'90s Action Movie Star, 73, Is Unrecognizable in Rare Public Appearance
Actor Stephen Seagal is undoubtedly one of the greatest action movie stars of all time. From Above the Law to Hard to Kill and Out for Justice, he proved himself to be one of the biggest bad asses in showbiz.
His most well-known movies are Under Siege and Under Siege 2: Dark Territory, where he played Navy SEAL, Casey Ryback.
However, his acting days are now behind him, and fans won't believe just how different he looks today.
Seagal was spotted attending the Russian Victory Day military parade in Moscow on May 9th.
There were mixed reactions from people who saw the clip, as it's no secret that Seagal has been a controversial subject for many years. He was granted Russian citizenship in 2016, and he's also a known supporter of president Vladimir Putin.
While many people left comments stating simple things like, "Respect 💪," others made it perfectly clear that they are no longer fans of the actor.
One person said, "I'm not a fan of you anymore," and another made a bold statement, saying, "Steve Seagal is a spy from Russia 🤔"One thing's for sure, Seagal looks absolutely nothing like he did in his Casey Ryback days. He was quite the heartthrob back then.
And who could ever forget this iconic flick?
🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK looks to military gap years to boost recruitment in the face of growing geopolitical tension
The UK government recently endorsed proposals in its strategic defence review to consider the creation of military gap years for young people in the UK. It would potentially be similar to a scheme offered by the Australian Defence Force. Young Australian citizens can spend 12 months doing paid work in a variety of roles in the Navy, Army or Air Force. In Australia in 2023, 664 young people enlisted in the gap year programme, and 374 of these transferred on to a role in the permanent Australian Defence Force. Like in Australia, the gap year model in the UK would be optional and for over 18s to get a 'taste' of military life. These gap years would be a part of recruitment strategy. The proposal comes at a time of global geopolitical crisis, national youth unemployment and a shortage of soldiers (a global problem). Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Another key reason for the introduction of these gap years, highlighted in defence secretary John Healey's oral statement on the review, is to 'reconnect the nation with those who defend us'. Keir Starmer, in his speech, spoke of 'a new spirit of service, flowing from every part of society … everyone benefiting, everyone playing their role'. Young people are seen as a key part of building these connections. Another avenue raised in the review is to increase the number of cadet forces, a voluntary uniformed national youth organisation for teenagers that can also be linked to schools. An evaluation of cadet forces in the UK has outlined significant positive outcomes for young people, including for their employment and career prospects. The strategic defence review also proposed 'working with the Department for Education to develop understanding of the armed forces among young people in schools', but details of this are still unclear. These suggestions form part of a trend towards increasing military presence in children and young people's lives. My research has found that, over the last decade, successive UK governments have encouraged programmes with a military ethos within schools and character education to foster grit and gumption. My research shows that calls to reintroduce some form of military service appear at times of political, social or economic crisis. It's not surprising then, that in the last few years we have seen several proposals in this area. Most notable is previous prime minister Rishi Sunak's election pledge in 2024 that school leavers would have to do a year of compulsory military or voluntary service. A voluntary gap year – national service 'lite' – would be a more palatable approach compared to formal conscription, which is still active in several countries. Starmer has been keen to distance himself from the language of national service, especially as he has also committed to introducing votes at 16: compulsory national service doesn't poll well with young people. The UK has also recently scrapped its voluntary National Citizen Service, a non-military, short-term youth programme centred on local community action that has cost over £1.5 billion since 2010. But the fact that two successive prime ministers in the space of one year have pitched some form of military experience for school leavers tells us that this is not necessarily about benefits for youth, but about the concerning geopolitical landscape and the urgent need to boost recruits. In 2025 compared to the last few decades, the state's concern is less about youth crime, apathy or patriotism, but rather growing international security threats and the nation's preparedness. It is important to remember that the debate about national service in the UK is fuelled by generational nostalgia. In the UK, formal national service ran from the late 1940s to early 1960s for men aged between 17 and 21. Ever since those final troops were discharged in 1963, there has been a debate about 'returning' to national service. Research shows that those who were actually part of compulsory national service after the second world war generally don't think we should bring it back. This debate is cyclical, and each time it happens, it reveals what the state and adults think about young people more generally, usually shaped by moral panics. Given the current economic climate, it could be that a paid short-term year of military service is more attractive to UK teenagers and their CVs than ever before. However, we must reflect on why it might be so attractive in the present moment and understand the wider, structural issues shaping the lives of children and young people today. The costs of austerity and inequality in the UK run deep for children and young people. These issues cannot be solved by a defence focused gap year and there are other pressing demands to support young people in this country. For example, youth sector representatives are urging the UK government to reverse the long-term decline in funding on youth services. The impetus for a military gap year in the report is strategic defence, not unemployment. But there is no guarantee the defence sector itself will be keen to embrace this idea. When Sunak proposed national service last year, defence experts and ministers raised concerns about the British Army and Navy's current capacity and resources to deliver such a programme. They also highlighted the potential impact of such a scheme on the morale of professional, dedicated and highly-skilled force personnel. The actual feasibility of any new programme is uncertain, especially with the current fiscal situation. One thing my research suggests is certain though, is that this national debate will circle back around again and again. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Sarah Mills has received research funding from UKRI (ESRC), the British Academy and the Royal Geographical Society. She is currently an unpaid member of the advisory 'College of Experts' group of researchers for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (UK Government)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pianists from across the world go for glory at international competition
The world's best young classical piano players are going for glory at an international piano competition in Texas this week. The Van Cliburn International Piano Competition is named for the famed American concert pianist. The competition, held every four years, is considered by some to be the Olympics of the piano world, pitting young pianists from across the globe against each other in a two and a half week event. According to the competition's website, this year had 340 applicants. Only 28 were invited to compete. Six competitors are this year's finalists. Far from home, some find support in their host families in Fort Worth, Texas, who have a front row seat to the music in their homes. Dr. Stephen and Michelle Maberry were a host family for 23-year-old Yanjun Chen, who made it to the semifinals of the competition this year. Practice sessions — sometimes a few hours long — became personal concerts and turned everyday chores into a sweet serenade. "Oh my gosh, it's wonderful. We love the arts. We love the music and so waking up to hearing that or late night hearing it is fantastic," said Michelle Maberry. For David Maberry, the couple's son, the musical alarm clock seemed like a fairy tale. "I wake up and the light is coming through my blinds and it feels like a Disney movie when I wake up in the morning (with this music playing) … it's amazing," he said. Competitors like Chen keep busy schedules, packed with practice time. "I try to pick sections that are difficult then try to practice them slowly and then get to a normal tempo or just imagining that I'm performing just running through the piece helps too," she said. When Chen isn't rehearsing, she spends time with her host family and plays music to relax. "The mom just comes out in you … you just want to nurture them and take care of them and help them and do whatever it takes to help them succeed," Michelle Maberry said. Chen's emotional performance in the first round drew a standing ovation from the crowd. When she stepped off of the stage, Chen signed autographs and spoke with concertgoers before the Maberrys rushed to greet her. "I was probably more nervous for her that she was," Michelle Maberry admitted. "I said you're going to do great. Good vibes, positive energy, and you know what? She knocked it out of the ball park." While Chen's Van Cliburn journey ended in the semifinals, her passion as a pianist will continue. For the Maberry family, the music she left in their home will echo for years to come. Sneak peek: Where is Jermain Charlo? Hegseth orders Navy to rename USNS Harvey Milk, Jeffries calls it "a complete and total disgrace" FEMA, Trump administration react to sources saying chief did not know U.S. had a hurricane season
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Naval Ship Honoring Harvey Milk Is Getting a Name Change. Several Others Could Be Next
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." 1930–1978 The USNS Harvey Milk tanker ship is on the verge of receiving a new name, sparking intense reactions from some political figures. According to a report, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the ship, which has honored the late gay rights activist and his military service since its launch in November 2021. A memorandum obtained by CBS showed that vessels named after other noteworthy figures—including Thurgood Marshall, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harriet Tubman, and Dolores Huerta—have also been requested for review. The act of renaming a Navy ship is very rare and considered partially taboo. The most recent occurrence was in 2023, when the USS Chancellorsville and research ship USNS Maury received new monikers. Both names were tied to the Confederacy. The timing of the proposed change is notable, as June is Pride Month in the United States. The honorary month dates back to 1970 when the initial LGBTQ Pride marches took place on the first anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising. Democratic lawmakers criticized the decision to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calling it 'an utter abomination in terms of the extreme MAGA Republican effort to continue to erase American history, and we're not going to allow it to happen.' Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer reacted in a post to X, formerly Twitter, saying Hegseth should immediately reverse the decision. Gay rights activist and community leader Harvey Milk made history in January 1978 when he became one of the first openly gay public officials in the United States. He served on San Francisco's Board of Supervisors. Prior to his political career, the native New Yorker had served in the U.S. Navy and worked in a variety of industries before settling in San Francisco and opening a camera shop. His life and his political career came to an untimely end when he was fatally shot in November 1978 at age 48. Numerous books and movies have been made about the politician, including the Oscar-winning 2008 biopic Milk starring Sean Penn.$10.30 at FULL NAME: Harvey Bernard MilkBORN: May 22, 1930DIED: November 27, 1978BIRTHPLACE: Woodmere, New YorkASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Gemini Harvey Bernard Milk was born on May 22, 1930, in Woodmere, New York. Reared in a small middle-class Jewish family, Milk was one of two boys born to William and Minerva Milk. A well-rounded, well-liked student, Harvey played football and sang in the opera at Bay Shore High School. Like his brother, Robert, he also worked at the family department store, Milk's. After graduating from the New York State College for Teachers in 1951, Milk joined the U.S. Navy, ultimately serving as a diving instructor at a base in San Diego during the Korean War. Following his discharge in 1955, Milk moved to New York City, where he worked a variety of jobs, including public school teacher, production associate for several high-profile Broadway musicals, stock analyst, and Wall Street investment banker. He soon tired of finance, though, and befriended gay radicals who frequented Greenwich Village. In late 1972, bored with his life in New York, Milk moved to San Francisco. In California, he opened a camera shop called Castro Camera on Castro Street, putting his life and work right in the heart of the city's gay community. For much of his life, Milk had stayed quiet about his personal life. He had known since high school that he was gay, and even in the wake of an emerging gay rights movement, the deliberate and careful Milk chose to remain on the sidelines. But things had started to turn for him toward the end of his time in New York, as he befriended a number of openly gay people who frequented Greenwich Village. In San Francisco, his life and outspoken politics evolved even further. As Castro Camera increasingly became a neighborhood center, Milk found his voice as a leader and activist. In 1973, he declared his candidacy for a position on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to help lead the city and the county. A novice politician with little money, Milk lost the election, but the experience didn't deter him from trying again. Two years later, he narrowly lost a second election for the same seat. By then, Milk had become a political force—an outspoken leader in the gay community with political connections that included San Francisco Mayor George Moscone, Assembly speaker and future city mayor Willie Brown, and future U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein. In 1977, Milk, who was known affectionately as the 'Mayor of Castro Street,' finally won a seat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He was inaugurated on January 9, 1978, becoming the city's first openly gay officer, as well as one of the first openly gay individuals to be elected to office in the United States. While his campaign certainly incorporated gay rights into his platform, Milk also wanted to tackle a wide variety of issues, such as childcare, housing, and a civilian police review board. Milk's ascension had come at an important time for the gay community. While many psychiatrists still considered homosexuality a mental illness at this time, the liberal San Francisco Mayor George Moscone had become an early supporter of gay rights and had abolished the city's anti-sodomy law. Moscone had also appointed several gay people and lesbians to a number of high-profile positions within San Francisco. On the other side of Moscone was Supervisor Dan White, a Vietnam veteran and former police officer and fireman, who was troubled by what he perceived as a breakdown in traditional values and a growing tolerance of homosexuality. Also elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, he frequently clashed with the more liberal Milk on policy issues.$12.00 at A year after his election, in 1978, White resigned from the board, citing that his salary of $9,600 wasn't enough to support his family. But White was prodded on by his police supporters and subsequently changed his mind regarding his resignation and asked Moscone to reappoint him. The mayor refused, however, encouraged by Milk and others to fill White's spot with a more liberal board member. For White, who was convinced that men like Moscone and Milk were driving his city 'downhill,' it was a devastating blow. On November 27, 1978, White entered City Hall with a loaded.38 revolver. He avoided the metal detectors by entering through a basement window that had been negligently left open for ventilation. His first stop was at the mayor's office, where he and Moscone began arguing before eventually moving to a private room so that they couldn't be heard. Once there, Moscone again refused to reappoint White, and White shot the mayor twice in the chest and twice in the head. White then went down the corridor and shot Milk, twice in the chest, once in the back, and twice in the head. Soon after, he turned himself in at the police station where he used to work. Milk died at age 48. White's trial was marked by what came to be known as the 'Twinkie defense,' as his lawyers claimed that the normally stable White had grown slovenly prior to the shootings due to abandoning his usually healthy diet and instead indulging in sugary junk food such as Coke, doughnuts, and Twinkies. In a surprising move, a jury convicted White of voluntary manslaughter rather than murder. In the wake of White's downgraded conviction, peaceful demonstrations by Castro's gay community outside City Hall turned violent. More than 5,000 policemen responded by entering nightclubs armed with truncheons and assaulting patrons. By the riot's end, 124 people were injured, including 59 policemen. This episode is known in history as 'The White Night Riots.' White subsequently served just six years in prison. In 1985, a year after his release, a distressed White died by suicide. Editor's Note: If you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or self-harming behaviors, call or text 988 to get help from the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. In the years since the killings, Milk's legacy as a leader and pioneer has endured, with numerous books and movies made about his life. In 1984, Milk was the subject of the Oscar-winning documentary The Times of Harvey Milk. Nearly three decades after its release, the project was added to the U.S. Library of Congress for preservation in 2012. In 2008, actor Sean Penn starred as Milk in the acclaimed biopic Milk. The movie primarily focuses on Milk's life and political aspirations throughout the 1970s. Penn's performance drew widespread acclaim, and he won the 2009 Academy Award for Best Actor for his portrayal of the slain politician. The film was also awarded the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. In July 2016, the U.S. Navy announced it would name a yet-to-be constructed tanker after Milk, calling it the USNS Harvey Milk. Milk's nephew praised the decision, saying it would send 'a green light to all the brave men and women who serve our nation: that honesty and authenticity are held up among the highest ideals of of nation's military.' San Francisco politician Scott Wiener also celebrated the announcement. 'When Harvey Milk served in the military, he couldn't tell anyone who he truly was,' he wrote in a statement. 'Now our country is telling the men and women who serve, and the entire world, that we honor and support people for who they are.' However, some critics argue that Milk wouldn't have wanted such an honor, citing his opposition to the Vietnam War. The ship, a replenishment oiler that refuels aircraft carriers at sea, launched from San Diego in November 2021. Four years later, in June 2025, the tanker was back in the headlines when reported U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had ordered the Navy to rename the ship, stripping Milk's name. According to the report, a memorandum showed the change was requested to show 'alignment with president and [secretary of defense] objectives and [secretary of the navy] priorities of reestablishing the warrior culture.' A new name for the ship has yet to be announced. Additionally, a terminal at the San Francisco International Airport is named after Milk following a five-year renovation project. Completed in 2024, the space now includes multiple departure gates, exhibits, and a museum gallery dedicated to Milk. All men are created equal. No matter how hard you try, you can never erase those words. Hope will never be silent. I know that you cannot live on hope alone, but without it, life is not worth living. Fact Check: We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us! You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos
