logo
Trump's favorite drug price approach is back

Trump's favorite drug price approach is back

Politico3 days ago
Driving the Day
MFN FALLOUT — President Donald Trump surprised pharma CEOs on Thursday with letters demanding they acquiesce to his most-favored drug-pricing scheme (see what we did there?) by the end of September, setting up a late-summer lobbying fight for the industry.
The White House said drugmakers' proposals for implementing his May executive order directing federal agencies to embrace most-favored-nation pricing — tying what the government pays for some medicines to cheaper prices fetched abroad — 'have fallen short,' your morning hosts report. If companies don't meet several demands by Sept. 29, Trump wrote, 'we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices.'
Greatest hits: The industry's two major trade groups gave strikingly similar responses to Trump's Truth Social posts — both slammed the idea of 'importing … foreign price controls' at a time when less-than-friendly nations, particularly China, try to usurp the U.S.'s dominance in drug development.
'To reduce price differentials with other countries, policymakers should rein in health care middlemen driving up costs for Americans and get foreign countries to pay their fair share for innovative medicines,' PhRMA spokesperson Alex Schriver said in a statement.
A spokesperson for the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, which represents startup and established biotech firms, echoed the pharmacy benefit manager dig and also called for the administration to target entities that take advantage of a drug program for low-income patients.
'The answer is to simplify the system,' the spokesperson said in an email.
Plaudits elsewhere: Unsurprisingly, the PBM lobby applauded the president's move.
'Drug companies alone set and raise drug prices and can lower the list prices at any time,' the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association said in a statement.
Trump has eyed most-favored-nation pricing since his first term and has repeatedly seized on other developed countries' lower drug costs as an unfair consequence of American dominance over drug development.
'MFN will be achieved,' a person familiar with the administration's health care priorities, granted anonymity to discuss the effort candidly, said via text. 'The administration is very serious about this.'
IT'S FRIDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. What a year this week has been.
Send tips to David Lim (dlim@politico.com, @davidalim or davidalim.49 on Signal) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com, @Gardner_LM or gardnerlm.01 on Signal).
MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here.
Eye on the FDA
OPIOID RISKS — The FDA on Thursday ordered opioid manufacturers to update their labels to emphasize the risks of long-term use — a major issue for both Commissioner Marty Makary and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The drug safety communication directs manufacturers to remove the phrase 'extended treatment period' to avoid suggesting that data supports the drugs' safety and efficacy 'over an indefinitely long duration.' It also requires them to highlight on the labels that higher doses bring a greater risk of serious harm, among other clarifications.
Makary focused on the medical community's role in overprescribing opioids — and recounted his own actions overlooking the painkillers' risks — in his 2024 book 'Blind Spots.'
'Today's FDA action is a long-overdue step toward restoring honesty, accountability, and transparency to a system that betrayed the American people,' Kennedy, who's in recovery from a heroin addiction, said in a statement.
What's next: Drugmakers have 30 days to submit their updates to the agency.
PRASAD OUT — ICYMI, your morning hosts scooped Wednesday night that President Donald Trump overruled his top health officials and ordered top vaccine regulator Vinay Prasad's ouster from the FDA.
Amid all the commotion, one detail from the story should stand out to newsletter readers. 'The Trump administration is weighing splitting the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research into two bodies: one focused on vaccine regulation and one on therapeutics, according to three of the people familiar with the discussions.'
Coronavirus
POLL: CONFUSION OVER COVID SHOTS — A new survey by KFF shows that most Americans are confused about whether the federal government recommends Covid-19 vaccines for healthy children — and that support for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s policy changes splits largely along party lines.
Polling released today found that 47 percent of the public either doesn't 'know enough to say' whether Kennedy has shifted U.S. vaccine policy or doesn't think he has. Most adults surveyed — 59 percent — said they will either 'definitely not' or 'probably not' get the Covid shot this fall, with 6 in 10 Republicans pledging the former.
Of those who plan to get vaccinated, two-thirds said they were worried about availability, and 62 percent said they're concerned about insurance coverage amid changes to how the federal government recommends who should receive which shots.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
HRSA FLOATS 340B REBATE PILOT — The Trump administration announced an application process Thursday for a 340B rebate model pilot program that could allow drugmakers to test a rebate program for a select group of drugs.
Several drugmakers have attempted to set up rebate programs unilaterally in an attempt to cut down on what they say is abuse of a program that allows hospitals and other covered entities that serve low-income patients to buy medicines at a discount. But pharmaceutical companies have faced losses in court when challenged over the practice.
Now, the Health Resources and Services Administration will explore a pilot program starting in 2026 that would be limited to drugs on the CMS Medicare drug price negotiation list.
America's Essential Hospitals, which represents safety-net hospitals that use the 340B program, argued the pilot program would require paperwork and bureaucracy to administer.
'Drug manufacturers will be the only beneficiaries of this program, while hospitals will have to contend with a whole new set of administrative burdens,' AEH CEO Bruce Siegel said in a statement.
PhRMA spokesperson Alex Schriver called the pilot a 'positive first step.'
'We believe it should cover all medicines and address broader program integrity concerns,' Schriver said.
In Congress
OMUFA MARCHES FORWARD — The Senate HELP Committee unanimously voted on Wednesday to advance legislation out of committee that would reauthorize the FDA's over-the-counter monograph drug user fee program.
The House and Senate each have versions of the bill ready for floor action, but it is not clear when the legislation will advance before the Sept. 30 deadline.
Pharma Moves
Tara Rabin has joined Context Strategies as a senior adviser. She previously worked at the FDA as a media relations director.
Mike Doustdar will become Novo Nordisk's president and CEO on Aug. 7. He's currently the drugmaker's executive vice president of international operations.
Document Drawer
The FDA Center for Tobacco Products' scientific advisory committee will meet on Oct. 7 to consider the renewal of modified risk granted orders issued to Philip Morris Products S.A. for five products.
CMS published its fiscal 2026 final rule for the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals.
WHAT WE'RE READING
Moderna plans to lay off 10 percent of its employees amid an effort to save money, BioPharma Dive's Delilah Alvarado reports.
Merck will cut roughly 8 percent of its workforce, Endpoints News' Kyle LaHucik reports.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former BLS commissioner explains damage of Trump's BLS firing
Former BLS commissioner explains damage of Trump's BLS firing

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former BLS commissioner explains damage of Trump's BLS firing

President Trump's surprise firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner has raised concerns about potential political interference in labor data. William Beach, former BLS commissioner and Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC) senior fellow in economics, joins to explain how jobs data is collected and why the integrity of the process is critical to public trust. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. I guess to start, Bill, let me just get your reaction on that news of Trump firing the BLS chief. What do you make of it, Bill? How important is it? What's at stake? I was I was very surprised when he did that. I, in fact, it caught me when I was in my pickup truck. I had to I had to come over to the side and just sat there for about 40 minutes fielding calls. Uh, so, what do I make of it? Well, it first off, it damages BLS a bit because as your previous experts pointed out, uh, now, there's this uh this cover, this uh this appearance that there may be some bias, and that there may be some people working inside BLS to shape the numbers. I can tell you that it's simply not true and and it's it's just simply not the case that the commissioner, especially the commissioner, has anything to do with the preparation of the numbers or the estimation of the numbers. Much more likely, there's some senior person deep inside the bowels might, but the commissioner's just completely locked out of that thing, but the damage is done. Uh, even if St. Peter was the nominee and that was approved in committee and on the floor of the Senate, there would still be this this possibility in people's minds who don't follow BLS that closely, that, "Well," you you know, "Uh, a poor month, maybe 25,000 jobs." And they'll say, "Well, it it could have been a lot worse, and it probably was a lot worse, but St. Peter raised the number." So, uh yeah, we're going to take a long time to recover from this. I hope we can recover in a shorter amount of time than I'm I'm expecting, but I think damage was done. Can you walk us through, Bill, how does BLS collect the data? Can you walk us through that process? Well, sure, there're two surveys, and the survey we're talking about, the revisions, the big revisions, is a survey of business establishments. You know, somewhere around 600,000. The number varies from month to month. These are surveyed. This is a survey, and as a consequence, uh the it is a sample of the entire 12 million firms that are out there. So, we collect that sample in the time period in which the 12th of the month occurs. That should be a payroll period, with the 12th of the month, the date in there. And then the sample begins to come in. By the end of the first month, we have about 68% of that sample in, and it's on the basis of that that the estimate is done. So, on the basis of about 68 65 to 70% of the returned sample. Now, you notice I didn't say 100%. Um, that's because some firms don't get their sample in, so it the period of collection is kept open for 2 more months. Uh, by the end of the second month, we have about 83% of the sample in. By the end of the third month, we have 91 to 95% of the sample in, so it's a very complete survey. That sample is collected at the regional level, sent to the National Office. In the National Office, which is here in Washington, now at the Suitland Federal Center, that the there are people who take the sample return and using formulas, mathematics, statistics, they expand that sample up to hit national targets for, say, individual industries, like banking or finance or something of that nature. And then, on the basis of those, we sum it all up, and that's the national number that's reported first Friday. That's the 73,000 additional net jobs in the economy. So, that's basically how it's done. Related Videos How Wall Street & DC are reacting to Trump's BLS firing Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions Trump to announce new Fed governor & BLS head this week Bill Dudley on Fed Disagreement, BLS Data Quality Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

FACT FOCUS: Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
FACT FOCUS: Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FACT FOCUS: Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible

Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a 'most favored nation' pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: "You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 — 1,500%.' THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim 'total fiction' made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. 'I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter,' said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is 'really hard to follow.' Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: 'It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people.' The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. 'So we'll be dropping drug prices,' he said. 'It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%.' Prices for most prescription drugs — unbranded generics are the exception — are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what — if any — impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. 'My expectation would be that they would make announcements — public announcements — and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect,' she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. 'Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever,' he said. 'And let alone 1,500.' ___ Find AP Fact Checks here:

Trump envoy Witkoff in Russia this week for stab at Ukraine ceasefire after Kremlin warns US to be ‘careful' over nuclear subs move
Trump envoy Witkoff in Russia this week for stab at Ukraine ceasefire after Kremlin warns US to be ‘careful' over nuclear subs move

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump envoy Witkoff in Russia this week for stab at Ukraine ceasefire after Kremlin warns US to be ‘careful' over nuclear subs move

Steve Witkoff, the New York real estate developer turned roving peace envoy for President Donald Trump, is heading to Russia this week for yet another round of talks with officials in Moscow with an eye towards pushing Russian President Vladimir Putin to end his years-long war against Ukraine. Trump told reporters on Sunday that Witkoff, who has also been tasked with serving as a mediator in the Israel-Hamas conflict, would be traveling to Russia on either Tuesday or Wednesday for meetings ahead of Friday's deadline for Moscow to call off the war or face more U.S. sanctions. Asked what Putin could do to avoid harsh penalties, including secondary tariffs on goods from countries that purchase Russian oil, he told reporters: 'Get a deal where people stop getting killed.' But the president also expressed skepticism that new sanctions could hurt Russia's economy, citing Moscow's demonstrated ability to evade them. 'Well there will be sanctions but they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions. You know, they're wily characters and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions. So we'll see what happens,' he said. Trump's Ukraine envoy, retired Army general Keith Kellogg, is understood to be planning travel to Kyiv at the same time Witkoff is in Moscow. Witkoff has visited the Russian capital multiple times since being handed the Russia portfolio, and he has attracted attention in foreign policy circles for his nonchalant and conciliatory attitude towards Putin and his government. He has openly spoken of his admiration for the Russian leader and once presented him with a painting of Trump as a gift. Witkoff has also violated normal diplomatic protocols by arriving without an American translator, instead relying on a Russian one during meetings without any other American witnesses. Kremlin press secretary Dimitri Peskov told reporters on Monday that the Russian government is 'always happy to see Mr. Witkoff in Moscow' and called the talks with the real estate developer 'important, substantive and very useful.' He also suggested that Witkoff could end up meeting with Putin during his time in the Russian capital. The Trump White House envoy's visit comes just days after Trump said he was redeploying a pair of American 'nuclear submarines' in response to belligerent statements made on X by former Russian president Dimitri Medvedev earlier last week. Writing on Truth Social on Friday, Trump said he was ordering the American warships to 'the appropriate regions' due to what he called 'the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia' and noted Medvedev's status as a deputy chair of the Russian national security council. Trump said the move was a precautionary measure 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' he added. The online feud between Trump and Medvedev comes as months of talks in Turkey between Ukraine and Russia have failed to achieve anything beyond arrangements for exchanges of prisoners of war and the bodies of each side's respective war dead. Russia has continued to target Ukraine with nightly attacks by drones and other aerial weapons, with a civilian death toll that has incensed Trump and led him to send more U.S. made weapons to Ukraine after months of indulging the more isolationist-minded members of his government. During an appearance last week alongside British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on the steps of his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, Trump complained that Putin had too often talked a good game about wanting to reach a ceasefire in the conflict only to resume bombing civilian targets in short order. 'We thought we had that settled numerous times. And then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. You have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it,' Trump said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store