Lebanon Says It Will Retaliate for Gunfire from Syria after Deadly Cross-Border Fighting
The fighting occurred after Syria's interim government accused militants from Lebanon's Hezbollah group of crossing into Syria on Saturday, abducting three soldiers and killing them on Lebanese soil.
It was the most serious cross-border fighting since the ouster of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in December.
Syrian News Channel, citing an unnamed Defense Ministry official, said the Syrian army shelled "Hezbollah gatherings that killed Syrian soldiers" along the border. Hezbollah denied involvement in a statement on Sunday.
Information Minister Paul Morkos said Lebanon's defense minister told a Cabinet meeting that the three killed were smugglers. He added that one child was killed and six people were wounded on the Lebanese side.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said five Syrian soldiers were killed during Monday's clashes. Footage circulated online and in local media showed families toward the Lebanese town of Hermel.
Lebanon's state news agency reported that fighting intensified Monday evening near Hermel.
"What is happening along the eastern and northeastern border cannot continue and we will not accept that it continues," Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun said on X. "I have given my orders to the Lebanese army to retaliate against the source of fire."
Aoun added that he asked Lebanon's foreign minister, who is currently in Brussels for a donors conference on Syria, to contact Syrian officials to resolve the problem "and prevent further escalation."
Violence recently spiked in the area between the Syrian military and armed Lebanese Shiite clans closely allied with the former government of Assad, based in Lebanon's Al-Qasr border village.
Lebanese media and the observatory say clans were involved in the abductions that sparked the latest clashes.
The Lebanese and Syrian armies said they have opened channels of communication to ease tensions. Lebanon's military also said it returned the bodies of the three killed Syrians. Large numbers of Lebanese troops have been deployed in the area.
Lebanese media reported low-level fighting at dawn after an attack on a Syrian military vehicle. The number of casualties was unclear.
Early Monday, four Syrian journalists embedded with the Syrian army were lightly wounded after an artillery shell fired from the Lebanese side of the border hit their position. They accused Hezbollah of the attack.
Meanwhile, senior Hezbollah legislator Hussein Haj Hassan in an interview with Lebanon's Al Jadeed television accused fighters from the Syrian side of crossing into Lebanese territory and attacking border villages. His constituency is the northeastern Baalbek-Hermel province, which has borne the brunt of the clashes.
Lebanon has been seeking international support to boost funding for its military as it gradually deploys troops along its porous northern and eastern borders with Syria as well as its southern border with Israel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Can Hezbollah Transition to a Fully Political Party?
Mounting calls in Lebanon for Hezbollah to hand over its weapons and dissolve its armed wing have reignited debate over whether the party's structure, principles and founding ideology could allow a smooth shift to purely political activity – or whether such a change would require a complete overhaul of the party and a new charter to match the country's shifting landscape. Founded in 1982, Hezbollah has gone through two major ideological milestones: its 1985 'open letter,' which served as its founding political and religious manifesto, and its 2009 'political document,' an updated vision shaped by regional and domestic changes. In its early platform, Hezbollah openly called for an Islamic republic in Lebanon, rejected the sectarian political system, pledged allegiance to Iran's supreme leader, and endorsed armed resistance as the only path to confront Israel. By 2009, the group acknowledged that Lebanon's multi-sectarian fabric made an Islamic state impossible, advocating instead 'consensual democracy' as a transitional step toward abolishing sectarianism, while reaffirming armed resistance in coordination with the army and the people. Hezbollah entered parliamentary politics in 1992 after the civil war and joined the cabinet in 2005, following the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri. Former MP Fares Souaid, head of the Lady of the Mountain Gathering, said Hezbollah 'does politics in military fatigues,' making it hard to imagine a transformation from what he called 'an Iranian military arm in Lebanon' into a regular political party. 'Hezbollah's presence in parliament and cabinet was to monitor decisions that could hinder its military and security work, not to be fully involved in constitutional politics,' Souaid told Asharq Al-Awsat. He added that many in the group's Shiite base still view its arsenal as a guarantee, even though dissenting voices have emerged. Jad al-Akhaoui, head of the Lebanese Democratic Coalition, said Hezbollah's founding principles – rooted in religious ideology and armed struggle under Iran's 'Wilayat al-Faqih' (Guardianship of the Jurist) – are incompatible with the concept of a civilian political party in a democracy. 'If Hezbollah truly wants to become a political party, it must separate religion from the state, abandon its weapons and redefine itself as Lebanese first and foremost, not as a regional proxy,' he told Asharq Al-Awsat. Al-Akhaoui argued that Hezbollah's political participation has been a means to entrench its position within the state without integrating fully into it, using parliament and cabinet to shield its weapons. 'The party used politics to legitimize its arms, not to reconsider them,' he said, adding that frustration is growing within its Shiite constituency over the economic collapse, international isolation and involvement in wars unrelated to Lebanon. Political analyst Kassem Kassir, however, said there is no inherent reason why Hezbollah could not become a purely political party. 'Armed resistance was due to Israeli occupation and external circumstances,' he told Asharq Al-Awsat. 'If the occupation ends and the state can defend the people and rebuild, there is no problem with giving up the weapons.' Kassir said Hezbollah's political track record shows it can mobilize popular support and use politics to serve the community and defend the resistance. 'Today, the continued Israeli occupation and the state's failure to protect its citizens are what keep the arms in place,' he said.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Exclusive Summoning Iranian ambassador possible if Tehran keeps interfering in Lebanon: Minister
Lebanon's Minister of Agriculture, Nizar Hani, told Al Arabiya on Monday that the Iranian ambassador could be summoned if Tehran continues interfering in the country's matters. This came after the Secretary of Iran's Guardian Council, Ahmad Jannati, described the disarmament of Hezbollah as a 'delusional dream.' Speaking at the start of a council meeting on Monday, Jannati said that the proposals being discussed regarding 'the disarmament of Lebanon's Hezbollah are unrealistic and constitute delusional dreams,' according to the ISNA news agency. His remarks followed those of Ali Akbar Velayati, senior adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, two days earlier, which drew condemnation from Lebanon's Ministry of Foreign Affairs after he declared his country's opposition to the disarmament of the group. Hezbollah has suffered significant human and material losses during recent clashes with Israel, which peaked last September and October. Jannati's position also came after Hezbollah supporters staged demonstrations for the fourth consecutive day on Sunday evening in Beirut's southern suburbs, denouncing the government's decision and expressing support for the group's stance. Last week, the Lebanese government approved a clause to restrict weapons to the state and tasked the army with drafting a plan to collect Hezbollah's weapons. The plan is to be presented later this month and implemented by the end of 2025. Hezbollah rejected this decision, describing it as a 'grave sin' and vowed to disregard it entirely.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Larijani's pager diplomacy: Saving the shattered remnants of Iran's regional proxies
When senior Iranian official Ali Larijani arrives in Beirut this Wednesday, it will be under the banner of diplomacy, but the subtext is far less ceremonial. The former parliament speaker, now Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, is stepping onto a Lebanese political stage at a moment when Tehran's regional network of allies is showing visible cracks. His visit appears aimed at shoring up Hezbollah's position in Lebanon – not as a matter of routine engagement, but as part of a broader effort to protect what remains of Iran's influence in the Levant, even as its military and political assets steadily erode. Larijani's presence signals Tehran's determination to maintain its hold on Lebanon through Hezbollah, despite the fact that the 'golden triad' the group once boasted – the army, the people, and the resistance – has collapsed into a hollow slogan. Hezbollah now stands in open confrontation with the Lebanese state and the Lebanese people alike. The fiction that its weapons serve the nation's defense is no longer tenable. Larijani's mission is to remind Lebanese leaders, and Washington by extension, that Iran still claims the right to speak for Lebanon's Shia – and that any engagement with Hezbollah must pass through the gates of Tehran. This claim to diplomatic legitimacy is especially hard to swallow in light of recent events. The Israeli pager attack against Hezbollah – a fait accompli that exposed vulnerabilities within the group's command structure – also revealed something Tehran would rather keep hidden: among those injured was Iran's current ambassador to Lebanon, was in possession of a pager linked to the targeted network. The image of a senior Iranian diplomat physically entangled in Hezbollah's operational communications blurs the line between diplomacy and covert coordination, underscoring why Tehran's envoys cannot plausibly present themselves as neutral state actors. This is not a position of strength. Across the region, Iran's web of militias and client movements – from Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces to the Houthis in Yemen – is fraying. Years of attrition on the battlefield, combined with shifting regional dynamics, have stripped away much of their military dominance. In Lebanon, the situation is even more dire. Hezbollah's armed power is diminished not only by military setbacks but also by the collapse of the Lebanese economy, which has gutted the patronage networks the party once sustained with state resources and illicit revenues. For years, the narrative was that Iran bankrolled Hezbollah's operations. But investigations and public records tell a different story: Hezbollah siphoned off funds from Lebanese state institutions, exploiting taxpayer money to buy political loyalty. When Lebanon's financial system imploded, Hezbollah's parallel economy – built on smuggling, drug trafficking, and black-market fuel – also began to crumble. The collapse of Bashar al-Assad's Syrian economy has further tightened the noose, choking off critical smuggling routes and drug revenues once worth billions. Stripped of its ability to offer social services and economic patronage at the scale it once did, Hezbollah's hold over Lebanon's Shia community is no longer guaranteed. Larijani's mission is to delay this erosion by reinforcing the perception that Hezbollah is not just a militia, but a political representative of Lebanon's Shia – a claim that ignores both the diversity within the community and the constitutional reality that MPs represent the nation as a whole. Yet this political veneer cannot disguise the strategic weakness. Without the cover of 'resistance,' Hezbollah's weapons have become tools of domestic coercion, aimed at silencing dissent and blocking reform. Militarily, the group is no longer a revolutionary vanguard but a heavily armed faction defending a corrupt order. Politically, it is boxed in – unable to reinvent its narrative, yet too deeply entrenched in Lebanon's governing system to disengage without risking collapse. Larijani's visit also reveals Iran's broader regional calculation. As in Iraq, where Tehran fears losing control of the Shia political space to rivals, Iran in Lebanon seeks to preserve at least a political foothold even if the military dominance of its proxies' wanes. The strategy is defensive, not expansionist – a stark contrast to the confident, interventionist posture Tehran projected a decade ago. However, Iran's ability to achieve even this limited goal is uncertain. In Lebanon, Hezbollah faces growing public indifference, even within its sectarian base, toward the old scare tactics of 'May 7, 2008, coup'–style street power. The memory of those clashes once deterred opponents; today, the threat of militia violence is weighed against the daily grind of economic collapse, and it no longer carries the same force. In Iraq, similar dynamics have eroded the PMF's capacity to monopolize Shia political life. Ultimately, Tehran's effort to protect its crumbling assets faces a convergence of structural challenges. The collapse of its financial pipelines has drained much of its economic leverage, eroding the patronage systems on which loyalty once depended. At the same time, the once-vaunted aura of 'resistance' has given way to a far less inspiring image – that of armed groups turning their weapons inward to bully and silence their own citizens. Compounding these weaknesses is a tendency toward political overreach, as Iran and its proxies insist on speaking for entire sectarian communities, a claim that alienates rivals and moderates alike and steadily undermines any remaining pretense of legitimacy. Larijani's message – to Lebanon, to the United States, and to the wider region – is that Iran still holds the keys to stability, and that bypassing Tehran is impossible. But the reality is that Iran's regional project is in retreat. In Lebanon, Hezbollah remains dangerous, but it is no longer untouchable. Its decline is gradual, but visible, and no high-profile visit from Tehran can reverse that trajectory. The challenge for Lebanon is to resist being drawn into Iran's final defense of its shrinking sphere of influence. That means refusing to allow Tehran's envoys to define who speaks for Lebanon's Shia, rejecting the normalization of parallel armed authority, and reclaiming state sovereignty from all external patrons. For the United States and regional actors, it means recognizing that while Hezbollah's military threat may have ebbed, its political role is being carefully curated by Iran – and that without countervailing political engagement, that role could survive the loss of the gun. Larijani will arrive in Beirut this week to keep a dying project on life support. The question is whether Lebanon will once again be the host body – or whether it will finally refuse to bear the cost of another's imperial ambitions.
