Ohio would see more than $1 billion in revenue if Medicaid expansion group stays, new study finds
A new study of Ohio Medicaid showed the Affordable Care Act expansion group of nearly 770,000 would bring the state an economic benefit of $1 billion if it survives cuts at the federal and state level. But Ohio Republicans might include a trigger in the state budget to cut the expansion if Medicaid budget cuts come down from Congress.
The Ohio Senate is expected to release its proposed state operating budget in the next few days, a proposal that will then be compared to and combined with the Ohio House's version already passed last month, before a final draft heads to the governor for his signature.
The Ohio House's version of the budget absorbed a proposal by Gov. Mike DeWine in his executive budget that creates a trigger effect, eliminating Group VIII, or the Medicaid expansion eligibility group, 'if the federal government sets the federal medical assistance percentage below (its current level of) 90%,' according to budget documents.
Child health programs including even pediatric cancer research see cuts in Ohio House budget draft
The expansion group, which was introduced administratively in Ohio in 2014, represents adults aged 19 to 64 who earn less than 138% of the federal poverty level but aren't eligible for Medicaid in other categories. For a family of two, the poverty level stands at $21,150 in Ohio and other contiguous states.
The federal budget, which is being reviewed by the U.S. Senate, could include a larger state contribution to the Medicaid program than seen in the past, dropping the federal contribution, called the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage or FMAP, from its current share of 90%. If that is passed into law, and if the state budget is passed and signed with the trigger in place, the expansion population would face cuts.
According to the Health Policy Institute of Ohio's newest policy brief, written by Amy Rohling McGee, the 10% the state currently pays to support Medicaid stands in juxtaposition to revenue and state savings generated by the program.
After accounting for the savings the state nets as a part of the program and revenue created, researchers found that the state share is effectively 1.4%.
'Discontinuing expansion would save substantially less than the state share amount, it would reduce federal funds coming to Ohio by over $42 billion over five years, and would leave an estimated 435,000 Ohioans without coverage,' Rohling McGee wrote as part of the HPIO's 2025 Ohio Medicaid Expansion Study.
The economic activity that results from those in the Medicaid expansion group having their health insurance covered 'is projected to generate over $1.1 billion over the next five years in state general revenue from personal income taxes, sales taxes and gross receipts taxes,' according to HPIO researchers.
State revenue would drop in a number of other ways without the expansion group, according to the HPIO Medicaid study. The population brings state revenue through health insuring corporation (HIC) premium taxes and franchise fees, along with prescription drug rebates.
'As part of the federal Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, Ohio's Medicaid program receives rebates from drug manufacturers in exchange for the program's coverage of most of the manufacturer's drugs,' the HPIO wrote. 'These rebates offset the costs of most outpatient prescription drugs dispensed to Medicaid patients.'
Money the state receives from drug rebates goes back into the Medicaid budget to support spending, according to the study.
Along with drops in economic health for the state, the loss of the Medicaid expansion group could negatively impact the state's overall health, dropping the number of insured Ohioans. The institute's research said Ohio's uninsured rate 'would potentially increase by 80%' in fiscal year 2026 without the existence of Medicaid expansion.
Those in the expansion group can include students, Ohioans with chronic health conditions, and older residents. Almost 50% of the Ohioans covered under the Medicaid expansion are among the state's workforce, according to the Center for Community Solutions.
If the Medicaid expansion remained as it is now, the policy institute found Ohio would get more than $42 billion from the federal government over five years to fund the population in that expansion.
'The state would have to raise considerable revenue to be able to fill the gap that elimination of expansion would leave,' the study stated.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP
Democrats' exit from Texas two weeks ago stalled a Republican plan to re-draw congressional maps in the GOP's favor. But their return means it's now expected to move forward. Democrats in the Texas House of Representatives returned to Austin this morning after leaving the state two weeks ago in protest of a Republican plan to re-draw congressional maps to help the party gain seats in 2026. The protest temporarily blocked House Republicans from having a quorum to move the redistricting plan forward and drew national attention to President Donald Trump's effort to avoid losing the Republican majority in Congress next year. The Texas House Democratic Caucus announced Aug. 18 that its members refused to return to work until Republicans adjourned its first special session in the state House on Aug. 14, and California moved forward with a retaliatory plan to re-draw its own maps in favor of Democrats. "We killed the corrupt special session, withstood unprecedented surveillance and intimidation, and rallied Democrats nationwide to join this existential fight for fair representation — reshaping the entire 2026 landscape," State Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Minority Leader, said in a news release. He said Democrats will now move to "build the legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court" and "inspire legislators across the country (on) how to fight these undemocratic redistricting schemes in their own statehouses." "The Great Golden State": California governor announces Nov. 4 special election to re-draw maps California, the only state with more congressional seats than Texas, will hold a special election on Nov. 4 so voters can approve a plan to re-draw congressional maps in favor of Democrats in time for the 2026 election. Additional Democratic-led and Republican-led states have planned or discussed redistricting.
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's trade ‘deals' are economically self-defeating and a geopolitical failure
To President Trump's supporters, the one-sided trade 'deals' negotiated with the United Kingdom, Japan and most recently the European Union may seem like victories. They may seem like a vindication of the president's supposed street-savvy negotiating style. In reality, they are self-defeating in their economics and harmful to America's alliances. Under the trade arrangement concluded at the end of July, the EU will scrap tariffs on U.S. imports and commit to large-scale purchases on American energy and defense systems, as well further U.S. investment. In exchange, the EU gets a U.S. tariff of 15 percent, vastly exceeding average tariff rates across the industrialized world in the post-war era. At the risk of stating the obvious, the three 'deals' are not trade agreements in any meaningful sense. They lack the legal weight that foreign trade agreements carry. Nor do they entail a liberalization of trade — rather, they ratify America's imposition of new tariff barriers against some of its closest allies, while also extracting concessions from these nations under threat of even higher tariffs. Because tariffs are effectively taxes on Americans, the U.S. economy and consumers are the first and foremost losers of these new 'deals,' especially in sectors where imports from the three partner economies serve as inputs into U.S. economic activity. The BMW plant in Spartanburg, S.C., to cite just one example, uses a lot of EU-made components; barring special, yet-unannounced carve-outs, its production has just become less competitive. Jobs will be lost, just as they were lost in the aftermath of Trump's first-term steel and aluminum tariffs across industries that rely on those metals. The geopolitical ramifications are even more pernicious. 'It's about security, it's about Ukraine,' the EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said to justify the European concessions back in July, not anticipating that the deal would have little impact on the administration's planned rapprochement with Russia, on full display in Alaska on Friday. American alliances since 1945 have been sustained by a perception of the U.S. as a fundamentally different kind of global superpower, one that was neither predatory nor seeking domination for its own sake. While Russia and China may have had control over their clients or over nations that they subjugated by brute force, the U.S. had real friends — at least until now. Europeans, the Japanese, or the Koreans have generally hoped for our leadership, comfortable in the knowledge that our decisions will be informed, at the very least, by a basic sense of decency. That sense is being shaken to the core. Trump is transforming a rules-based, voluntary system of international cooperation, imperfect as it was, into a system of quasi-colonial extortion. The MAGA camp might derive a sense of satisfaction from humiliating 'free-riding' U.S. allies, but the resulting arrangements are not sustainable. Canada and Mexico have learned that even a proper free trade agreement negotiated with a Trump administration and ratified by Congress offers little protection against new arbitrary tariffs. It will soon dawn on voters in Japan, the U.K. and the EU — if it hasn't already — that their country's trade deals are both hopelessly unbalanced and subject to change by Washington at a moment's notice. Even if the deals hold in the short term, they are bound the produce a political backlash, which will make the prospect of working together with the U.S. on matters of mutual interest far less likely. There was a reason why the Japanese government postponed the announcement of its trade deal with the U.S. until after its recent upper house parliamentary election, from which it has emerged badly bruised. Similarly, the European Commission will have a hard time selling its deal with Trump to member states — whose cooperation is essential if the promises of hundreds of billions in U.S.-bound investment and purchases of American goods are ever going to materialize. For decades, there have been voices in European politics decrying America's real or imaginary domination of the old continent. Today, they have a real, tangible grievance they can hold on to: The EU is essentially promising a large transfers of wealth to the U.S., in the form of future military and energy purchases as well as outbound investment, while acquiescing to being subjected to a trade policy that would have been essentially unthinkable a few months ago. If the Trump administration were purposefully trying to peel the EU, the U.K. and Japan away from America's system of alliances, it would be hard-pressed to find a more surefire method than these deals. They put to rest a benevolent vision of America that has underpinned our soft power worldwide for 80 years.
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump threatens executive order to end mail-in voting; says Putin agrees
Trump's opposition to mail-in balloting intensified after his 2020 election loss, when the 'red mirage' of a lead on Election Day evaporated when mail-in ballots were counted. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said he would sign an executive order to abolish mail-in voting, a move he said Russia's President Vladimir Putin supported. Mailing ballots is a popular option for voters to avoid waiting in line at polling places on Election Day. Election-security officials say voting has never been more secure. But Trump has long railed against mail-in voting as vulnerable to fraud – despite election experts, including those in his first administration, who said mail-in voting is secure. 'THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!!' Trump said on social media Aug. 18. The post came after Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News on Aug. 15 that Putin, 'smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting.' Trump's announcement came while special House races are pending in Arizona and Tennessee; New Jersey and Virginia will be choosing governors in November this year and some big-city mayors will be chosen in New York and elsewhere. The whole country will be voting on House races and one-third of the Senate 2026, and for president in 2028. Mail-in voting is popular. Out of 155 million votes cast in 2024, nearly 47 million were mailed in, according to the Election Assistance Commission. Not all states track mail-in ballots by party. But among those reporting, about 41% of the ballots were cast by Democrats and 38% by Republicans, according to a report by the Council on Foreign Relations. Trump's opposition to mail-in voting became more aggressive after his 2020 election loss. His campaign aides told Congress that his lead on election day was a "red mirage" before absentee ballots were counted and tipped the victory to former President Joe Biden. A major looming dispute is over who runs elections. States traditionally set their own election rules and federal authorities monitor the accuracy of the results, with the Justice Department potentially prosecuting fraud. Trump contends states are 'merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes.' 'I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS,' Trump said on social media. But Joyce Vance White, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama, said Trump was 'spewing lies about elections.' 'Each state runs its own election,' White said on social media. 'We don't owe the president. It's the president who owes us a duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed.'
