Canfor Pulp Products Inc. and Canfor Corporation Announce Fourth Quarter Results Conference Call
When:
Friday, August 1, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. PT
Call details:
1-888-510-2154 (Toll-free North America)
Please ask to participate in Canfor's second quarter call.
Listen live at canfor.com/investor-relations/webcasts, select Online Log In.
Presentation material referenced during the conference call will be available the morning of the call at canfor.com/investor-relations/presentations.
Following management's discussion of the quarterly results, the analyst and investment community will be invited to ask questions. Media are invited to attend on a listen-only basis.
Recording playback:
The replay of the conference call will be available until August 15, 2025.
canfor.com/investor-relations/webcasts
1-888-660-6345 Passcode 18122 #
About Canfor Pulp Products Inc.
Canfor Pulp Products Inc. ("Canfor Pulp" or "CPPI") is a leading global supplier of pulp and paper products with operations in the northern interior of British Columbia ("BC"). Canfor Pulp operates two mills in Prince George, BC with a total capacity of 780,000 tonnes of Premium Reinforcing Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft ("NBSK") pulp and 140,000 tonnes of kraft paper. CPPI shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CFX. For more information visit canfor.com.
SOURCE Canfor Pulp Products Inc.
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2025/03/c1695.html
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CP NewsAlert: Billionaire David Thomson interested in buying Hudson's Bay charter
TORONTO — New court filings show a holding company owned by David Thomson wants to buy the royal charter that formed the Hudson's Bay retailer for at least $15 million and donate it to the Archives of Manitoba. The department store previously announced it would seek court approval next month to sell the charter for $12.5 million to a holding company belonging to the Weston family, which intends to donate it to the Canadian Museum of History. More coming. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CRA penalizes taxpayer for failure to report the sale of his principal residence
Perhaps the biggest tax break remaining for ordinary Canadians is the principal residence exemption (PRE), which allows individuals to realize an unlimited tax-free gain upon the sale of their home. Contrast that to the U.S. where the exemption is currently limited to US$250,000 for single filers (US$500,000 for married couples filing jointly), although last month, a bill was introduced in the U.S. that would provide an unlimited exemption just like in Canada. Under our tax rules, if you do sell your principal residence, as of 2016 you need to report that sale on your tax return even if it fully qualifies for the PRE. The designation of your principal residence is reported on the front page of Schedule 3 of your return, and you must also complete the appropriate sections of Form T2091(IND), Designation of a Property as a Principal Residence by an Individual. For a property to qualify as your principal residence for a particular tax year, four criteria must be satisfied: 1. the property must be a housing unit; 2. you must own the property (either alone or jointly with someone else); 3. you or your spouse (or common-law partner) or kids must 'ordinarily inhabit' the property and 4. you must 'designate' the property as a principal residence. Note that a seasonal residence, such as a cottage, cabin, lake house or even ski chalet, can be considered to be 'ordinarily inhabited in the year' even if you only use it during vacation periods 'provided that the main reason for owning the property is not to gain or produce income.' A rental property, however, is generally not considered a principal residence, and you could be on the hook for capital gains tax when you sell it. Similarly, you may be precluded from claiming the PRE if you bought or built a home with the purpose of selling it for a profit. In recent years the government has been cracking down on residential house flipping. New anti-flipping rules for residential real estate (including rental properties) came into effect Jan. 1, 2023, and were designed to 'reduce speculative demand in the marketplace and help to cool excessive price growth.' The rules prevent you from claiming the PRE to shelter the capital gain realized on the sale of your home if you've owned it for less than 12 months. And, any gain on the sale of residential real estate held under 12 months is taxable not as a 50 per cent capital gain, but rather as 100 per cent taxable business income, subject to certain exemptions for life events such as death, disability, separation and work relocation. If you sold residential real estate (including a rental property) that you owned for less than 365 days, you are obligated to declare that sale on Part 2 of the Schedule 3 of your personal tax return for the year of sale. And, although the flipped property rules only came into play for 2023 and future years, the Canada Revenue Agency can still challenge real estate flips that took place prior to 2023 if it feels a taxpayer has speculated and flipped a property for a quick profit. In recent years, the CRA has also been cracking down on perceived abuse of the PRE even when properties are held for more than a year. Take the recent decision of the Tax Court, decided in June 2025, involving a Toronto taxpayer whose 2016 tax return was reassessed by the CRA because he failed to report a capital gain of $159,282 on the sale of residential real estate. To make matters worse, he was also hit with a $21,000 gross negligence penalty for failure to report the gain. The taxpayer, an avid investor who was 'particularly fond of real property,' purchased several properties along a certain portion of Toronto's Yonge Street between 2010 and 2017. In 2016, the taxpayer sold multiple real estate holdings. One of these properties was his principal residence in which he lived from May 2010 to July 2016. The CRA allowed him to claim the PRE on the sale of this property even though he failed to report its disposition on his 2016 tax return. The taxpayer also failed to report the disposition of a second property sold at a gain in 2016, claiming that it was 'always intended as a principal residence.' This claim was rejected by the CRA for a variety of reasons, including the fact he never resided at the property, did not file a T2091 to report it and already had a different principal residence at the same time in the same taxation year. Unfortunately, this was not the first time the taxpayer failed to report a disposition of real estate. It turns out that in 2011 the taxpayer was also reassessed, penalized and 'red flagged for future vigilance by the (CRA)' for failure to report a sale. In his defense, the taxpayer claimed that he reviewed his 2016 tax return with his accountant, reported the disposition of two other properties he sold in 2016, but omitted the gain on his principal residence and the property in question, believing that the gains were sheltered by the PRE. The taxpayer blamed his accountant for failing to disclose the sale of his principal residence since 2016 was the first year this was required and his 'accountant likely was ignorant' of the need to report it. When asked why his accountant didn't testify, the taxpayer said it was because he had 'moved to the States.' But the judge wasn't buying this excuse, noting that the taxpayer had a master's degree, was experienced in real estate and even became a licensed real estate broker in 2022. The judge upheld the CRA's assessment of the unreported gain. CRA loses case as judge rules in favour of taxpayers' Home Buyers' Plan withdrawal timing CRA prevails over Holt Renfrew saleswoman in battle over wardrobe deduction The judge also concluded that in failing to report any disposition from the sale of the property, the taxpayer 'knowingly or under circumstances amounting to gross negligence' made a false statement or omission on his 2016 tax return. Consequently, the CRA was justified in levying a gross negligence penalty for failure to report the gain associated with the sale of the property. Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Estate Planning with CIBC Private Wealth in Toronto. If you liked this story, in the FP Investor newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
6 minutes ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of Broadwind, Inc.
NEW YORK, Aug. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Broadwind, Inc. ('Broadwind' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: BWEN). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980. The investigation concerns whether Broadwind and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. [Click here for information about joining the class action] On August 12, 2025, Broadwind issued a press release announcing its financial results for the second quarter of 2025. Among other results, the Company reported a GAAP loss per share of $0.04 for the quarter, missing consensus estimates by $0.05. The Company also suspended its previously issued full-year 2025 financial guidance as a result of a definitive agreement that it had entered into to sell its industrial fabrication operations in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. On this news, Broadwind's stock price fell $0.36 per share, or 14.46%, to close at $2.13 per share on August 12, 2025. Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. CONTACT: Danielle Peyton Pomerantz LLP [email protected] 646-581-9980 ext. 7980
