logo
Cassie's mother's testimony may prove to be 'very damaging' to Diddy's case: expert

Cassie's mother's testimony may prove to be 'very damaging' to Diddy's case: expert

Yahoo21-05-2025
Cassie Ventura's mother testified Tuesday about the alleged abuse her daughter endured from Sean "Diddy" Combs.
Regina Ventura took the stand at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in New York and told the court that, among other things, the "Bad Boy for Life" singer attempted to blackmail their family.
Cassie's mom's testimony may prove to be a crucial component to the U.S. Attorney's Office's case against the disgraced music mogul, according to legal experts.
Diddy Trial Witness Reveals Threats And Violence That Could Support Rico Charges: Expert
"Generally speaking, relatives can be perceived as extremely biased witnesses. However, credibility is largely dependent on the demeanor of the individual," Los Angeles litigator John J. Perlstein exclusively told Fox News Digital.
"It is irrelevant to the case whether Ventura's mother spoke to Diddy or not, and would unlikely favor either side. What will be relevant is her testimony regarding the $20,000 payment exchange for keeping sex tapes from being released, which in my opinion, can be very damaging to the defendant as it shows what little value a man of great means placed upon this poor woman."
Read On The Fox News App
Cassie Ventura Emerges As 'Star Witness' In Diddy's Federal Sex Crimes Trial: Expert
The jury was shown Tuesday an email Cassie sent to her mom on Dec. 23, 2011. In the digital correspondence, Cassie said that Diddy would release two sex tapes. Cassie's email also claimed that Diddy would have someone hurt her and rapper Kid Cudi, whom she was dating at the time.
Cassie and Cudi, whose full name is Scott Ramon Seguro Mescudi, dated in 2011 when she was on a break in her relationship with Diddy.
"The threats that have been made towards me by Sean 'Puffy' Combs are that are that (sic) he is going to release 2 explicit sex tapes of me," Cassie allegedly wrote in the email. "One on Christmas Day, maybe before or right after and another one some time soon after that. He has also said that he will be having someone hurt me and Scott Mescudi physically (he made a point that it wouldn't be by his hands, he actually said he'd be out of the country when it happened)."
Regina testified that she "was physically sick" and did not understand a lot of it. She claimed the sex tapes threw her, but she understood that Diddy was allegedly going to hurt Cassie. She testified that Diddy demanded $20,000 to recoup the money he spent on Cassie.
Watch On Fox Nation: What Diddy Do?
At the time, Diddy was allegedly angry that Cassie was with another person. It was expected the money would come from Regina and her husband.
Regina claimed they took a home equity loan to pay the "Last Night" rapper. When Regina received wiring instructions, she claimed she wired the money from her checking account to the Bad Boy account. About four to five days later, the money allegedly came back. Regina said she did not have any conversations with Diddy about the money, and also does not have a copy of the wiring instructions.
WATCH: SEAN 'DIDDY' COMBS ASSAULTS CASSIE VENTURA IN 2016 LOS ANGELES HOTEL INCIDENT
"I was scared for my daughter's safety," Regina told Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson.
Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News
"Ventura's mother's testimony is further corroboration of the allegations that have been made by her daughter and further supports the repetitive pattern of intimidation that the prosecution is trying to prove," Perlstein told Fox News Digital.
"It is likely that the defense may have found the witness to be damning and thus, declined cross-examination, but it is unusual as it is common practice to ask any witness on the stand at least a question even an irrelevant softball question."
He added, "Avoiding cross-examination creates the perception that the witness is to be believed in every respect in the eyes of the jury."
Diddy's attorney, Marc Agnifilo, didn't ask to cross-examine Regina, which is a common courtroom strategy when it comes to a victim's mother, according to former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani.
"You don't want to turn off the jurors," Rahmani told Fox News Digital.
Cassie testified about allegedly being raped by Diddy after their break-up and claimed to enter rehab at the beginning of 2023 after suffering "horrible flashbacks" of the abuse.
Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter
The singer, who is pregnant with her third child with husband Alex Fine, also claimed that Diddy's "freak offs" became a job. "Freak offs" were "elaborately produced sex performances that Combs arranged, directed, masturbated during, and often electronically recorded," according to the indictment.
The "freak offs" would last between 24 and 72 hours. Ventura recalled the longest "freak off" was four days. When she wasn't participating, she was recovering from "the drugs, dehydration, staying awake," she said.
On Wednesday, Cassie also disclosed she received a $20 million settlement 24 hours after filing a lawsuit against Diddy in November 2023.
Diddy was charged with racketeering conspiracy; sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and transportation to engage in prostitution in a federal indictment unsealed Sept. 17. He has maintained his innocence. If found guilty, he faces a minimum of 15 years behind bars or a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Fox News' Maria Paronich contributed to this report.Original article source: Cassie's mother's testimony may prove to be 'very damaging' to Diddy's case: expert
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Morgan Wallen bows out of Grammy race despite record-breaking country album
Morgan Wallen bows out of Grammy race despite record-breaking country album

Fox News

time42 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Morgan Wallen bows out of Grammy race despite record-breaking country album

Morgan Wallen will not submit his best-selling country album for Grammy Awards consideration, Fox News Digital confirmed. The "Last Night" singer's representatives did not provide Fox News Digital with additional details surrounding the decision. Wallen, 32, took the country music industry by storm with his 2018 "If I Know Me" debut, but only recently received his first Grammy nominations in 2025 for his "I Had Some Help" collaboration with Post Malone. The "Wasted on You" singer released his fourth studio album, "I'm The Problem," earlier this year, which debuted at No. 1 on the charts and extended his run as the country artist with the most debuts to top the Billboard 200. The 37-track catalog dominated the Billboard Hot 100 charts, too, with 36 of the tracks making an appearance on the leader board. In addition, the album secured Wallen's spot as the only artist to earn each spot in the top 10 of the Hot Country Songs chart. Following the release, Wallen embarked on a 19-date North American stadium tour with guests including Brooks & Dunn, Ella Langley and Thomas Rhett. While it's unclear why Wallen does not want to enter the catalog for consideration, Wallen's no stranger to conflicts. One month after the release of his second studio album, "Dangerous: The Double Album," in January 2021, Morgan found himself in his biggest controversy to date. In February 2021, a video surfaced showing Wallen using a racial slur while walking home with a group of friends. The "Chasin' You" singer uttered a racial epithet and used other profanities. Shortly after the incident, he issued an apology. Wallen faced backlash online and also from within the country music industry. Even though he was nominated for multiple Academy of Country Music Awards, Wallen was not included in the ceremony. In a statement released in early February 2021, the ACM announced it had barred "Wallen's potential involvement and eligibility for this year's 56th Academy of Country Music Awards cycle." The Country Music Association restricted his eligibility for awards, and Wallen was not allowed to attend the ceremony or any associated events. Wallen was also banned from attending the 2021 American Music Awards, and was not invited to the Billboard Music Awards despite earning six nominations. He was also dropped by his record label, and his music was banned from iHeartRadio. Representatives for the Recording Academy did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for more information.

Smartmatic Filing Details Ex-Fox News Host Jeanine Pirro's Desire To Boost Donald Trump In 2020 And Her Efforts To Secure Pardon For Ex-Husband
Smartmatic Filing Details Ex-Fox News Host Jeanine Pirro's Desire To Boost Donald Trump In 2020 And Her Efforts To Secure Pardon For Ex-Husband

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Smartmatic Filing Details Ex-Fox News Host Jeanine Pirro's Desire To Boost Donald Trump In 2020 And Her Efforts To Secure Pardon For Ex-Husband

A new batch of text messages and emails have emerged in newly unredacted filings in Smartmatic's defamation lawsuit against Fox, including ones showing then-network host Jeanine Pirro's desire to boost Donald Trump's prospects in the 2020 presidential election. Smartmatic is suing Fox for its amplification of claims that it was involved in rigging the 2020 presidential election. In its challenge to the lawsuit, Fox is contending that it was merely covering an issue of national importance, while blasting the election systems company's claim of $2.7 billion in damages. More from Deadline 'The Daily Show's Desi Lydic Talks Emmys Milestone, Trump-Epstein Saga, AI & Navigating Late-Night's Uncertain Future - Comedy Means Business Podcast Ari Shapiro, "All Things Considered" Host, To Depart NPR After 25 Years Roy Wood Jr. Predicts Stephen Colbert Will Become Leading Anti-Trump Voice On YouTube Next Year Read Smartmatic's filing. Read Fox's filing. In a September, 2020 text message that Pirro sent to Ronna McDaniel, who was then chair of the Republican National Committee, the Fox News host wrote, 'I work so hard for the party across the country… I'm the # 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party…' Smartmatic also claimed that Pirro sought a pardon from Trump for her ex husband, Al Pirro, including by speaking to the president's son, Eric, Rudy Giuliani and Bernie Kerik. At one point, according to the Smartmatic filing, she spoke with Eric Trump because she 'was upset' when she thought the president would not grant a pardon. Per the filing, 'On January 20, 2021, Pirro texted Yanina Fleysher, Bernie Kerik's girlfriend: 'U can tell ur boyfriend he's a selfish bastard.' 'I fought for his pardon.' 'DO NOT CALL ME.' 'FUCK HIM' 'I DONT CARE ABT HIM.'' Trump did pardon Al Pirro in the hours before he left office. Earlier this month, Senate confirmed Pirro as Trump's nominee to serve as U.S. attorney for the District Of Columbia. A spokesperson for her office did not immediately return a request for comment. As it seeks a summary judgment ruling from New York Judge David Cohen, Smartmatic sought to show how Pirro, Maria Bartiromo and Lou Dobbs in particular featured guests who pushed out claims that the election was stolen and that the company was part of the deception. Per the Smartmatic filing, Pirro was incensed when Fox News decided not to air her show on Nov. 7, 2020, the day that networks declared that Biden had won the race. David Clark, who was an executive in charge of weekend programming, wrote to another Fox executive, Meade Cooper, 'Bottom line – I don't trust her to be responsible tomorrow. Her guests are all going to say the election is being stolen and if she pushes back at all it will just be a token.' 'Maybe she does not have show tomorrow night,' Cooper wrote back. 'Honestly that would be the wisest course of action,' Clark wrote. But Pirro was incensed. She wrote in a text message to Sean Hannity, 'I'M TIRED OF THE CENSORSHIP AND I'M EMBARRASSED BY HOW THEY CALLED THIS ELECTION…' 'This may be different. I'm now looking for changes. One is to leave u alone,' Hannity wrote back. Pirro did return to the air the next week, with Trump attorney Sidney Powell as a guest, making unproven claims that software from Smartmatic and Dominion was manipulated. As the stolen election claims were amplified on air, Smartmatic said that it alerted Fox executives to the falsity of the allegations made on air, while executives themselves thought that figures like Rudy Giuliani and Powell were making outlandish and false claims. Smartmatic's filing noted that Jesse Watters, now a top primetime host, wrote to friends and colleagues about Powell that she had 'lost it.' Watters referred to a Nov. 19, 2020 press conference that featured Powell and Giuliani, writing, 'Fox can't even touch that. She's radioactive now.' Pirro's show eventually was ended in 2022, when she became a regular on The Five, the top rated show on cable news. The unredacted filings also showed the extent to which Pirro and Hannity were in Trump's orbit. Per the Smartmatic filing, in a text message to Fleysher on Oct. 27, a week before the election, Pirro called Hannity an 'egomaniac.' 'I was in the Oval with Hariri talking to POTUS. He storms in like he owns the place, throws his papers on the Pres desk and says, you don't mind if I use your private bathroom, and walks into bathroom within Oval and uses it. Looks at me and says, I got to talk to him. Ie, you go. It's all abt him, period. No one else matters.' Still, Smartmatic noted, Pirro in her deposition testimony was asked if she believes that Biden 'was legitimately elected President of the United States in the 2020 election.' 'I do,' she answered. Trump has continued to make claims that the election was rigged. The Washington Post first reported on the unredacted filings. Pirro, Bartiromo and Dobbs' estate are named as defendants in the lawsuit, along with Fox. Powell also was named. Pirro, Bartiromo and Dobbs were the most prominent personalities at the network to feature the election rigging claims on their shows. Per the Smartmatic filing, on Nov. 17, 2020, Bartiromo sent a Signal message to Powell, 'Sidney we must keep you out there. Dobbs is considered very opinionated. I am news. How about Friday? I'm off all next week.' She later wrote to Powell, 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence. I know you can. Talk Thursday won't keep bugging you. I know you are drowning in info.' She also texted to Michael Flynn, a Trump ally who had served as his national security adviser: 'I'm so worried. I will get these people on. I'm not sure I can do any more ghosn [sic] I'm doing. I am fighting hard.' Smartmatic's lawsuit makes some of the same general claims that another voting company, Dominion, made in its lawsuit against the network — that as Fox saw ratings fall in the immediate aftermath of the vote, it sought to lean into stolen election claims. In emails and texts, hosts and executives worried about a viewership backlash after Fox was the first network to call Arizona for Joe Biden on election night, the first signal that Trump would lose the race. A Fox News spokesperson said, 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech. Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' In 2023, Fox settled the Dominion lawsuit for $787.5 million, but in its own filings, its attorneys say that Smartmatic's case is different. Fox's legal team has deemed Smartmatic's $2.7 billion damages claim 'pure fiction.' 'While Smartmatic claims scores of lost contract opportunities, there is no evidence that Fox News's coverage caused a single former, existing, or potential customer to refuse to do business with Smartmatic,' Fox attorneys wrote in their filing. 'Many of Smartmatic's claimed 'opportunities' are not even real.' Fox contends that Smartmatic's reputation already was harmed by 2020, noting that its president and co-founder and other executives were 'under federal criminal investigation for international bribery and money laundering in connection with obtaining one of its largest customer contracts in the Philippines. Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News's coverage of the 2020 Election.' The bribery allegations are a reference to Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez and two other officials at the company who face federal corruption charges in Florida. More recently, Fox has sought public records that related to the process by which Smartmatic was awarded its Los Angeles County contract in 2020, including efforts to woo Los Angeles Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan. They cited allegations by federal prosecutors that Smartmatic executives funneled government contract money into a 'slush fund' to bribe officials, although the DOJ filing does not make a claim about recipients of that money. A Smartmatic spokesperson said on Wednesday, 'The allegations in the DOJ's filing are full of misrepresentations. For example, there are no 'slush funds'—only healthy contingency funds to ensure massive deployments run smoothly. The alleged 2019 bribe in Venezuela is also untethered from reality. Smartmatic ceased all operations in Venezuela in August 2017 after blowing the whistle on the government, and has never sought business there again. The timing of these allegations seems highly suspect, especially when paired with Fox's aggressive effort to amplify them.' Fox's attorneys also contend that its coverage was well within the realm of the public interest. 'Some Fox News and Fox Business reporters and commentators—including on its highest-rated shows— were skeptical of the President's challenges,' its legal team wrote. 'Others believed they had merit. But all accurately reported the President's claims while also providing their opinions on a fast-moving and evolving issue of national importance. None had any motive or desire to harm Smartmatic.' Fox attorneys also wrote that Smartmatic has fallen short of proving a key ingredient of defamation claims against a public figure: actual malice. The networks' personalities 'did not know whether the allegations were true, but they did know that the President's attorneys were filing court cases and claiming to have evidence to support them. That is not the stuff of actual malice, and a contrary ruling would be a massive blow to the First Amendment and New York law.' Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'Emily In Paris' Season 5 So Far 'The Morning Show' Season 4: Everything We Know So Far 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store