
Retargeting needs a creative reboot
For every customer who visits a brand's website but leaves without making a purchase, retargeting ads have long been the go-to strategy for marketers aiming to convert them. However, once the go-to for converting warm leads, retargeting is slowly losing its edge. As it reaches a plateau, marketers must reconsider where their approach may be falling short.
But before we dive into the cracks in the system, let's take a moment to understand what retargeting involves.
Unlike typical banner ads, retargeting ads are a form of online
advertising
served to people who have already visited a brand's website or are in contact with the brand.
According to Criteo, only 4% of site visitors end up making a purchase. This leaves marketers with a pressing question: How do you convert the 96% who left without buying? Retargeting.
However, as the saying goes, 'Retargeting works, until it doesn't.'
While the concept seems foolproof on paper, real-world execution is fraught with challenges.
Let's break them down one by one.
Dynamic Landing Pages
As an increasing number of Indians join social media to connect with their friends and family,
Meta
and
Google
have become the top advertising platforms for retargeting customers. They dominate retargeting by leveraging vast user data to serve ads based on browsing behaviour, past purchases and search history.
Every time a customer clicks on a retargeting ad, they are directed to a landing page (web page designed to receive traffic from that specific ad. These platforms use static ads (fixed content pieces that remain the same regardless of context) that work well for categories like e-commerce and retail, but have limited applicability for more complex categories like insurance, where dynamic, personalised content is essential to engage users and drive conversions.
Rohitesh Sahu, associate vice president -
digital marketing
, PolicyBazaar, pointed out this mismatch and said, 'Imagine visiting an e-commerce app to view a pair of shoes. That product page looks the same for everyone and no personal inputs are needed to see the price.
In contrast to e-commerce, customer journeys in insurance are highly personalised. Quotations and policy details depend on individual data, such as age, health status, smoking habits and more.'
Conventional retargeting ads offered by Meta and Google rely on audience pools, where customers are segmented based on predefined triggers like site visits or cart abandonment.
These ads are usually templated and automated, directing customers to static landing pages (look the same for everyone). Serving a dynamic landing page on these platforms is not a straightforward task as insurance products often involve a longer and more complex decision-making process.
Consumers typically go through several steps, reading about plans, comparing quotes and sometimes speaking with agents, before making a purchase. Because of this fragmented journey, showing a perfectly tailored landing page based on just one ad click becomes challenging, as it's hard to pinpoint exactly where the user is in the buying process.
Moreover, platforms like Meta and Google have limited the use of PII (Personally Identifiable Information) due to privacy concerns.
Dynamic landing pages often rely on personal customer data to tailor content. For insurance products, tailoring based on age, health conditions, or income could raise compliance flags or breach privacy norms.
The challenges of serving dynamic landing pages make it significantly harder for categories like insurance to run effective retargeting ads.
Diminishing Returns
When a customer browses a shirt on an e-commerce site but doesn't purchase, they're often overwhelmed with static retargeting ads, nudging them to buy.
These ads typically showcase the shirt, its price and discounts, but their static nature can feel repetitive and saturating. This lack of dynamism risks being ignored by customers. Dynamic ads offer a solution, but the challenge remains: are there truly 50 unique ways to advertise a single shirt? Likely not, and this is where marketers face a dilemma.
Manan Bajoria, group VP - growth marketing, Ixigo, elaborated on the challenge and said, 'There's little room for creativity in retargeting ads. Even with videos or GIFs, the core message stays the same: the shirt and its price. This repetition is what makes retargeting ads feel monotonous.'
When creatives remain largely unchanged, the customer experience becomes monotonous and intrusive. For instance, a user might search for a product, see related ads, return later to make a booking and then search again, only to be shown the same ads all over again. This repetitive cycle continues because the creative content doesn't evolve meaningfully over time, making the retargeting feel stale and overbearing.
What remains to be seen is how technologies like agentic AI can enable brands to present a shirt in 50 unique ways during retargeting.
Frequency Caps
Have you ever felt annoyed scrolling through social media, seeing the same ad from a brand over and over again?
Repeated exposure can lead to ad fatigue or worse, push your brand into the customer's blind spot, where they become indifferent to your messaging. To prevent overexposure, marketers use frequency caps to limit ad displays. These caps ensure brands don't overwhelm customers.
Sounds simple to implement? It's not.
As per Vishal Agrahari, VP -
digital
paid media, Bcwebwise brands typically allocate 5% to 10% of their campaign budgets to retargeting, yet often fail to achieve the desired results. A key reason, he explains, is that marketers tend to overexpose customers to retargeting ads. They repeatedly bombard users with the same creatives, failing to implement proper frequency caps—believing that more impressions equate to better recall, without realising this can lead to negative brand perception.
Sharing an example of a failed retargeting campaign by a D2C brand, he said, 'A D2C apparel brand in the last quarter of 2024 had executed an aggressive retargeting campaign on Meta and Google. The campaign budget was INR 15–20 lakh per quarter allocated for retargeting, as the audience pool for remarketing was around 4 lakh users. Since they were offering discounts on products, they wanted to reach out to everyone who visited their website.
But the retargeting campaign failed miserably. ROAS dropped from 3.6 to 1.4. Conversion rate went below 1%. Where they went wrong was, the audience saw the same creatives over 10 times without any frequency caps.'
But why is implementing frequency caps so difficult?
Here are two reasons:
'Different teams manage different channels: someone runs paid ads, another handles CRM (Customer Relationship Management) and WhatsApp, and a different team manages the call centre. It is challenging to tie one customer across these platforms and track all communications from each channel while implementing the frequency caps,' Sahu (PolicyBazaar) articulated.
Highlighting the fragmented nature of digital marketing, Kedar Ravangave, EVP - marketing, Kotak Mahindra Bank, said, 'Digital marketing operates in a fragmented ecosystem, where consumers encounter ads across independent platforms like Instagram, YouTube, or news websites.
This disintegration complicates tracking a user's cumulative ad exposure, as some of these platforms operate in isolation, making it difficult to manage frequency effectively. A user might encounter the same ad across Instagram, YouTube and Facebook, with no unified system tracking these repeated exposures.'
Incrementality
When evaluating retargeting, it is important to take into account the incremental cost—the additional expense required to achieve results that wouldn't have occurred otherwise. While retargeting may appear to be a fraction of the cost of new user acquisition, it can sometimes be up to 'ten times' more expensive when factoring in these hidden incremental costs.
To demonstrate how retargeting often ends up being more expensive than new user acquisition, Bajoria conducted an experiment at Ixigo five years ago.
Explaining the experiment, he said, 'When I joined the company, we were investing heavily in retargeting campaigns, spending significant budgets to re-engage users who dropped off in the funnel. To evaluate the impact of retargeting, we ran an incrementality test, dividing our audience into a target group and a control group. The test withheld ads from 20% of users while showing them to the remaining 80%, running the campaign for two weeks to compare conversion rates between the two groups.
The control group, which didn't see the ads, had a 5% conversion rate, while the group exposed to ads converted at 5.5%. This meant that only 0.5% of conversions were incremental, with the remaining 5% occurring naturally, regardless of the ads. Despite Meta attributing the full 5.5% to our campaign, making the cost per booking appear favourable, the actual cost per booking was 10 times higher, revealing the inefficiency of our retargeting efforts.'
To put this into perspective, imagine you run a travel website and show retargeting ads to 100 people who visited but didn't complete a booking. You spend INR 300 per booking, which seems like a bargain compared to the INR 1,000 it typically costs to acquire a new customer.
However, if only 10 of those 100 bookings actually happened because of the ads and the remaining 90 either would have booked later as they were still planning their travel or didn't book at all—your real cost per incremental booking is actually INR 3,000. That's three times the cost of acquiring a new customer, not one-third as it initially appeared.
Armed with these insights, Ixigo decided to halt all retargeting campaigns on Meta and Google.
Now the question arises: if the actual cost of retargeting is so high, why do marketers continue to ignore the incremental cost of retargeting?
'Many marketers either aren't familiar with incrementality or know the term but don't fully understand how to measure it. They may not go the extra mile to decode its real value or simply lack the tools to do so.
Often, performance metrics focus on user acquisition at low costs, making retargeting appear efficient. Without the intent or capability to dig deeper, most marketers do not want to take the bold call of just shutting down a channel,' Bajoria resolved.
By allocating the money spent on retargeting to new user acquisition and targeting customers via email and WhatsApp, Ixigo's retargeting budgets have decreased by 90% compared to their previous levels, thanks to the shift to CRM channels such as email, SMS and push notifications.
Vague Intent
While retargeting is already a complex challenge for D2C brands, requiring a deep understanding of customer behaviour, it becomes even more challenging in the B2B space, primarily due to the lack of clear buyer intent signals.
Describing this challenge, a source told ETBrandEquity, 'A major hurdle in B2B marketing is the absence of clear intent signals. Marketers often rely on vague indicators or market whispers that suggest a potential customer might need their solution, but where do you find these signals? They're rarely available in a real-time or easily accessible format.
If you're trying to sell to a B2B customer, how would you even know which product they are actively exploring? Without behavioural or contextual signals, retargeting becomes a shot in the dark.'
Closing The Loop
Another challenge that adds to the fatigue of customers is when these static ads pop up even after the product has already been purchased. But why do customers keep receiving these ads after purchasing?
Explaining, Sahu said, 'When campaigns are created, they typically involve both a targeting list and an exclusion list. For instance, if a user visits your website, brands may choose to target them with ads for the next seven days. However, it's critical that after those seven days, the user is automatically removed from the targeting list.
Marketers sometimes fail to establish clear rules for exclusion lists and overlook the importance of excluding users who have already reached a key milestone in the customer journey. Without a defined and automated exclusion process, these users continue to receive ads, leading to wasted ad spend or worse, pushing the brand into the consumer's blind spot.'
To manage this, PolicyBazaar structures campaigns around the customer's buying cycle. For example, in the case of car insurance, the brand knows that most purchases occur about a week before the due date. Therefore, it aligns its campaigns accordingly and avoids targeting beyond this window.
A Tech Challenge
Marketing professionals highlight a key gap in the current retargeting infrastructure: 'If I need to track specific customers, analyse historical data and estimate the potential dollar value from retargeting them, there's no solution that consolidates all campaigns, target bases and expected outcomes for me in one place,' says one of them, who prefers to stay anonymous.
He stressed the need for a smarter, goal-oriented system.
'When I input a desired conversion rate or KPI, the system should interpret that goal and recommend the exact set of actions required to achieve it. Today, this entire process is manual,' the anonymous source added.
He also pointed out the limitations in operational efficiency in retail, where a team member typically reviews past data and plans actions for the following week. If that person is on leave, the entire process can fall apart.
Asking for a more intelligent, automated solution, he said, 'We need a customised tool that predicts potential revenue from retargeting specific cohorts—and suggests the right campaigns to execute.'
Ad Fraud
Retargeting is already a capital-intensive marketing exercise—now imagine the frustration of being taken advantage of in the process. Retargeting frauds exploit advertisers' efforts to reach users who've previously visited their website.
Bots are programmed to mimic human behaviour, such as browsing product pages or adding items to a shopping cart. The advertiser's retargeting mechanisms then prompt the ad server to serve more ads to these fake 'leads,' ultimately draining budgets and wasting valuable impressions.
Recalling an experience of retargeting fraud, Ravangave shared: 'This was a case from my past marketing experience during a large-scale retargeting campaign we were running with a major publisher. The goal was to deliver a high volume of clicks through specific messaging. As soon as the campaign went live, the publisher started reporting a significant number of clicks. But none of this traffic was reflected on our site.
Had the team not set up hourly monitoring, we would have ended up wasting the entire campaign budget in just a week because it was a short-duration sale campaign. We quickly flagged the issue and reached out to the publisher. That's when we discovered the numbers were being manipulated by bots. What was reported as a million clicks was, in reality, just around a thousand.'
Ravangave emphasises that ad fraud will continue to evolve, but the most effective countermeasure is building a solid, in-house measurement framework.
After reviewing the challenges, let us now explore the solutions.
Sequential Storytelling
Retargeting efforts plateau beyond a point due to ad fatigue, audience saturation (a customer may fall in the retargeting pool of multiple brands in the same category) and privacy limitations.
To overcome this challenge, Pragya Bijalwann, head of marketing, Voltas, suggests marketers explore strategies such as sequential storytelling and creative experimentation. These approaches help sustain engagement, expand reach to new audiences and drive conversions without relying solely on personalisation.
Sequential storytelling is the practice of developing modular creatives that evolve with the consumer's journey, where each ad feels like a natural continuation rather than a repetitive nudge, creating an experience that resonates with consumers.
Kotak Mahindra Bank utilises its in-house photo studio to create diverse, tailored campaign messages for every stage of the customer journey.
Explaining this practice, Ravangave said, 'Our product stories have evolved from broad thematic narratives to focused messaging that highlights how a product solves problems or enhances a consumer's life. From there, we integrate bottom-funnel elements like creator endorsements, targeted offers and location-based nudges.
We use signal-based sequencing (using browsing behaviour, purchase history and engagement patterns) to deliver relevant messaging tailored to each stage of the customer journey. This approach increased conversion by three to six times for customers exposed to a full-funnel strategy compared to traditional retargeting methods.'
Sharing an alternate strategy to prevent retargeting from reaching a plateau, Amit Chaudhary, digital marketing head, Orient Electric, said, 'We continuously refresh our audience pools and watch for buying signals across categories. For instance, a bulk lighting buyer often signals home renovation—we can then remarket fans or geysers to such users. And this would work even better if we could tell the user our brand story. The conversion likelihood in retargeting is higher when brand trust has already been built through an intense narrative exposure.
We have seen that when users are exposed to a strong brand narrative, our overall performance marketing, including retargeting, performs significantly better, as it's no longer just a push, it's part of a bigger story.'
A MadTech Approach
If marketing teams could openly complain about one aspect of retargeting, it would be the diminishing reach of various channels.
Bajoria also noted a significant decline in the reach of CRM channels. For example, push notifications now reach only about 50% of users, as more customers choose to opt out of receiving them.
'SMS has been overused to the point where people rarely read them unless it is an OTP or a bank alert,' Bajoria added. 'WhatsApp remains a viable option, but it comes at a cost—approximately 80 paise per message. Moreover, WhatsApp imposes limits on the number of marketing messages a user can receive each week. Once this threshold is met, additional messages are simply not delivered,' Bajoria added further.
The saturation of traditional CRM channels has led many marketers to see Meta and Google as more appealing options for retargeting.
However, the high cost of retargeting on these platforms has created a dilemma: should marketers continue investing in Meta and Google at a premium, or shift focus to the more cost-effective CRM channels for their retargeting efforts?
Bajoria believes that CRM channels such as emails, push notifications and SMS remain a better bet for retargeting due to their lower cost, and the dollars saved on retargeting on Meta and Google can be put to new customer acquisition.
As a result, marketers are increasingly exploring new ways to retarget customers. One emerging approach involves retargeting the followers of micro and nano-influencers after running influencer campaigns with them—an audience known for significantly higher engagement rates.
'This strategy has proven highly effective because micro and nano-influencers have a strong presence within their communities and tend to drive much higher engagement. You're far more likely to trust a mother from your neighborhood promoting homemade pickles than a celebrity,' an anonymous source revealed.
Dynamic Creative Optimisation
The challenge of little to no variations in retargeting creatives causes fatigue, so what can brands do?
PolicyBazaar is currently in the process of leveraging agentic AI and generative AI for personalised marketing communication, especially in banner and video formats. They are iterating and testing it on a small scale.
'While we believe it will not necessarily lead to dramatically different outcomes in terms of performance uplift, it should provide incremental benefits. Such as improving creative variety, reducing manual workload and enhancing operational efficiencies,' Sahu noted.
The question of whether to retarget or not lacks a straightforward answer. It depends on factors like the brand's category, the length of the consideration period, and whether static ads effectively serve your audience or risk annoying them.
Before launching campaigns, marketers must prioritise KYC—Know Your Customer—to build detailed customer profiles for strategic retargeting. Nevertheless, retargeting strategies must be re-evaluated with customer fatigue in mind to ensure better ROI (Return on Investment).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft buy green power under a special contract. That's causing losses
New Delhi: In a rare occurrence, India's falling real-time renewable energy tariffs are causing losses to Big Tech firms. The reason: a mechanism aimed at ensuring price stability and managing risks. Meta, Amazon and Microsoft are incurring losses on their green energy power purchase agreements (PPAs) that are based on Contract for Difference (CfD), said four people aware of the development. Power producers and buyers agree to pricing under long-term pacts. When such agreements are based on CfD, either party has to pay the difference between the contracted and the actual price to the other. In case the market prices are higher than the agreed-upon 'strike price', the power producer pays the differential to the procurer–in this case, corporates. But if the market price is lower than the contracted price, the company needs to pay the developer. With the prices falling below ₹1 per unit last month, the tech firms that signed CfD-based long-term PPAs are witnessing an average loss of around ₹1 per unit. Read more: NTPC ties up with SEforALL for energy transition roadmap Corporations and generators enter into CfD-based PPAs for risk management and assured prices. These contracts are important for large corporations to earn carbon credits to meet their green targets. 'The CfD contracts are under stress given the renewable energy prices trajectory," said one of the four people cited above, requesting anonymity. 'The price touched record lows last month and the recent trend is a rare development. The losses to corporates tied up in CfD-based PPAs would also be unprecedented, although unquantifiable as these PPAs are mostly private," said an executive with an energy exchange cited above who also did not want to be named. 'There are not many corporates in the country who have tied up such PPAs. The major players include the global tech giants." Queries emailed to Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft remained unanswered till press time. "Procuring entities would have been incurring losses in the past two months owing to the fall in market prices of power. Currently, the market-clearing price stands around ₹2.1-2.2 per unit during the solar hours," said Jatin Arya, director at CareEdge Ratings. 'This downtrend has been seen for two months in a row. However, in case prices rebound, these entities may be able to offset such losses over the course of the remaining months of the fiscal." Power prices drop in cooler May The decline in real-time prices comes as demand for power in India's top six industrialized states flattened in April and cooled in May, as reported by Mint earlier. This suggests a potential fall in factory production at the start of the new financial year. The average market-clearing price (MCP) on the Indian Energy Exchange during solar hours (11:00-16:00 hours) in May was ₹2.2 per unit against ₹3.5 a unit a year earlier, with prices in some time blocks at nearly ₹0 per unit. The average MCP during non-solar hours (00:00-11:00 hours and 16:00-24:00 hours) was ₹3.8/unit vs ₹5.2/unit in the corresponding period of the previous year. The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) has projected a peak demand of 270 gigawatt (GW) this year, compared to a record 250 GW recorded on 30 May last year. But May was cooler this year compared with a year earlier, when the peak demand had touched 250 GW. The fall in temperatures drove prices down in the short-term power market. Average market-clearing price (MCP) in the real-time market declined 28% on-year to ₹3.43 per unit in May 2025, indicating ample availability amid tepid electricity volume requirement, said a Crisil report. Green commitments AEI New Energy Trading Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of Amazon Inc has a 20-year PPA at ₹2.72 per unit from 100 MW (AC)/135 MW (DC) solar power project in Rajasthan. Last August, Microsoft signed a PPA for 437.6 MW of green attributes, marking one of the largest corporate renewable deals in the country. Under this agreement, Microsoft aims to advance its renewable energy targets, while supporting community initiatives such as rural electrification and women's economic empowerment. Given the requirement of green attributes for achieving green energy targets, 30% of green energy usage cited by large corporations comprises green attributes sourced through international renewable energy certificates, CfD-based PPAs and virtual PPAs, said Aditya Malpani, senior director and regional business head – west, AMPIN Energy Transition. Temporary blip Industry players do not expect real-time renewable energy prices to remain low for long. 'The instance of prices reaching below ₹1 last month was a rare and is unlikely to sustain over the long term. It's important for industry to come up with a mutually winning contractual structure," said Malpani of AMPIN Energy Transition. "One provision could be the introduction of 'cap and collar'; in other words, lower and upper limits in case of upswings and downswings. Further, merchant projects can offload physical electricity to bulk off-takers under short-term contracts as breakeven prices in third-party sale are still much higher than market-clearing prices in exchanges. Lastly, electricity derivatives being launched in a short while shall provide another hedging mechanism for CfD contracts," Malpani said, adding that since price volatility is a reason why corporates remain cautious of getting into CfD-based PPAs. Read more: Crisis alert: Careless water management poses India an existential threat According to Suddhasatta Kundu, director-power sector advisory at Nangia & Co LLP, the decrease in solar price is attributed to various reasons, including low financing cost, higher generation during the day when demand is low, favourable regulatory provisions, among others. 'In the short term, there may be a reduction in solar price; however, in the long term, CfDs will be a favourable risk-mitigation instrument for the buyer. Green attributes requirement would certainly drive, but it will not solely be the driving factor," he said. Rahul Mishra, senior VP & head-C&I, BluPine Energy, said: 'While such price movements have prompted discussion around Contract for Difference (CfD)-based agreements, these are largely situational developments rather than indicators of a systemic challenge." Noting that for commercial and industrial (C&I) customers, renewable energy procurement remains a long-term strategic choice aimed at energy cost stability, decarbonization goals, and sustainability commitments, he said that CfD structures are designed to balance short-term fluctuations with long-term value, and temporary price dips hardly undermine the fundamental economic or environmental rationale of these contracts. These developments point to surplus renewable availability during certain periods, which reinforces the importance of storage solutions, transmission and evacuation efficiencies, demand-side flexibility, and innovative contracting models in the future, Mishra said. Read more: Energy security: India needn't be staring at a $1 trillion import bill


United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
Maha Guv urges Portugal to focus on select sectors to increase trade volume
Mumbai, June 10 (UNI) Maharashtra Governor C P Radhakrishnan on Tuesday suggested that Portugal should focus on select sectors such as infrastructure, information technology, tourism, and textiles, and make efforts to increase the current trade volume from USD 1.2 billion to at least USD 10 billion. According to a statement issued by the Governor's house, the suggestion was made during a courtesy meeting between Ambassador of the Republic of Portugal in India, João Manuel Mendes Ribeiro de Almeida, and the Governor of Maharashtra at Raj Bhavan, here. Stating that Portugal and India share a historical relationship, the Ambassador said Portugal is now focusing on the future and is keen to enhance cooperation with India across various sectors, including trade. In this context, he said, Portugal is also interested in signing a memorandum of understanding with Maharashtra. The Ambassador mentioned that this year holds special significance for both India and Portugal, as it marks the 50th anniversary of the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the two nations. He informed that efforts are underway to strengthen bilateral cooperation in areas such as trade, tourism, textiles and information technology. He told the Governor that he was meeting over 100 business representatives in Mumbai. The Ambassador also informed that around 1.25 lakh Indians reside in Portugal and that they had integrated well into Portuguese society. He said Indians possess a wide range of skills and added that Portugal currently has a growing need for skilled manpower. Sharing that Portugal is ranked the fifth safest country in the world next only to the Scandinavian countries, the Ambassador added that Portugal is a leading destination in global tourism. He expressed Portugal's interest in increasing cooperation with India in the field of tourism. The Ambassador also shared that Portuguese is spoken in around 15 countries, including Portugal, Brazil, Mozambique, Angola, East Timor, among others. Welcoming the Ambassador to Maharashtra, Governor Radhakrishnan noted that Spanish and Portuguese are widely spoken languages across the world. He told the Ambassador that in his capacity as Chancellor of universities in Maharashtra, he has advised universities to offer at least one European language to the students. He noted that learning foreign languages would help students explore career and business opportunities internationally. UNI AAA SS


Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
CloudThat Wins Google Cloud New Training Partner of the Year Award 2025
NewsVoir Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 10: CloudThat, a leading provider of cloud training and consulting services, revealed that Google Cloud Learning Services has named it the Google Cloud New Training Partner of the Year for 2025, an honour announced at a dedicated, private event held at the Google Cloud Next conference in Las Vegas recently. This prestigious award recognizes CloudThat's remarkable contributions in empowering learners through innovative training programs that have driven significant skill development and accelerated cloud adoption worldwide. CloudThat achieved this milestone in its first year as a Google Cloud Authorized Training Partner, training close to 1,100 professionals and delivering 50+ impactful sessions across diverse industries with a customer satisfaction score (CSAT) of 4.60. The company also established training partnerships with Fortune 500 companies in sectors such as fintech and IT/ITES, where their tailored programs accelerated cloud adoption and innovation. A global IT company collaborated with CloudThat to enhance its cloud capabilities, overcoming challenges in utilizing cloud infrastructure through customized training that improved the team's technical expertise and enabled successful cloud-based projects. "We are thrilled to be recognized as the Google Cloud New Training Partner of the Year from Google Cloud Learning Services," said Bhavesh Goswami, Founder and CEO of CloudThat. "This award reflects our team's dedication to empowering learners with the skills to succeed in a cloud-driven world. We look forward to continuing our collaboration with Google Cloud to shape the future of cloud expertise." CloudThat's expert team of Google Authorized Trainers has been instrumental in delivering high-quality training, reinforcing its role as a partner that transforms organizations. With a proven track record, CloudThat has established itself as a trusted leader in Google Cloud training across the APAC region. The company remains committed to advancing cloud education, delivering innovative training solutions that enable organizations across industries to harness the full potential of cloud. Established in 2012, CloudThat is an award-winning company and the first in India to offer cloud training and consulting services for mid-market and enterprise clients worldwide. Headquartered in Bengaluru, India, with offices in the UK, USA, and Bangladesh, CloudThat specializes in training for Cloud, GenAI, AI/ML, Data, DevOps, and other cutting-edge technologies, having trained over 850,000 professionals across 600+ certifications. CloudThat recently won Google Cloud Learning Services's New Training Partner of the Year Award for 2025, continuing its legacy with consecutive AWS Training Partner of the Year Awards (2023 & 2024) and the Microsoft Training Partner of the Year Award (2024). These achievements mark its 12th award in eight years, along with the distinction of being recognized by all three cloud giants--Google Cloud, AWS, and Microsoft.