logo
Why Llosa is essential reading for marketers and brand builders

Why Llosa is essential reading for marketers and brand builders

Mint24-04-2025
Mario Vargas Llosa, an aristocrat of Spanish ancestry, was sent to Lima's military academy to sweat the love of literature out of him. Instead, the experience gave us his first novel,
The Time of the Hero
. Among the greatest literary figures of our times, the Peruvian novelist and liberal died on 13 April, aged 89. I was introduced to his work in 2001 whilst I lived in Aliso Viejo in Southern California and have read much of his work since then.
Llosa's pen charted the psychological, political and social transformations of Latin America with a rare combination of intellectual rigour and narrative brilliance, but his legacy goes beyond the obvious. He offered more than storytelling. His imagination was like an SOS. As Roger Scruton said, 'Consolation from imaginary things is not an imaginary consolation."
What made Llosa's voice unique was his fearless engagement with power in all facets—its seductions, hypocrisies and consequences. He dissected dictatorships and democracies alike, drawing from the political chaos of Latin America not just to critique, but to understand. His lessons were applicable to all mankind.
Llosa's 2010 Nobel Prize was not just in recognition of literary merit, but also of a lifetime spent confronting uncomfortable truths. Whether writing about the terrifying charisma of strongmen or the quiet resilience of individuals, Llosa fused journalism, fiction and philosophy with rare precision. He evolved from a youthful revolutionary sympathizer to a staunch defender of liberal democracy.
It is this ideological evolution that drove Llosa and his friend Gabriel Garcia Márquez apart. 'Gabo' stayed with the revolutionary left in Castro's Cuba, while Llosa joined the Western liberal mainstream.
To Llosa, a writer's role is not to please, but to provoke, challenge and awaken. My professional career has gained from Llosa's example. Marketers can learn a great deal from Llosa—not just about storytelling, but about the power of narrative to shape perception, culture and identity.
Stories are not just entertainment; they are how people make sense of the world. For marketers, this translates into a crucial lesson: facts may inform, but stories persuade. Llosa didn't sell plots and characters, but entire worlds. Brands, too, must create immersive and believable narratives that tap emotions and aspirations.
Another key lesson is complexity. Llosa never flattened characters into caricatures, even in depictions of despots or revolutionaries. He showed that human beings are self-contradictory, complex and driven by competing desires.
Great marketing embraces this nuance. Instead of reducing consumers to mere stereotypes, demographics or personas, marketers who take a Llosa-like approach look for inner tensions—between status and simplicity, tradition and progress, freedom and belonging—that make people care.
Authenticity emerges from acknowledging and resolving complexity, not avoiding it. Llosa teaches that credibility comes not from rigid positioning, but from clarity and the courage of conviction in principles. Marketers can take a cue from his intellectual honesty: speak with conviction, adapt with humility and always root communication in a deeper understanding of the historical, cultural and emotional context.
Finally, attention is earned, not granted. His viscous prose demands engagement; it's rich, ambitious and unapologetically intelligent. It reminds me of Nirad C. Chaudhuri.
Marketing that respects the audience's intelligence—by telling deeper stories, refusing to oversimplify and inviting interpretation rather than dictating it—builds loyalty and trust. Brands that eventually win are not the loudest, but the ones that say something worth remembering.
Llosa is more relevant than ever in today's polarized world because he championed the enduring value of truth, freedom and critical thinking. His novels dissected the dangers of authoritarianism, fanaticism and blind ideology—forces that are resurgent globally. Llosa believed in literature's power to illuminate complexity and challenge complacency.
His intellectual journey underscores the importance of evolving convictions through reason. In an age that often rewards outrage over nuance, Llosa's life and work remind us that real engagement with politics, people and art requires courage, curiosity and moral clarity. He was a chronicler of history, a critic of complacency and a craftsman of language whose influence spanned the globe. In honouring Llosa, we honour the enduring power of literature to shape our conscience. Only a handful of businesses and brands can claim that for themselves.
In homage to a man of letters, let me offer an epitaph: 'Here lies Mario Vargas Llosa, a titan of literature whose pen carved truth into fiction and gave voice to the soul of Latin America. Nobel laureate, fearless critic and eternal storyteller, he challenged power and celebrated freedom. His words live on—bold, brilliant and unyielding—etched in the hearts of readers across generations. A life of letters, never forgotten."
Llosa is dead but his ideas will live forever.
The author is CMO, Tata Motors CV
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump repeats role in India-Pakistan truce; Armenia and Azerbaijan say he deserves Nobel Prize
Donald Trump repeats role in India-Pakistan truce; Armenia and Azerbaijan say he deserves Nobel Prize

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump repeats role in India-Pakistan truce; Armenia and Azerbaijan say he deserves Nobel Prize

US President Donald Trump on Friday renewed his claims of brokering peace between India and Pakistan while signing a peace accord between Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House. He also highlighted his role as a mediator in several other countries, including Thailand and Cambodia. After the signing of the accords, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan also stated that they will nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize(AP) After the signing of the accords, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan also stated that they would nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for the historic agreement, news agencies reported. Azerbaijan President Aliyev said that both countries will issue a joint letter for the Nobel Peace Prize, stating, "Who, if not President Trump, deserves the Nobel Peace Prize? Speaking at the ceremony alongside the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, Trump said, "Today's signing follows our success with India and Pakistan. They were going at it. They were going at it big. And they were great leaders that came together just prior to what would have been a tremendous conflict, as you know, a nuclear conflict probably," Trump said further. Also read: Donald Trump announces peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia Earlier on Friday, during a press briefing, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio listed Trump's efforts in defusing conflicts between nations, mentioning his role in the India-Pakistan conflict. He said that the President was able to deliver peace. President Trump went on to cite other examples of his administration's efforts to defuse tensions, mentioning talks between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, as well as Thailand and Cambodia. 'We've saved countless lives,' Trump stated, presenting the Armenia-Azerbaijan agreement as part of his broader legacy of diplomatic successes. The accord is the latest US brokered deal in the region, after decades of dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the late 1980s. The dispute is over Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous Azerbaijani region that broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. Trump described the pact as 'historic,' stating that it could pave the way for a lasting peace in the region. The agreement signed on Friday will result in strengthening regional stability and open doors for trade and investment, reported ANI. Trump also reflected on his administration's efforts over the past months in diffusing tensions, stating, "I came in, and this whole world was on fire. All these things were sort of happening. We've only been here for six months. The world was on fire. We took care of just about every fire." This is not the first instance where Trump has claimed credit for brokering a truce between India and Pakistan. He has been making these claims since May 10, when hostilities between the two countries calmed down. Meanwhile, New Delhi has been rejecting these claims. Azerbaijan and Armenia leaders to nominate Trump for Nobel Prize In a new call for the Nobel Peace Prize for President Trump, both Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan's President Aliyev stated that they would nominate Trump for the award. The Armenian leader said the "breakthrough" would not have been possible without "peacemaker" Trump, adding that the US president deserved the Nobel. President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan said, 'From the leaders of the countries which were at war for three decades, having these historic signatures here, means a lot. This is a tangible result of President Trump's leadership. So who, if not President Trump, deserves the Nobel Peace Prize ?' As soon as we [return], we will agree to issue a joint letter," he said further. (With inputs from ANI)

Ram Madhav writes: Countering Trump's transactionalism
Ram Madhav writes: Countering Trump's transactionalism

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Ram Madhav writes: Countering Trump's transactionalism

It's not just India — many countries have faced ups and downs in their ties with the US in the past. Even today, the Donald Trump administration is engaged in hardball negotiations with over 20 countries on trade and tariffs. At the root of all this is the sense of 'American exceptionalism' that the US leadership developed after World War II. It built post-War financial institutions in a manner that ensured they helped perpetuate its economic hegemony. Although President Harry Truman claimed 'all countries, including our own, will greatly benefit', the real intention remained US supremacy in the world. The same American businesses realised that despite this weak trade regime, countries like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Japan and Germany emerged as powerful competitors. That prompted them to support the creation of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995, again with the aim of ensuring better opportunities for Western companies in an increasingly competitive trade space. By then, the developing world had understood the rules of the game and offered stiff resistance. At multiple negotiations in the late 1990s and early 2000s, India led the developing world's campaign for an equitable trade regime. The resistance grew stronger with China's accession to the WTO in 2001, which forced the body to build a regime that helped the developing world as much as it did the developed ones. The WTO regime helped countries like China, India, Indonesia and others register impressive economic growth. China raced ahead in the two decades after it joined the WTO, and India, too, picked up momentum in the past decade and emerged as the most promising economy. The Western powers began feeling insecure and started targeting the rising economies once again. While accusing others of violating WTO rules, they themselves did everything possible to cripple that regime by blocking judicial appointments, violating tariff commitments and not paying membership dues for several years. China became the target after it emerged as the second-largest economy, and soon, it was India's turn. Robert Lighthizer, who was the US Trade Representative under Trump from 2017 to 2021, boasted in 2019 that he got India removed from the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) regime that allowed developing countries to access US markets easily. Despite regime change, the US didn't restore India to the GSP regime. The Western powers always tried to rig the international trade regime in their favour. They never allowed a real level playing field or free flows of trade and investment. Thomas Friedman's 'the world is flat' was merely a platitude, while the reality was that 'the rise of the rest', to borrow from Fareed Zakaria, was never taken kindly by the West as it believed this was happening at its expense. Jeffrey Sachs, the renowned American economist, warns that the Trump administration's real objective behind tariff aggression is to prevent the Indian economy from growing as a big competitor to the US. India's insistence on strategic autonomy, too, became another sore point for many in the US and EU capitals. As America's influence declined vis-à-vis countries like China and Russia, India was increasingly seen as an important partner. India's refusal to become a party to power-bloc politics irritated many. The current tariff tussle should be seen in this context. There can be other, more 'Trumpian' reasons, too, like Prime Minister Narendra Modi's refusal to stop over in DC after the G7 summit in Canada or the Indian establishment's consistent refusal to accept Trump's claims of having mediated during Operation Sindoor. Trump sees himself as a serious contender for the Nobel Peace Prize. In the past six months, his regime claimed the President had negotiated six peace deals — a record one-a-month success — which included the India-Pakistan, Thailand-Cambodia and Israel-Iran ceasefires, as well as the resolution of other disputes between Serbia and Kosovo, Rwanda and Congo, and Egypt and Ethiopia. He has invited the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia to sign a truce next week. Several of these countries, including Pakistan, Cambodia and Israel, and some lawmakers in the US, have already submitted his nomination for the coveted prize. Trump's transactional approach is an extension of America's trade exceptionalism, which needs to be tackled not with aggression in turn but with calm and tact, as Europe and others are doing. The Indian leadership, too, is maintaining a studied silence while working to ensure that normalcy returns sooner rather than later. Trump's targeting of several countries is rooted in his threefold mission — resolve the Ukraine-Russia conflict, secure a Nobel Peace Prize, and Make America Great Again to contain China. He understands that India is an indispensable ally in achieving all three. For India, these Trumpian dreams can be turned into an opportunity. Trump holds PM Modi in great awe and respect. Having made clear that India won't compromise on national interests, the question for the country's leadership is whether long-term discord between the world's most influential democracies, which have grown closer over several decades of strenuous efforts, is a good sign for posterity. If not, the two leaders are just a phone call or an emissary away. The writer, president, India Foundation, is with the BJP. Views are personal

Putin's NUCLEAR Game: Russia Shuts Airspace For Burevestnik ICBM Test
Putin's NUCLEAR Game: Russia Shuts Airspace For Burevestnik ICBM Test

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Putin's NUCLEAR Game: Russia Shuts Airspace For Burevestnik ICBM Test

/ Aug 09, 2025, 08:37AM IST Russia is reportedly on the brink of testing its nuclear-powered Burevestnik cruise missile, raising global security alarms. This cutting-edge weapon is designed to evade Western air defences and travel unlimited distances using a nuclear propulsion system. Recent military activity near Novaya Zemlya, including a 500-km airspace closure and multiple naval vessels in position, signals that preparations are nearing completion. Meanwhile, the US has deployed a WC-135R "nuke sniffer" aircraft near Russian nuclear bases to monitor any radioactive activity. Watch as tensions escalate and the nuclear arms race intensifies in this exclusive update.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store