
Hegseth aides probed by Pentagon watchdog for potentially deleting leaked Signal chat messages
The inspector general's request focuses on how information about the March 15 air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen was shared on the messaging app.
This comes as Hegseth is scheduled to testify before Congress next week for the first time since his confirmation hearing. He is likely to face questions under oath not only about his handling of sensitive information but also the wider turmoil at the Pentagon following the departures of several senior aides and an internal investigation over information leaks.
Hegseth already has faced questions over the installation of an unsecured internet line in his office that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols and revelations that he shared details about the military strikes in multiple Signal chats.
One of the chats included his wife and brother, while the other included President Donald Trump's top national security officials and inadvertently included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson had no comment on Friday, citing the pending investigation. The inspector general's office would not discuss the details of the investigation but said that when the report is complete, their office will release unclassified portions of it to the public.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
How historical amnesia fuels US-China conflict
This August marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Asia. Contrary to the narrative often presented by Western commentators, the conflict did not begin in 1941, but in 1937, when Japan invaded China. Advertisement Unfortunately, this has been forgotten. In a breathtaking display of historical ignorance, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly declared during his first visit to Japan: 'We share a warrior ethos that defines our forces. Japan is our indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression.' For the record, Japan's aggression against China predated 1937 by decades. The first Japanese attack occurred in 1894-95, resulting in the seizure of Taiwan as spoils of war. In 1904-05, Japan's victory over Russia expanded its reach into Manchuria. Imperial Japanese infantry amid the occupation of Manchuria in 1931 following the Mukden Incident. Photo Getty Images By 1910, Korea had been annexed as a Japanese colony. In 1931, the Japanese Imperial Army manufactured the Mukden Incident as a pretext to carve out Manchukuo from China's northeast: a date still commemorated in China every September 18 . Then, in 1937, came the Lugouqiao, or Marco Polo Bridge, incident – again orchestrated by the Japanese Imperial Army. Only then did full-scale war ensue. At the G7 summit in May 2023 , world leaders gathered at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, which documents the horrific aftermath of the US' atomic bombing on August 6, 1945. What it does not document is why Hiroshima was bombed. Advertisement Japanese aggression against China led to a US oil embargo in 1941. Rather than withdraw, Japan chose to attack the colonial possessions of Britain and the Netherlands and launched a surprise assault on Pearl Harbour – resulting in America's entry into the war and ultimately leading to the atomic bombings. Unlike Germany, Japan has never fully and honestly confronted its wartime history, especially in relation to China.


South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Ukraine war: Trump moves nuclear submarines after Russia's Medvedev makes threats
US President Donald Trump on Friday said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in 'appropriate regions' in response to threats from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump said in a social media post that called Medvedev's statements highly provocative. He added: 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump did not say whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the locations, which are kept secret by the US military. Trump and Medvedev, who is deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after Trump on Tuesday said Russia had '10 days from today' to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil buyers, with tariffs. 02:08 Trump threatens Russia with 100% 'secondary' tariffs if no deal on Ukraine ceasefire Trump threatens Russia with 100% 'secondary' tariffs if no deal on Ukraine ceasefire Moscow, which has set out its own terms for peace in Ukraine, has shown no sign that it will comply with Trump's deadline.


South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US Treasury secretary says China meetings have ‘advanced our talks'
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that meetings with his Chinese counterparts this week 'advanced our talks', but stopped short of confirming that US President Donald Trump approved the consensus that Beijing claimed they had reached. Advertisement 'This week's negotiations in Stockholm have advanced our talks with China, and I believe that we have the makings of a deal that will benefit both of our great nations,' Bessent wrote on X. 'Thanks to the powerful bond between @POTUS and President Xi, I am optimistic about the path forward,' he added, without specifying where consensus stands following talks that ended on Tuesday. Since then, the US side has been seen taking its time to confirm any new agreement reached with China, its third-largest trading partner after neighbouring Mexico and Canada. China's vice-minister of commerce, Li Chenggang, who also took part in the talks, said before leaving Stockholm on Tuesday that a pause on new tariff increases – in place since May – would be extended, but neither Trump nor Bessent has made similar announcements. Advertisement The Trump administration has instead delivered mixed messages.