logo
Report: Nottingham Forest's ambitious stadium plans face key hurdles

Report: Nottingham Forest's ambitious stadium plans face key hurdles

Yahoo17-02-2025

Nottingham Forest is a club on the rise. Despite a setback in their 2-1 defeat to Fulham, there remains a sense of optimism among supporters. European football is within reach, attendances are at their highest levels since the club's historic European Cup triumphs, and the long-awaited stadium redevelopment is edging closer to reality.
For years, Nottingham Forest fans have heard about plans to modernise the City Ground, starting with the ageing Peter Taylor Stand. However, the process has been anything but smooth. Bureaucracy, environmental concerns, and financial considerations have delayed progress significantly.
Fulham's Riverside Stand, which has transformed Craven Cottage's skyline, serves as a stark reminder of how long such projects can take. Fulham's development faced its own share of complications—including a peculiar delay due to the presence of the 'hairy German snail,' an endangered species on the Thames. Forest's equivalent came in the form of a bat roost found near the Peter Taylor Stand. Conservationists conducted extensive surveys, ultimately concluding that no permanent bat habitat was present, but the delay added yet another layer of complexity to an already protracted process.
The club has had to navigate through archaeological studies, flood risk assessments, traffic impact reports, and even evaluations of Japanese knotweed growth. At last count, 1,875 planning documents had been submitted to Rushcliffe Borough Council, alongside 2,565 public comments. Yet, after years of delays, there is now genuine belief that work may soon begin.
One of the biggest questions surrounding the redevelopment has been the cost. Initially estimated at £80 million in 2019, the projected expense of the new 10,000-seat stand has now risen to £130 million. To help fund the project, Forest originally planned to construct a residential block, with the sale of 169 apartments contributing to costs. However, a recent report by property experts Savills indicated that 'build-cost inflation has far outpaced sales-value growth in the area,' making the scheme financially unviable.
Despite this, Forest's owner, Evangelos Marinakis, is prepared to underwrite much of the cost. According to a report submitted to the council, 'the project will be in deficit and rely on a significant amount of the stadium development cost being underwritten by the club's benefactor.'
The club will also contribute £1.2 million in compensation to the Britannia Boat Club for relocation, as well as over £1.5 million in local infrastructure improvements, including funding for new cycle lanes, bus services, and pedestrian crossings.
The most pressing question for supporters remains: when will the redevelopment finally get underway? While official confirmation is pending, internal documents suggest that the club is working towards a summer 2026 start date. In a recent planning application, Forest included a proposal for a temporary executive lift at the Peter Taylor Stand, specifying that it was needed only until 'the end of the 2025-26 season.'
Before work can begin, the club must finalise a Section 106 agreement with the local council, formalising their commitments to infrastructure improvements and community compensation. Once this is signed, the redevelopment will move into its next phase. The council is expected to reassess the plans in late spring before issuing final approvals.
While the current focus is on expanding the City Ground to a 35,000-seat capacity, Forest has also explored more ambitious ideas. At one stage, the club considered relocating to a purpose-built 50,000-seat stadium in Toton, a district on the Nottinghamshire-Derbyshire border. Initial site visits, planning consultations, and even discussions on tree-planting strategies were held before the club ultimately decided to remain at its historic home on the banks of the Trent.
With European football on the horizon and ambitions for continued growth, the expansion of the City Ground is a necessity. Club data suggests that demand could support a stadium of 42,000 or even larger, making future phases of redevelopment a distinct possibility.
The drawn-out nature of the redevelopment process has tested patience. For years, fans have been promised a modernised stadium to match the club's ambitions, only to face repeated setbacks.
The rising costs of construction are concerning, but having an owner like Marinakis willing to invest heavily is reassuring. What's more, the infrastructure improvements tied to the project will benefit not just Forest, but the wider Nottingham community.
However, the club must be careful not to let costs spiral out of control. Fulham's Riverside Stand project, initially estimated at £80 million, ended up exceeding £130 million, with delays further inflating the budget. Forest cannot afford to fall into the same trap.
Ultimately, while supporters remain frustrated by the delays, there is excitement about what lies ahead. The new stand will not only increase capacity but improve matchday experience, generate additional revenue, and reinforce the club's status among the elite.
Forest's resurgence on the pitch must be matched by progress off it. If the redevelopment is completed as planned, it will be a milestone moment in the club's modern history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump
JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump

Now entering the ring: Vice President JD Vance. Appearing on an episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von," the vice president weighed in on the public feud that erupted this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk and Trump became embroiled in the spat after the Tesla CEO called Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that," Vance told podcast host Theo Von in the interview, which was recorded Thursday and released Saturday. Vance had posted to X about recording the podcast on Thursday, as the pair's row was escalating, saying, "Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?" "Elon's entitled to his opinion," Vance told Von in the episode. "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying, I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man," he continued. Vance, who said Trump had been getting "a little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticism of him, added that he believed a feud between the pair would be "bad for the country" and that he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." While Trump appeared to be holding his tongue about Musk's criticisms at first, he hit back Thursday during a White House event to welcome German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump said. "He knew every aspect of this bill — better than almost anybody —and he never had a problem until right after he left," he added, referencing Musk's recent announcement that he was stepping back from his role in the president's administration. Musk then unleashed a whirlwind of X posts directed at the president, saying Trump would have lost the election without his help and accusing him of "ingratitude." The fallout grew progressively uglier, with Trump threatening to cut Musk's government contracts. The pair, who became close allies after Musk endorsed Trump's reelection last year, continued to trade barbs until Friday evening, when their tones appeared to soften. The White House rapid response account posted a clip on X of Trump speaking on Air Force One, saying he wished Musk well. "Likewise," Musk replied late Friday night.

Inter Milan complete the signing of Brazilian forward Luis Henrique
Inter Milan complete the signing of Brazilian forward Luis Henrique

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Inter Milan complete the signing of Brazilian forward Luis Henrique

Inter Milan have completed the signing of Brazilian forward Luis Henrique from Marseille, as confirmed by the club. Henrique is Inter's second signing of the summer following Croatian midfielder Petar Sucic's arrival from Dinamo Zagreb days earlier. Advertisement The Italian giants fought off competition from German giants Bayern Munich to secure the services of Henrique, who will reportedly pen a new five-year contract. The Nerazzurri will pay a transfer fee of €25 million, and the Brazilian is set to earn around €2.5 million per season at San Siro. Les Minots signed Henrique from Botafogo in 2020, and he steadily grew as one of their key players in the following years. He enjoyed his most productive campaign last season, tallying nine goals and ten assists in all competitions to help Roberto De Zerbi's side qualify for the Champions League. De Zerbi benefited largely from Henrique's versatility last season. Primarily a winger, the 23-year-old was deployed as a right wing-back whenever Marseille played in a back-three system. Advertisement Henrique is known for his explosive pace, playmaking abilities, finishing and dribbling flair. He is also a menacing presence in the final third and can progress the ball from deep effectively. The Brazilian can provide competition for Denzel Dumfries at the right-wing back position. He can also be used as a Mezalla or back-up to striker duo Marcus Thuram and Lautaro Martinez. Inter are expected to announce Cristian Chivu as their new head coach soon, following Simone Inzaghi's departure to Al-Hilal. The Nerazzurri are also looking to strengthen their forward line following the underwhelming performances of Mehdi Taremi and Marko Arnautovic last season. Manchester United's Rasmus Hojlund is their priority target, with Inter in continuous contact with the Red Devils and the player's entourage.

Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift
Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Musk deletes Epstein tweet after Trump rift

Elon Musk has deleted a tweet in which he alleged that Donald Trump was 'in the Epstein files'. The social media post was written on Thursday during a fierce war of words between the tech billionaire and the US president, after a dispute over Mr Trump's flagship spending Bill marked an abrupt end to their close alliance. As the disagreement escalated, Mr Musk also suggested that his former boss should be removed from office. 'The Epstein files' is a phrase colloquially used to describe intelligence the US authorities hold on Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile financier who died in 2019. However, by Saturday morning, Mr Musk had deleted his post on X, in a sign the row could be winding down. Mr Trump also appeared to suggest he was moving on from the spat, telling reporters during a flight to New Jersey: 'Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk. I just wish him well.' The row began when Mr Musk – who last week stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency – criticised the president's upcoming Bill as a 'disgusting abomination' and claimed it would increase the national debt. Mr Trump retaliated by saying the billionaire was upset because one of his allies had not been chosen for a role in the new Nasa administration. The president also suggested Mr Musk was annoyed because the White House's 'big beautiful Bill' would end tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions of dollars to his car company Tesla. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Mr Trump said. The president later said, during an Oval Office meeting with Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, that Mr Musk had 'Trump derangement syndrome'. The Republican later added that he was 'very disappointed' in the entrepreneur. However, Mr Musk was quick to hit back, alleging that the president had only won last year's election because of his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate... Such ingratitude,' he wrote on X. The world's richest man then published his post about the president and the Epstein files – but provided no evidence to back up his claim. Mr Trump and Epstein ran in the same social circles in New York and were pictured partying together on various occasions in the 1980s and 1990s. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. In February, Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, pledged to release the Epstein files. However, the 'phase one' documents that were released to a hand-picked group of conservative influencers contained information that was largely already in the public domain. As the row escalated, Mr Musk said he would decommission his Dragon spacecraft, which is used by Nasa to deliver and collect astronauts from the International Space Station. Mr Trump in turn threatened to cancel all the Tesla and SpaceX owner's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' he said. The president also reportedly considered selling or giving away the red Tesla car he purchased earlier this year. Tesla shares tanked as the rift intensified, amid investor fears that Mr Trump might hinder the roll-out of self-driving cars in the US, hitting the company's growth potential. Shares closed down 14.3 per cent on Thursday and lost about £111 billion, although the firm staged a partial recovery on Friday. An administration official claimed Mr Musk was 'clearly having an episode', while Steve Bannon, Mr Trump's former adviser, encouraged the president to initiate a formal investigation into Mr Musk's immigration status and have him 'deported from the country immediately'. As well as deleting the Epstein post, Mr Musk also appeared to walk back on his threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft. When an X user suggested Mr Musk and Mr Trump 'take a step back for a couple days', the Tesla chief executive wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' However, the billionaire has continued to keep a poll pinned to the top of his X profile which invites users of the social media platform to vote on whether it is time for a new political party in the US. Mr Musk wrote on Friday night: 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80 per cent in the middle! This is fate.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store