US Olympic & Paralympic Committee bars transgender women from competing in women's sports
The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) has updated its policy to align with an executive order signed earlier this year by U.S. President Donald Trump barring transgender women from competing in women's sports.
"The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act," the USOPC said in an update to its Athlete Safety Policy.
The USOPC did not respond to a request for comment on the change.
USOPC President Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland referenced Trump's executive order in a memo to the Team USA community sent out this week, ABC News reported, which said, "As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations."
Trump signed the "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" order in February in a bid to exclude transgender girls and women from female sports, a directive that supporters said will restore fairness but critics argue it infringes on the rights of a tiny minority of athletes.
The order directs the Department of Justice to make sure all government agencies enforce a ban on transgender girls and women from participating in female school sports under Trump's interpretation of Title IX, a law against sex discrimination in education.
Trump's order goes beyond high school and college sports, calling for the U.S. government to deny visas for transgender females seeking to compete in the United States.
Trump also said he would not allow transgender athletes to compete in the Los Angeles Olympics in 2028.
The executive order instructed the State Department to pressure the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to change its policy, which allows trans athletes to compete under general guidance preventing any athlete from gaining an unfair advantage.
The order is expected to affect only a small number of athletes.
The president of the National Collegiate Athletics Association told a Senate panel in December he was aware of fewer than 10 transgender athletes among the 530,000 competing at 1,100 member schools. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Indonesian military's new pharma role sparks fears of expanded powers
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has expanded the powerful military's role in civic affairs since taking office in 2024. JAKARTA - Indonesia's military will begin manufacturing medicines for public distribution under a new agreement, officials said on July 22, in the latest expansion of the armed forces' role in civilian affairs since President Prabowo Subianto took office. The president, a former defence minister and special forces commander, has expanded the powerful military's role in civic affairs since taking office in 2024 – including running much of his flagship project to serve free school meals . In March, Parliament, dominated by Mr Prabowo's coalition, also passed a revision to military law that allows more civilian posts to be occupied by soldiers , sparking protests by student and activist groups. The moves have dismantled some of the safeguards put in place after authoritarian leader Suharto was overthrown in 1998 and raised fears of a return to an era when the armed forces were allowed to crush dissent and dominate public life. Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin late on July 22 signed an agreement with the food and drug agency for laboratories operated by the army, navy, and air force, which previously supplied medicines for soldiers, to begin manufacturing drugs for public use. 'We are thinking of ways to lower the price even more so we could provide free medicines,' Mr Sjafrie told reporters. Mass production will begin in October and the medicines will be distributed to villages across Indonesia at 50 per cent below the retail price, he said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore S'pore's domestic recycling rate drops to all time low of 11% Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Youth Courts will take a new approach to cases, focused on underlying issues and supporting needs Life The Projector will resume daily screenings at Golden Mile Tower. Is its Cineleisure exit next? Singapore Ex-Tanjong Pagar United footballer charged with assault after Jurong East Stadium match Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024 Asia Japan Prime Minister Ishiba to resign by August, Mainichi newspaper reports Life New Pokemon theme park to open in Japan in early 2026 Military involvement is expected to curb the flow of illegal medicines and fight the 'mafia' in the medical industry, said the drug agency's head Taruna Ikrar. But rights groups have said that the agreement was unlawful as it brought serving military officials into civilian business positions – prohibited under military law. 'This is a symptom of how the government has shifted into authoritarianism,' said Mr Usman Hamid from Amnesty International Indonesia. The military and Mr Prabowo's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The medicines will be distributed by 80,000 state-backed cooperatives launched by Mr Prabowo on July 21, Mr Sjafrie said. Mr Prabowo's cooperatives were set up to boost economic activity and cut out middlemen by providing services directly to the general public, including giving loans and selling medicines and staple foods. The defence minister has also signed another agreement with the health ministry to build hospitals staffed by military doctors and nurses in conflict areas, including Papua province, where a low-level insurgency has battled for independence for decades. REUTERS
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Xhaka too important for Leverkusen to let go, Ten Hag says
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Granit Xhaka is a key figure for Bayer Leverkusen and the Bundesliga side cannot afford to let the Swiss midfielder leave, manager Erik ten Hag said amid reports linking him to a move to Sunderland. Leverkusen have already lost playmaker Florian Wirtz and defender Jeremie Frimpong to Premier League champions Liverpool, while centre back Jonathan Tah has moved to Bayern Munich. Former Arsenal man Xhaka has been linked with a move to Sunderland, with his agent telling German media the 32-year-old Switzerland skipper has an agreement in principle with the newly-promoted Premier League club. "The agent can say anything. But this club has already lost three important players," Ten Hag told German media on Tuesday. "We won't let any more players go, that's not possible. That would neglect the structure and also the culture of the squad. "It's clear — Granit is a leader, he has signed here for five years and has three years left on his contract. He's too important for us to let him go." Xhaka helped Leverkusen secure the double in the 2023-24 season as they lifted their first Bundesliga title without losing a game, won the German Cup and reached the Europa League final. He has made 99 appearances for Leverkusen, scoring six goals and registering nine assists. Former Manchester United manager Ten Hag replaced Xabi Alonso in May after the Spaniard left to manage his former club Real Madrid. REUTERS
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump piles up trade deals as Asian countries, under tariff threats, agree to open up to American goods
Find out what's new on ST website and app. US President Donald Trump with Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, on Feb 7. AUSTIN – It's no easy feat to catch Washington's formidable trade lobbies and relentless, scoop-hungry journalists off guard. Yet on July 22, US President Donald Trump managed to do exactly that. On a day when experts and analysts were poised to dissect a potential deal with the Philippines, awaited after President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's visit to the White House, Mr Trump blindsided everyone by announcing a 'massive' deal with Japan. 'We just completed a massive deal with Japan, perhaps the largest deal ever made,' he said on his social media platform Truth Social. 'Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 billion dollars into the United States, which will receive 90 per cent of the profits. This deal will create hundreds of thousands of jobs - There has never been anything like it,' he added. US$550 billion is S$703 billion. Confirmed by Japan's chief negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, the deal slashes US tariffs on imports from Asia's second-largest economy to 15 per cent, well below the 25 per cent threat that loomed after the July 9 tariff pause ended. Japan will also accede to a key White House demand and open its market to American cars, trucks, rice and certain other agricultural products. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore S'pore's domestic recycling rate drops to all time low of 11% Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Youth Courts will take a new approach to cases, focused on underlying issues and supporting needs Life The Projector will resume daily screenings at Golden Mile Tower. Is its Cineleisure exit next? Singapore Ex-Tanjong Pagar United footballer charged with assault after Jurong East Stadium match Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024 Asia Japan Prime Minister Ishiba to resign by August, Mainichi newspaper reports Life New Pokemon theme park to open in Japan in early 2026 In a win for Japan's powerful carmakers, their exports to the US will attract lower tariffs of 15 per cent from the current 25 per cent. The announcement stole the thunder from the Philippines deal, which had been previewed only hours earlier on Truth Social. Mr Trump said the Philippines exports to the US will be subject to a 19 per cent tariff - higher than the 17 per cent initially proposed in April but lower than the 20 per cent threatened earlier in July. In contrast, the Philippines will levy zero tariffs on US goods. Threaten steep tariffs to make others buy more and invest more On the same day, further details emerged on the July 16 agreement with Indonesia, South-east Asia's largest economy. Key provisions included the elimination of nearly all Indonesian tariffs on US goods and a 19 per cent US tariff on Indonesian exports, with certain goods containing content from 'nonmarket economies', read China, to be tariffed at 40 per cent. It was also agreed that Indonesia would provide critical minerals to the US and would purchase Boeing aircraft and American farm products. Such details are still missing from the first deal struck by the Trump administration with a South-east Asian nation, Vietnam, in early July. While negotiations are reportedly still underway, Mr Trump's July 2 Truth Social post revealed key terms of the Vietnam deal, including a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese imports to the US and a 40 per cent tariff on transshipped goods, in exchange for Hanoi's commitment to eliminate all tariffs on American exports. Within the span of a month, thus, the White House has unveiled deals not only with Asia's second-largest economy but also with three key Asean economies. For the Asian partners yet to strike deals, such as India and Singapore, these deals set a precedent and create pressure to negotiate similar terms to avoid punitive tariffs and maintain strong trade relations with the US. High-level talks between the US and South Korea talks are scheduled for July 25, with Seoul considering politically sensitive concessions, for example in agriculture and autos, to avert steep US tariffs, which currently stand at 25 per cent but have been postponed to Aug 1. As part of a broader US effort to reset global trade relationships, it would seem that Mr Trump's aggressive tariff strategy is delivering some visible results. All four deals share a common goal: opening markets to American goods to cut trade deficits and support domestic industries. Two other trends are also clear: Mr Trump's steep tariff threats have been effective, and despite falling short of the promised 90 deals in 90 days, analysts are noting a surprising surge in agreements. 'I was very surprised to hear this deal announced today,' Dr William Chou, the deputy director of Hudson Institute's Japan Chair, told The Straits Times. The US$550 billion on top of Japan's current US$860 billion foreign direct investment in the US would make Japan the top investor in the US, head and shoulders above any other country, he noted. Will there be purchase, investment agreements in deal with China? The deals with Asian partners have also attracted the notice of those monitoring US-China trade. 'There was a lot of attention on what would come out of these deals, especially (with) Vietnam, on transshipment and rules of origin. Unfortunately, the devil is in the details and we don't have any details,' said a source who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he advises American companies engaged in business with China. But the Japan agreement signals that the US is expecting purchase agreements in trade deals and that has high significance for a highly anticipated visit to China by Mr Trump, he added. During a press conference alongside Mr Marcos, Mr Trump hinted at a visit to China 'not too far into the future' to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. But no firm date has been set yet and Chinese imports could be subject to tariffs higher than 50 per cent unless new agreements are reached. 'Many of us are wondering if there will be a focus on purchase agreements similar to phase one trade deal with China in Trump's first term.' The huge investment component in the Japan deal has also sparked the idea that a deal with Beijing might involve large investment commitments from China. 'President Trump in the Oval Office has welcomed Chinese investment in the US. This is obviously in contrast to the hawks in his administration and in Congress, but Trump is ultimately the one that determines China policy,' said the source. However, Dr Chou said a direct geopolitical implication of the flurry of trade deals - with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, and likely soon South Korea - is expected to be for China. He said it meant that China can no longer use trade as a wedge issue between the US and Indo-Pacific countries. 'Given the White House's desire to negotiate a good deal with China - and in the wake of China's use of rare earths as economic coercion in the past few months - these trade deals by the White House strengthen Washington's negotiation position with Beijing,' Dr Chou noted. 'I think the administration's demonstration of its priorities, the 10 per cent baseline and long-term frameworks for balanced trade, have become increasingly clear to trading partners,' he said. 'Combined with Trump's willingness to live with tariffs, and the news of customs duties of US$27 billion last month, it provided impetus for trading partners to strike a trade deal,' he added. Customs duties fetched about US$27 billion in June, three times higher than in the same month of 2024, after Mr Trump levied across-the-board 10 per cent tariffs on imports in April on top of other selective duties. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled US$113 billion, rise of 86 per cent over last year. Minimising imports doesn't augur well for any economy Less impressed was Mr Frank Lavin, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a veteran trade negotiator and former ambassador to Singapore. 'It is hard to fully understand Trump's ultimate goals because at times he talks about the trade balance, at times he talks about reciprocity of tariff rates, at times he talks about re-shoring American manufacturing, and at times he talks about increasing tariff revenue to the US Government,' Mr Lavin said. 'There are any number of contradictions among those four goals,' he said. For instance, if the goal of high tariffs is to boost US manufacturing by disincentivising imports, tariff revenues will fall in tandem with declining imports. It seems that his over-riding goal is a form of mercantilism, attaining greater market access for US firms, and reducing market access to foreign firms. 'It is not clear how this will help the US economy,' he said. Economists believe that maximising exports while minimising imports in an interconnected global marketplace does not augur well for any economy, regardless of its size. Such policies risk economic inefficiency, trade wars and shortchange consumers.
