logo
I fled Iran as a child. Regime change will come only when the world allows it.

I fled Iran as a child. Regime change will come only when the world allows it.

USA Today25-06-2025
Iranians have risen again and again. They've paid with their lives. But the Islamic Republic remains strategically protected and diplomatically tolerated by other countries.
'Why haven't Iranians freed themselves?' is a cruel question with a cruel answer.
For 46 years, Iranians, like me and my family, have lived under the brutal grip of the Islamic Republic. We've been tortured, executed, silenced and disappeared.
And yet, the world too often asks: Why haven't Iranians freed themselves? As if liberation is a matter of will. As if courage alone could dismantle a regime that's not only authoritarian – but also propped up by global powers salivating over Iran's oil and strategic leverage.
My family and I got out – but Iran was never far from our lives. In an Iranian household, politics isn't distant – it's part of everyday dinner conversation. On Monday June 23, when Evin Prison – known grimly as 'Evin University' – was bombed amid the escalating conflict, I couldn't stop thinking about the time my father was behind those bars.
Just over the weekend, the United States had entered the war, striking Iranian nuclear sites and then attempting to hold a fragile ceasefire.
We fled Iran when I was 6 years old and settled in Sweden, where I grew up. But the memories – and the impact – never left us.
More than 20 years ago, I moved to the United States, became a licensed psychotherapist and later founded Iran House, a nonprofit supporting survivors of torture and political repression. This work isn't theoretical – it comes from lived experience. From witnessing what this regime does to people, to communities, to entire generations.
Iranians are caught in psychological vise
Because of my history, I know Iran is not just a dictatorship. It is a dictatorship backed by geopolitical interests. A regime that has made itself useful to the West, to the East and to every government that finds value in suppressing Iran's freedom for the sake of their own economic or military gains.
The Islamic Republic is not just brutal – it is Machiavellian. It funds terror and negotiates peace, silences dissent and plays victim – weaponizing both its suffering and its influence. It is a master of moral disengagement, using every tool – whether virtuous or vile – to survive. So the Iranian people are caught in a psychological vise. They are blamed for not breaking free while every exit has been bolted shut.
I survived war in Iran. These US bombs feel eerily familiar. | Opinion
From a trauma-informed lens, this is textbook coercive control – a term used to describe abusers who isolate their victims, cut off their resources, surveil their every move and convince the outside world that the problem is the victim, not the abuser.
Sound familiar?
Judith Herman, in her groundbreaking book "Trauma and Recovery," explains that prolonged captivity – whether in an abusive relationship or under political tyranny – creates a state of learned helplessness, not because the victim lacks strength, but because every attempt at resistance has been punished with more violence.
This is not unique to Iran. We've seen it in North Korea, where generations live in total information control. In Belarus, where protesters vanish without a trace. In Syria, where democratic uprisings were drowned in blood. Even in Saudi Arabia, where the facade of reform masks the reality of state murder.
More than 10 Iranian uprisings, answered by more brutality
How do you rise when the world trades your freedom for oil? How do you scream when your throat has been crushed – and then you're told you're silent?
Iranians have risen again and again. Not once, not twice but more than 10 times. The first was in 1979, when women demonstrated against the mandatory hijab. The most recent was in 2022.
In between, there have been countless protests, executions and disappearances. People paid with their lives. And while they've fought on the front lines, the regime has continued to profit.
Iran is ranked third globally in oil reserves and second in natural gas. On paper, it should be a wealthy country – an energy giant with the potential to offer prosperity to its citizens.
And yet, millions of Iranians live below the poverty line. Basic goods are unaffordable.
The inflation rate hovers near 50%, crushing families – even those once considered middle class. And the economic despair is not just mismanagement – it's deliberate. The Islamic Republic keeps its people poor, exhausted and distracted because desperation weakens resistance.
You can't fight for freedom when you're worrying about how to feed your child. You can't rise up when the cost of bread doubles overnight.
According to Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, until people have food, safety and shelter, they can't focus on freedom, dignity or self-actualization. That's why asking, 'Why haven't Iranians freed themselves?' without acknowledging starvation-level inflation and state violence is not only unfair – it's psychologically ignorant.
Take our poll: Do you agree or disagree with Trump's decision to bomb Iran? Tell us. | Opinion Forum
Countries are strategically protecting the regime
The exodus of Iran's brightest minds isn't accidental. It's engineered. By fostering despair, criminalizing dissent and making daily life unbearable, the regime drives out its most capable citizens on purpose.
The brains of the country have either fled, are behind bars or have been silenced into submission. This benefits Western economies, which absorb Iranian doctors, artists, engineers and scientists – turning them into assets for the very countries that looked away when they bled. Meanwhile, inside Iran, the regime is left with fewer challengers and even greater control.
What made peaceful liberation possible for some nations was not just courage. It was timing, pressure and cracks in the system – when the world finally stopped protecting those regimes.
Iran's regime remains unbroken – not because Iranians lack courage, but because it has been strategically protected, economically enriched and diplomatically tolerated. Its survival is a business model – for the East, the West and everyone in between – while the Iranian people have been isolated, exiled and condemned.
So again, the question is not 'Why haven't Iranians freed themselves?'
The real question is: Why has the world made sure they can't?
Azadeh Afsahi is a licensed psychotherapist, PhD candidate in psychology and founder of Iran House, a nonprofit for survivors of torture and political repression.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran Issues New Threat to US
Iran Issues New Threat to US

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iran Issues New Threat to US

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran's top commanders have issued a new warning to the United States and Israel, vowing a far stronger and more punishing counterstrike if either launches new attacks against the Islamic republic. The threat came during a high-profile meeting in Tehran on Tuesday between Iran's senior military officials and South Africa's defense chief, part of a growing alignment rooted in shared opposition to what they call global arrogance and colonialism. Newsweek has reached out the U.S. State Department and Iran's Foreign Ministry for comment. Why It Matters Tehran's latest statement signals a firmer military posture after the 12-day U.S. and Israeli offensive in June that had targeted Iran's military infrastructure and nuclear sites. While Iran frames its warnings as a measure to deter future attacks, the U.S. and its allies view Iran's intensifying rhetoric as likely to heighten regional tensions. Observers say the potential for further escalation could have broader implications, affecting not only Middle East security but also global energy markets and international diplomatic efforts. Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Army Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi speaks during a rally outside the former US embassy in the capital Tehran on November 4, 2019, to mark the 40th anniversary of the Iran hostage... Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Army Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi speaks during a rally outside the former US embassy in the capital Tehran on November 4, 2019, to mark the 40th anniversary of the Iran hostage crisis. MoreWhat To Know "The Iranian armed forces are prepared to give a harsher response to any fresh Israeli or U.S. act of aggression," Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, Iran's armed forces chief of staff, told South African General Rudzani Maphwanya, according to state media. In response to the Israeli and U.S. airstrikes on Iranian targets in June, Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel and later fired ballistic missiles at U.S. military bases in Iraq and Qatar, dealing limited damage to the latter. The Israel-Iran missile exchange, however, caused heavy casualties and infrastructure damage on both sides: Iran reported over 1,000 civilian deaths, while Israel confirmed 28 fatalities from Iranian strikes. The conflict concluded with a ceasefire, though both nations have emphasized their readiness to act if tensions escalate again. Chief of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), General Rudzani Maphwanya (L) and Chief of Logistics, Vice Admiral David Maningi Mkhonto (R) stand at attention during a military parade at Thaba Tshwane Military Sports... Chief of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), General Rudzani Maphwanya (L) and Chief of Logistics, Vice Admiral David Maningi Mkhonto (R) stand at attention during a military parade at Thaba Tshwane Military Sports Club in Pretoria, on November 29, 2024. MoreIran-South Africa Ties Iranian officials used Tuesday's meeting to reinforce ties with South Africa, praising the country's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice as "courageous" and consistent with Tehran's stance on Gaza. Discussions centered on intelligence sharing, joint defense projects and an offer to South Africa to access Iranian military expertise, state media reported. Trump's Warning Last week, President Donald Trump credited his administration with preventing wars in the Middle East by confronting Iran. "We have stopped wars in the Middle East by stopping Iran from having a nuclear weapon," he said, referring to the June bombing. He warned Tehran against restarting its program. "That's a very dangerous thing for them to do, because we'll be back as soon as they start," said Trump, who called Iran a "perpetrator of hate" and "a very evil place." He said Iran would be "a lot different in the coming years," without elaborating. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington, as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington, as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on. Alex Brandon/AP Photo What People Are Saying Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces: "The Iranian armed forces are prepared to give a harsher response to any fresh Israeli or U.S. act of aggression." General Rudzani Maphwanya, chief of the South African National Defense Force: "The Republic of South Africa and the Islamic Republic of Iran have common goals. We always stand alongside the oppressed and defenseless people of the world." What Happens Next Iran's military leaders have signaled their missile forces remain fully prepared, warning that any future U.S. or Israeli military action could prompt an even more punishing retaliation—an escalation with consequences far beyond the region.

European powers threaten 'snapback sanctions' if Iran doesn't return to nuclear talks
European powers threaten 'snapback sanctions' if Iran doesn't return to nuclear talks

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

European powers threaten 'snapback sanctions' if Iran doesn't return to nuclear talks

France, the U.K. and Germany have told the United Nations they support reinstating snapback sanctions on Iran, if it doesn't re-enter dialogue with the West over its nuclear program, according to reporting by the Financial Times. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," ministers of the three countries — using an acronym that describes the European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal — said in a letter obtained by the FT. The reported letter was delivered to the U.N. Security Council and U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres two months after Israel and the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities over the course of a 12-day conflict that set regional tensions and energy prices soaring. CNBC was not able to immediately verify the report and has contacted the Iranian foreign ministry and mission to the UN for comment. 'Snapback' sanctions are part of a mechanism that was built into the original 2015 Iranian nuclear deal — formally titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the JCPOA. The deal removed a number of sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs to its nuclear program. They were designed to act as a guardrail: if Iran commits a "significant non-performance" of the deal, any of the JCPOA signatory countries can trigger the automatic reimposition of U.N. sanctions lifted under the agreement, and no other permanent member can veto it. The EU said in mid-July that it would start the process of reinstating UN sanctions on Tehran from Aug. 29 if it does not make sufficient progress on limiting its nuclear program. Those sanctions are set to expire on October 18 unless one of the remaining parties of the deal — Russia, China, or a member of the E3 — triggers the snapback option. "'Snapback' looks set to be the word of the summer in European negotiations with Iran," Ellie Geranmayeh, Deputy Director, Middle East and North Africa program at the European Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in a July report. The consequences for Iran could be dire and could once more spike tensions and the possibility of conflict. Iranian officials have suggested the country could withdraw from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) if those sanctions are reimposed. For its part, Tehran has said that it remains open to direct talks with the U.S. once more, but stopped short of accepting the terms to abandon its uranium enrichment program. The sixth round of talks with the U.S. was dropped after Israel and the U.S. began bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in mid-June. Iran's economy has deteriorated dramatically in the years since Trump in 2018 withdrew the U.S. from the JCPOA. Trump has made is abundantly clear that he will not accept a nuclear-armed Iran. The stakes have been raised in recent years: in the time since Trump withdrew from the deal, Iran has been enriching and stockpiling uranium at its highest levels ever, prompting the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, to issue numerous warnings. Tehran insists that its program is for civilian energy purposes only, but Iran's nuclear enrichment has reached 60% purity, according to the IAEA — dramatically higher than the enrichment limit posited in the 2015 nuclear deal, and a short technical step from the weapons-grade purity level of 90%.

Controversial Princeton prof with Iran ties steps down amid criticism from dissidents, senators
Controversial Princeton prof with Iran ties steps down amid criticism from dissidents, senators

New York Post

time13 hours ago

  • New York Post

Controversial Princeton prof with Iran ties steps down amid criticism from dissidents, senators

A controversial Princeton professor with strong ties to the Iranian regime has quietly stepped down from the Ivy League school, following a campaign from dissidents to remove him. Seyed Hossein Mousavian, a Middle East security and nuclear policy specialist, retired from his position after 15 years as the head of the school's Program on Science and Global Security on June 1, according to an announcement listing retiring employees on Princeton's website. The professor is controversial for being heavily involved in Iran's chemical and nuclear programs beginning in 2004, long before the country was known to have been building up its nuclear arsenal, according to Swiss journalist Bruno Schirra. Advertisement 4 Seyed Hossain Mousavian, an Iranian security specialist, quietly stepped down from Princeton University after 15 years and amid a federal crackdown on alleged antisemitism at the school. Getty Images The move comes amid the news Princeton could lose more than $200 million in grants from the Trump administration for not tackling antisemitism on campus, The Post has learned. Iranian opposition activists as well as Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz, a Princeton alumnus, had long urged the school to fire Mousavian. Advertisement 4 The Trump administration reportedly paused the payment of more than $200 million in grants. to the Ivy League school amid allegations of antisemitism. LightRocket via Getty Images 'It's a victory, but one has to wonder if he's staying behind the scenes somehow,' said Lawdan Bazargan, a former political prisoner in Iran, a human rights activist and member of the US-based Alliance Against Islamic Regime of Iran Apologists. The group has waged a two-year campaign to get the university to ditch Mousavian. 'We exposed the truth,' the group said in a press release last week. 'Mousavian is not a neutral scholar but a former ambassador of the [Islamic Republic of Iran] who defended the fatwas to kill author Salman Rushdie. Advertisement 4 Former Iranian Kurdish leader Sadiq Sharafkindi (left) and Nuri Dehkordi were two of the four opposition politicians killed in the Berlin restaurant Mykonos in 1992, while Mousavian was Iranian ambassador to Germany. Associated Press Shirin Ebadi, a former Iranian judge who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, has also previously accused Mousavian of supporting the fatwa. Before being hired by Princeton in 2009, Mousavian had also worked as a diplomat and editor of the Tehran Times, the English-language newspaper which is a mouthpiece for the regime. Mousavian was also Iran's ambassador to Germany in 1992 when four dissidents were murdered in the back of a restaurant in Berlin. Advertisement The group of dissidents which campaigned to get him fired from Princeton has previously alleged when Mousavian was ambassador to Germany, 23 Iranians were killed in Europe for being enemies of the mullahs. In 1997, a German court concluded that the Iranian leadership, including the foreign ministry, masterminded the murders and that the headquarters for plotting them was the Iranian embassy, but did not name Mousavian. During the trial, German newspaper Tagesspiegel reported a former Iranian spy, Abolghasem Mesbahi, said under oath, 'Mousavian was involved in most of the crimes that took place in Europe. 4 Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad tours a nuclear facility in 2008. The country's nuclear program is much older than many Western intelligence sources had predicted. AP 'Specifically, in Germany, it concerns the crimes that were committed against Iranian opposition members.' Following the trial Mousavian was called back to Tehran. Mousavian, whose Princeton email address is still active and who is still prominently featured on the school's website, did not return a request for comment Tuesday. He wrote of his retirement on Twitter: 'After 15 years of service at Princeton University, I retired at my own request at the end of May 2025. Advertisement 'I am deeply grateful to the university officials for their support and especially for their commitment to freedom of expression.' The retirement coincides with the imminent publication of a 2004 interview with Mousavian by Schirra. The interview, which is now being published by the Middle East Research Institute, a US-based nonprofit that studies extremism, suggests Iran's nuclear program was secretly active for decades before Western intelligence sources warned of its existence. Advertisement 'After Iraq's attack [in 1980], we announced our defensive chemical and nuclear programs,' said Mousavian in the interview, who was then deputy of Iran's National Security Council. In April, Cruz urged the school to fire Mousavian, saying: 'His presence at Princeton makes students feel justifiably afraid for their safety.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store