US Supreme Court to issue term's final rulings on Friday
FILE PHOTO: A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., June 1, 2024. REUTERS/Will Dunham/File Photo
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court will issue its final rulings of its current term on Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts said. It has yet to resolve several important cases, including one involving President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship as well as others involving Obamacare, age verification for online pornography and LGBT story books in elementary schools.
Due to the unusual procedural nature of the birthright citizenship case, which was brought to the court on an emergency basis but was argued before the justices, a decision in that case could be among the court rulings issued on Friday.
Trump signed an executive order to restrict birthright citizenship, a move that would affect thousands of babies born each year in the United States. Federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts blocked Trump's order, finding it likely violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship language. The administration is seeking to broadly enforce the directive.
The court also could act at any time in other pending disputes on its emergency docket including Trump's bids to carry out mass job cuts at federal agencies and gut the Department of Education.
Other cases awaiting rulings include ones involving preventive care under the Obamacare law, opting children out of certain classes in a Maryland school district when storybooks with LGBT characters are read, Louisiana electoral districts and the Federal Communications Commission's mechanism to fund a multi-billion dollar effort to expand phone and broadband internet access. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
The high cost of Trump's brain drain
[WASHINGTON, DC] – US President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University and its international students have shocked the world, not just because of their crudeness but also because of their blatant short-sightedness. For decades, leading universities like Harvard have been a cornerstone of American 'soft power'. Many of the world's brightest students have aspired to attend US institutions, and top researchers have sought to join their faculties. Harvard itself represents the pinnacle of American – and global – higher education. Even Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his daughter there. Now, the tide is turning. Prominent scholars are leaving the US to escape the paranoid atmosphere fostered by Trump's policies, and top-tier international students who once aimed to attend universities like Harvard, Columbia, or Northwestern – all recently targeted by Trump – are choosing other countries, fearing their education might be disrupted. Severe consequences The consequences could be severe. Since 2000, US-based researchers have won around two-thirds of the Nobel Prizes in chemistry, physics, and medicine – and 40 per cent of those laureates were immigrants. Notably, nearly half of immigrant US-based Nobel Prize winners completed their graduate studies at US universities. These scholars not only advanced groundbreaking research and enhanced their institutions' prestige but also served as teachers and mentors to both American and international students, attracting a new generation of academic talent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Moreover, these cross-cultural interactions help American students gain a deeper understanding of other societies while giving their international counterparts firsthand experience of life in the US. Many of those who study in America later return to their home countries and rise to prominent positions in government, academia, and the private sector. As at 2024, 70 heads of state or government had completed part or all of their higher education in the US. Until recently, these benefits were widely acknowledged across the US political spectrum. A well-functioning system – the Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP) – allowed certified institutions to admit foreign students. SEVP enabled graduates on student visas to remain in the country for up to three years to gain work experience. But in a stunning display of ignorance and malice, the Trump administration tried to strip Harvard of its ability to enrol international students and even instructed US consulates not to process visa applications for those planning to attend the university – a move that was recently blocked by a federal court. This uncertainty is deeply unsettling for current and prospective students. Those who had planned to begin their studies in September may now find it is too late to enrol elsewhere for the upcoming academic year. A decline in international-student enrolment will not only hinder research at US institutions by shrinking the pool of talented assistants; it will also weaken the global pipeline of future scientists, diminishing the depth and quality of research worldwide. Strong link What Trump and his acolytes fail to grasp is the strong link between the excellence of American universities and the country's record of innovation. An analysis from 2022 found that more than half of US startups valued at over US$1 billion had at least one foreign-born founder, and in half of those cases the founder first came to the country as a student. Some Trump supporters have argued that barring foreign students from enrolling at Harvard and other private universities would create more opportunities for American students. But while a few additional spots might open up, the impact will likely be minimal. In fact, since a significant share of international students pay full tuition, their absence would reduce the resources available for financial aid. Foreign students have been effectively subsidising American students receiving assistance – a vital source of financial support that would now be lost. Those lost revenues pale in comparison to the broader contributions of Harvard and the higher-education system. University education has long been a major US export, with far more international students coming to the country than Americans going abroad. In the 2023-24 academic year alone, foreign students contributed an estimated US$44 billion to the US economy. To be sure, Harvard and other universities are not immune from criticism. But discouraging or restricting foreign enrolment would be a profound loss for American and international students and faculty alike. By attacking leading universities, the Trump administration is undermining one of America's crown jewels and dealing an unprecedented blow to the engine of US competitiveness. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer, a former World Bank chief economist and former first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, is senior research professor of international economics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and senior fellow at the Centre for International Development at Stanford University.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Germany's Merz urges 'quick and simple' EU-US trade deal
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz speaks during a press conference, on the day of the European Union leaders summit in Brussels, Belgium June 26, 2025. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann BRUSSELS - German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Thursday the EU should do a "quick and simple" trade deal with the United States rather than a "slow and complicated" one. Merz spoke at the end of a summit of EU leaders in Brussels, where European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU had received a new proposal from U.S. President Donald Trump's administration in their transatlantic trade dispute. With the clock ticking before a tariff respite expires on July 9, Merz said time was of the essence. "We have less than two weeks until July 9 and you can't agree a sophisticated trade agreement in that time," he told reporters. Merz said German industries such as chemicals, pharmaceuticals, mechanical engineering, steel, aluminum and cars were already being burdened with high tariffs that businesses were in danger. Merz also said von der Leyen had suggested that Europeans build a new trade organisation that could gradually replace the World Trade Organization (WTO), which has struggled to function effectively in recent years. He said the idea was in its early stages but could include mechanisms to resolve disputes, as the WTO was meant to do. "You all know that the WTO doesn't work any more," he said. Also on trade, Merz said EU leaders were "basically united" in wanting to finalise a trade deal with Latin America's Mercosur bloc as soon as possible. He said there were only "small differences" between EU members on the pact. Asked about objections from France to the current proposal, Merz said he had spoken twice to French President Emmanuel Macron about the topic twice during the summit and felt there was "great readiness" to conclude the deal. Macron, however, struck a different note, telling reporters France could not accept the deal as it stands. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US House committee subpoenas Harvard over tuition costs
A view of Harvard campus on John F. Kennedy Street at Harvard University is pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - The US House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Harvard University on June 26 seeking documents and communications for its probe into tuition costs and financial aid for Ivy League students. A letter to Harvard President Alan Garber, signed by committee chairman Jim Jordan and US Representative Scott Fitzgerald, both Republicans, described Harvard's response to previous requests for documents as inadequate and said the committee needs the documents 'to fulfill its oversight and legislative responsibilities'. A spokesperson for Harvard said in a statement: 'We are disappointed that the Committee has chosen to issue a subpoena and believe it is unwarranted, unfair and unnecessary.' It added: 'There is no basis for an allegation of collusion in Harvard's setting of tuition and financial aid.' The investigation into tuition is part of a larger fight between Harvard and the White House and Congress, including over cuts to federal funding and efforts to block foreign students from attending the university. President Donald Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the US - because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of anti-Semitism. The subpoena comes as part of an investigation by the Republican-controlled US House Judiciary Committee into whether Harvard and other Ivy League schools broke antitrust laws by raising tuition costs. 'We are concerned that Ivy League member institutions appear to be collectively raising tuition prices while engaging in perfect price discrimination by offering selective financial aid packages to maximise profits,' the letter to Harvard's Garber said. US Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, called the investigation 'plainly ridiculous' and 'based on pathetically weak allegations'. The Harvard spokesperson said the school has produced thousands of pages of documents on its tuition-setting process and financial aid. While the Judiciary Committee said it had received hundreds of requested documents, it added that some of them contained publicly available facts and lacked specific information that was desired. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
