In historic first, NAACP will not invite Trump to convention
WASHINGTON, June 17 (Reuters) - The NAACP said it will not invite Donald Trump to its annual convention next month, the first time the 116-year-old civil rights organization has not asked a sitting U.S. president to attend its convention.
Derrick Johnson, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, accused the Republican president of working against the group's mission.
"This has nothing to do with political party,' Johnson said in a statement on Monday. "Our mission is to advance civil rights, and the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights."
Johnson said Trump has undermined American democracy by trying to consolidate power, has signed unconstitutional executive orders that oppress and undo federal civil rights protections and has turned the U.S. military against communities.
The group, which is nonpartisan, has invited presidents from both Republican and Democratic parties since President Harry Truman, a Democrat, in 1946, it said.
"But right now, it's clear — Donald Trump is attacking our democracy and our civil rights. He believes more in the fascist playbook than in the U.S. Constitution. This playbook is radical and un-American," Johnson said.
The NAACP said it also will not invite Vice President JD Vance to its national convention July 12-16 in Charlotte, North Carolina.
The civil rights group has filed several lawsuits, opens new tab against the Trump administration over diversity, equity and inclusion programs and voting rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
39 minutes ago
- NBC News
Steve Kornacki: How Cuomo & Mamdani could run for NYC mayor even if they lose the Democratic primary
NBC News National Political Correspondent Steve Kornacki looks at the New York City Democratic mayoral primary with one week until election day. Kornacki explains how frontrunners Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani could still appear on the general election ballot even if they fail to clinch the Democratic 17, 2025
NBC News
41 minutes ago
- NBC News
A 'wake-up call': State lawmakers are fearful after Minnesota shootings expose lack of security
State lawmakers across the country say they are deeply concerned about the lack of security they receive in the wake of the targeted shooting of two Minnesota legislators, even as local officials attempt to ramp up some safety measures. Outside of their state capitol complexes, state legislators have little to no security protection. No state offers proactive security to members of its legislature, though law enforcement will typically step in if there are credible threats. And despite the renewed attention to the issue, lawmakers fear little will ultimately be done that can make a meaningful difference, given that in many states, such positions are effectively part-time jobs with small budgets. Democratic Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman, who was a close colleague of this weekend's shooting victims, said the attack in her state would almost certainly have to serve as a 'wake-up call' around the lack of safety measures for state lawmakers, but that solutions remained sparse. 'I think a lot of us are going through this,' Greenman told NBC News in an interview. 'We are normal people in normal neighborhoods.' 'What does this mean now for part-time legislators?' she added. 'We are not members of Congress, who have a lot more resources. Frankly, there's just been a lot more thinking about how to protect members of Congress, or a governor, probably even a mayor.' The safety concerns following the Minnesota shootings have also extended to members of Congress. Only a handful of federal lawmakers receive 24-hour protection from Capitol Police security details, though members may ask for extra protection. Still, that level of protection goes far beyond what is available to state legislators. Like Greenman, Arizona state Rep. Stephanie Simacek, a Democrat, said she receives no security outside of her state Capitol complex. 'We are constantly out there, vulnerable. Whether I'm volunteering somewhere, knocking doors for someone, starting to run my own campaign, I'm out there, vulnerable,' Simacek said. In Simacek's home state, then-Rep. Gabby Giffords, D-Ariz., was shot in the head while she was meeting with constituents in 2011. Simacek, who makes $24,000 annually as a state representative, said there is no appetite to fund a security apparatus for legislators. 'I don't see any path for that,' she said. 'And that's so frightening, considering the circumstances right now.' So Simacek is taking matters into her own hands. She said she's already started the process of installing cameras on her home property, which she is paying for herself, not with campaign funds. Kansas state Sen. Tory Marie Blew, a Republican, also said she doesn't receive any security protection after she leaves the state Capitol building in Topeka. She also said she has no hope for a legislative path that might fund added safety measures. 'It would be expensive, obviously, and we'd have to have a budget item for it,' she said. There are also logistical complications, especially in larger states, Blew noted. 'I live three hours away from the state capital. I don't think we'd even know where to start for all these lawmakers who live far [away],' she said. Blew and her family have a Ring security device on their door at home, 'but we can't afford a massive security system,' she said. Authorities said the Minnesota shooting suspect, Vance Boelter, visited the homes of four elected officials early Saturday, impersonating a police officer. Authorities allege he shot and killed state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband at their home, shortly after, they say, he seriously wounded state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife in a separate shooting at their home. Like Greenman, Simacek and many others serving in state government, Blew has been on the receiving end of threatening emails and somewhat regularly gets 'yelled at' in public. 'It's part of the job,' she said. 'More and more, it's nerve-wracking.' A number of state officials in recent days have attempted to take some additional steps to protect lawmakers. Wisconsin officials announced increased security at their state Capitol on Monday as lawmakers look to continue their legislative session. New Hampshire officials did the same. In Colorado, officials paused public access to the state's campaign finance database. Campaign finance filings in every state almost always require a candidate to list their home address, making it publicly searchable for anyone. Legislators in Minnesota, New Mexico and North Dakota took similar actions, The Associated Press reported, removing lawmakers' home addresses from state government websites and databases where they are listed or searchable. Elsewhere, other actions to ensure lawmaker safety marked a clear interruption in what have typically been mundane legislative procedures. For example, following the shooting, lawmakers in one state postponed the unveiling of at least one bill that was expected to receive a lot of attention politically while they evaluated whether proper security protocols were in place for its release, an operative in that state said. In the meantime, lawmakers NBC News spoke with said they're not taking any chances with their home safety. Simacek said she 'makes sure the door is always locked' and reminds her children 'that we don't open it when anybody knocks — we see who it is first.' Greenman, who was forced to shelter in place throughout the weekend as law enforcement officials frantically searched for the Minnesota suspect, said she remains fearful. 'Even now that this guy's caught, there is going to be a worry about copycats,' she said. 'We all feel much more vulnerable now.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump isn't just burning his MAGA coalition over Iran — he's inspiring a new one to rise against him
Donald Trump, in the words of one prominent supporter this week, is 'angrily hemorrhaging the coalition that returned him to power' with his open support for Israel's onslaught against Iran and his open consideration of direct U.S. involvement. On Capitol Hill, there already are signs that a new political alliance is emerging in direct defiance of the president's sudden heel turn. With Axios reporting Tuesday that the president is now actively considering direct U.S. engagement in the Israeli effort to target Iranian nuclear weapons development facilities, the illusion of Donald Trump as the 'peace' candidate is quickly dissolving away. Signs of peace in Ukraine are nonexistent. Massacres at aid distribution sites occur in Gaza, where a ceasefire is still not within reach. And despite touting his first administration's record of non-engagement in further global conflicts and his relentless campaigning on the issue of a world in chaos in 2024, Trump is now potentially poised to direct U.S. military forces to strike Iran. Republican opponents of this hawkish neoconservative view of Iran — who supported his administration engaging in the first sustained talks with Tehran in more than a decade — are furious. Monday dawned in D.C. with that tension boiling over into a dispute between former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Trump, who blasted his one-time staunch ally as 'kooky' on Truth Social and reiterated that he was bent on preventing Iran's government from developing a nuclear weapon. The president and other administration officials have fought back (without evidence) against reporters and critics who have questioned why the White House believes the Iranian nuclear program is active when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to the contrary earlier this year. Steve Bannon, another top figure in Trumpworld, continues to trash the idea of U.S. combat operations. 'We have to stop that,' he told Carlson in a conversation on his War Room podcast Monday, referring to an order for such operations from the White House. They were joined on Tuesday by Caroline Sunshine, a former deputy communications director for the Trump campaign, who posted an essay on Twitter urging against U.S. military support for the war. 'The USA has nothing to gain from getting involved in another war in the Middle East. Young strong Americans will die early deaths, gas prices will go up as oil rises, China would love seeing us distracted in yet another costly prolonged conflict, and President Trump's entire domestic agenda of mass deportations for illegal immigrants & tariffs to rebuild the American middle class will be totally derailed by the distraction of war,' she wrote. 'President Trump is a chess player. I pray all of this is an elaborate ruse to get Iran to fold like Reagan did with the USSR,' she added. Others on the right see the issue, led by Trump's own decisions and actions, as having the real possibility of irreparably damaging the MAGA voting coalition. Younger voters especially are skeptical of U.S. military interventionism, and younger males made up a growing and significant part of the president's winning voting bloc in 2024. On Tuesday, Curt Mills of the American Conservative magazine wrote that the political damage from the Iran conflict was already becoming apparent. Mills, who wrote that Trump was voluntarily 'hemorrhaging' his alliances on the right, was apoplectic about the possibility of the U.S. becoming involved in a drawn-out conflict with Iran — it was evident across his Twitter feed. Like Bannon, Mills and other 'paleo' conservatives fret that a war with Iran could become the same kind of protracted struggle that led to the occupation of Iraq and subsequent war against the Islamic State, or the pullout of U.S. forces from Afghanistan and collapse of the democratic Afghan government in the face of a Taliban insurgency. 'Tacky jingoism. Will end in tears,' said Mills in a tweet, deriding Trump's boasting of achieving 'total' control of Iranian airspace. 'Is that what tens of millions of frustrated and desperate Americans put their faith in this person to achieve? I missed that part. Though heard a lot about 'no more endless wars'. 'The tragic, full circle of destroying the Bush monarchy only to enact their policy— dangerously complete,' Mills continued, referring to Trump's public skewering of former Gov. Jeb Bush and his brother, President George W. Bush, during his first run for the presidency. Mills pleaded: 'Can still pull back'. He also warned that the growing and bipartisan group of lawmakers on Capitol Hill signing on to a resolution led by Thomas Massie, a non-MAGA Republican with a libertarian streak and history of bucking Trump, over restricting the president from going to war with Iran was a sign of a strong, unifying political force mobilizing against the president. Centrist Democrats and progressives alike were coming together around an issue while the national Democratic Party's battle over its identity rages on. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) was one of the first to sign on to Massie's resolution, which does not yet include any other Republicans. Some GOPers typically close to the president, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), have already expressed their own opposition to war with Iran. In the Senate, a resolution is being led by Tim Kaine — the center-left Virginia Democrat who was Hillary Clinton's running mate in 2016, to give an idea of the breadth of the agreement on the left. Rep. Ro Khanna, a Pennsylvania progressive who has openly tried to build bridges with populist Republicans, was at it again on Tuesday afternoon. As the possibility of war seemed to draw closer, he made an open appeal for Greene and other House conservatives to sign on to Massie's resolution. Their reluctance may be the only political silver lining for Trump in this moment, even if it's a sign of the president's own electoral strength, rather than ideological agreement. Tweeting at Greene, Rep. Chip Roy and others, Khanna issued his rallying call: 'We have 14 progressives. Let us show anti war is no longer partisan.'
