Court case challenges SA's approval of offshore drilling by TotalEnergies
(Chesnot/Getty Images)
A judicial review heard in the Western Cape high court this week has questioned the environmental authorisation process for
The applicants, the
This includes
Their case is focused on the state's decision to grant environmental authorisation to TotalEnergies EP South Africa Block 567 (Pty) Ltd (Teepsa), which permits it to conduct exploratory drilling for fossil fuels off the country's south west coast.
The applicants participated in the process that led to the granting of the environmental authorisation.
The respondents are the minister of forestry, fisheries and the environment and the minister of mineral resources and energy, the director-general of the department of mineral resources and energy as well as Teepsa.
On 17 April 2023, the director-general of the former department of mineral resources and energy granted an environmental authorisation to Teepsa to conduct exploration well drilling in Block 5/6/7. On 24 September 2023, the environment minister dismissed the joint appeal by the applicants against the initial decision.
According to the applicants' heads of argument, the bulk of their review grounds are premised on the final environmental impact assessment report failing to meet the standards imposed by the National Environment Management Act (Nema) and the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act (ICMA).
Specifically, they contend that the decisions to grant the environmental authorisation were unlawful and irrational in six respects.
Among these are that the final environmental impact assessment report failed to properly assess — and the state respondents failed to consider — the socio-economic effects of the proposed project, 'which a well blowout and consequent oil spill will have on the fishing industry and small-scale fishers'.
The applicants argued that the state respondents failed to consider the factors prescribed by the ICMA and failed to properly assess and consider the need and desirability of the proposed project in relation to the climate change impacts, 'which will be caused by burning any gas discovered by the proposed project'.
The state respondents failed to assess and consider the transboundary effects of the proposed project both on Namibia and on international waters. Neither the final environmental impact assessment report, nor the environmental management programme report, included Total's oil spill contingency plan or blow out contingency plan, they argued.
'Accordingly, the final environmental impact assessment report's failure to assess the impacts of an oil spill on fisheries, the factors prescribed by the ICMA, the relevance of climate change impact to the need and desirability of the proposed project, and the transboundary impacts of an oil spill, render the decisions to grant the environmental authorisation unlawful, irrational and unreasonable.'
Although TotalEnergies has since announced its withdrawal from exploration activities in Block 5/6/7, it has now filed a joinder application to include Shell as a party in the legal proceedings.
'The application is made on the basis that Shell holds a commercial interest in the right, and that it will become the exploration operator in the future. However, the Green Connection and Natural Justice oppose this move, arguing the exploration right has lapsed and that Shell has no legal standing in the case.'
Teepsa said in its heads of argument that the applicants have 'conflated the considerations that are only relevant to production operations with the considerations relevant to exploration operations'.
'The information the applicants say should have been placed before the decision-makers was either in fact placed before the decision-makers and considered, or, on a proper scientific approach, is simply not capable of reliable ascertainment at the stage when authorisation is sought for exploration operations.'
The applicants would prefer that no new oil and gas exploration be authorised, it maintained. 'They wish to ensure that the various stakeholders — including the public, the government and those whose skill lies in discovering new sources of energy — remain ignorant of whether South Africa is possessed of hitherto unknown sources of energy.
'That is the essence of their objective. But there is no warrant for this court to assist the applicants in achieving that objective, given its sterilising effect. Ignorance about South Africa's energy options cannot be in the interests of the country or its people.'
The environment minister noted in his heads of argument that, since the 1940s, 358 offshore wells have been drilled in the waters of South Africa for the purposes of oil and gas exploration and production, with no recorded economic losses incurred by fishers as a result of blowouts or oil spill.
The government has also established several measures and legal frameworks to mitigate the risks associated with blowouts and oil spills.
The minister said Nema mandates Teepsa to take reasonable measures to contain oil spills, clean up, remedy effects and assess the effects on the environment and public health.
'Under Nema, Teepsa is obligated to implement measures aimed at preventing, controlling, and minimising blowouts and oil spills. Additionally, Teepsa is responsible for bearing the costs associated with the remediation of blowouts and oil spills that occur during the exploration and production phases of operations.
'The applicants' case is premised on the assumption that there exists no distinction between the environmental impact assessment for the oil and gas exploration phase and production phase and that the final impact assessment report supporting the environmental authorisation also encompasses the oil and gas production phase.'
This assumption is 'erroneous' in both legal and factual contexts, the minister argued. 'The environmental impact assessment for listed activities specifically for the proposed well drillings, [is] restricted solely to oil and gas exploration.'
The scope of the environmental impact assessment for oil and gas exploration encompasses activities such as seismic surveys, exploratory drilling and preliminary geological studies.
'The data available and presented during the exploration phase is comparatively limited due to the uncertainty regarding seafloor conditions. The environmental impacts are minimal due to minor seafloor disturbance and low emissions. If oil and gas reserves are discovered within the block, Teepsa will be obligated to apply for a production right to the minister.
'If Pasa [Petroleum Agency of South Africa] accepts the application, Teepsa is required to apply for the environmental authorisation for listed activities in terms of section 24 of Nema or oil and gas production; consult the interested and affected parties, including the fishing sector and other marine users, and compile another detailed environmental impact assessment report with scientific studies dealing with, inter alia, blowouts and oil spills during the oil and gas production stage.'
The minister stressed that until the oil and gas reserves are discovered in the block, there are no grounds in law or fact to assume that the environmental impact assessment encompasses both the exploration and production phase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
37 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
What role, if any, is South Africa playing in Ukraine peace efforts?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been in direct telephonic contact with all the main players, but it is unclear just how significant a role South Africa can, or will play. Before the big Ukraine war peace summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, 15 August 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa had phone calls last week with the three key players, Putin, Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky – who is, inexplicably, not invited to the Alaska meeting. Were Ramaphosa's calls an indication that he and South Africa have a role to play in trying to end Russia's brutal war on Ukraine, now in its 42nd month? Or was this merely some sort of diplomatic name-dropping? It's clear from the statement by his office that Ramaphosa and Trump mainly discussed tariffs and other aspects of the fraught South Africa-US relationship. Whether they also talked about Trump's peace efforts in Ukraine is unclear. But peace was, of course, the main focus of Ramaphosa's calls with Putin on Thursday, 7 August and Zelensky on 8 August. The Kremlin statement said Putin had shared with Ramaphosa the main results of his conversation the day before in Moscow with Trump's special envoy on the peace process, Steven Witkoff. Putin also complimented the African Peace Initiative, the delegation of Africans which Ramaphosa led in June 2023, meeting Zelensky in Kyiv and Putin in St Petersburg. Ramaphosa's office later said Putin had asked to brief the President on the peace process and had 'expressed his recognition and appreciation for South Africa's involvement in advancing a peace process between Russia and Ukraine'. Call with Zelensky, cryptic statements A day later, Zelensky posted on X that his call with Ramaphosa had been 'a friendly and candid conversation about how to achieve real peace and stop the killings'. He said Ramaphosa had shared details of his conversation with 'the Russian side' (Putin) and was adamant that 'the path to peace must begin with a ceasefire'. Ramaphosa's office said Zelensky 'expressed his appreciation for South Africa's continued support in finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. These statements were rather cryptic. Zelensky and Putin are poles apart on how to end this vicious war, yet both expressed appreciation for Ramaphosa's contributions to peace efforts. So what did Ramaphosa say, what advice, if any, did he give? No one who really knows seems to be saying. Jalel Harchaoui, a political scientist at the Royal United Services Institute, said he believed 'Ramaphosa couldn't possibly have said anything of relevance' in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin. And Ramaphosa's conversations with Zelensky and Putin were probably 'just standard fare', underlining his general narrative that he wants a ceasefire. 'And that does not mean over-concern about Ukraine's territorial integrity or the status of the occupied territories,' said Samuel Ramani, lecturer in politics and international relations at Oxford University (and author of the book, Russia in Africa). 'Moreover, South Africa wants to be seen as supportive of a key Trump initiative to help it deal with the US 30% import tariffs. So I think this is largely routine from him. I wouldn't read too much into it,' he said. Peace talks in SA? One source suggested, however, that a future round of the peace talks starting in Alaska could be held in South Africa. Was this discussed in the phone calls? Dzvinka Kachur, co-founder of the Ukrainian Association in South Africa, noted that Ramaphosa had in the past spoken about the importance of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and so she hoped that he underscored this in his call with Putin. It should also be noted that Zelensky made about 30 calls to international leaders last week to underscore his point that no Ukraine peace negotiations were possible without Ukraine in the room, and that a ceasefire should be unconditional, rather than conditioned on territorial concessions, as the US had initially suggested. And it is understood that Putin also initiated the call to Ramaphosa. Nevertheless Ramaphosa's phone conversations – and there have been others, as well as Zelensky's visit to Pretoria in April and Ramaphosa's in-person meeting with Putin at the BRICS+ summit in Kazan in October 2024 – do prompt the wider question of whether Ramaphosa and South Africa are playing any kind of real role in the Ukraine peace process, and if so what is the contribution, and what should it be? Kachur noted that South Africa was playing a concrete role in the attempts to return some of the about 20,000 Ukrainian children abducted by Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and deported to Russia. When Zelensky met Ramaphosa in Pretoria, he gave him a list of 400 abducted children who South Africa promised to try to return – but with no success and no visible progress so far. African Peace Initiative But Kachur believes there is much South Africa and Ramaphosa could still do for Africa and otherwise. The 2023 African Peace Initiative remained important, not only because of those direct impacts which Ramani mentioned – such as African food insecurity caused by Russia's blockade of Ukraine's grain exports. It also remained important because the Ukraine war also had wider, deeper and longer impacts on principles important to Africa, such as restitution for war damages, accountability for aggression, reframing borders, and the future of the UN system. She also noted that Russia's questionable presence in the Central African Republic, Mali and Niger through the Wagner private security company and its successor, the Africa Corps, had direct negative outcomes for the human rights, safety and security of the continent. 'The illegal, undocumented export of raw materials from these countries also provides Russia with the funding to continue the aggression. This is not bringing any benefits to the continent, but creates more trauma, undocumented weapons and suffering.' And she believes that given its history and role as a champion of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, South Africa could and should be doing more to ensure nuclear safety – which has been jeopardised by Russia's military capture of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Perhaps Ramaphosa was conveying messages in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin, said Steven Gruzd, head of the Africa-Russia project at the South African Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg. 'But I don't think South Africa is playing any major role in peacemaking between Ukraine and Russia. 'I don't see much room and evidence of us being a major peacemaker. 'The African Peace Initiative didn't really go very far. And there was not much follow-up. I don't think the money or the infrastructure has been put behind it to really make it a serious effort.' Gruzd added though that South Africa had also 'taken measures to appear less one-sided (i.e. pro-Russian) in this conflict, the biggest being Zelensky's visit to SA in April'. He thought that South Africa could play a bigger role in the Ukraine peace effort but that would require US support, which could in turn improve its poor relations with Washington. And he noted that South Africa has attended most of Zelensky's international peace formula meetings (which began in 2023) and is working on two points of the formula – returning kidnapped Ukrainian children and exchanging prisoners of war. Denys Reva, researcher at the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, said those meetings still continued at a lower level (mainly, it seems, on the return of the abducted children). And although the African Peace Initiative did not seem to still exist as a formal grouping, South Africa had been engaging in different peace processes, promoting the values of the African peace plan, including advancing African interests and values. For example, at the UN in New York in September 2024, South Africa joined the 'Friends for Peace' group backing the China-Brazil peace plan (which Zelensky strongly opposes because he believes it serves Moscow's interests mainly because it does not demand the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine, as his plan does). Read more: War in Ukraine 'Realistically, no single initiative has yet succeeded in bringing peace,' Reva says. 'Pretoria seems to have shifted its emphasis towards humanitarian concerns, rather than positioning itself as a primary broker of a peace settlement.' He added that 'SA's readiness to mediate the return of the children is an important humanitarian contribution amid stalled negotiations elsewhere. I think Pretoria has been fairly consistent in this regard, and I think that both Kyiv and Moscow probably welcome South African efforts.' And he said both Kyiv and Moscow also see South Africa as crucial in improving their relations with Africa. Ramani said: 'I'm not hearing too much about South Africa being an influential interlocutor.' He added that other countries of the Global South were playing a greater peace role, citing the United Arab Emirates, which he said had hoped to host Friday's summit between Trump and Putin. However, he also added that South Africa was probably doing its best to ensure that the voice of Africa was heard in the Ukraine peace process, and that this was important because the war had significant implications for food security, supply chains and many other things that impacted Africa's socioeconomic development so profoundly. DM
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Civil lobby group MACUA criticised for targeting illegal miners not buyers of illicit materials
JOHANNESBURG - Civil lobby group Mining Affected Communities United in Action (MACUA) has been criticised for only targeting illegal miners and not the buyers of illicit minerals. On Wednesday, the group marched to the offices of the Department of Mineral Resources in five different provinces. Part of their demands to the government is the formalisation of artisanal and small-scale farming. MACUA criticised Operation Vala Umgodi as inhumane. Operation Vala Umgodi is a police strategy to deal with illegal mining by closing the access to the mines and forcing the illegal miners out. However, MACUA's Sabelo Mnguni said police must take into account that the majority of illegal miners are desperate, unemployed young people. 'The concern that we are having is we are only seeing the zama zama's or the workers, those who are underground or undocumented. We haven't seen any arrests in the supply chain itself. We want it to cut across, including the kingpins.' Police have previously mentioned they have a multi-disciplinary approach to illegal mining, with the Hawks responsible for catching the buyers of illicit minerals.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Calls are growing for the legalisation of artisanal mining by communities around mining towns
JOHANNESBURG - There are growing calls for the legalisation of artisanal mining by communities living in and around mining towns. On Wednesday, civil group Mining Affected Communities United in Action (MACUA) held a coordinated march across five provinces to the Department of Mineral Resources' offices. They submitted their inputs to the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill. Among other things, the draft Mineral Resources Development Bill aims to formalise artisanal and small-scale mining through a licensing regime. MACUA believes formalising artisanal mining will assist many people living near mining towns. The group's Sabelo Mnguni said, "When it comes to mining, once mining ceases to operate, we are left without an economy, and the only economy in the community is mining, whether formal or informal. So in the absence of formal employment, the informal economy becomes the order of the day, which includes mining, and informal mining becomes the order of the day.' Mnguni said the formalisation of artisanal mining will also assist in dealing with illegal mining and its accompanied dangers.
