Planned Parenthood of MA: Supreme Court Medicaid ruling ‘tied together' with Trump spending bill
That means health care services such as cancer screenings, birth control and STI testing would not be covered if they were obtained at Planned Parenthood — in a state that decided to go that direction.
On Thursday, Planned Parenthood executives in Massachusetts said care and access will remain the same for the foreseeable future in the Bay State, a staunch protector of reproductive rights.
But the Supreme Court ruling sets 'a dangerous precedent' that other states are expected to follow, MaryRose Mazzola, the executive director of the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts, said.
And it comes packaged with what's transpiring in the federal budgeting process.
'It's just devastating, especially compounded by what we see going through Congress,' Mazzolla said. 'We see this all as one piece, tied together with the spending bill.'
Read more: On Dobbs anniversary, Mass. pols warn of attack on abortion rights in Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'
In the background of the Supreme Court ruling is President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' that includes language that would ban insurance plans offered under the Affordable Care Act from covering abortion care in certain states, according to an analysis by the National Women's Law Center.
The center said the disruption in insurance coverage 'could ultimately lead all insurers to drop abortion coverage for all Americans – even those who get their health insurance through their employers.'
Mazzola said MassHealth, the state's Medicaid program, gets about half of its funding from federal Medicaid dollars. If the bill were signed as is, Planned Parenthood in the state would lose approximately $14 million a year.
'Anyone on public health insurance would not be able to visit a Planned Parenthood, period,' Mazzola said.
Read more: Mass. lawmaker asks Trump to keep strollers, cribs out of his trade war
Medicaid coverage for abortion is already limited by the Hyde Amendment, but some states, like Massachusetts, use their own funding to expand coverage.
The 'Big Beautiful Bill' would effectively defund Planned Parenthood by blocking Medicaid reimbursements, according to Dominique Lee, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts.
Planned Parenthood serves 30,000 patients in the state, and about 40% of them are on Medicaid.
During a press conference on Monday in Boston, Lee said if Trump signs the bill in its current form, it would 'wipe out' nearly half of Planned Parenthood's revenue while blocking 'thousands from care.'
The bill passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House by a single vote in May and is now before the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate, which is widely expected to amend the bill and return it to the House before it can go to Trump.
Read More: MASS.-ive Impact: What Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' means to you | John L. Micek
Lawmakers are moving the bill across Capitol Hill under a process known as 'reconciliation,' which requires a simple majority vote. All told, the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion over 10 years.
In Massachusetts, the bill would cost the state's health care system $1.75 billion and strip coverage for about 250,000 people, according to the Healey administration.
In a statement Thursday responding to the Supreme Court ruling, Lee said while it doesn't have an immediate impact on Massachusetts, it is 'dangerous' and 'builds on this Court's record of empowering politicians to decide where and what kind of health care people are able to access, when those personal decisions should be made by patients and their doctors.'
In South Carolina, the state at the center of the ruling, Republican Gov. Henry McMaster celebrated the outcome, saying they 'took a stand to protect the sanctity of life.'
MassLive Politics Editor John L. Micek contributed to this story.
Harvard subpoenaed in Ivy League tuition price-fixing investigation
Should Harvard enter into a deal with the Trump administration?
Baby on board: Mass. lawmaker asks Trump to keep strollers, cribs out of his trade war
This big number proves the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is a loser for small biz, Mass. lawmaker says
Alliance for Digital Equity pushes for internet access for underserved on namesake day
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
D.C. religious leaders blast Trump crackdown as 24/7 federal patrols ramp up
The Trump administration's D.C. crackdown was ramping up National Guard deployment and 24/7 federal patrols on Wednesday night, drawing a sharp rebuke from religious leaders in the U.S. capital. The big picture: President Trump's maintains his unprecedented action in declaring a " crime emergency" in D.C. was necessary, but the interfaith group said his " sweeping language" to justify it is "inaccurate and dehumanizing, increasing the risk of indiscriminate arrests and the use of excessive force." What they're saying:" Even one violent crime is one too many, and all Washingtonians deserve to live in safety. But safety cannot be achieved through political theatre and military force," per the statement from the group that includes Bishop Mariann Budde — who upset Trump at a January prayer service when she implored him to "have mercy" on immigrants and LGBTQ+ people. "It requires honesty and sustained collaboration between government, civic, and private partners — work now being sidelined," the statement reads. "Inflammatory rhetoric distracts from that work, even as the administration has cut more than $1 billion from programs proven to reduce crime, including law enforcement support, addiction and mental health treatment, youth programs, and affordable housing," the statement said. Of note: "The president has likened his intentions for Washington — and possibly other cities — to the harsh measures already used against migrants, tactics that have resulted in thousands detained in inhumane conditions and many deported without due process," they added. The group is calling on the city's political and civic leaders to "reject fear-based governance and work together in a spirit of dignity and respect — so that safety, justice, and compassion prevail in our city." For the record: The D.C. religious leaders involved in the statement, titled "Fear Is Not a Strategy for Safety," along with Budde are: Washington National Cathedral Dean Randy Hollerith; Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt, co-senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation; Bishop LaTrelle Miller Easterling, episcopal leader of the Baltimore-Washington and Peninsula-Delaware and Rabbi Abbi Sharofsky director of Intergroup Relations and rabbi in residence at the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington; The Rev. John Molina-Moore, general presbyter for National Capital Presbytery; Bishop Leila Ortiz, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Rabbi Jonah Dov Pesner, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism; Rabbi Jon Roos,Temple Sinai; and Rabbi Susan Shankman, Washington Hebrew Congregation also signed onto the statement. Scenes from D.C. as federal patrols stepped up


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Appeals court allows Trump to cut $2 billion in foreign aid
A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that President Trump can withhold some $2 billion in foreign aid payments, overturning a lower-court order that had blocked the administration's plans to slash disbursements from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of judges on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia lifted Biden-appointed District Judge Amir Ali's temporary restraining order, which forced USAID to continue making billions of dollars in foreign assistance payments for work already done by organizations the agency contracted with. Ali issued the restraining order in February in response to a lawsuit filed by two nonprofit organizations, the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and Journalism Development Network, after Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid funding on his first day in office. Advertisement 3 President Trump speaks to the press about deploying federal law enforcement agents in Washington to bolster the local police presence, in the Press Briefing Room at the White House, in Washington, DC, on Aug. 11, 2025. REUTERS Judge Karen Henderson, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, noted in the majority opinion Wednesday that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring a case against the Trump administration's funding freeze. 'The district court erred in granting that relief because the grantees lack a cause of action to press their claims,' Henderson wrote. Advertisement The nonprofits had argued that the president exceeded his authority by virtually abolishing USAID and cutting congressionally approved spending. Henderson, joined in the majority by Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee, ruled that under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, only the Government Accountability Office – a congressional watchdog agency – had standing to challenge the president's order to withhold foreign aid. Judge Florence Pan, a Biden appointee, slammed the funding freeze as 'unlawful' and warned it could lead to 'tyranny' in her dissenting opinion. 3 A federal appeals court on Wednesday cleared President Trump to withhold $2 billion in foreign aid, reversing a lower court's block on his plan to cut USAID disbursements. REUTERS Advertisement Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The court's acquiescence in and facilitation of the Executive's unlawful behavior derails the carefully crafted system of checked and balanced power that serves as the greatest security against tyranny – the accumulation of excessive authority in a single Branch,' Pan wrote. A White House Office of Management and Budget spokesperson hailed the ruling, telling Reuters it would halt 'radical left dark money groups' from 'maliciously interfering with the president's ability to spend responsibly and to administer foreign aid in a lawful manner in alignment with his America First policies.' The Trump administration had previously petitioned the Supreme Court to lift Ali's restraining order, but in a 5-4 ruling, the high court rejected the bid. Advertisement 3 President Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, on Aug. 13, 2025. REUTERS In February, the State Department outlined plans to eliminate roughly $60 billion in foreign aid spending and terminate 92% of grants issued by USAID. The figures were included in a State Department memo detailing the results of a foreign aid audit ordered by Trump. The audit identified nearly 15,000 grants and targeted almost 10,000 for elimination — the majority of which were issued by USAID. USAID was one of the first federal agencies that Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by billionaire Elon Musk, targeted for massive cuts based on allegations of widespread waste, fraud and abuse within the agency. In July, Congress approved a White House recession request that clawed back about $8 billion earmarked for USAID.


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Maine clinics hope to get blocked Medicaid funds restored as they sue Trump administration over cuts
PORTLAND, Maine — A network of clinics that provides health care in Maine is expected to ask a judge Thursday to restore its Medicaid funding while it fights a Trump administration effort to keep federal money from going to abortion providers. President Donald Trump's policy and tax bill, known as the ' big beautiful bill ,' blocked Medicaid money from flowing to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. The parameters in the bill also stopped funding from reaching Maine Family Planning, a much smaller provider that provides health care services in one of the poorest and most rural states in the Northeast.