summit, today the Trump administration almost certainly believes that no deal is better than a bad deal, and it continues to prefer a back-to-basics approach to the G-7,' Welsh said at a briefing held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The Trump administration last time around believed that the G-7 had strayed from its original purpose, which was to promote global economic stability and growth,' she said, adding that Carney's agenda "appears to stick to traditional G-7 principles.'


Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Japan enacts law to turn science council into special entity
Parliament on Wednesday passed into law a bill to convert the Science Council of Japan from a state organization into a special public corporation. The new law for the council, which represents the country's scientific community, will come into effect in October 2026. In a plenary meeting of the House of Councilors, the upper chamber of parliament, the bill was approved by a majority vote with support from the ruling bloc and Nippon Ishin no Kai, an opposition party, following its passage last month at the House of Representatives, the lower chamber. The SCJ had called for revising the bill due to concerns about its independence. Meanwhile, an amendment proposed by the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan was voted down Tuesday at the Cabinet Committee of the Upper House. Under the new law, the council will be positioned as a "representative organization for Japanese scientists at home and abroad," and the government will provide necessary financial support. The law will newly establish an evaluation committee and auditors, to be appointed by the prime minister, to check the council's activities and finances. The SCJ will continue to hold the right to make recommendations to the government on science and technology policies. The law expands the number of council members from 210 to 250. Newcomers will be approved through a vote in the council's general meeting, after being nominated by a selection committee comprising council members. An advisory committee of outside experts will be able to give opinions on the nomination policy. In 2020, then-Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga took the unprecedented step of rejecting the appointments of six council member nominees, sparking a debate over how the body should be structured. In 2023, the government compiled a bill to change the council's membership selection method, but gave up submitting it to parliament due to strong opposition from the council. After discussions with experts, the government decided to seek a new law that turns the body into a corporation. SCJ President Mamoru Mitsuishi had released a statement on the new law, saying, "Concerns have not been eliminated from the perspective of autonomy and independence." At its general meeting in April, the SCJ approved by a majority vote a resolution seeking the bill's revision.