The secretive shop that keeps the rare McLaren F1 on the road
PHILADELPHIA – Of the many amenities Mr Kevin Hines was grateful for when his workplace relocated earlier in 2025 – spacious tool cabinets, gleaming epoxy-coated floors, a powerful extractor system for exhaust fumes – it was the simple presence of windows that he particularly appreciated.
While abundant natural light may seem a basic requirement for a car repair shop, the previous location was windowless.
There are good reasons to limit street-level transparency at this specialised business, which is dedicated to servicing a single model from a single carmaker: the McLaren F1, produced in England from 1992 to 1998.
Assuring privacy and security for the owners of these ground-breaking supercars, which typically trade at eight-figure prices, is non-negotiable. The shop in the Philadelphia area , operated by the McLaren Philadelphia dealership, keeps its address closely held.
Mr Hines' previous workplace was a curtained-off area of a service facility, where he tended to everything from periodic maintenance – McLaren's guidelines calls for service at nine- and 18-month intervals – to precision repairs to factory-developed upgrades.
Mechanic Kevin Hines has been specially trained to handle the McLaren F1.
PHOTO: TONY CENICOLA/NYTIMES
That work continues at the new shop, where each visit may have the car staying for weeks , depending on what needs attention and whether parts need to come from England .
The hourly rate is US$395 (S$500) , Mr Hines said, and the waiting time for an appointment is about 1½ months. The nine-month maintenance typically runs about US$14,000 , while the 18-month service is usually about US$21,000.
Owners of the limited-edition F1 model – just 106 were produced, of which only 64 were road cars to begin with – have a powerful incentive to take their cars to Mr Hines. His shop is one of only two McLaren-authorised service facilities in the world, the other being in Woking, England. He is also one of just two technicians trained by McLaren to work on the F1.
Today, an F1 costs at least $20 million.
Enthusiasts who track individual cars estimate that as many as three dozen F1s are in the United States, and owners ship their cars to Mr Hines for service. While other brands, including Mercedes-Benz and Porsche, offer upkeep and repair services for vintage models, they serve a much larger constituency.
Reflective foil made of real gold is used to protect the bodywork from the engine's heat.
PHOTO: TONY CENICOLA/NYTIMES
Even among low-volume exotics, the F1 stands out. Engineered by Gordon Murray, a revered designer of championship-winning Formula One race cars, the F1 hits speeds of 386kmh.
It is still the fastest combustion-powered production model that does not use a turbocharger or supercharger. The power comes from a BMW V12 engine that delivers more than 600 horsepower.
To prevent the heat generated by that engine from damaging the bodywork above, a reflective foil – made of gold – lines the underside of the engine cover.
Built with a Formula One mindset, every detail of the F1 is optimised for performance, which is why it requires such extraordinary resources to look after it. Weight-saving measures are seen throughout; even the tool kit is titanium. Special tools like the gauges used to calibrate the fuel injection throttles were created expressly for this engine.
Among the attributes the F1 is known for, it may be the interior, three-seat arrangement that draws the most attention. Two passengers flank a driver who sits slightly forward, to afford a panoramic view like a single-seat race car. And despite its prodigious top speed, road models were originally designed with no wing at the rear. Aerodynamic downforce is generated by the flat underside and a rear diffuser.
The F1 driver sits in the middle, between the two passengers, and enjoys panoramic view of the road ahead.
PHOTO: TONY CENICOLA/NYTIMES
The car is largely free of the digital controls common in modern vehicles. There is no power assist for the steering or brakes, nor is there electronic traction control or anti-lock brakes. Those are intentional design choices that contribute to the car's reputation for delivering its driving experience. In the words of Mr Hines, who commutes in an electric vehicle but also has seat time on racetracks: 'You're connected to everything. There's not a lot of latency.'
Owners of low-volume models are accustomed to finding specialists who can attend to their vehicles, so it might seem like overkill that the F1 rates a dedicated service operation.
How can there possibly be a business case for an operation devoted to such a tiny population of customers? Mr Robert DiStanislao, the McLaren dealership's owner, is succinct about this: 'There is no business case.'
Why McLaren continues to support a model that is decades old and produced in small numbers has to do with keeping a heroic model on the road and engendering customer loyalty; F1 owners are also buyers of McLaren's new road cars.
In addition, it is a whispered message that the carmaker is on solid footing and here to stay, a status that has not always been assured among British luxury brands. In the words of Mr Hines, it is a matter of carrying the torch.
On a recent visit to Mr Hines' lair, there were four cars being tended to, including a blue road version F1 that belongs to Mr Daniel Heard, the retired chief executive of a Louisiana industrial supply company.
'My F1 was built in 1995,' Mr Heard, who also has a McLaren P1 and a 675LT, said in an interview in July. 'Thirty years later, limited-edition cars like that can become portfolio items that we wouldn't be able to drive. Having a factory-authorised shop to look after it becomes a do-or-die matter.'
Mr Heard's F1, which he said he drove about 2,400km a year , was in for its nine-month service, which included checks of ride height, corner weights and wheel alignment.
Detailed records are kept on each car that comes through the repair shop , starting as handwritten notes on a ruled pad that are transcribed and forwarded to McLaren Special Operations in Woking, which in turn feeds a program to compile documentation on the care and feeding of F1s. The coordination and information-sharing are key to assuring that the F1 fleet remains roadworthy, but the relationship extends much farther to the development of replacement parts to update the cars.
Upgrades made possible in recent years by the availability of improved components include brighter headlights, larger radiators and high downforce body panels. More involved programmes have brought revisions that counter the passage of years since the cars were new.
For instance, the magnesium wheels originally fitted to the cars are susceptible to ageing, so McLaren Special Operations developed forged aluminium wheels that are lighter and stronger. A set of aluminium wheels in the original 17-inch diameter is about US$45,000, and fitting them with new Michelin tyres costs roughly US$34,000.
An ambitious effort by special operations involved a two-year development process to replace the car's original fuel bladders – which would not tolerate today's ethanol-laced petrol – with an aluminium tank.
The job requires the removal of the mid-mounted engine and rear suspension and includes replacement of some 70 parts, including the fuel pumps and filters. It is a job that costs about US$75,000, and not work that a local shop can take on.
McLaren continues to introduce upgraded parts for the F1 decades after production has ended.
PHOTO: TONY CENICOLA/NYTIMES
Indeed, not even the Philadelphia shop can handle all services for the F1. Work like a full engine rebuild or a repair of the carbon-fibre chassis necessitates an air cargo ride to the Woking headquarters, south-west of London.
'It's not just a rare car or a fast car, but an engineering triumph by Gordon Murray and a masterclass in packaging,' Mr Hines said.
'The F1 is put together with nuts and bolts like any other car,' he added, downplaying the role of hardware as its secret sauce.
'It was designed to do tasks in a very specific way,' he said. The engineers 'wanted it put together in a certain way, and that's where the magic lies'. NYTIMES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
11 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Crypto's comeback: Should Bitcoin and other digital assets be in your portfolio now?
Bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency, was trading at more than US$119,000 on July 28. SINGAPORE - Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether have rallied in recent weeks, buoyed by clearer regulations in the United States and renewed investor interest, prompting the question of whether digital assets now have a place in mainstream investment portfolios. Bitcoin, the world's largest cryptocurrency, was trading at more than US$119,000 on July 28, after briefly crossing the US$120,000 mark for the first time on July 14. It has risen more than 80 per cent in the past 12 months, driven by new bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETF) and rising institutional adoption, among others. Ether was changing hands around US$3,800, up more than 60 per cent in the past month following inflows into newly launched US-listed spot Ether ETF. It is up nearly 20 per cent over the past year. The price surge coincides with the passing of the Genius Act in the United States, which sets out clearer rules for US dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies known as stablecoins. While the new law does not apply to other digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ether, it is still seen as a win for the sector, with supporters welcoming it as a step towards legitimising an industry long associated with speculation and regulatory ambiguity. Crypto's rebound has raised questions over the role of digital assets in investor portfolios. While clearer regulations in the US and renewed interest have fuelled gains, analysts here are divided on whether the rebound signals a sustained recovery for crypto. Still a risky asset Mr Timothy Liew, head of investments at OCBC Bank, said the regulatory developments in the US are a welcome step and will be viewed positively by investors and market watchers. However, he cautioned that it is still 'early days' and that volatility in the cryptocurrency market is likely to persist. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row World US, China hold new talks on tariff truce, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road recovery works progressing steadily, tests under way Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Sport Gan Ching Hwee breaks 2 national records, qualifies for World Aquatics C'ships 1,500m final Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life 'While the Genius Act may provide greater legitimacy to crypto-linked companies, it still remains to be seen if the law can usher in long-term systematic shifts that will pave the way for everyday digital asset payments,' he said. 'Cryptocurrencies can have significant price volatility as their value does not typically relate to any economic fundamentals, so investors must exercise caution when deciding to invest in it.' Mr Liew noted that institutional investors are likely to gravitate towards more established cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether, while retail investors and those with higher risk appetites may favour smaller, lesser-known tokens - known as altcoins - which tend to be more volatile but offer the potential for bigger returns. 'While investors with bigger appetites can still consider such assets, they need to understand these risks by diversifying their portfolio and limiting exposure to cryptocurrencies… They also need to be prepared to suffer significant or total capital losses in a worst-case scenario,' he said. Mr Saad Ahmed, head of Asia-Pacific for cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, said that the Genius Act does not introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework for all cryptocurrencies, but it's a 'meaningful signal' that US lawmakers are starting to take digital assets seriously. 'Combined with growing institutional participation and continued momentum around Bitcoin ETFs, the legislation has helped boost investor confidence across the board,' he said. 'However, it's important to note that this is not a full regulatory framework for crypto, and broader clarity may come through the market structure bill, which is still pending and expected to address more comprehensive oversight of digital asset markets in the US on the institutional and retail side.' Mr Ahmed was referring to the Clarity Act, a second piece of legislation which is awaiting consideration in the US Senate. This aims to set clear rules on whether a digital asset is regulated as a security by the Securities Exchange Commission or as a commodity by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. He added that 'while Bitcoin and other digital assets are increasingly seen as credible parts of a diversified portfolio, whether to include them depends on each investor's personal circumstances and time horizon. 'Investing in crypto, like any asset class, should be guided by individual research, risk tolerance and financial goals.' Becoming more mainstream Still, things are looking up for the emerging asset class. DBS Group Research FX and credit strategist Chang Wei Liang struck a more positive tone, noting that clearer rules under the Genius Act could encourage stablecoin adoption by financial institutions, corporates and even households. This, in turn, may boost demand for cryptocurrencies used in stablecoin transactions and pave the way for broader use of crypto-based payment methods While cryptocurrencies could face heightened volatility given their sensitivity to broader market movements, the investor base for digital assets has been growing beyond retail participants to include institutions like corporate treasuries, pension funds, and even US state funds, Mr Chang said. This trend is driven by improved access via ETFs, increasing recognition of cryptocurrencies as potential reserve assets, and greater interest in developing blockchain-based payment systems, such as those using stablecoins. 'The net impact is that cryptocurrency prices could continue to rise even after Trump's term, helped by the ongoing structural rise in crypto usage, and this may sustain investor interest despite uncertainty over tariffs,' he added. Mr Darius Sit, founder of digital asset trading firm QCP Capital, noted that much of the recent purchase of digital assets has so far come from institutional investors. He said cryptocurrencies are evolving from speculative instruments to investment-grade assets that now command serious consideration from such investors. 'The approval of US spot Bitcoin ETFs led by BlackRock was a watershed moment for the space…. It opened the door for some of the world's largest countries and companies to access Bitcoin through a structure they already understand and trust,' he said. Bitcoin and Ethereum are also larger coins by market capitalisation, and hence more mature with declining volatility, and this a strong indicator of market maturity and increasing institutional adoption, he added. 'Bitcoin is finite and programmatically scarce by design.... Given its fixed supply of 21 million and rising institutional adoption, its price is likely to trend higher from here,' he said. Rising investor interest As a result, both institutional and retail interest in cryptocurrencies has picked up globally. In the US, banking giant JPMorgan is preparing to offer loans backed by clients' cryptocurrency holdings, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. The bank already allows clients to borrow against crypto ETFs, such as BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust. On July 18, Hong Kong-based virtual asset manager Pando Finance launched its Bitcoin ETF on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, expanding access to the cryptocurrency to retail investors. Still, investors here should be aware of Singapore's more cautious stance on crypto. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has repeatedly warned of the risks of crypto-trading and prioritised consumer protection in its regulatory approach. For example, licensed crypto firms, classified as digital payment token service providers under the law, are prohibited from offering incentives to attract retail customers. Retail investors are also not allowed to use credit, leverage, or derivatives linked to cryptocurrencies. From June 30, digital token service providers offering services exclusively to overseas customers - whether involving digital payment tokens or capital market products - must be licensed by MAS or cease operations,' MAS said in June.
Business Times
11 minutes ago
- Business Times
Nuclear power partnerships in Asean: Worth studying despite hurdles
[SINGAPORE] Interest in nuclear power has surged across South-east Asia , with countries eyeing a low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels that is more consistent than solar or wind power. As Singapore and its neighbours deepen their exploration, joint nuclear power projects and regional trade could also be worth examining. This possibility was raised by the director-general of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog on Friday (Jul 25). Rafael Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) not only highlighted Singapore as a 'perfect example' of a country that needs nuclear power, but suggested that projects could involve regional partnerships. 'My personal impression is that within a few years, you will see your first nuclear power (project)... perhaps in a wider sense, in combination or cooperation with your Asean neighbors,' he said at a dialogue while visiting the Republic. Singapore has stepped up its exploration of nuclear power in tandem with its neighbours. Last year, the Republic inked a 30-year deal with the US to study advanced nuclear technologies. This includes exploring the use of small modular reactors (SMRs), which can be as small as a three-storey building and suit land-scarce Singapore. Our neighbours are likewise racing to explore nuclear energy. The Philippines aims to have its first nuclear power plant by 2032, decades after a mothballed attempt in the 1980s. Indonesia wants to build its first nuclear power plant by 2034. Malaysia recently decided that nuclear power is 'one of the options' for energy post-2035. At the same time, plans for regional energy trade – via the Asean power grid – are moving forward. Singapore wants to import 6 gigawatts (GW) of low-carbon electricity by 2035, and has issued conditional licences and approvals for projects in Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia and Australia. An expansion of a separate energy trade deal – involving Laos, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore – is also in the works. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Similar regional deals for nuclear power are not inconceivable. As Grossi noted, Croatia and Slovenia have successfully pulled off such a partnership. Both countries co-own the Krsko nuclear power plant in Slovenia, which started operations in 1983. The plant provides 16 per cent of Croatia's energy needs and a fifth of Slovenia's annually. That said, geopolitics could certainly be a significant hurdle for collaboration on nuclear power to take off. Thailand and Cambodia recently clashed at the border. South-east Asian countries also have to navigate US-China tensions. In such a volatile environment, countries may be more invested in their domestic energy security than on interdependence. The need for regulatory frameworks will be another hurdle to clear. Having nuclear power in Asean would require countries to set clear base rules to ensure safety and the non-proliferation of weapons. As one observer previously told BT: 'If it's left to individual governments to set standards, you run the (risk) that one country has a much higher standard than another, but they are in close proximity to each other... If one country is going to place its nuclear reactor just at the border of another country, imagine how (the other country) will feel.' The road to any possible consideration of nuclear power in the Asean power grid will certainly be a long and complex one. But the potential benefits – with a baseload source of clean electricity that boosts the region's resilience – are too large to ignore.
Business Times
41 minutes ago
- Business Times
Harley Davidson nears financing unit deal with Pimco, KKR
[NEW YORK] Harley-Davidson is in advanced talks to sell a stake in its financing unit as well as its existing motorcycle loan portfolio in a deal worth US$5 billion to Pacific Investment Management Company (Pimco) and KKR, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. The firms' private credit arms are in discussions to purchase an interest in the bike maker's Harley-Davidson Financial Services, or HDFS, the sources said. HDFS, which was put up for sale earlier this year, helps the company's dealers finance their inventory and lends to consumers for the purchase of Harley-Davidson and LiveWire motorcycles. The US$5 billion price tag would include the iconic bike maker's existing book of motorcycle loans, the sources said, adding that Pimco and KKR are also seeking to purchase the debt the firm originates in the future. A deal could be announced within weeks, they added. Conversations are ongoing and details and size of the deal may change. Spokespeople for Pimco and KKR declined to comment, while a representative for Harley-Davidson did not respond to requests for comment. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The potential sale comes as Harley-Davidson grapples with lacklustre sales growth and stiff competition from rivals, including Honda Motor and BMW. The motorcycle maker is set to report results on Jul 30. Its shares are down around 22 per cent year-to-date. Harley Davidson's chief executive officer Jochen Zeitz said in May that 'the HDFS transaction is continuing to progress with multiple interested parties'. The company said earlier this year that it has retained an executive search firm to find a replacement for Zeitz, who intends to retire. Private credit firms have been growing their footprint in the US$5.2 trillion asset based market, which encompasses everything from auto loans to residential mortgages and can often receive investment-grade ratings. Some of them have been buying up stakes in the companies that originate those consumer loans while also purchasing the debt they originate. For instance, Carlyle Group has done so in the past by acquiring minority stakes in firms such as Sungage Financial, which provides financing for residential solar cells. Often times, these firms may look to repackage those loans into securities of varying risk and size. Harley-Davidson is no stranger to that asset-backed bond market, having previously repackaged its motorcycle loans into notes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. BLOOMBERG