‘Make foreign students pay £10k deposit so they don't claim asylum'
Policy Exchange said there was increasing evidence that overseas students were using their study visa as a back door to long-term work or settlement in the UK, including through claiming asylum.
Home Office figures showed that 16,000 of those who claimed asylum in 2024 had arrived in the UK on a student visa, nearly one in six (15 per cent) of all asylum claims, according to the think tank's report.
It suggested that foreign students could be required to provide a £10,000 surety that they would comply with the conditions of their visa and leave on completion of their studies.
The report said the aim would be to prevent over-staying and abuse of student working rights. The deposit would be forfeited if they breached the terms of their visa or if they made an asylum claim which was denied.
Prospective international students could also be required to undertake a commitment not to seek asylum whilst in the UK on a student visa. This would enable the Government to make the case that they have entered on a false promise in violation of immigration law if they then did so.
In a foreword to the report, author David Goodhart said the university sector had become a 'backdoor for unprecedented levels of migration that is neither beneficial, short term nor controlled'.
'What must cease is the marketing of our universities as a backdoor to long-term migration. The failure to address this has meant we have welcomed far too many who have been incentivised to come here for the wrong reasons,' he said.
'Restoring control to the international student regime would serve as a vital first step to addressing popular disillusionment with both the UK's immigration system and its higher education sector.'
Research by Policy Exchange found 43 per cent of all non-travel visas last year were issued to international students and their dependents – with those using the graduate route increasingly studying short postgraduate taught courses at low ranked universities.
Of those arriving on student visas, 40 per cent transferred to a different visa within 12 months in 2023 – up from just three per cent in 2019. The number of individuals transferring directly from study visas to health and care worker visas rose by 560 per cent between 2022 and 2023.
Warning system
The report recommended that the graduate visa route should be ended for all students other than those on postgraduate research degrees. It said the English standards required for incoming students should be raised.
Students from European Union member states should not be granted access to domestic fee rates or the student loan book, it said. And universities should be required to collect new data on the work undertaken by international students and their impact on the student experiences of domestic students.
Labour's white paper proposed limiting the graduate visa from two years to 18 months and consideration of a six per cent 'levy' on the £12 billion-a-year fee income that universities generate from overseas students.
It said the money would be reinvested in the 'higher education and skills system' as part of proposals to boost training of domestic workers to reduce reliance on foreign staff.
To prevent the misuse of student visas, universities will now be required to ensure at least 90 per cent of foreign students complete their courses and at least 95 per cent turn up for them. A new red-amber-green warning system will tell the public how universities are performing in achieving compliance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
28 minutes ago
- ITV News
India rejects UK parliament report on transnational repression
India has launched a blistering counterattack against a UK parliamentary report that accused it of waging 'transnational repression' on British soil and misusing global policing tools like INTERPOL to silence political dissidents. In a strongly worded statement on India's foreign ministry denounced the allegations as 'baseless,' 'politically motivated,' and 'drawn from dubious and discredited sources.' 'The deliberate reliance on unverified inputs from proscribed entities with a long record of anti-India hostility calls into question the credibility and objectivity of the entire report,' said MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, dismissing the claims as an orchestrated smear. The rare diplomatic rebuke was triggered by the release of a hard-hitting report titled 'Transnational Repression in the UK' on July 30 by the UK Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights — a powerful cross-party body comprising lawmakers from both the House of Commons and House of Lords. The report accuses multiple foreign governments of targeting exiled dissidents, activists, and journalists who have sought refuge in the UK, creating what it describes as a 'chilling effect' on diaspora communities. India was named among 12 countries, including China, Russia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, allegedly involved in such practices. While the report reserves its sharpest criticism for what it terms the 'three most flagrant perpetrators' — China, Russia, and Iran — India's inclusion, particularly the accusation of abusing INTERPOL's Red Notice mechanism for political ends, has sparked sharp pushback from New Delhi. The committee's findings draw heavily from evidence submitted by UK-based Sikh advocacy groups, including the Sikh Federation (UK) and Sikhs for Justice. These groups allege that Indian authorities have sought to weaponise international policing tools to harass and intimidate diaspora voices, especially those supporting the Khalistan separatist movement — a claim India has long dismissed as misinformation propagated by extremist elements. While the report has reignited debate within Britain over how to protect residents from foreign interference, India's sharp reaction signals a potential diplomatic flashpoint — particularly amid already sensitive ties following the killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada last year, which also raised questions around cross-border intelligence operations. As both countries navigate a delicate relationship shaped by strategic partnerships and domestic political pressures, the fallout from this latest allegation is likely to echo beyond Westminster and Raisina Hill.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband refuses to publish details of green energy deal with China
Following the decision, the Ministry of Defence raised concerns that the Chinese could use the turbines as spy sensors – but the Treasury was said to be resisting attempts to block the deal because of a desire to encourage inward investment. In Freedom of Information disclosures, the Government revealed that while Mr Miliband had been in China from March 13 to 17, Ofgem officials stayed until March 21. The officials, including Mr Brearley, used four temporary 'burner' phones while in the country, a standard security precaution government visitors are advised to take while in China. An Ofgem spokesman said: 'We always seek to keep expenditure as low as possible to deliver the best value for money and we regularly review our business travel and expenses policy in order to minimise the number of flights Ofgem staff take.' The group's food, local transport, and accommodation costs were paid for by the Foreign Office, the British embassy in China and the UK Integrated Security Fund, they added. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero insisted it was 'misleading' to suggest memorandums signed with other countries are made 'publicly available'. A spokesman said: 'The MoU is not about encouraging Chinese investment or involvement in the UK critical national infrastructure. 'Instead, it renews a partnership that has been in place for over ten years, and which facilitates the sharing of research and ideas to support the global clean energy transition.'
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says she no longer feels Nigerian and has given up passport for the country where she was brought up before coming to Britain aged 16
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has said she no longer feels Nigerian and has given up her passport for the country. Although she was born in Wimbledon, Mrs Badenoch spent most of her childhood in Nigeria before returning to south London at the age of 16, after the country's economy collapsed in the 1990s, to continue her education. She explained that she didn't 'identify' with the country, as she spent most of her life in the UK. And when it came to her passport, she no longer had it up to date. 'I have not renewed my Nigerian passport, I think, not since the early 2000s,' she told the Rosebud podcast. She revealed that she had to get a visa when her father died, describing the process as a 'big fandango.' She said: 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents… but by identity, I'm not really. 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I'm very interested in what happens there.' 'But home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws.' She also made it clear that she felt the Conservative Party was part of her 'extended family'. The North West Essex MP said her early experiences in Nigeria influenced her political views, particularly 'why I don't like socialism.' 'I remember never quite feeling that I belonged there,' she added. The Tory leader shared that the reason she returned to the UK as a teenager was because her parents thought she would have 'no future' in Nigeria. And she said she has not experienced racial prejudice in Britain 'in any meaningful form', she said. 'I knew I was going to a place where I would look different to everybody, and I didn't think that that was odd,' she said. 'What I found actually quite interesting was that people didn't treat me differently, and it's why I'm so quick to defend the UK whenever there are accusations of racism.' Asked if she was made conscious of her 'blackness' after coming to Britain, she said: 'Never. And I think that this is one of the things that probably made me an outlier. She continued: 'I had a couple of instances at school which now I look back and I think "Well, that might have been prejudice" but even then, when I talk about the soft bigotry of lower expectations, teachers saying "You don't need to go to all these fancy universities, just to this poly or this former poly". 'Some of it was just coming from what they thought was a good place, they thought they were being helpful or they were well-meaning. 'I don't think they were trying to disadvantage me. So I didn't feel that way.' But Mrs Badenoch, who moved permanently to the UK when she was 16 in 1996 because of economic turmoil in Nigeria, warned that things could get worse. The mother-of-three said it would be a 'dereliction of duty' to leave a worse world to her children. She added: 'I have mixed-race children. Making sure we keep a socially cohesive society, one where the colour of your skin doesn't matter any more than the colour of your eyes or your hair, is quite important. I think we've done such a brilliant job in the UK, and that's in danger of turning because of people on both extremes.
