logo
Commentary: The world's strongest currency is also super-competitive

Commentary: The world's strongest currency is also super-competitive

CNA2 days ago

NEW YORK: Amid all the talk about whether the US is keen to devalue the mighty dollar as one way to revive American manufacturing, it is worth noting that the dollar is not the world's strongest currency and has not been for decades.
That title goes to the Swiss franc, and the mighty franc has done nothing to undermine Switzerland's competitiveness.
The world's richest major economy has both a strong currency and a strong manufacturing base. The Swiss franc has been the top-performing currency over the past 50 years, 25 years, 10 years and five years.
It is near the top even over the past year when some of the more beleaguered currencies have staged a comeback against the dollar. Nothing can compare for durable strength.
Yet Switzerland also defies the assumption that a strong currency will undermine a nation's trading prowess by making its exports uncompetitive. Its exports have risen and are near historic highs both as a share of Swiss GDP (75 per cent), and as a share of global exports (near 2 per cent).
The global conversation has become unduly obsessed with currency valuations, which are just one of the factors that shape a nation's competitive position.
Like Germany and Japan in their heydays, Switzerland has gained a reputation for goods and services of such high quality that the rest of the world is willing to pay a currency premium for the 'Made in Switzerland' label.
DIVERSE AND DYNAMIC GOODS
For more than a decade, it has dominated a UN ranking of the most innovative economies, both for the resources it puts into innovation – for example through practical university education and research and development – and for its returns on these investments.
It generates more than US$100 in GDP per hour worked – that's more productive than any of the other 20 largest economies. Its decentralised political and economic system encourages the rise of small enterprises, which account for over 99 per cent of Swiss companies.
It also has a large share of globally competitive businesses in sectors from pharmaceuticals to luxury goods.
Harvard's Growth Lab ranks Switzerland number one among major economies for the 'complexity' of its exports, a measure of the advanced skills needed to produce them. And its exports range from chocolates and watches to medicines and chemicals – belying the notion that strong currencies kill factories.
At 18 per cent of GDP, its manufacturing sector is one of the largest among developed economies. Over half its exports are 'high-tech' – more than double the US level. Since advanced goods are more expensive, this has helped Switzerland keep its current account in surplus, averaging more than 4 per cent of GDP since the early 1980s.
Income from trade is recycled into significant investments abroad. The country now runs a net international investment surplus of more than 100 per cent of GDP, which helps it resist external shocks.
If Switzerland has a weakness, it is a huge run up in private debt as a share of GDP. Yet unlike the US and many other European countries, it does not have a large population of zombie companies – which earn too little to pay even the interest on their debts.
HOW TO STAY COMPETITIVE
Quietly, the Swiss have built an all-weather economy. The franc has appreciated steadily whether the dollar was rising or falling, and whether the global economy was in recession or recovery.
They just seem to understand how to stay competitive. In 2015, the franc surged on a shift in central bank policy and manufacturers responded by moving even more sharply to sophisticated exports, which are less sensitive to currency shifts.
Many policymakers think the East Asian 'miracles' devalued their way to prosperity. Undervalued exchange rates did help countries from South Korea to China grow their manufacturing export bases rapidly.
But other factors including infrastructure investments and opening to foreign capital played a bigger role. Meanwhile, the importance of exchange rate valuations faded as they moved up the development curve.
Developed economies need to compete more on quality than on price. For them, devaluation can backfire by encouraging domestic producers to focus on making cheaper goods.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the aid group backed by the US and Israel?
What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the aid group backed by the US and Israel?

CNA

time8 hours ago

  • CNA

What is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the aid group backed by the US and Israel?

Over the past two weeks, a new Gaza aid group has been at work in the Palestinian territory, bypassing the longstanding UN-led aid system there with a new distribution mechanism and drawing criticism over various issues. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), backed by the United States and Israel, said on Tuesday (Jun 3) that it has given out more than seven million meals from its aid centres "without incident". However, the Israeli military is facing allegations of shooting into crowds of civilians rushing to pick up aid packages near GHF sites, which it denies. On Tuesday, emergency responders said Israel's military killed at least 27 people near a GHF centre in Gaza, a figure later corroborated by the Red Cross. The United Nations has also denounced the foundation and refused to cooperate with it over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Here's what you need to know about the GHF and recent developments involving its aid operations in Gaza. What is the GHF? US consulting firm Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helped establish the GHF in October 2024, one year after the Oct 7 attack by Hamas in Israel. According to the Geneva commercial registry, the GHF was officially registered in February this year in Switzerland to oversee aid deliveries in Gaza. An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel had completely cut off supplies into Gaza for over two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. The foundation has said it will work with private US security and logistics firms - UG Solutions and Safe Reach Solutions - according to a source familiar with the plan. A second source said that prior to starting its operations, the GHF had already received more than US$100 million in commitments. It was not immediately clear where the money had come from. Senior US officials were working with Israel to enable the GHF to start work, acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the Security Council in May, urging the UN and aid groups to cooperate. Israel said it would facilitate the GHF's work without being involved in aid deliveries. Chaired by evangelical Christian leader The GHF is operated by a group of American security contractors, ex-military officers and humanitarian aid officials. In late May, Jake Wood, a US military veteran who had co-founded a disaster relief group, resigned as CEO as he said it was clear the GHF would not be allowed to operate independently. It was unclear who would succeed him until Tuesday, when the GHF named evangelical Christian leader, Reverend Johnnie Moore, as its executive chairman. Moore, an adviser to US President Donald Trump on interfaith issues, has had a confrontational approach to the United Nations. After UN chief Antonio Guterres expressed revulsion at "reports of Palestinians killed and injured while seeking aid in Gaza" on Sunday, Moore responded angrily. "Mr Secretary General, it was a lie," Moore posted to Guterres on X, "spread by terrorists & you're still spreading it. Correct this". On the same day that Moore was appointed, BCG said it had terminated its contract with the foundation and placed the partner leading the project on leave. "Unapproved follow-on work relating to Gaza lacked buy-in from multilateral stakeholders and was stopped on May 30. BCG has not and will not be paid for any of this work," the group said in a statement, adding that a formal review is underway. How does GHF deliver aid? The GHF bypasses the longstanding aid system in Gaza, where UN-led aid groups have been carrying out a massive operation moving food, medicine, fuel, tents and other supplies across Gaza since the Israel-Hamas war began in October 2023. For decades, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, had spearheaded aid distribution in Gaza, with dozens of other organisations participating in efforts to assist the population. Israel has demanded an alternative plan because it accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid. The UN and aid groups deny there is significant diversion. Israel has also accused UNRWA of providing cover for Hamas militants, claiming that some of the agency's employees took part in the group's October 2023 attack. The new mechanism centralises and limits food distribution to a small number of hubs guarded by armed contractors, where people must go to pick up the food. Currently four hubs have been set up, all close to Israeli military positions. Aid will be delivered with the help of private subcontractors transporting supplies in armoured vehicles from the Gaza border to the hubs, where they will also provide security. The GHF said the aim is to deter criminal gangs or militants from redirecting aid. The GHF said each of its initial four hubs would serve meals for roughly 300,000 people. It also said it will eventually be able to meet the needs of 2 million people. One of the hubs is in central Gaza, close to the Netzarim Corridor, a strip of land held by Israeli troops, according to a map issued by the Israeli military. The three others are in the area of Rafah, south of the Morag Corridor, another military-held strip. Almost the entire population is currently in northern Gaza - where no hub is currently located - or in central Gaza. They would have to cross through Israeli military lines to reach the hubs near Rafah. The GHF said it will create more hubs within 30 days - including in the north - but did not specify their exact locations. The UN has rejected the new mechanism, saying it allows Israel to use food as a weapon, violates humanitarian principles and will not be effective. Why do aid groups and the UN oppose it? The UN and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns that its plan would "weaponise aid" for Israel's military and political purposes. They said Israel would have the power to determine who receives aid and to force the population to move to where it is being distributed, emptying large parts of the territory. That would potentially violate international laws against forced displacement. "We cannot take part in a system that violates humanitarian principles and risks implicating us in serious breaches of international law," said Shaina Low, communication adviser for the Norwegian Refugee Council, a leading aid group operating in Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had said that under the aid mechanism, Gaza's population would eventually be moved to a 'sterile zone' in Gaza's far south. He said it was for their protection while Israeli forces fight Hamas elsewhere. He also said once the Palestinians enter the area, "they don't necessarily go back". Israel has also said that after Hamas is defeated, it will implement a plan proposed by Trump to relocate the territory's population outside Gaza, though it portrays migration as "voluntary". The Palestinians, along with nearly all of the international community, have rejected the idea. The GHF said in a statement that it is independent and apolitical and will not be part of any mass displacement, adding that its system is fully consistent with humanitarian principles including impartiality and independence. It also said food will be given according to need, without eligibility requirements, despite Israel previously telling aid groups that the country intends to vet aid recipients and use facial recognition technology. However, aid groups say recipients will have to pass close to or through Israeli military positions to reach the hubs, exposing them to vetting. The aid groups also noted that the GHF has said each meal it distributes would have 1,750 calories, which is below the 2,100-calorie per day standard for meals in emergency situations used by the UN's World Health Organization, UNICEF and World Food Program. They added that the GHF's plans for distributing non-food aid remain uncertain. Thus, the change is simply not necessary, said the aid workers. What has been happening at GHF aid sites? Scores of Palestinians have been killed or injured as chaos erupted near the aid centres on multiple occasions, prompting a call for an independent investigation by UN chief Antonio Guterres on Monday. In one instance, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli gunfire killed at least 31 people and wounded 176 near the aid distribution site in the southern city of Rafah on Sunday, with medics at nearby hospitals also reporting a deluge of gunshot wound victims. The Israeli military denied firing at people "while they were near or within" the site, and urged "media to be cautious with information published" by Hamas. But a military source acknowledged "warning shots were fired towards several suspects" overnight about a kilometre away from the GHF distribution centre, outside of operating hours. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said that its field hospital in Rafah received 179 people, including 21 pronounced dead on arrival. The ICRC reported that all the wounded "said they had been trying to reach an aid distribution site", adding that "the majority suffered gunshot or shrapnel wounds". Pause in operations and what's next The GHF said it will not give out any aid on Wednesday (Jun 4) as it presses Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its distribution sites, a day after dozens of Palestinians seeking aid were killed. It said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimises confusion or escalation risks" near military perimeters; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety. The UN Security Council is also set to vote on Wednesday on a demand for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and humanitarian access across Gaza. "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking - and in several instances losing - their lives just trying to get food," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on Tuesday, adding that the GHF aid distribution model was "all a recipe for disaster, which is exactly what is going on".

200,000 Afghans left Pakistan since deportations renewed
200,000 Afghans left Pakistan since deportations renewed

CNA

time8 hours ago

  • CNA

200,000 Afghans left Pakistan since deportations renewed

ISLAMABAD: More than 200,000 Afghans have left Pakistan since the government renewed a deportation drive in April, Islamabad's interior ministry told AFP. Pakistan has launched a strict campaign to evict more than 800,000 Afghans who have had their residence permits cancelled, including some who were born in Pakistan or lived there for decades. According to the ministry, more than 135,000 Afghans left Pakistan in April, while the number dropped to 67,000 in May and more than 3,000 were sent back in the first two days of June. Millions of Afghans have poured into Pakistan over the past several decades, fleeing successive wars, as well as hundreds of thousands who arrived after the return of the Taliban government in 2021. A campaign to evict them began in 2023, prompting hundreds of thousands to cross the border in the span of a few days, fearing harassment or arrest. In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan. The UN's International Organisation for Migration on Tuesday (Jun 3) voiced concern over a surge in Afghan families being deported from Iran, recording 15,675 crossing in May, a more than two-fold increase from the previous month. The influx across both borders threatens to strain Afghanistan's already "fragile reception and reintegration systems", IOM said in a statement. Islamabad has labelled Afghans "terrorists and criminals", but analysts say the expulsions are designed to pressure neighbouring Afghanistan's Taliban authorities to control militancy in the border regions. Last year, Pakistan recorded the highest number of deaths from attacks in a decade. Pakistan's security forces are under enormous pressure along the border with Afghanistan, battling a growing insurgency by ethnic nationalists in Balochistan in the southwest and the Pakistani Taliban and its affiliates in the northwest. The government frequently accuses Afghan nationals of taking part in attacks and blames Kabul for allowing militants to take refuge on its soil, a charge Taliban leaders deny. Some Pakistanis have grown weary of hosting a large Afghan population as security and economic woes deepen, and the deportation campaign has widespread support.

US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on June 4, UN to vote on ceasefire demand
US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on June 4, UN to vote on ceasefire demand

Straits Times

time14 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on June 4, UN to vote on ceasefire demand

Palestinians who collected food GHF boxes on June 3 described scenes of pandemonium, as crowds jostled for aid. PHOTO: AFP US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on June 4, UN to vote on ceasefire demand CAIRO/JERUSALEM/NEW YORK - The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) will not give out any aid on June 4 as it presses Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its distribution sites, a day after dozens of Palestinians seeking aid were killed. The GHF said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimises confusion or escalation risks" near military perimeters; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety. "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," said a GHF spokesperson. An Israeli military spokesperson warned civilians against moving in areas leading to GHF sites on June 4, deeming them "combat zones". The Israeli military said on June 3 that it opened fire on a group of people it viewed as a threat near a GHF food aid distribution site. The International Committee of the Red Cross said at least 27 people were killed and dozens injured. The GHF said the incident was "well beyond" its site. Palestinians who collected food GHF boxes on June 3 described scenes of pandemonium, with no-one overseeing the handover of supplies or checking IDs, as crowds jostled for aid. The UN Security Council is also set to vote on June 4 on a demand for a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas and humanitarian access across Gaza, where aid has trickled amid chaos and bloodshed after Israel lifted an 11-week blockade on the enclave where famine looms. "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking – and in several instances losing – their lives just trying to get food," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on June 3, adding that the aid distribution model backed by the US and Israel was "all a recipe for disaster, which is exactly what is going on." That model is run by the newly created GHF, which started operations in the enclave a week ago and said on June 3 that it has given out more than seven million meals from three so-called secure distribution sites. GHF interim executive director John Acree urged humanitarians in Gaza: "Work with us and we will get your aid delivered to those who are depending on it." US veto? The UN and other aid groups have refused to work with the GHF because they say it is not neutral and the distribution model militarises aid. GHF uses private US security and logistics companies to get aid to the distribution sites. It is the latest in a string of efforts to get more aid into the enclave, where experts say the entire population of some 2.1 million people is at risk of famine. Jordan in 2024 spearheaded humanitarian air drops, while the US briefly installed a floating aid pier, but it was beset by challenges. The UN has long-blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for hindering the delivery of aid into Gaza and its distribution throughout the war zone. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies. Israel said on June 3 that three of its soldiers had been killed in fighting in northern Gaza. Gaza health officials said at least 18 more Palestinians were killed in other military strikes in the territory on June 3. Reuters could not independently verify the reports in northern and southern Gaza. The 10 elected members of the UN Security Council have asked for the 15-member body to vote on June 4 on a draft resolution that demands "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." The draft text, seen by Reuters, also demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas and others, and the immediate lifting of all restrictions on the entry of aid and its safe and unhindered distribution, including by the UN, throughout Gaza. "The time to act has already passed," Slovenia's UN Ambassador Samuel Zbogar told Reuters. "It is our historical responsibility not to remain silent." As US President Donald Trump's administration tries to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, it was not immediately clear if Washington would veto the draft text. A spokesperson for the US mission to the UN said: 'We cannot preview our actions currently under consideration.' A resolution needs nine votes in favour and no vetoes by the permanent members - the United States, Russia, China, Britain or France - to pass. The war in Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel in an October 7 attack and took some 250 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, which do not distinguish between fighters and non-combatants. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store