Resident doctors to restart talks over pay dispute
In a joint statement, Dr Nieuwoudt and Dr Ryan shared: 'We met yesterday with Mr Streeting to once again reiterate what is needed to bring this dispute to an end.
'We were very clear about the determination of resident doctors to return to a fair level of pay.
'Our conversation was informative and we feel that we have achieved a greater mutual understanding than in previous talks.
'We have agreed a window for negotiations, which we hope the Government will use wisely.'
The statement added that medics are working to 'ensure strike action does not need to be repeated'.
'We want to work with the Department for Health and Social Care to deliver on non-pay items it previously agreed to, and to forge mutual respect following years when the previous incumbents seemingly cared little for doctors' pay or wellbeing,' it said.
'We are clear, though, that going forward there has to be movement on pay.
'We also reminded Mr Streeting of the urgent need to provide enough jobs for doctors and bring an end to the current situation where thousands of resident doctors apply for far too few roles, leaving many unable to progress their careers and go on to be our future consultants, GPs and other specialist doctors.
'We are working to ensure strike action does not need to be repeated and will give time to explore solutions. However, doctors and patients both deserve a resolution sooner rather than later.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'The Secretary of State had a constructive conversation with the BMA resident doctors co-chairs yesterday and agreed to continue engagement through the summer with the aim of preventing further disruption to the NHS and patients.
'We have been clear that, following a 28.9 per cent pay rise for resident doctors, we cannot go further on pay this year, but there is shared ambition to explore and address some of the unique additional costs that resident doctors incur through their training and work.'
It comes after early analysis by NHS England claimed less than a third of resident doctors joined strike action last week.
The number of medics that took part in the walkout was down by 7.5 per cent (1,243) on the previous round of industrial action in July last year.
However, the BMA rejected this, saying complex work schedules and doctors taking leave make this information 'almost impossible to know'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Ambulance services hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients
Ambulance services have been hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients. Bosses have been forced to splash out on specialist ambulances and lifting equipment or pay private providers to carry people who are too large for standard vehicles. Health leaders last night urged the government to do more to tackle the nation's obesity crisis, while campaigners warned the NHS 'cannot cope' with the burden placed on it by individuals with 'grossly unhealthy lifestyles'. North West Ambulance Service has paid almost £15million in the past five years for ambulances to carry the overweight, Freedom of Information responses show. It hopes to cut its annual payment of £2.715million to private operators by buying eight new vehicles this year for £416,976. And London Ambulance Service is investing £1million for its own fleet, having paid contractors £1.6million a year for five years. South Central Ambulance Service - which covers Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and most of Hampshire - said it had spent £2.3million over the past five and a half years. East of England Ambulance Trust has got through more than £1.25million in two years. North East Ambulance Service said it has not spent any money on new transport for bariatric patients but all its ambulances 'include an extra wide tail lift with the lifting capacity of 500kg or 78 stone to allow bariatric patients to be transported'. John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to see the burden placed on NHS budgets by some irresponsible patients. 'The health service simply cannot cope with the weight placed on it by those individuals with grossly unhealthy lifestyles. 'Ministers need to start seriously considering how to ensure that patients cough up when their own choices end up impacting taxpayers.' Rory Deighton, acute director at the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare organisations, said: 'These examples of NHS spending on bariatric ambulances highlights the reality of the increasing costs of an ageing and increasingly unfit population. 'NHS leaders will be looking to the government to tackle some of the root causes of obesity as part of its wider mission to improve the health of the nation. Being bold and legislating on contentious issues like food policy will help deliver the Secretary of State's ambition to spend less on treatment by focusing more on prevention.' Recent Government research shows nearly two-thirds of UK adults are overweight or obese. Being overweight increases the risk of heart disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes and muscular-skeletal issues. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS trusts, said: 'The NHS is there for everyone who needs it. 'Providing care for the most obese patients require specialist skills, equipment and ambulances 'It is right for trusts to make that investment.' The average response time in June for ambulances dealing with the most urgent incidents, defined as calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries, was seven minutes and 55 seconds. This is up slightly from seven minutes and 50 seconds in May and is above the target standard response time of seven minutes. Ambulances took an average of 29 minutes and 37 seconds last month to respond to emergency calls such as heart attacks, strokes and sepsis. This is up from 27 minutes and 48 seconds in May. The Government and NHS England have set a new target for this figure to average 30 minutes across 2025/26. Response times for urgent calls, such as late stages of labour, non-severe burns and diabetes, averaged one hour, 44 minutes and 56 seconds in June, up from one hour, 34 minutes and 51 seconds in May.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Popular breakfast option linked to higher risk of cancer... and it's not bacon or sausages
Bacon and sausages are often vilified as dangerous breakfast foods, with ties to devastating diseases like cancer. However, another popular choice, cereal, may be no better. Sugary cereals are a breakfast staple in millions of homes, but these products can be full of additives such as dyes, sweeteners, thickeners and preservatives designed to extend shelf life and improve taste, making them ultra-processed foods (UPFs). UPFs have been linked to rising rates of obesity and diabetes, and more recent research has found links to cancer and dementia. The sugary cereals that fall under the wide UPF umbrella are often advertised as being part of a balanced breakfast, and their fun shapes and bright colors make them popular among children. According to new CDC findings, 55 percent of daily calories consumed by both kids and adults in the US come from UPFs, and children and teens got about two-thirds of their calories from these foods from 2021 to 2023. The links between UPF-heavy diets and cancers have become more solid in recent years amid new interest in the roles they play in the rising rates of chronic illnesses in America, as well as the Trump administration's Make America Healthy Again initiative. In a recent study, UK researchers found that all UPFs, not just processed meats, are linked to cancer. For every 10 percent increase in UPF consumption, the risk of cancer rises by 12 percent. The strongest link researchers found was between all UPFs, including sugary cereals, and breast cancer. The study's online design helped them track over 100,000 French adults for years. They were participants of the NutriNet-Santé study launched in 2009. People ranged in age from 18 to 72, with an average age of about 43. They logged surveys about their diet, lifestyle, and general health every six months for up to eight years. The study, published in the BMJ, asked participants to record everything they ate and drank on three random days over 24 hours. The random days chosen were spread out over two weeks so that researchers could get a clearer picture of their regular eating habits. They repeated this process every six months for the duration of their time in the study, which ranged from a few years to up to eight years. They considered UPFs to include mass-produced items like packaged bread, breakfast cereals, snacks, candy, sodas, chicken nuggets, instant noodles, frozen meals, and ready-to-eat foods. They found that sugary cereals and starchy foods made up 16 percent of the UPFs found in people's diets. Other top sources included sugary products (26 percent), such as candies and desserts, followed by sugary drinks (20 percent), including sodas. Processed fruits and vegetables, such as canned peaches or peas with seasonings in a microwavable pouch, made up 15 percent of the UPFs people ate. These products often contain additives, like artificial flavors, colors, and sweeteners, and are made using industrial methods such as hydrogenation, extrusion, or deep-frying. They're designed to mimic real food but typically include ingredients not used in home cooking, such as modified starches, protein isolates, and preservatives. Throughout the study, more than 2,200 people reported a new cancer diagnosis. Researchers followed up by looking at medical records, hospital reports, speaking to their doctors, and convening an expert committee to review and verify the reports. Of the cancers reported, 739 cases were breast cancers, including 264 premenopausal and 475 postmenopausal; 281 were prostate cancers, and 153 were colorectal cancers. In addition to raising the overall risk of cancer by 12 percent, for every 10 percent increase in UPF consumption, the risk of breast cancer grew by 11 percent. 'No association was statistically significant for prostate and colorectal cancers,' the researchers said, but added that they also found a 'borderline non-significant trend' of higher colorectal cancer risk the more a person's diet was made up of UPFs. Sugary cereals and other UPFs typically contain a laundry list of ingredients that have public health experts and officials concerned. Emulsifiers, the additives that give milkshakes, sauces, and processed meats their smooth texture, are a major culprit. These have been tied to an increased risk of colon cancer, as they may damage the protective barriers in the intestines, leading to inflammation. The CDC found that kids and teens have diets primarily made up of UPFs Kids aged 6 to 11 are consuming the most ultra-processed foods, with 65 percent of their daily calories coming from these products. That number drops slightly to 63 percent for adolescents aged 12 to 18, and to 56 percent for kids under six. As for adults, those between 19 and 39 are the biggest consumers, getting 54 percent of their calories from ultra-processed foods. The number drops slightly to 53 percent for adults aged 40 to 59, and a bit further to 52 percent for those over 60. Recent studies suggest ultra-processed foods could be linked to over 120,000 early deaths in the US, a number higher than that of top killers like fentanyl.
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Firstborn daughters ‘cost mothers more in lost pay and housework'
Having a first child often entails sacrifices, but a study suggests that British mothers pay a far higher price when the baby is a girl. It is well established that women's earnings tend to fall after childbirth. The new research shows that this so-called 'child penalty' is, on average, steeper when the firstborn is a daughter.'Mothers' monthly earnings over the five years after birth were, on average, £450 lower if they had a daughter compared to a son,' said Sonia Bhalotra, a professor of economics at the University of Warwick, who worked on the study with Angelina Nazarova of the University of Essex and Damian Clarke of the University of Exeter. 'To put these figures in perspective, they exceed the child benefit for first children, which is approximately £110 per month.' The arrival of a girl, rather than a boy, was also associated with mothers doing more housework, and with fathers saying that they were more satisfied with their relationships with their partners. The research draws on more than a decade of data from the UK Longitudinal Household Survey, which tracks about 100,000 individuals from about 40,000 households. It suggests that the sex of a first child shapes not only women's careers, but also family life, household chores, societal views and mental health. Mothers of girls saw their incomes fall by an average of 26 per cent in the five years after birth, compared with fathers — more than eight times the 3 per cent fall for mothers of boys. Employment rates showed a similar pattern: they fell by about 20 per cent for mothers of daughters, compared with 6 per cent for mothers of sons. • Flexible hours 'trap' mothers into doing more parenting After a first son, the share of household chores mothers carried out alone increased by 27 per cent; after a first daughter, it jumped by 43 per cent. Similarly, mothers were 57 per cent more likely to identify as the main carer after a son, but 67 per cent more likely after a daughter. The researchers also found that mothers, compared with fathers, became more likely to report 'traditional' views such as the belief that 'the husband should earn and the wife should stay at home'. Fathers' views did not change. Mothers of girls suffered a bigger drop in mental health than mothers of boys. Meanwhile, fathers of daughters reported greater satisfaction with their relationships with their partners than fathers of sons, a finding that may be linked to women shouldering more domestic work. The study could not show what caused these results. It is possible that some mothers choose to take more time off to nurture daughters, or that fathers share more of the household burden when they have a son. However, these remain speculative explanations. To the extent that children benefit from the mother spending more time at home, the behavioural shifts the authors observe may give firstborn daughters an advantage. Bhalotra stressed that the term 'child penalty' has been used in academia to refer to a persistent drop in earnings of the mother relative to the father after birth, and that it does not imply any moral judgment. 'These intriguing findings imply that girls grow up in a systematically different household environment than boys, which could influence their perceptions of the role of women and men,' she and her colleagues wrote in a working paper.
